web space | free website | Business Hosting Services | Free Website Submission | shopping cart | php hosting























WHAT DO YOU MEAN?

IT TOOK YOU FIFTY YEARS TO FIGURE OUT THAT

TWO HALF EQUAL A HOLE?
















JUST THAT


IT MAY TAKE YOU FIFTY YEARS TO READ THIS PAGE





    A atom functioning as a hole sphere can not produce a force that will allow it to move. But a atom that is composed of, and acting as two independent half sphere can.

    The math of the two atom model of gravity is no problem. It's simple. The physical proof is. Till you find out how it's done. Then the physical proof becomes, no problem.


    A really weird thing happens when you find the physical proof to gravity. Mother Nature her self. The Grand Master on all the laws of nature. There are no unknown laws of nature that Mother Nature doesn't know about. Mother Nature tells you how to work the math in just such a way. That you can unite all the other forces of nature with gravity. IF you are being told the answer. Just how hard can this be. What I'm trying to say is you don't have to be Einstein to figure this one out.


    The way that thing are in science now day. There is no way to solve the two atom model of gravity. We don't have the physical proof. As of yet. You will have to go out and build or find the physical proof. We have the mat already. We just don't know how to use our mat in just the right way to make gravity work. Here's what you need to know. In order to win the war on the battle for the physical proof. Over the two atom model of gravity. You have to pick your fights. Pick your battles in places that you know your going to win . Even before you start.


     Your going to have to build the two atom model of gravity from the ground up. From scratch. You don't start out at level of gravity. First things first and last things last. The order in which you proceed. Where do you start at? You would first have build the physical proof of String Field Theory. The bad part is this. There are no such things as strings found in nature. We have the math of strings. But no strings. This is good, because your not looking for strings. What your looking for are "Tubes" The forming of tubes in nature is a phenomenon that takes place naturally. Tubes are real. They are common in nature. Real common. There every where. There every where. Free space negative lens are real. They have this natural ability to form light in the shape of tubes. And these tubes that form naturally in nature are scale invariant. This means that they come in big sizes and middle sizes and little bitty sizes. I call this the Goldilocks and the Three Bears syndrome. It's hard to study the big one and it's hard to study the little bitty ones. But the ones in the middle range are just right size for studying. Not to big. Not to small. Just the right size for studying and breaking them down and finding what they are really like. This is where you start at. This is where you pick your first big fight. This is a battle that your going to win. By studying the tubes formed by free space negative lens in simple optics. You can find out about the great big ones (wormholes) and the little bitty tiny ones. (The so called strings.) Some thing really great and wonderful happened when I was studying free space negative lens. I not only found out about wormhole and strings. I found out what the true shape of a atoms are really like. One of those little pieces of the puzzle, that you would have to know about in order to solve the mystery of gravity. In order to find out about wormholes. You first have to find out what gravity is, and how it works. It is the tube part of atoms that form the membrane that makes up the shape of the worm. You have to find out about strings or tubes, membranes, and the true shape of atoms in order to find out about gravity.


     So, if you took all this info and through it out on the table. And arranged it in some kind of order. A time line. or Road map. First things first and last things last. The order of operation or the order of procedure. This is what it should look like. And this is my up date on what I've been studying. Now I'm posting it so every body can see.


(1) study costic sheets of light
     By studying costic sheet of light we can prove that membranes are composed of many small tubes. Membranes are multiverse.
    Prove that tubes can rest in two different place in space at the same time. That they can rest in many different places in space at the same time. Proves that multiverse universe are real. This goes a little bit beyond parallel universes. Some thing that point like particle can't to. But take on the nature of strings. And are able to do what we know that point like objects can't do. At this point you have to ask your self the Question. "What is real hear?" The string is what is real. The particle is just an side effect of vibrating strings. A particle can't express it's self like a string. But on the other hand. Strings can express their self like a point like object. I told you the answer. Just in case you are having trouble with the question. Or the right answer.
    Prove that all tubes are composed of membranes
    Prove that all tubes are multiverse. Due to the fact that all tubes are composed of membranes and all membranes are multiverses.
    prove that membranes have fringes. (free bee} And what caused the fringe pattern to form is due to the polarizing effect of difracted light by the yet smaller tubes that all multiverse membranes are composed of. And again you have to ask your self the question. "What is real hear?" A string can express it's self like a wave. But a wave can't express it's self like a string. The string is what is real.
     Use polorized screen with holographic film. to prove that strings are really there and they can be turned on and off.
    use the above info to prove that when you test very small strings. And use polorizes screen to turne on and off the strins ability to form fringes (or form packets....or form particles.}
     There two very imporant parts of the puzzle of gravity that we have to prove in order to sole the mystery of gravity. 1 That strings are real and 2 that they really do vibrate.
     The fact that you have just united string field theory with main stream science The particle - wave duality. Is a free bee. And the fact that you have just used a particle detector to prove that strings are real. It also makes a statement. Using particle detectors to prove that strings are real. Then the use of a particles detector to detect particles is not indirect evidence that strings are real . But direct evidence that strings are real. No multiverse tube = no vibrating strings = no particle. There is no way around it. This is some thing that we haven't done yet. But are going to have to do. I'll show you the way to do it.


(2) study the shape that free space negative lens can make in simple optics.
    Use particles detector to map out the true shape of a free space negative lens.
    Prove that they have the ability to change their past history. (some thing that a point like particles can't do.}
    Prove that the tubes part of a free space negative lens has change reaction.
    Prove that they are Y-strings. The building blocks of nature.
    Prove that they are closed loop systems.
    Last but not least . Prove that even though they are closed loop system. Due to there shape and the chain of inter cations found there . They are also at the some time acting like open loop system. A system that is able to produce a force due to mass.


(3)Use the info gathered in study's (1) and (2) To solve the mystery of gravity.
     Prove that 1/2 the shape of a free space negative lens is the right shape of the 1/2 a atom.
     Use the building blocks of nature to form A two atom model of gravity.
     Use the two atom model of gravity as the building blocks of gravity and solve the mystery of gravity. The fact that you have just united string field theory with the particle - wave duality and the fact that you just united gravity with the other forces of nature. Is nothing to brag about. Remember. That you weren't smart enough. You had to get Mother Nature to tell you the answer. When you are told the answer. Isn't that a lot like cheating? Yes it is. How is it? It's great. Ounce the cat is out of the bag. There is no putting him back in again.


use the info found out about gravity in study (3) Use the tube part of the atom. It's gravitational field. And use them to form the membranes that wormholes are made out of. A wormhole is a tube. A gravitational free space negative lens. All tubes are multiverses. All tubes are composed of membranes. All membranes are composed of yet smaller tubes. Now where do the smaller tubes come from that make up the membranes that make up what a wormhole is? The tube part of the atom. It's gravitational field. Many tubes. The mass of all the tubes part of all the atoms in the universe.


Use the info found in study's (1), (2), (3), and (4) To tell us what a wormhole is and why we can get one to form. I wasn't smart enough again. I had to be told. How to form a wormhole. The only people that know for sure. How to get a wormhole to form. Are the ones. That are all ready forming wormholes. The sad thing is that they know how to get one to form. They don't know what they are for sure. and How they work. Well just how are we going to find out what makes them work? I don't know. THAT WHAT YOUR HEAR FOR.


Now that we have a wormhole in the lab. We get to run test on them to see if our theories are right or not. And just how it effects gravity in just such a way that you can use a worm hole to manipulate gravity.


    The membranes are composed of a sub-structure to them. They are made of yet smaller [string ] tubes. I have believed that the membranes of the tubes were composed of smaller tubes due to the fringe pattern on the membranes thought that what was being illuminated in the sheets of light was the membrane. This is not true. What is being illuminated is the smaller tube that the membranes are made of. The human eye is a resonator. You can see the costic sheets of light when they form on the inside of the eye ball. When light goes through the liquid of your eye that is on your eye lid. The light will form long lines that seem to come out of the top of the light that you are looking at. Glare. They look like string or tubes. But their not. This is a fringe pattern. Fringe lines have wiggly edges to them. But off to the left and right, you can see some other membranes of light. This is caused by the light that is diffract ed by your eye lashes. They form membranes that do not have a fringe pattern in them The tubes run parallel to each other. But One night when I was diffractions pattern. My eyes started to mat up The irregular of the mat caused a lens action. A negative lens. And when the light from the diffract ed light from my e3ye lashes pasted through the mat. The parallel line that the parallel tubes were making crossed path. It allowed me to see the individual tube that the membranes are made of. They come out and curved back { a 180} and went back to the focal point from which they came. It looked like a egg beater. A whisk. When they come out and made the curve ,I could see the individuals tubes. and expressed no singes of a fringe pattern. But if you looked at where the all came back to a point There appears of membrane that had a fringe pattern in it. This means that the fringe pattern that we have been seeing for all these years is not due to the constructive and destructive patterns of waves. But the polarizing effect of diffractions light of the tubes the membranes are composed of. The wave function of the universe is really due to tubes. (strings)


