web space | free website | Web Hosting | Free Website Submission | shopping cart | php hosting

EINSTEIN'S TWO ATOM MODEL OF

GRAVITY



  By Larry L. Burks
























WHAT DO YOU MEAN?

YOU CAN SEE GRAVITY?
















JUST THAT








http://www.physorg.com/news122897584.html




      And here. Live action. But what they did wrong is they put the pictures together to where the bands of the fringe pattern are not moving. You can take the same group of pictures. And put them together a little differently. And the bands of the fringe pattern will move. Most people believe that the fringe pattern is a standing wave. Some times they do not move. But in other places there is movement. I have seen them as standing waves and as moving waves. There are two kinds.





     The other important thing that can be seen in the picture is that the atom is composed of two different half's. This is why it has a blackness between the two different half's. Two half's equal a hole. Atoms are more complex than what is seen here. They are composed of many half's. Atoms are a multiverse's. Composed of many parallel universes. Many different states of being. I will get to that later.




  This theory of gravity is very different from all other theories of gravity. In order for you to get your mind wrapped around this theory. You have to know about this one big difference. At what point did Newton make his big mistake at? He cherry picked his evidence. Newton assumed that there was a out side force. Acting on the object. With out knowing for sure that there " was " a out side force.



   Newton's statement is based on assumption and not evidence. No one has ever found this unseen, undetectable out side force. And no one ever will. Why? Could it be that there is not one. If not. Then where should we look?



  Newton said that an object at rest will remain at rest unless acted upon by an out side force. Which may , or may not be true. But what Newton didn't tell you about is the there are " The dynamic of outside force producing systems. And then there are the dynamic of inside force producing systems.



  The odds are fifty / fifty here. It is either a outside job. Or it is a inside job. For three hundred years all have looked for this out side force. All have come up empty handed.



  But if we find out that nature has every thing that it needs to produce the forces of gravity. By way of the way that atoms are in nature. As a dynamic inside force producing system. If you look at nature. Look at atoms. They way that they are in nature. That is all that is there. After that. There is nothing else left. It is the only thing that is there. Nothing more. Nothing less. That. And that alone. Then!



   "WHY THE NEED FOR A OUT SIDE FORCE." There's not one.





THE PICTURE BOOK THEORY OF GRAVITY




      NATURE ANY ONE? Now you know where I'm getting my ideals from. This is a picture of a free space negative lens. Looking down the mouth of it. It's what a worm hole looks like. It's also what half of a atom look's like. It is a open loop system. A open loop system is what makes the atomm produce a force and move through space. Gravity. You can see all the different parts of the open loop system. You can see The half shpere.( The Atom ) The tube.( What the atom's gravitational field looks like ) And the hole at the other end of the tube. (what has to be there in order for the open loop system to work. And allow the strength of the force to change. And in what direction the force will be produced. And for how long the force will be produced.) The fuzzy stuff around the half sphere is the mouth of the wormhole. This picture is as close as man will every get to seeing gravity. Having what gravity is. All in one picture. And your looking at it right now. Also see pictures on my other webpage http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/9958/



  First things first. The order of operation. The first step in developing a new theory or a proof. Is to developing a mental picture or a thought experiment of what you believe is happening in nature. Some kind of logic. some kind of reasoning. In just such a way that you will be able to detect, record, measure, verify, and apply some form of math to it all. This is all the further I intend to take this theory. May be suggest a few experiments That some one else might want to try. That I would like to see them do. For this reason. The mere suggestion of one person. Will start an avalanche of new ideals in an other group of people. It's just food for thought. All so go look at the picturs on my other home page. http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/9958/


      The most information, in the fewest amount of words. Reduced to it's simplest terms. For the sake of opening up the subject for exploration and discussion. Gravity. The first step in developing a proof. Is forming a mental picture of what is happening in the dynamic of the system.




       This is it. The big dog This is what we all have been looking for all these years. The road map to gravity. The key. The code. The primer.