    Which brings us to this. If you can see the individual tubes that membranes are made . Wouldn't it be interesting to see what a tube does When the information of a particle passes down one. If it does what the big tubes. It will form a fringe pattern that will move down the string. Because if it is really a tube. The the membranes that form the tube will be made of yet smaller tubes.. In order for the fringe pattern to move the tubes that form their fringe pattern will have to move. You could say that they giggle. OR you could say that they resonate. You could even go so for to say that they vibrate. We are nothing more that vibration found in higher dimensional space. The tube would be very small relative to the wave function of the string. This means that the fringe pattern would be just as long as it is wide. You could say that the fringe pattern is causing the tube to break up into little bands. You could say that the string is breaking up into little packets. You could even go so far as to say that the strings are forming particles. Out rages. Imposable. The little tubes have the natural ability to express their self as a wave or a particle. The wave particle duality? It gets worst. If the tube forms a very short tube {bubble} {atom} When the strings vibrate when ever there is a interaction. The fringe pattern will move It is expressing it's self in a timely faction and is also expressing singes of mass. Atomic clocks pulse. So what does the fringe pattern found in membranes and tubes of light. Have to do with mass and time and space . A lot. What does this have to do with gravity. Or even build a proof of gravity? A Lot. Lot. Lot. For this reason When you look at the fringe pattern in sheets of light. They are a standing wave. They do not move. They are not related in time they are not expressing any singes of mass. It is only when there is a interaction when they move. When a particle is adsorbed or an interaction happens This is the key to developing a physical proof of gravity. When there is an interaction with in the membranes of a atom. The strings {little tube. } have to vibrate. They are expressing singes of mess. The same strings that vibe rat in atoms that give atoms their solid state {knock on wood} It's real. Atoms are real. Is the same mass that is used by the atom to create a force that allow them to move. There are not two kinds of strings found in the membranes that make up atom The same strings that vibrate That makes atoms solid like is the very same strings. make them move or create a force Gravity. Atoms are real. Gravity is also real. What is real about gravity. Tubes. Tubes are real. I got pictures. Light can express it's self as a tube naturally in nature. Here's the bad news. Strings vibrate. Strings are nouns. Vibrate. is a verb. Gravity is a verb, it is not a noun. Those poor scientist down there have been looking for gravity {the noun} for the past 150 years. And now we find out at this late date and time. A sad state of affairs. That it is not a noun but a verb. Nature fails to play fair. Nature as been playing man for a fool, for all these years and man has been nun the wiser.


     That doesn't bother me nun. So lets get back to gravity. Are the tubes we find in nature the tubes of string field theory. Or are they the tubes of General relativity? In nature tubes are tubes. They all work the same way. But where you find them in nature. They take on different rolls. And cause different effect. They perform different rolls and functions. The tubes are the building blocks of nature. Because when they form there is a interaction that takes place. You could prove this if you could find a free space negative lens that forms in slow motion in nature like it does in whirlpool in shallow water. You can get a particle detector in water to map out its shape and track the interactions of the particle. By finding out that all tubes go through this interaction. You can use them as building blocks of nature. Y-strings. And build the two atom model of gravity. Then if you use the two atom model of gravity as the building block of gravity.


     This one model of gravity has room enough in for General Theory of Relativity. The membranes that make up the geometrical shapes of the space that rest between atoms. And it also has enough room for this other theory of gravity. What roll does the atoms play in gravity. The origin of the force comes from atoms. You can't have gravity in nature with curvature of space . You can't have gravity with just atoms. The origins of the force. You have to have both. The membranes that make up the geometric shapes of atoms and the membranes that make up the geometric shapes of the space that rest between the atoms. Einstein's two atom universe has both. That why it works. By using the building blocks of gravity {the two atom universe that comes all in tack. The space that rest between the atoms, is accounted for and it's roll or function is in play. The only part of the gravitation field that is real is where these membranes form at in nature relative to the observer , the atoms. This one on one atom is the way it works in nature. The membranes do not go out in every direction. The membranes only form where the membranes form in the negative lens that only forms between atoms.


    The things we need to be working on or talking about are parallel universe , We need to explain negative lens in a way as parallel universes. " It's relative" "The observer determines the out come of the experiment." The particles and the membrane shear a common ancestor. The history of the membrane relative to the observer and the history of the particles. relative to the observer are one and the same. Particles are point like . They can not alter their past history. Membranes are not point like. They have the ability to chance their past history. Both histories of the membrane relative to both observer can be real at the same time. Some thing we call parallel universes. The history of a membrane and one particle can be different from the history of a different observer need to explain a way atom in the way they express their self as parallel universes. The history of an egg shaped atom that points to one observer can also at the same time point it's egg shape at an other observer. It like having two egg shaped atom resting in the same space at the same time but it's the same atom. The phenomenon is what we call parallel universes. The two types of strings Vibrating strings and reciprocating strings. Two types of membranes. One membrane made of vibrating strings and one type of membrane made of reciprocating strings. We haven't talked about all the different ways the two types of strings can connect together. Do they perform in a timely faction or are the not related in time? We haven't talked about Self propelled atoms., what does the negative lens have to do with the force that atom produce? The negative lens provides a place where their is a inter action.. It provides a way for the atom to produce a force. The negative lens provides a way for the force to very it's strength. and because the lens all way form on the back side . It determines in what direction the force will form. The membrane of atom will not produce a force. They have to be made up of yet smaller object. Vibrating strings. The gravitational fields as the geometric shapes of negative lens. Worm Holes The ones that are made by 90% of the mass of the universe. Are negative lens also. We haven't talked about the space that has no mass that forms on the inside of the inside vortex. I used two penny to make the membranes of the negative lens that forms between two objects like two atoms. The gravitational field. If there is enough mass between two pennies to form the meme brains of a real worm hole If their is enough mass in the membranes between two objects like two pennies. To form a worm hole. Then there is enough mass in the membranes that form the negative lens of the gravitational field. that rest between two atoms to have curvatures of time and space or General relativity.


    Every thing keep coming back to negative lens. The building blocks of nature. This should be telling every body some thing. The key to solving the two atom universe. Is solve the mystery of negative lens. We don't know enough about negative lens and where they form in nature to solve the mystery of gravity.


    We only need to solve the mystery of 1/2 of a negative lens in order to solve the hole mystery of negative lens. Because when it comes to negative lens , two half make a hole. One half does the same thing as the other half. Man can not solve the mystery of a hole negative lens. But he can solve the mystery of 1/2 of a negative lens. And this is all we can solve. But good news This is all we need to solve to get the hole negative lens.


    Every thing is resting on one simple experiment. We can produce supporting evidence. By way of the mirage generating experiments that I do. We can also produce evidence by using transit holograms Like Rosen did. We can find out what shape the negative lens makes. But what we haven't been able to do is find out what particles the membranes are expressing their self as. produce. Where about's in the membrane does the inter action take place. If we can find out what particles are there. The negative lens aligns it’s self with spin theory. The same particles that are found in spin theory are the same particles found on the front side of atoms. Which in turn align it's self with Ed Witten's. Famous pair of paints . The building blocks of atoms. If I can rotate the transit light of negative lens because it is relative to the observer. We can do the same thing with a atom. If you turn a atom side ways Instead of being round it will be egg shaped. And will have a worm hole on the back side. If the worm hole is to small is see. You can take a positive lens a and magnify the info the light has in it of the negative lens and activated it by using a positive lens. If the information can be found in the very center of the atom and no where else. Then the theory is true. We know that all negative lens has an interaction take place in them We know that all atom have an interaction in them But what we don't know is what shape does the atom produce on the back side where this interaction takes. All we need to do is prove is that the shape is a negative lens to prove the theory.


    Now back to the experiment. What I have found out is when water forms turbulence some times it will form a vortex. If there is a light over head like sun light. The light that passes through the water will form a positive lens. But this positive lens will shape shift and form a tube in the middle the same thing it does when two positive lens meet in the middle of a negative lens a Vortex with in a vortex. The tattle tall sing of the black dot is there. When a positive lens forms a point. A point of light forms. When a positive lens forms a tube with in the tube. or a 1/2 vortex with in the membranes of the positive lens It forms a very large black dot. There is your difference. Now when a negative lens forms You can't find out what is happen 1/2 in the negative lens because it is relative When you are at the 1/2 mark the light performs like a positive lens. It is only when you are at the other end does the light form a negative lens. It's relative. You can't use a particle detector to prove that the interaction is taking place. You can prove what is happening with a particle detected in the positive lens. What is good to know about the positive lens that is forms by vortex in water. Is the positive lens performs like 1/2 of a negative lens. This means that if you put a one membrane slitter in the bottom of the tank so the light will shine through the bottom of the tank. And below that you place a parabolic mirror. A concave curved mirror. The positive lens will then perform like it does when it form in a negative lens. Why do all of this? Why? You can not use a particles detector to prove what is happening at the 1/2 way mark in a real free space negative lens. But if you can find a way to get a positive lens to perform the same way it does in a real free space negatives lens. You can use a particles detector to map out the geometrical shapes that it makes. You can prove that it goes through the different shapes that it makes in the life cycle. You can prove that there is an inter action taking place with the particles. And what particles are being produce. And align it with spin theory. and where it is taking place. Because the shape shifting is taking place in a slow timely faction You can use a particles detector to map out what shape it is making. How much mass it has Etc. Etc. With this experiment There is nothing that is happening in the negative lens that you can't prove with a particles detector and very accurate clocks. Verifiable by know scientific means. The right shape of the building blocks of nature.


    If you have with in your hand every thing there is to be know about the building blocks of nature and where they form in nature you can solve the two atom universe and solve Einstein's G.U.T.



    All you need is one atom and 1/2 of the negative lens.


    But it get's better Because the shape of 1/2 the two atom universe is in such a way that you can drew a line through the center of the shape. and cut it by half again.


    But it gets even better. The shape can be drawn out as a 2d line drawing.. mathematical slops. A circle,a oval or egg shape , a positive lens shape and last but not least the shape of inverse vortex.


    Most high school math students can do the math to all of these lines that make up these curved lines or slopes.


    There is a mathematical proof and a physical proof to the two atom universe. When it comes to developing a physical proof . It's the only game in town. Why? This is the way it happens in nature. The simple two atom universe is the only way it can work. This is the way it all works. the way it is in our universe or the world we live in , in our every day lives.


    This means that space is curved in two different direction at the same time. Gravity is a two way street. It's able to do this because the history of the membranes that each atom is seeing is the only membranes that are real to him. and in just what way space is curved will determine in which direction the other atom will move or produce a force.


    A negative lens is the only thing found that has the ability to curve space in two directions at the same time But relative to each atom they are not connected. But relative to a observer standing half way between the atoms and back away from them they are connected You can see the worm hole. The negative lens. Not only do negative lens have the ability to covers space in two directions at the same time. It can also connect the two atoms together. But there is one more thing that has to happen. the negative lens can also have a particle reaction. It can fracture in the middle and form two halves. A vortex with in a vortex. The inside vortex is different from the out side vortex. The out side vortex has fringes, and the inside vortex does not. Membranes that have fringes , have vibrating strings and the membranes that do not have reciprocating strings. So there is a lot going on with in a negative lens action.


    There is a mathematical solution to the two atom universe. The right shape of the atom is a egg shape with a worm hole in the back. But the right shape of the space that rest in between the atoms. is that of a negative lens. Space can be curved in two directions at the same time. and at the same time it connects both atoms together. This is the way it is in nature. Two positive lens when combined together, form a negative lens the two positive lens are part of a bigger hole The negative lens. A person standing in between the two atoms would see a negative lens. But relative to each atom what they would see is not a negative lens but a positive lens and that the observer is not connected to it.


    So Einstein's two atom universe is correct due to the fact that gravity is relative. And what makes relativity work is parallel universes. Different membrane with different shapes and different history. and different spaced that is curved in different directions. Relative to each individual observer. But if you try to get the math to add up !!!! It doesn't. It's not supposed to. Every truck driver knows that if you get your trucks transition such in two different gears at the same time . It will lock up. It works fine if it is in one gear or the other But not in two at the same time. Space is the same way. The same thing that allows it to work in one universe at a time. is the same thing that keeps the gears from grinding. It is also the same thing that will for ever bar man from being able to get the math to work. Parallel universes. Your probable thinking . " Now what kind of world or science is it, that in which the math doesn't add up?" " One that works." You use the logic of parallel universe. Relative to each observer the math works perfect. It exceeds the accuracy of one part in one billion. You add the effect or the force of each atom relative to every atom.


    This is what allows gravity to produce a force in two different directions at the same time. Because it has a geometrical shape. This means that there is a mathematical proof to the Einstein's two atom universe.


    But in order to get gravity to work like it does in nature. You would have to get the three atom universe to work. If you can get the three atom universe to work. Then you can get a universes to work regardless of how many atom their are in the universe or how few. Just as long as it does go below the three or the two atom universe. Universe that have only one atom can not have gravity.


    In order to have a three atom universe. Not only the space That rest between the atoms. Would have to have the ability to be curved in two direction at the same time. But the atoms would also have to have the ability to produce a force in two directions at the same time.


    Einstein knew that if he could unity the strong and weak nuclear forces with the electro magnet force. That you could show that all the forces of nature are some how, in some way connected together. His G.U.T.


    One day I was copying some negative lens in the back. in it. But when I copped the pictures. The pattern was gone. I took the picture out of the copier. I still couldn't see ant fringe pattern. I know the picture had the fringe pattern in it because that is why I choose it. I was thinking what had happen was impossible. I took the picture out side in the sun light to look at it. The fringe pattern was back The polarized light was turning the black in the picture back on. When people make hologram have found out that when you take the film of a hologram and cut it so you can look at the side view of the film. They found that the membranes of the light had little squiggly line in it . But the lines are fragmented. If I can turn the light back on in a picture. Them this means that I could also turn the light or lines back on in a hologram. This tells me that the fringe pattern formed in the membranes of light is not caused but th constructive and destruction wave pattern of light but by the polarize of light by strings. That are over lapping each other. Vibrating strings. Strings that have no fringe pattern in them are not vibrating. They are reciprocating. But if I can turn back on the light with a polarized screen. I could record the shape of a hole string in the film of a hologram. This means that membranes are composed of vibrating strings. This means that if a atom are composed of membranes. membranes a lone will not make a atom move. But a atom composed of vibrating strings can Vibrate strings rest in three dimensioned space. And are curves in a circle. All that is required in order for a string to produce a force like centrifugal force. There is no point like object in atoms. They are constructed 100% as membranes and strings. And geometrical shapes.


    Every thing in the universe is made of matter. If it is not made of matter. It does not exist. If it does not exist. Then it is not real. Just what part of gravity is it that man does not under stand? The part that is real. Every thing that we find in the universe, that is real, is composed of particles. Matter. Objects and the two kinds of space that rest in between objects. The space that can be detected , simple light or simple optics and the mass of the particles that makes up the space that can not be detected as particles, space optics. This is the way the universe is made.


    And the particles that make up the geometrical shapes of the field energy of the 2-D flat space that make up the atoms of objects their self. What place in the universe is the forces of gravity being produces? And by what particle? And in what way is the force being produced? Where is the source of the force?


    Why is this so? When Newton stated the An object that is in motion will remain in motion, unless acted upon by an out side force. Which is true. But when Newton said "out side force" Every body took it for granite that the force that makes objects move, would be found in the space on the out side of objects. The space that rest between objects.


   Of all of the mass of the universe. Only 10% is detectable. The stars and planets make up 9.9 % of this mass..and the particles that make up the space that rest in between objects make up .1% of this detectable mass. But 90% of the mass that rest between objects and can not be detected. But the effects of it can be detected by an indirect way. This mass is like an unseen ocean. If we could make a bubble to form in this unseen ocean. A bubble that would have no mass. The same as bubbles that form in water have no water on the inside of them. Then it could be detected due the effect it would have on objects.


   For years we have know that. If objects are every going to move. They will have to move their self under their on power. Einstein said that when you fall. You can't feel the effects of gravity on your body. There is probably a simple reason for this.


   Einstein said that gravity is like a boat drifting down a river. Which is one way of stating gravity. The other way would be to say that the water of the river is not moving and the boat is moving down the river under it own power. That the boat is self propelled. Again the odds are 50/50. Either the water is moving or it is not. At this late date and time we find that there is no movement of the particles that make up the space that rest between objects. That would make objects move the way that they do in nature. This means that atoms are the source of the force.


   But the forces of centrifugal force produced by the mass of the electron found in atoms. If it could produce more force on one side of the atom than it does on the opposite, or other side. It could produce a force that is equal to the strength of the force. Like that seen in nature.


   They are like little perpetual motion machines. The electron never runs down. The force of gravity never runs down. Well almost never, Give or take 12 billion years. Take the electron out of an atom. The force of gravity goes away. Put the electron back in the atom and gravity comes back. There is probably a simple reason for this.


  Because the electron is not at rest. It is traveling at a very fast speed. It has speed, inertia and mass. It is also going in a circle. Because the electron has mass The electron is also producing centrifugal force. The electron is producing centrifugal force on all sides. Because the centrifugal force is equal on all side the atom does not move. And as along as the force is equal on all side it will not move. It is at rest.


   In order to find out what is happening in the atom . In order for it to produce the force. One would have to find all of the ways that the mass of the electron is turned off and turned on again. At the quantum level where we find the electron in atoms. The rules change. The electron can turn off and on it's mass.


   There is three ways that the electron {Which has mass } can turn off and on it's mass. The electron must make use of all three ways in order for the atom to move They are (1) inline locks. (2) tunneling, Photon (3) a hole.


  (1) A inline lock is like two weights on the end of a string that is spinning around so that the weights are producing centrifugal force. That keeps the weights pulling in opposite direction. And holds the system open or apart. The string holds the weights together. A inline lock is a form of kinetic energy. The forces on the string after it forms does not change. The centrifugal force produced by the spinning weights is not turned off. The forces are in opposite direction. And the centrifugal forces of each weight is canceled out. The canceling out of the centrifugal forces of each weight = equals to the same thing as if the mass of each weight has been turned off. The same is true for the bubble like shape of a atom. The bubble now becomes the inline lock Taking on the roll of the string.


   Now that we have things to where it is as if we have turned off the mass of the electron of an atom. The trick now becomes. How do we turn it back on again?


   If you take the string and the two weights. Out in to deep space and you gave it a toss and set it spinning. The inline lock would not move Because the forces are equal on all sides. But if one of the weights vanished. The other weight would no longer goes in a circle. It would now move in a straight line. The laws of nature dictates that it does so. You can test this your self . You can take a weight on the end of a string and spin it around. Let the string go, and the weight does not continue to go in a circle. It will now move in a straight line In an inline lock. Turning off mass on one side of the system. Turns on, the 180 degrees out, centrifugal force on the opposite side. How is this done in nature.