The "BUILDING BLOCKS OF GRAVITY"


EINSTEIN'S TWO ATOM MODEL OF GRAVITY



      I'm trying to prove a theory put forth by Richard P. Feynman. Who stated that gravity is two different aspects of the same thing. The electron. One force due to it's charge. And one force due to it's mass. We have tryed to find the force of gravity due to it's charge for 100 years. Every one has come up empty handed. I think it's time that some one should start working on the part of gravity that has to do with the mass end of what gravity is. Dr. Feynman felt that gravity might have something to do with something he called A monopoles. A monopole due to it's charge. I'm working on something like a monopole due to it's mass. The other type of monopole. But I'm not calling it a monopole. I'm calling it a open loop system. There are no monopoles due to it's charge found in nature by man. There are open loop systems that can prodduce a force due to it's mass found in nature by man. Nature is realy weird some times. Nature does stuff that's not quite right some how. I believe that the electron can do all the right things, at just the right time. At the right plases. It can do all the right things in order to form a open loop system that can proddduce a force due to it's mass Like that found in nature. I know that nature can form closed loop systems. What I'm hopeing for is to find a closed loop system That has the ability to preform like a open loop system. A electron has mass. A photon has no mass. I know that you can't have gravity with out an interaction of particles. You can't have gravity with out mass. To get gravity to work like it does in nature. You have to have both. They go hand in hand. If one could explain a way gravity as the after glow of mass due to the the interaction of particles. This would put Feynman on the same page with Einstein.



10/4/08 update.




      There is a simple way to understand gravity. Reduce it to it's simplest's form. Einstein felt that if you couldn't explain a theory in such a way that a child could under stand it. Then it's probable wrong.


      If you just don't get this stuff. This road map will help. We all know that all objects are made of atoms. (1) So this is a good place to start at. We use to thing of them as little bitty rocks. Well, that turned out to be not true. Atoms have a sub-structure to them. Called particles. The electron is the particle we find that the atoms are made of. This became know as Quantum Field theory. (2) They made drawings of What they thought the atom should look like. Looked a lot like a little sun with little planets buzzing around the sun. But real fast like. Well that to turned out to be wrong. At last we were able to take some pictures of the atom. They looked like little bubbles of membranes of raw energy. Light. Then we found out that particles don't perform right somr how. We found out that particles have a , (Not a sub-structur) But some thing more like a hidden- sub- structure to them. They act more like a vibrating string. This gave us String field theory. (3) Both teams are trying to find gravity. Both groups have come up empty handed. They both are scraping the bottom of the bucket. And there is no gravity to be found. To find gravity we have to go back to square one. (1) We don't under stand the true shape of the atom or what it is. Or what it's doing. You would have to rip apart the atom into it's smallest pieces. It's building blocks. (4) The building blocks of nature. The sub-structure of atoms. Understand it as a system. Not a particle or a string, but as a system. Use the building blocks of nature. And build the smallest system of gravity. That is able to still work. The building blocks of gravity (5) And use the building blocks of gravity and solve the mystery of Gravity. To solve gravity you would have to have all three. No one is working on the shape of the atom. This is what this page is about.





     This little road map will help you find what it is that you are looking foe in nature. Where we find gravity.





       The first step in developing a proof. Is forming a mental picture of what is happening in the dynamic of the system of gravity. The dynamic of the system of the atom. The dynamic of the system of the it's gravitational field. The dynamic of the system of the atom, and the dynamic of the system of the it's gravitational field, all at the same time. Gravity will not work with just one atom. The only way it will work is if you have two atom. Working as one geometrical shape. All at the same time. The big picture. Seen as one. Seen as one fields energy, one membrane. The same membrane in two different places at the same time. All connected together. Two atoms? Sure. But as one system. But it has to perform as four independent open loop systems in order to work right. A closed loop system due to it's charge. and at the same time a closed loop system due to it's mass. The only thing is that the closed loop system due to it's mass performs as a like a open loop system. Each atom has to have two half atoms. The same interaction of particles that make up the half bubble ( what produces the force.} of the atom is also apart of the interaction of particles that make up the tube. The gravity part of the atom. If the electron of the atom is real. Then the tube part of the atom is just as real. You can't have it both ways. The same membrane that makes up the half bubble part of the atom is also the same membrane that makes up the tube part of the atom's gravity field. The same chain of interactions that make up the bubble is also the same chain of interactions that make up the tube. The two different aspects of the atom are just different parts of a greater hole.