   The other two remaining way can be study in nature by studying free space Gaussian beam optics. Free space negative lens. Einstein - Rosen bridges. Worm holes. Y-strings the building blocks of nature. There all the same thing. They all fracture in the middle and form two halves.


   Einstein once said that the most likely place to find an Einstein - Rosen bridge would be between the inside and the out side membranes of an atom. Einstein - Rosen bridges are made out of a space that is related in time and the electron has mass. But when Wheeler came out with his worm hole that are made out of a space that is not related in time. And the electron does not have mass. This is the point where Einstein put two and two together. He ran around all day lone saying some thing about this Grand Unity Theory. And mumbling about something to the effect that ? It is all as one.? Why is this? There is probably a simple reason for this.


   There are two types of 2-D flat space. One is a Einstein type of space that is related in time. And the other type of 2-D space is a Wheeler?s type of space. It is not related in time. When time goes to zero space becomes infinity. And all information of the electron is lost. When the electron is forming this type of 2-D flat space the electron has no mass. Free space negative lens form two types of space membranes. A vortex with in a vortex. The out side membrane is related in time and has fringes in it. The inside membrane at one point, is not related in time. It has no fringes in it . It is smooth. Here is where the electron tunnels, and expresses no sings of mass. The inside of the inside vortex is hollow. It is a dead zone. Where the probability of detecting the electron there is zero. The type of space that forms the worm hole between the inside bubble and the out side bubble is a Wheeler space. This type of space does not express any form of mass.


   (2) This is where the electron tunnels in between the inside and outside of the bubbles of the atom. Tunneling = no mass.


   (3) And the other way that the mass of the electron is turned off is the hole. Wheeler?s type of worm hole. There is no electron there to be found. It?s a hole. Holes are just that. There is nothing there to be found. A space that where the probability of detecting a electron is zero. Zero electron = zero mass. Or no mass.


   If you put a weight on the end of a string and spin it around. You can feel the weight and the centrifugal force being produced by the object. The object has mass. Take the object off the end of the string and spin the string around by it?s self. And the weight the mass and the centrifugal force that was once there is now gone. Turn off The same is true about electron found in worm holes that form in atoms No electron = no mass. No mass = no centrifugal force. The atom is now producing more force on one side than it is on the other. There is nothing found in nature to stop the atom from moving.


   If the electron is producing centrifugal force on all sides. And if it produces more force on one side than it does the other it will move. If the electron retains it's mass on one side of the atom and turns it's mass off by some way. ????


   Inline locks when expressed in their higher dimensional forms. They are like a loop or a bubble. They have to be looked upon as closed loops. A spinning closed loop will not produce a force. A spinning loop that has a fixed section of the loop missing on one side and not the other.. Will produce a force. You can take a loop of some thing say the v-belt off your lawn mower. If you spin it around it will not move. You can take the same belt and form a circle C shape out of the belt with pulleys and ideal rowers. There is a 2-d shape of a vortex forming where the two ends of the C shape almost meet. You can spin the belt as fast or slow as you like. But it will not move. It is a loop. A closed loop. The forces are still equal on all sides. It will not move.


   In an atom. The field energy always forms a closed loop system. Because there are two kinds of space that the atom is composed of. One expresses mass and the other does not. The atom can function as a closed field energy loop and an open loop system expressed as mass At the same time.


   The rest of the atom is still forming a force on all side. And is not relevant to the force.


    How does Einstein?s General Relativity work together with Feynman?s Machine. The real part of gravity.


    Addressing the problem of uniting Einstein's General Relativity with Feynman's quantum electro dynamics. The two different theories are united by way of the shape of the atom. Like it does in nature.


   The same particles that make up the field energy that makes up the space between objects. Is also the same particles that make up the field energy that makes up the space that forms atoms. It's is not two different field energies. There is only one field energy. They both act together as one in separable hole. When the geometrical shape of one changes. The strength of the force of the atoms changes by the same amount.


   In simple optics I have seen the shapes of bubbles form on the inside of two vortex mouth to mouth. In simple optics, the mass of the shape of the vortex is equal to the energy of the shape of the bubble that forms there. This means that if the space that rest in between objects has just as much energy or mass as the space that the objects have. When the Tube part of the atom, that form in between atoms change. The strength of the force produced by the atoms will change by the same amount. What makes the shape of the space change is the mass and size and distance that the other object has that the first object to being attracted to and vise versa.


   There is no such thing as gravity in nature. Gravity is really a verb. It is a unit of work. You can't find gravity in nature. You can find in nature, the centrifugal force produced by the speed, inertia and mass of the electron found in atoms. Centrifugal force and the gravitational force are not two different forces they are the same force. Centrifugal force and gravity are one and the same. They are part of an inseparable hole.


   About Einstein?s GUT If it is the mass of the electron that is producing the force. Centrifugal force. Then the gravitation force and the electromagnetic force automatically become united together as one.


   Two different aspects of the same thing. The electron. To have some thing like gravity in nature. You just can't look at just one of the aspects of the electron. You have to look at what is happening in the hole dynamics of both factors. The big picture of the atoms. The binding force of the photon holds the atom together due to it's charge, and the centrifugal force of the mass of the electron holds the atom open. The binding force of the electromagnetic force is pitted against the speed, inertia and the mass of the electron. Because the force can be tracked back to the binding force due to it's charge. One aspect of the force. The photon particle. And the forces of the electron due to it's speed, mass and inertia. Which gives us Centrifugal force. The other aspect of the electron. You have to look at what the space that rest in between object is doing as well as the space that make up objects. The big picture.


   And the shape that the field energy is making is very important. With out the right shape The system will not produce a force.


   The photon is the carrier of the electron. For every electron the is a photon associated with it. The photo - electric effect Glue balls.


   The best part of this theory is that we have a particle to work with. The theory can be tested in the lab. The same laboratory equipment need to develop the physical evidence is also the same laboratory equipment needed to develop a technology to manipulate the gravitational force. The people that work on the theory will be the first to find ways to manipulate the force.














   8/25/07 up date; For the past year I have been talking to a lot of people on the internet about the two atom system of gravity. E-mails etc. etc. You may want to see what was said so I'm posting most of them her so that you can easily read what was said. They want let me post every thing that was said. But most of it I can. It may help you develop a better picture of what gravity is like and how it works in nature. Larry









    (A) The mass of the electron found in the atom. (2) What all has to be there in the two atom system of gravity. In order for it to work? Answer (A) One building block of gravity. (B)Two atoms and a gravitational field. (C)Four building blocks of nature. (D) All of the above.









    There are objects the we refer to being point like object. We express them as being in three dimensions of space. And one of time. We usually refer to them as being point like because there movement can be expressed with three dimensions of space and one of time. There are rules that point like objects fellow. There are thing that point like objects can do. And there are things that point like objects can not do. Things seem to be working all right till the point like objects start doing things that we know that point like objects can not do. When ever a objects is accelerated it produces a force. We call the force that the object is producing mass. Electrons produce a force when ever they are accelerated. When they are at rest they don't produce a force. This is the way that point like objects are supposed to work. And every thing goes all right. Atoms are like point like objects. Up to a point. At times they act just like electrons act. When every a atom is excelarated they produce mass. When a atom is at rest. It doesn't produce a force. But there is some thing that a atom can do that a electron can not do. It can be at rest and at the same time produce a force. It is at this point that every thing goes to hell in a hurry. In a hand basket. The electron. The atom. But are said to be point like objects. But then again there are times when they don't perform like point like objects. Point like objects can not produce a force due to it's mass when at rest. Like the electron. But the atom can So what is the difference between the two? The atom may have the treats of point like objects. but point like objects they are not. The look like bubbles. That are smeared out over time and space. They are three dimensional objects. They rest in three dimensions of space. They are composed of membranes. The membranes have a sub structure to them. The electron particle. The info of the electron particle found in the atom is not at rest. It is related in time. It is moving very fast. At the speed of light. If the electron is being accelerated because it is moving in a circle. It will produce a force. Due to it's mass. Due to the centrifugal force produced by the electron. Then the atom has a means by which it can move by. Atom may have the treats of a point like objects. But point like objects they are not. Atoms are a system. A closed loop system. The electron moves as a repeating cycle thought the closed loop system. The system is dynamic and compound. It is a compound complex system. Atoms are not simple spheres. Well every thing is going all right up to a point. Then we find out that the point like nature of electrons are not so point like after all. WE find them doing what point like objects can not. So what wrong with our electrons. They to are truly not point like objects. They to are the end produce of a the dynamic of a sub system. Called strings. Point like objects can take on the traits of strings. because particles are composed off a substructure that is composed of strings. Strings can express their self as point like objects. This is why point like particles can do what we know that point like objects can not do. That's because they are no made of point like objects. They are made of strings. Well The string thing is going all right up to a point. Then we find out that strings don't break up into point like objects. They are string. Strings do not break up into units. Strings are unbroken units unto their self. Independent unto their self's many strings. So what,s wrong here. They to are function as a compound complex dynamic system. There is a primary function and a secondary function. And a final function. The crosshatch pattern produced by the strings ( more than three strings)is the primary function. The info of the space. ( the secondary function) That diffract's due to the mass of the string. The diffracted space goes on to produce a membrane. The membrane is now broken up into units due to the polarizing effects of the crosshatched strings. That is broken up. The final effect. The info of the particle. This is one huge part of the puzzle. Of the mystery of gravity. Man will have to get this part of nature right before he will be able to solve the mystery of gravity. So. Lets put it all in a nut shell. The earth and all other objects. Are point like. They have the treats of point like objects. But at times they are able to perform in a manner the is not characteristics of point like objects. They can produce a force when they are at rest. Why They are composed of a sub structure called atoms. Atoms have the traits of point like objects. But they can produce a force at rest. Why Atoms have a sub structure called electrons. Electrons are not at rest. They have the ability to produce a force. Electrons. Are point like. But are able to do the things that point like objects can not. Because they to also have a sub structure to them. Called strings String are able to do thing that strings can not do a line due to the fact that strings are only part of a dynamic system composed of three parts. Strings the geometry of polarized rays of light the arrow of time. And the fragmented membrane. There are three or more different ways the fragmented membranes can express it's self as a point like objects. It can travail down a tube. It can move around a half sphere as a lot of ever collapsing rings. It can express it's self as a tube the forms between two membranes.. There tubes that are the carriers of the info of particles that never express there self as particles. And are not related in time. If in the end it is found out that the lowly electron is the source of the force of gravity. The four forces of nature become united as a given. A free bee. It becomes united by default. Blatantly obvious. Some truths are self evident. Simple and Beautiful. You can't unite some thing that is all ready united. If this is true. Then what we need to be doing is finding a way to tell the difference forces apart form one another. I believe we have all ready did this. "Two different aspects of the same thing. One force due to it's charge. One force due to it's mass. The electron." Richard P. Feynman