       This is gravity's weaknesses. This is how man will in the end prove that gravity is just as real as any thing else we find in the universe. The true topographical shape of the atom is the same as that made by a free space negative lens. The same chain of interaction of particles that takes place in a negative lens. Is also the same chain of interaction of particles that takes place in two atoms. If man can prove that the tube part of free space negative lens is real then there is also a way of proving that the tube part of atoms are also real. I got pictures. Free space negative lens are scale invariant. This means that big ones like those found naturally in nature in nature in simple optics work the same way that much smaller ones do in the atom. The interaction of particles are also scale invariant. Just breaking the atoms down in to half's is not going to be enough. We will have to break each half down in to yet smaller pieces. Which can be done. But the membranes that the parts of the half's are made will have to be broken down into to yes smaller parts. All membranes are made of yet smaller tubes. And tubes can express their self as point like objects. Like particles. Particles!!!????. and this means that gravity is real. And that makes us scientist. It's really nice to know that your' not crazy after all these years.




     But at this late date and time. We find out that the state of being that the information is in when we choose not to record. But. Observe. The Info of the electron is in it's wave state of being. And what's right about the wave state of being is that. The wave can produce a force that is continuous. That does not break up into to some kind of unit. A steady force that does not get weaker with time. And this one fact is what makes this theory right by way of nature. Not only of what is seen. But also how it performs. Finding out that the wave state of the electron has the ability to produce a force due to it's mass. Makes this theory right and different from all other theories. The wave function of the electron? This takes gravity into mainstream science. Gravity is no different from any of the other forces of nature.




      Tubes can express their self as a wave function. The fringe pattern that you see in costic sheets of light. Is not produced by waves. It's caused by the polarizing effect of diffract ed light. Now if membranes are composed of yet smaller tubes. Then very small tubes are composed of yet smaller tubes. But because of the wave length of the particle. The fringe pattern in a very small tube would look like little bands of light. Little packets. Little quanta. You can see where I'm going with all of this. PARTICLES. This means that String - Field Theory is some how united with the wave - particle duality. But in order for the fringe pattern to move down the very small tube. The strings would have to move. You could say that they jiggle. You could say that they resonate. You could even go as so for as to say that they ( outrageous! ) Vibrate. Strings are nouns. Strings vibrate. Vibrate is a action verb. ( No wonder we have had people walking around with there hands waving in the air. Saying stuff like. "I just don't get it. There 's no such animal as some kind of stinking string thing. Now where is the dam noun.?" ) There is only one tongue that man speaks in which they use only verbs. It's called Ten Dimensional Hyperspace. String Field Theory. How much evidence does man have, that states strings are not real? None. How much evidence does man have that states that string are real? All of it. A vibrating string is like gyro smeared out over space and time. Like a spinning spring. If you take a disk gyro and try to turn it . It produces a force. If you try to move it in the bilateral axes from the central axes. It produces a force. And if you try to swing it around in a circle when it is spinning . It will produce a force. But with a higher dimensional gyro. Everything is all right till the vibrating string takes a curved path. It starts to producing a force due to it's mass. Just like when you try to turn a gyro. Or move it in it's bilateral axes. Or swing a gyro in a circle. It produces a force. When a string takes a curved path. It's as if it just turned, moved in it's bilateral axes and is being slung in a circle all at the same time. It's not the viberating string. It's when the viberating string expresses it's self as a point like object. Point like objects going in a circle produce a force. Nature calls this force centrifugal force. Man calls it gravity. A force in which the strength of the force exceeds that of it's original atomic mass. It's acting as if it's being accelerated. Any time that the particle is recorded, or there is an interaction that takes place. The strings move. They are related in time and they are expressing signs of mass. Atomic clocks are related in time. They are solid. Atoms are curved like. There like little bubbles. A hole loop will not produce a forward force. But a half loop will. A half loop is the same thing as saying a open loop. This is why atoms are composed of two half's. The positive energy of a atom is equal to the negative energy of it's gravitational field. With things that are in orbit. Gravity is pitted against centrifugal force. The signs are all there.



      The atom has just as much to do with it's gravitational field as the gravitational field has to do with the atom. The gravitational field is the atom and the atom is the gravitational field. The positive energy of the atom is equal to the negative energy of it's gravitational field. If it turns out that atoms are composed of two half sphere to make one hole sphere. If one half of the atom was the positive energy of the atom and the other half was the negative energy of it's gravitational field. If one half of the atom produces a force that is responsible for the force that resist acceleration and the other half of the atom is responsible for the force that makes atoms move toward the other atom. Then the positive energy of a atom would be equal to the negative energy of it's gravitational field. This would be a true statement. Because one half minus one half equals zero .5 - .5 = 0.