   The orbs. They are like the calling cards of field energy. They appear all the time in nature. http://www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/Show%20and%20Tell.html Click here and go take a closer look at these pictures. In the top picture. You can see the field energy forming them. But if you go down to the bottom picture and look at the right side of the membrane. There are two orbs. Now what is causing these orbs to form is because there is either some thing there that has mass or there is some thing there that has no mass. You get the same lens effect with both. Mass and the absent of mass. Look at this picture. In the mouth of the wormhole. In the lower right hand side of the worm hole. The membrane is interacting with some thing. See how it kind of hooked up. There is nothing there. This is why it is black. Now look at this picture. There are two of these black hole in it. I have no ideal of why they are there. Or what purpose they serve. The point I'm trying to make is. Gravity is composed of field energy. If there is some thing that is around. May be some thing that you can't see right off. A lot of time. These orbs will start to form. Some times the UFO is hidden behind one of the orbs. Wormhole form orbs. Most of the time you can see the orb part of the wormhole That forms on the center of the mouth. But you can't see the mouth of the wormhole. And there will be several other orbs found near by. Because the UFO is forming a wormhole. How do you think it got here? This is why the people in N.M. are seeing orbs. This is why we are seeing orbs form around the black lines we are now seeing in the sky out west. The black beams in the sky. The black wormholes in the sky. Most of the time if you can see the orbs. They are not more than five miles form you. 25,000 feet. Any further up and you can't see them. The ones that you are seeing are about three miles a way. 15,000 feet. It's hard to see a car at three miles. So if you start seeing orbs. Starting looking around for some thing else that is out of order. It might be a black line or a much bigger orbs. At night. If you go there at night. Some times it will look like a small dot of light. Some times it will look like a tube of light. It can change it's shape from one thing to some thing else.









   Hidden UFO base Finding UFO's is a lot like going fishing. If you want to see UFO'S. You have to go where the UFO live at. There base. Or where they hang out at. Having a place where you go to see UFO's. Is like having a secret fishing hole. Nanook. Do you thank they would bust us if i told every body here where if have found a secret UFO base. I was able to down load pictures of the base from satellite map pictures before they kicked it off the net. I could not get the hole base in one picture. But I do have about eight little pictures of it. Would you want to post them here. So that others can see that the base is real. Should I post where you can go and what time of day you can see the UFO's come up off the ground? Larry









    We are closer that others have lead us to believe. We are close. Very close. It could happen in the twinkle of a eye. It could happen tomorrow. Next week. Soon. It may have all ready happened. Who knows. All it takes is for one man to state it right for the first time. And post his findings before the eyes of the public. It is only required for him to state it right one time. Then the burden of proof. Is on the nay sayer's. If he has got it right by way of the physical evidence of the laws of nature. The nay sayer's will have to use the same physical evidence to prove the theory wrong. If theory is right in every way. Right by way of the laws of nature. You can't turn around and prove the theory wrong using the same laws of nature. The laws of nature are written in stone. They don't change with time. If the theory is right. It will with stand all on comers. All nay sayer's. It will with stand a test of time. It takes a long time to get it right the first time. The act of getting it right can happen in the twinkle of a eye. It takes a long time to Try and prove it wrong. If it is right. If the theory is right. You can try for ever and a day to prove it wrong. And never be able do so. This is a test of time. Written in stone. Dr. Kaku is going to win this bet. Because nature is going to prove Kaku right. Soon There is to much going on right now for it not to happen.









   Nanook: There are some people that clamed that the have detected a photon that moved faster than the speed of light. I don't think this is what is happening in nature. It think some thing else is happening. But this does not mean that there is any thing in the rule book that states that a object that is made of atoms. Can not go faster than the speed of light. There is some thing that states the rockets can not get us up to the speed of light. But gravity is different. Gravity could. Now just because particles are not moving faster than the speed of light, I know of ways of producing physical evidence that no other man up to now has be able to produce. You talk about the black box. That No man nor any laboratory equipment can see in side of. Now we can. This is what I'm doing. This is why there is very little of peer review papers to back up of what is seen in the pictures. It is new. Never done before by man. There is tons of peer review papers to back up how the end results of how the light will perform. But there is no peer review papers on what is happening in between point A and point B. It is a unknown. The black box. I have found out that if you can see the front view of light. You are nun the wiser. A particle detector can tell you every thing that is happen now. At the place in time and space of where the particle detector is at. But it can not tell you any thing about what is happening in the space before you. Before that point. But if you have found a way to see the light from the side view. See in to the black box. Big difference. See nature in places that man has never been seen before. If you can see this part of nature. You can prove what you are saying is right. The bad news is that when you look at this part of the system that nature is producing. It is quick to point out your mistakes. Neil. Want to look inside of the black box? Don't go here if you don't want to see inside of the black box. Don't go here if you don't want to find out the truth. Don't go here if you don't want to find out that you have made mistakes in your papers that you have written. It's all right if you have made mistakes. Mistakes can be easily fixed. This is why we write papers and post the before the eyes of the public. So that may be some one that knows a little about the subject can give you sone feed back. Some insight on what you are trying to do. Some insight to where you are making your mistakes. There are tons of people out there that are quick to point out your mistakes. But very few that are good enough to tell you how to fix your mistakes. But if you go to the Grand Master to find your mistakes. The worlds leading authority on the laws of nature. Mother Nature her self. She is a wicked witch that has a hart that is cold and hard as stone. I can't help you. But mother nature can. Go here first. http://www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/Show%20and%20Tell.html This is light like that found in nature. It is smeared out over time and space. Higher dimensional space. It is not point like. It is expressing it's self as membranes. If you open up one of these membranes . You will find that they are composed of very small lines. Light in the form of a tube. Strings. Strings can express their self's in parallel universes. The same string can rest in two places in space In many places in space at the same time. And carry the same info of the same particle. The info of one particle. This is what allows the info one particle to have many different histories. And cause a interference pattern with it's self. This is what causes the light to break up. And express their self's as if their are waves. When there are not. To cause the space to break up in just a way. In order for it to express their self's as particles. Ten Dimensional Hyperspace. Sure. It's true. Look for where the light breaks up. And forms a fringe pattern. In the bottom picture. At the close to the top. There are three pictures on this page. if at first they don't come up. click the "Refresh button" in the tool bar at the top, a few times. This should do it. OK. So I lied There is only two pictures here. But the second one from the top. I blew up so that you can get a better look at it. It's two pictures of the same object. When ever a positive lens forms in nature. it will form a focal point. A singularity. but the light does not stop there. it goes on past the focal point and forms a half spherical shaped membrane. Nature proves these people right. About what they are saying about the very close and the very far view of singularity found in nature. What point would that be.? When looked at the focal point from very far a way. The info in the system looks like it all goes to a point and all info is lost. This is true when you are using math. But not true when you are looking at what nature is saying. It is close to a point. But a point it is not. The same would be true about black holes found in the center of galaxies. The first picture is the front view. You can see some cross hatch lines on the back side of the sphere. a particle detector can not detect what is happening behind the walls of the sphere shaped membrane. The black box. But you can't tell what the lines are till you see the side of the shape. The other black box. The side view. When you look at the side view of what is happening. a lot more can be learned about what you are seeing. And when you look at the side view you learn. The the sphere shape that you seen from the front view is not a sphere. It is a semi sphere shape. And the lines as seen from the front view. Turn out to be part of a membrane of the focal point. ( what point? ) We are learning at a very fast pace here. But by looking at the side view. There is some thing else that can be seen. you can see the membranes of the shape. And you are shocked down to your very sole to find out that there two different kinds of membranes. Two different kinds of spaces. If you look at the bottom picture. The big one. You can see the fringe pattern in the semi spherical membranes on top. The way that membranes of light should look like. The only way that man has seen membranes of light like. Then you look at the membrane that the focal point is composed of. Where is the fringe pattern at? It doesn't have one. Light or space is compound. It is composed of two different kinds of space. Space has two different types of functions. One is related in time. The other is not related in time. Your supper fast particles. You fasted than light particles. The membranes that have no fringe pattern in them is the space that is the carrier of the info of your faster than light particles. This is the way that it performs in the lab by way of testing the light. You are right that there is a sub hidden order to the particles. You are looking at it for the first time. It's real. Buy nature is not expressing it's self as a particle. What you see here is membranes. If you open up one of the membranes. You will find that they have a sub order to them. Little tubes that look like lines. The so called strings. You will never to prove the there are fasted than light particles. But you can prove that there is a kind of space that is the carriers of the info of particles that are able to performs " as if" there was a particles that was able to move faster than light. But the only thing that moves faster than light was the info of the particle. By way. By way of the strings. Which did not move at all. Strings are a standing wave. They are in two different places in space at the same time. The very same strings that make up the membrane at the bottom of the picture is the very same strings the makes up the membranes at the stop of the picture. The strings in the membrane at the top do not move either. They vibrate. There is a difference. The very same string that is the carrier of the info of the particle at the bottom of the picture. Is also the very same strings That can experts their self in a timely faction. Having mass and related in time. are able to express their self's as point like objects that can be detected with particles detectors. Strings can expresses their self in two different ways. ALL at the same time. All you need to do in is state it like I just did. Then it's all right to say the space is performing " as if " there are supper fast particles found in nature. And this is the way that nature performs in nature. Nature will prove you right if you start saying " as if " If you say " as if ". It then becomes all right to use the logic of faster than light particles. Because there are ways in the lab to prove what you are saying.