       How in the world could something like this be true? Go look at my pictures. And see if you can find the half sphere. Like those found in nature. Then see if you can find the picture where two half spheres forms a hole sphere. Look and see if you can find the tubes.


      What the atom looks like in nature is a sphere. But the atom performs as if it is two half sphere. That's because it really is two half spheres. Mother nature has played man for a fool for all these years. Here is one place where man keeps messing up. The same membrane that forms the tube that forms the hole( the thing that is responsible for regulating the strength of the force }. That is responsible for the curvature of time and space is also the same membranes that forms the tube that form the membrane of one half of the sphere of atom. On the other end. One tube. Two end. One of the tube has a hole. Like all good tubes should. and at the other end. A half sphere. That allows it to produce a force. A open loop system. Mass. The positive energy of a atom. {e=mc\2}But the same is true about the gravitational field. The other half sphere of the same atom. The same membrane that forms the tube that has a hole in it. {curvatures of time and space} is also the membrane of the tube that forms one half of the atom that produces the force that makes atom move toward each other. The negative energy of it's gravitational field. It's a little more complex. The roles of the half sphere are reversed. In order for it to work like in nature. It's a top down instead of s bottom up. Which I will explain later.


      It's not two different tubes it's the same tube. It is a tube that has a hole in one end and a half sphere membrane on the other end. Each atom is composed with two tubes, two holes and two half sphere. A two atom model of gravity would have four tubes four half spheres. and three holes.???


      Why three holes? The two tubes that form the gravitational field. That rest between the two atoms. Share the same "Hole". The end of two tubes . But just one hole.


      So lets break the system down to the bare bones. And see how it's going to work out. How we are going to get our physical proof and our mathematical proof.



      Richard P. Feynman was able to track the source of the force back to the electron that is found with in the atom. He put it this way " Two different aspect of the same thing. The electron. One force due to it's charge and one force due to it's mass. What Feynman failed to tell you was the any time there is an interaction that takes place with in the system of the atom. The strings of that membranes that make up the geometrical shape of the atom.... vibrates. When ever a string vibrates. It is related in time and is expressing it's self as mass. centrifugal force.


      This is the KEY to Gravity's weaknesses. There is a interaction taking place with in the system. This also the key of how we are going to develop our physical proof.


       Their can be no gravity with out this interaction that takes place with in the system of the atom. No interaction = no vi berating of strings = no force = no gravity. If you form a relation ship between the interaction[ of the particles} and the vibrating of the strings{ where it gets it's mass} that the membranes are made of. What atom are made of. With the true geometrical shape of the atom. There can be some thing like gravity in nature.


      But what Feynman also failed to tell you was the force due to it's mass has many different aspects what are related back to the mass of the electron. Found in the atom. And that all of these forces that relate back to the electron become united as one when space becomes curved to the point that atoms are ripped apart. and out comes as only one Particle that has mass. The Electron.


       Gravity falls into the same category of forces that have the ability to make the strength of the force " very ". Find out how the dynamics of the system of mass works in the atom. You got you gravity. In order to do this. You have to get the geometrical shape of the atom right.


       Atoms have the ability to make the strength of the force, stronger or weaker. You not only have to find out how the force is produce. But you also have to find out how it is able to make the strength of the force very. You have to have a way of making to atom produce a force in the right direction. In all of the right direction. In all of the right strength of the forces in the right direction. For the right duration of time. All of the forces that have the ability to make the strength of their force very. Are like little. "perpetual motion machines ". The interaction that takes place with in the atom is a never ending cycle. It is able to take place with out gain or loss of energy. This causes the strings found with in the membranes that make up the atom to vibrate endlessly. Which in true causes the atom to have the ability to produce a force that is never ending. Mass. Centrifugal Force and Gravity. All have this never ending effect Of force.


       Mass. Centrifugal Force. and Gravity. Are all a like in some ways. And are all different in other ways.