    If you do the spores in the bottle experiment that I told you about. It will produce a very long positive lens. But if you do the same experiment. But this time you use two different light sources. The tubes of the positive lens of the first light source. Will connect up with the tubes of the positive lens of the second light source. And form a very long negative lens. wormhole. If you use sun light from two different sources. Two mirrors. Or the light from the sun and the light from the sun being reflected off one mirror. a And you use two a very small ball of spores. And record what is happening in the experiment with a space shielding hologram made from spores so that the info of the wormhole becomes frozen in time. Written in stone. Use two sources of sun light. It will form a wormhole that has enough mass that it will cut a diamond. The finger of God. Bcause the space shielding effects of the small balls of spores. Not only effect the part of the sun light that has mass. The electrons and radon paritcles. But it also effects the other part of space that you can not detect with a particles detector. But is there. Then the little tube of light has enough mass to form a wormhole. Larry









   Warm: I have found a way the simply fie the tin can spores experiment. a powder puff only has so many spores in it. It would take a lot of powder puff to coat a tin small tin can. But if you had a very small tin can you could use the spores one powder puff. And do the experiment. IF you used the cap off of a lip stick canister. It's has the same shape as a tin can. It would work just as well. and you only need to find one powder puff to have enough spores to do the experiment. larry









   You poor misguided sole. Where are you making your mistake. How can I help you. How can I help you when your this right by nature? I read your paper that you posted a link to. It was 99.9% right. You could rewrite the paper and change the words you use and add a few things that I know about that is happening in nature. About gravity. And be 100% by nature. Your are that close. May be we should co- authored a paper together. You do good work and have the peer review papers to back up your work. I know of ways of producing physical evidence that no other man up to now has be able to produce. You talk about the black box. that No man nor any laboratory equipment can see in side of. Now we can. This is what I'm doing. This is why there is very little of peer review papers to back up of what is seen in the pictures. It is new. Never done be fore by man. There is tons of peer review papers to back up how the end results of how the light will perform. But there is no peer review papers on what is happening in between point A and point B. It is a unknown. The black box. I have found out that if you can see the front view of light. You are nun the wiser. A particle detector can tell you every thing that is happen now. At the place in time and space of where the particle detector is at. But it can not tell you any thing about what is happening in the space before you. Before that point. But if you have found a way to see the light from the side view. See in to the black box. Big difference. See nature in places that man has never been seen before. If you can see this part of nature. You can prove what you are saying is right. The bad news is that when you look at this part of the system that nature is producing. It is quick to point out your mistakes. Neil. Want to look inside of the black box? Don't go here if you don't want to see inside of the black box. Don't go here if you don't want to find out the truth. Don't go here if you don't want to find out that you have made mistakes in your papers that you have written. It's all right if you have made mistakes. Mistakes can be easily fixed. This is why we write papers and post the before the eyes of the public. So that may be some one that knows a little about the subject can give you sone feed back. Some insight on what you are trying to do. Some insight to where you are making your mistakes. there are tons of people out there that are quick to point out your mistakes. But very few that are good enough to tell you how to fix your mistakes. But if you go to the Grand Master to find your mistakes. The worlds leading authority on the laws of nature. Mother Nature her self. She is a wicked witch that has a hart that is cold and hard as stone. If you see this. Your not going to break down and start to cry on me. Are you Neil? I can't help you Neil. But mother nature can. Go here first. http://www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/Show%20and%20Tell.html There are three pictures on this page. if at first they don't come up. click the "Refresh button" in the tool bar at the top, a few times. This should do it. OK. So I lied There is only two pictures here. But the second one from the top. I blew up so that you can get a better look at it. It's two pictures of the same object. When ever a positive lens forms in nature. it will form a focal point. A singularity. but the light does not stop there. it goes on past the focal point and forms a half spherical shaped membrane. Nature proves George right. About what he was saying about the very close and the very far view of singularity found in nature. What stinking point would that be.? When looked at from very far a way. the info in the system looks like it all goes to a point and all info is lost. This is true when you are using math. but not true when you are looking at what nature is saying. it is close to a point. But a point it is not. The first picture is the front view. You can see some cross hatch lines on the back side of the sphere. a particle detector can not detect what is happening behind the walls of the sphere shaped membrane. The black box. But you can't tell what the lines are till you see the side of the shape. The other black box. When you look at the side view of what is happening. a lot more can be learned about what you are seeing. And when you look at the side view you learn. The the sphere shape that you seen from the front view is not a sphere. It is a semi sphere shape. And the lines as seen from the front view. Turn out to be part of a membrane of the focal point. ( what point? ) We are learning at a fast pace. But by looking at the side view. There is some thing else that can be seen. you can see the membranes of the shape. And you are shocked down to your very sole to find out that there two different kinds of membranes. Two different kinds of space. If you look at the bottom picture. The big one. You can see the fringe pattern in the semi spherical membranes on top. The way that membranes of light should look like. Then you look at the membrane that the focal point is composed of. Where is the fringe pattern at? It doesn't have one. Light or space is compound. It is composed of two different kinds of space. Space has two different types of functions. One is related in time. The other is not related in time. Your supper fast particles. You fasted than light particles. The membranes that have no fringe pattern in them is the space that is the carrier of the info of your faster than light particles. This is the way that it performs in the lab by way of testing the light. You are right that there is a sub hidden order to the particles. You are looking at it for the first time. It's real. Buy nature is not expressing it's self as a particle. What you see here is membranes. If you open up one of the membranes. You will find that they have a sub order to them. Little tubes that look like lines. The so called strings. You will never to prove the there are fasted than light particles. But you can prove that there is a kind of space that is the carriers of the info of particles that are able to performs " as if" there was a particles that was able to move faster than light. But the only thing that moves faster than light was the info of the particle. By way. By way of the strings. Which did not move at all. Strings are a standing wave. They are in two different places in space at the same time. The very same strings that make up the membrane at the bottom of the picture is the very same strings the makes up the membranes at the stop of the picture. The strings in the membrane at the top do not move either. They vibrate. There is a difference. The very same string that is the carrier of the info of the particle at the bottom of the picture. Is also the very same strings That can experts their self in a timely faction. Having mass and related in time. are able to express their self's as point like objects that can be detected with particles detectors. Strings can expresses their self in two different ways. ALL at the same time. All you need to do in your papers is state it like I just did. Then it's all right to say the space is performing as if the are supper fast particles found in nature. and this is the way that nature performs in nature. Nature will prove you right if you start saying " as if " If you say " as if ". It then becomes all right to use the logic of faster than light particles. Because there are ways in the lab to prove what you are saying.









    There is just one more thing that I want to say to you before I go to bed to night. many act like one. One acts like many. If you are using many particles in your experiment. There might be some thing like a interference pattern. But when you use just one particle. In order for the data to come out like it does. For the experiment to perform like it does. The same shape that the geometry of the field energy makes when you use many particles. For the experiment to perform the way that it does. It would have to make the same geometrical shape when you use just one particle. and if you are using just one particle. How does the shape of the interference form. When their is just one particle in use. One particle can't interfere with it's self. Because there is just one particle in use. A particle can't do this. But a string can. Because it can rest in two different places in space at the same time. In many places in space at the same time. It can have more than one histories. The string can have many histories. There is a way to tell what is happening if you could look at the light with out recording it. You would have to find out what is happening when you choose not to look. What I mean what is happening when you detect the particle. And you are looking at the light all at the same time. There is a way to look at the light with out detecting it. You can look at the light and see what is happening when you use just one particle. You could use just one particle and look at the light at the same time. And see if it makes the same geometrical shape with one as it does with many. If you see the same shape with many as you do with just one. It's strings. And not waves nor particles.









    Your right about there being some thing about gravity the is fasted than light. But nothing is moving. Gravity does not come in from all directions. It does not go out in all direction. It does not push or pull. Atoms move under their own power. Self propelled. It is " as if " it is connected in all directions. It is only connected in the directions of other atoms. Kind of like a shadow. Push gravity But it's not the shadow that makes atoms move. But if each object is casting a shadow. Each atom would be resting in the shadow of the other atom shadow. Kind of like a arrow of time pointing in the direction in witch each atom will move. Towards each other. To find where you are making your mistake. You will have to go back and review the history of this shadow stuff "Lord Rayliegh". Type this in to googles and see what you can find. I read about it in " Fundamentals of Photonics ". You need to buy this book. It will help you more than any thing I know. Read Dr. Kock's book also. ( Lasers and Holography. He will take you step by step through the history behind the technology. The scattering of light by the edge of a object. This is what Lord Rayliegh worked on. Along with a lot of other stuff. But later on we found out that the light was being diffracted by the edge of objects. Lord Rayliegh Used a round disk to do his experiments with. And what he found out was that " even in the darkest part of the shadow. There could be found light. A light that didn't shine. How can this be. Only if you look into the direction from where the source of the light is coming from can you see the light. The arrow of time thing. Gravity works great at night. And the atoms don't produce any light. Atoms are made of this kind of light that does not shine. Later on we found out that when ever the light Diffract's around all of the edged of a dish. It forms the geometrical shape of a positive lens Now picture this. If there was two different light sources that came from two different directions. And it made the two atoms cast shadows in the direction of the other atom. Just like in your shadow form of gravity. At the same time each atom would form the geometrical shape of a positive lens that would point in the direction of the other atom. But when ever two positive lenses meet. It forme a free space negative lens. Atoms are round. And there is a tube ( the gravitational field) that forms between the two atoms. It connects the two atoms together. And this is the way that it works with every atom in the universe. The only thing is the same membrane that makes up the sphere shape of the atom. Is all so the same membrane that makes up the tube part of the atom. Positives lenses form a sphere in the middle of them. The sphere shape of the positive lens can form a unbroken chain composed of membranes to negative lenses. They can form a unbroken chain. Just like a train. When ever this train of lenses forms. It is not two different shapes. It is just one shape. Because it is all connected together as one thing. Not two. And this is also the way that gravity works. This is the way that atoms are like in nature. This is the way that gravity works. The way that atoms are in nature is also the way the gravity is in nature. They are inseparable. Two different aspects of the same thing. They are as one. The positive energy of a atom is equal to the negative energy of it's gravitational field. This is why you have to compute gravity as a binary system. In the end you will have to go to nature. Nature will not come to you. Is it the shadow that makes gravity work. Or is it the tube of light that does not shine. That has to do with gravity. There is one way to find out which system is right. Look at the light and see. Is there a shadow in the darkest part of the shadow. No. Is there a tube of light found in the darkest part of the shadow? Yes.









   If the lines are produce by waves. Then what is causing the fringe pattern seen in the plate. If you polarize the light in the room. The fringe pattern goes away. When you polarize the light in the room. the line seen in the film does not go a way. There for the lines and the fringe pattern seen in the plate are two different things. There are several things that could be happening here. It could be the recording of the interference pattern of light. But if the lines are recording of waves. Then what is causing the fringe pattern. It could be particles hitting the film in just the right place and forming the shape of a line. But particles are random. They would not form the pattern of a line. But on the other hand. If there is a very small tube of light. Where every the tube is at. The particles can be detected there. Where every the particles are at. This will be the places where the particles will interact with the chemicals of the film. And the line forms. The interaction of the particles with elements of the film maps out the presents of the string. But if the film has recorded the shape of the line. the when the light is placed on the film. The lines will produce the fringe pattern. Just the same way the strings will produce the fringe pattern in the membranes that I'm taking pictures of. The waves would have to be making two different interference patterns. What would be there to cause the light to diffract to produce the lines? The lines is what causes the light to diffract and produce the fringe pattern. Well that's the problem. Particles are detected. What I'm doing is a observation. Because it is a observation and not a detection. You could repeat many known laboratory experiments. And observation what is happening when you are using the particle detector. All at the same time. The double slit experiment? Wheelers double slit experiment. Wheeler used a around disk that formed a positive lens. The same way that I'm forming a positive lens.









    I know the Bohm was doing experiments with plasma gases. Bohm found out that by pumping high energy into the gas. You could see the field energy. It formed tubes. Bohm also believe that the membranes was composed of yet smaller tubes. The called strings. It just so happens the shape of a tube in mechanically sound and it is also mathematically sound. But when I found out that the field energy of simple light also chooses to express it's self as a tube. Other people find it hard to believe. Could it be that the shape of field energy is universal. All transit energy form's it's field energy in the shape of a tube. Because a wave can not expand 3 dimensional. Start off as a point and grow to the shape of a sphere. And still be mechanically sound. There is no known wave form known to man nor nature that can do this. It can not transmit info accurately. So how does nature do it? It doesn't. It can't. But if the info in the field energy goes by way of a tube. It could. the tube doesn't go out wards in every direction like we thing it does. The tube only goes out from the point in the direction that it needs to. If there is no object to be found there in space. light will not shine in that direction. Light will not shine or work in the direction of the black empty space of a wormhole. The same is true for gravity. The field energy of gravity expresses it's self as a tube. I got pictures. The tube part of the atom is it's gravitation field. I thought I all ready said that. And the same would be true for the gravitational field. Gravity doesn't go out from a atom in every direction. It's " as if " it goes out from the atom in all directions. It only goes out in the direction of other atoms. Not in every direction. Only in the direction that is required for it to be come functional. Mechanically sound. In a theory. It is only required to prove what is there. It is not required to prove the things that are not there. There is no signal. There is now gravity wave. There is no gravity particle. But there is a particle. The electron. And it can be found in the atom. Some other feller proved that. And that's just great. That's just some thing that we don't have to prove. Because it has all ready been prove. If light connects two different objects or atoms. Regardless of where you places the two objects. It all ways connects the two with a tube. Creating a false mental image that the field goes out in all direction like a wave from a rock tossed in to the duck pond. The only way to prove this is if you can see the side view of light. This is why I keep saying that this light is not right by man. But it is right by nature. I have found out that nature is quick to do one think and create an illusion that some thing else is happening. Nature has played man for a fool. Or is it. Man has play man a fool. And now we are just starting to wise up to nature. See. This is what you get for practicing science base on assumptions. In sated of checking it out with nature first. It was what man pictured in his head with out every being able to see what is going on. But now we can't say that any more, because now we can see the side view of light. Any thing that is geometrically correct is also mechanically correct, Which is also mathematical correct and if you can back all this up with physical evidence. There is your proof. Lets do it again. Any thing that is geometrically correct( the shape of a tube ) is also mechanically correct,( The crosshatching of the vibrating strings that the membrane of the tube is made of. What causes the light break up) Which is also mathematical correct ( There is a math to string theory ( as of right now It's all math) )and if you can back all this up with physical evidence. ( Except the physical evidence at it's face value. Trust nature. She will not make you look a fool.) There is your proof.









    Thank you; "An infinite velocity particle is simultaneously everywhere along its trajectory" Spoken by Neil in his own works. You have just gave me you verbal discreption of the true nature of a string. strings are not a signal. They do not " velocity " They are a standing wave. Just like those found in nature. They are here and there at the same time. They are not related in time. They vibrate. The vibration of the string is what causes the broken up light to move. If the broken up light. The particle. moves. It is related in time. If it now is related in time. Then it becomes a signal. Now the moment that we have all been waiting for. The moment of truth, May I have the "Envelop Please". I sorry. What I mean to say was. May I have the " Bottle Please ". If there was a so called infininty velocity particle that light is composed of. It could not be seen with the human eye. Wait a minute. I think I can see some thing. Look. look look. Quick. There goes some now. If light was composed of a infinity velocity particle. You could not see it with your eye. But if light was a standing wave. A string that does not move. Why am I seeing light. Why are we seeing light. Why is every body seeing light. Tell me why. Is it because Neil can't see the light. But every body else can? Think about that one Neil. What's wrong with this picture? "Nothing". That's what's wrong with it. The Nothing part of it. it's not me that you have to convince. It's nature. Nature is not the person that you have to convince that strings are not real. The pictures that I'm am taking par produced by nature. i have brought forth my physical evidence. just like in a court of law. The burden of proof is not on you to prove the strings are not real. I have proven the strings are real It is now your job to prove that strings are not real. This is the way it works among honorable men. If you are unwilling to play by the rules that honorable men play by. Now is the time to say so. You must take the same evidence. Produced in the same way that I produced. And prove that there is nothing there in the picture. It's a picture, Neil. Pictures don't lie. Larry









    There may be some thing that I'm doing that might interest you. Bohm did a lot of work in plasma physics. He talked about the tubes of energy in plasma. He also felt that the tubes were composed of yet smaller string like things. Bohm talked about them to Einstein. The light that I'm studying. It don't do right. It doesn't act like light should. It is acting more like a high energy plasma gas than light. Did Bohm find strings 50 years ago? Are strings only found in plasma gases? Is string theory, light, and plasma gases all the same stuff? Light may be some weird kind of plasma. We just didn't know it till right now. larry