      The first thing we will have to do is find out what gravity really is. When ever there is an interaction. The tube that particles come from. The fringe pattern move down the tube. When it moves. The fringe is related in time. Any time that the fringe pattern moves. In order for the fringe pattern to move down the tube. The string have to vibrate. And when they vibrate. They produce mass. The information of the particle,time and mass go hand in hand down the tube. Centrifugal force. Which gives us mass.


       Strings vibrate. A strings is a noun. Vibrate is a verb. Gravity is not a noun. Gravity is a verb. Gravity is the force produces by the vibrating of the string. The strings that vibrate with in the membrane that the atom is made of , is when every there is an interaction that takes place in the atom. This is what produces the force. Centrifugal force. There is no real such thing as gravity. The noun. Strings are nouns. Membranes are noun. Gravity is not something that energy is. It is something the energy does. "It Vibrates". There is no such thing as gravity the force. There is such a force that we call centrifugal force. And out of Centrifugal force. The tube is able to give the particle it's mass. And out of centrifugal force produce by the vi berating strings of the membranes that atom are made of. The atom now has the ability to produce a force. Like Mass. Centrifugal Force. and last but not least Gravity.


       The same centrifugal force that gives atom it's solid state { knock on wood It's real!} Is also the same centrifugal force that allows the atom to produce a force in just such a way. That allows the atoms to move. It's not two different forces it's all the same force. The forces of the atom can all be tracked back to the charge, the interaction and the mass of the electron. That is produce when ever a atom is rip apart or smashed. Just like Richard P. Feynman said it does.


      I have been studying light. Using a technique that is like no other. You can use this technique to find out things about light that you can't find out about light by reading text books. By studying light like that found in nature. Direct observation of nature. I now have enough info about light that I can pull all of the pieces of the puzzle together. and solve the mystery of gravity. I have been studying free space negative lens. The geometrical shape of free space negative lens. I found out that they are made of membranes that have a fringe pattern in the membrane. I was able to find a way to break open the membrane and found out that the fringe pattern is due to the polarizing effect of diffract ed light that is caused by the strings when they over lap each other that the membranes are made. For a long time I thought that the reason why I could see the membranes was due to the fact that the membrane was being laminated. But when I got a membrane split open. I found out that what was really being laminated was the so called strings. { the little tubes. } This is what is really allowing me to see the membrane. But I also found out that there is no such thing as a string. What I thought was a string. Just turned out to be a stinking tube. Just like free space negative lens's are tubes. The smaller tube are composed of membranes. Which also produce a fringe pattern. But these tubes are so small the fringe pattern is as long as they are tall. And again the fringe pattern is due to the polarizing effect of diffract ed light. That is caused by the strings when they over lap each other. That the membranes are made. That the little tubes are made of. But any time there is an interaction taking place. The fringe patterns moves down the tube in a timely fashion. The fringe pattern in the light causes the light to break up in to little bans. Little packets. little quantum. That are related in time and are producing mass. acting like point like objects. Like Like Like. Particles.


      So the tubes { the so called strings} like those found in nature. Can express their self as waves and like particles. And all particles have this wave like nature to them. It is not a wave. It is The vibrating of the small tubes of the tube that is linked to the info of the particle. We are nothing more than vibrations of higher dimensional space. But in the atom. The sphere shape is so small relative to the wave function of the tube-string. In stead of seeing a fringe pattern. It pulsates. Atomic clocks pulsate. They are related in time.( clocks are some how related to time. Imposable! What on earth was I every thinking about. Everyone knows that clocks can't possibly be related some how to time.} They are not only related to time. They are also expressing singes of mass. { knock on wood.} This means that there is an interaction taking place with in the dynamics of the system of the atom. When these tubes form. they fracture in the middle and form two half's. There is a interaction when ever this happens. You can map out the geometrical shape of these tubes. and you can also verify the interaction that takes place there. You can also establish a direct link that relates to the geometrical shape of the free space negative lens and the interaction. Why oh why would any body every want to do some thing like this? Because these interaction that take place in every thing we find in the universe. These interactions are the building blocks of the universe. You can also use these building blocks of nature, to build a Two Atom Model of Gravity. In turn you can use the two atom model of gravity and use them as the building blocks of gravity. And solve the mystery of gravity. Ounce in for all. At last. At long last. A theory of gravity that has a proof. for the fact that there is an interaction taking place. You can't have something in nature like gravity with out an interaction. Why? These interactions are the building blocks of nature.





Back to Home Page