    There may be some thing that I'm doing that might interest you. Bohm did a lot of work in plasma physics. He talked about the tubes of energy in plasma. He also felt that the tubes were composed of yet smaller string like things. Bohm talked about them to Einstein. The light that I'm studying. It don't do right. It doesn't act like light should. It is acting more like a high energy plasma gas than light. Did Bohm find strings 50 years ago? Are strings only found in plasma gases? Is string theory, light, and plasma gases all the same stuff? Light may be some weird kind of plasma. We just didn't know it till right now. The Bohm thing? Sure. If you cut a hologram up in to little pieces. Every one of those pieces of the hologram has the same ability to produce the image of the objects the is recorded in it. each pieces has the same info as does all the other pieces. But if strings are what make holograms work. Strings can rest in two different places in space at the same time. The same string can rest in many different places at the same time. The recorded film of holograms are made up of the same string resting space here and there. This means that if you cut up the hologram. Every pieces of the hologram would have the same info as does every other pieces of the hologram. Particles can't do this. All particles are related in time. They can not be in two different places at the same time. So How does nature do this? She uses strings. If you use the logic of the true nature of string. It simplifies the though process. You don't have to run out into the back yard late at night and beat your head against a flat rock to come up with some hair brained ideal to make particles do what we know good and well that particles can not do. You can use the string. Or you can learn to stop screaming because your head is hurting and take the pain. Larry









    What do you think I'm working on. I'm trying to find ways to prove that strings are real. Did you know the we now know that what makes a hologram work is not waves. They have taken the film of a hologram and cut it. And looked at it under a microscope. The opaque part of the film is not a bunches of waves. The opaque part of the file is composed of little fragmented squiggly lines. That right I said lines. I know that Dr. Kock was making costic sheets of light form. Membranes. and making holograms of the membranes of negative lenses. Dr. Kock has pictures of them in his book. This means that if I have found a way to make strings form that are long and are not fragmented. There is a way to record them in the film of holograms. And reproduce them as a hologram. But in the world of holograms. There is a kind of hologram that they call a transit hologram. This is where you make a hologram of the strings the rest in the space before you. Then you take that hologram that has the strings that are resting in the space before you. And use it to produce a hologram of the strings. But if while the hologram is up and running. If you take another plate. The film used to make holograms with. And you place it in the space where the strings rest before you. And record the presents of the strings found there. If you take that hologram and cut it open. You will find that it has recorded in it. A long unbroken string in beaded or recorded in it. But if strings are real. They would have mass. This means that if you do the eyeball experiment. Where the mass of the strings make the light diffract around the string and produce a fringe pattern in a membranes. And if you use the transit hologram setup. And prove that ever thing that I'm saying about how string are able to break up the light in the membranes and form the fringe pattern But if it is polarizes light produced by the strings. That causes the light to break up. You could also use polarized screens in your experiment and prove that it the polarizing effect of strings that is causing the light to break up. By recording the effect in the film of holograms. you could develop the physical proof the strings are real. Because you could prove that strings have mass. Strings would have to have mass in order to interact with light and cause the light to diffract. Just the same way the every other thing that is composed of mass. Matter. Has mass. Every thing in the universe is composed of matter. All matter has mass. If this is found to be true. Then strings are real. And one more thing. If you are watching the side view of a steady stream of particles moving down a string. If you use polarized screens in your experiment to turn off the ability for the string to break up. And form particles that can be detected. It is the strings that is causing the light to break up and form packets. Your particle. There are ways to test for string. Say. Haven't we all ready used polarizes screens in our experiments to turn of light before. I think we have. But we don't know what is happening in the light that turns off the ability of light to form packets. So that you can detect Particles. with a particle detector. I was using polarized screens a few years back. In my experiments. The polarized screens didn't stop the light form coming through the screens. But it did cause the fringe pattern found in the membranes to go a way. It made me wonder why that is. Now I know. Larry









   That's the piece of dirt that you plow and plant corn in. Why do you ask? When they first studied magnets. They places piece of paper over the magnet. and sprinkled iron filling on the paper. It produced a pattern that looked like rows in a plowed field. That you plant corn in. When they study the lines of the rows. They found out that the lines seamed to go out for ever. That's why they call it the magnet field. But when they started to study light. Newton found out that the light could also formed rows in it. The Newton rings. Now days they call the rows found in light a fringe pattern At first they thought that the fringe pattern was being produced by the constructed and destructive interference patters produced by waves. They developed the math of waves and was able to produce the same effect of the concealing out of the energy of waves. So they was lead to believe the light was a wave. From time to time we have to remind them. Less they for get. At this late date and time. A sad state of affairs. Light is not light like throwing a rock in to a pond of water. And forming waves. waves in light can do what waves in water can not do. light can't be expressing it's self like a wave in water. If not that kind of wave. Then what kind of wave is light? It's not a wave at all. there was a person that sent me a link where there was a Dr. that was using a computer generated program that he designed. That used the polarizing effect of diffracted light produced by strings that crossed paths with each other and was getting a fringe pattern just like that found in light. I had seen in the eye ball experiment. Where there was a membranes where there was strings coming out from the membrane. The strings when out a way from the membranes did not cross each others paths. The individual strings did not form a membranes nor did they form a fringe pattern. But the place that they all curved around and came back together. It formed a membranes with a fringe pattern in it. For about five years now .I have been asking my self. How does I do that. Then about two months ago It donged on me. The light that diffract's around a sphere of light and forms a focal point. But the light goes on past the focal point and forms a membrane. See the drawing of Wheelers delayed reaction experiment. But if the object that was difracting the light was a lone line Like a hair. (the whisker experiment that I told every body about.) Instead of a sphere. It would also form a membrane. But if there was more that one hair. A lot of hairs. It would form a much bigger membrane. But if the hairs were crossing each others path. It would cause a polarizing effect. It would cause blind spots in the membrane. If the strings where places just so, so. the blind spots where the polarizing effect is effecting the membrane would form blind spot's in a row. Just like the rows that you find in a field that you plant corn in. But if the strings is what makes the light break up into rows ( the fringe pattern found in the membranes of light.) Then could it not also be true. That a very small tube of light that is composed of a membrane. In which the membrane has a sub structure to it. That is composed of yet smaller strings. That would make the membrane break up into rows. But the rows would be like little rings around the tube. And if it so happened that the strings started to vibrate. It would cause the little rings to move down the tube. Even though the strings are not moving down the tube. They are standing still and only vibrating. The broken up light would move down the tube. If the strings were vibrating at the speed of light. The broken up light. The little bands of light the little rings. The little units the little packets of energy the little unites of mass. Would move down the tube at the speed of light. And if the strings crossed paths in just such a way. The packets of energy and mass would have the same energy and mass as does particles. Like the ones we find in nature. I give you your particles. On the end of a string. They can also use string theory to predict the interaction of particles. Murray Gillmann. These chain of interaction of particle make up every known thing in our universe. That why they call them the building blocks of the universe. The y- strings. But the atom is no different from any thing else we find in the universe. They to have a chain if interaction found with in them. The interaction takes place some where on the back side of the atom. If the same chain of interactions that is happening on the back side of the atom is found to be the same chain of interaction that take place in the half spheres found in positive lenses. We will have our gravity. To get atoms to perform like they do in nature. You will have to get the particle to perform the way that it does in nature. But in order to get particles to perform the way that they do in nature. You will have to get strings to perform the way that they do in nature. Ever thing in our universe is composed of the a chain of interactions of particles. The building blocks of nature. The chain of interaction of particles can be tracked back to the way the string perform in nature. There can be nothing in our universe that is real with out strings. Larry









    String field theory is not some thing that I came up with. Some other fellow did that In fact I thing there are quite a few people that are working on string theory. The only problem with the theory. They don't have any physical proof. Big problem. String theory has been around for about 30 years now. It has a history. thanks to Warm's link I now have this link. Thanks Warm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory http://www.superstringtheory.com/ i got that link off this link http://members.tripod.com/da_theoretical1/wdphysics.html I would be hard for me to believe that you have never herd of string theory. Never heard of Dr. kaku? or Dr. Ed Witten. http://www.mkaku.org/ Did you know that Dr Kaku and Jack were two of the people that did the peer review work on NASA"s BPP. Books? Sure. There are a few around. Back to the physical evidence of strings. There has be so many people say the string field theory will fail due to the fact that there is no evidence that nature expresses it's self as a string. That is not a true statement. The only way that nature expresses it's self is as a string. Every thing that is real in our universe, can be tracked back to strings. How much evidence is there that proves that strings are real? "All of it". And I stand by these words You can't have the wave effect with out strings You can't have particles the way that they are in nature with out strings. You can't have membranes with out strings. You can't have objects like atoms that have gravitational fields with out membranes. You can't have some thing like the two atom model with out strings. 10% of the mass of the universe is composed of atoms and their gravitational fields. the gravitational fields and transit energy makes up the other 90% of the mass of the universe. And after that. There is nothing left. If you can't find what you are looking for in the hole of the universe. It's not real. If you can't find what you are looking for In the two atom model of the universe. It's not real. The two atom model of the universe is also the two atom model of gravity. You can take the two atom model of gravity. The building blocks of gravity. The building blacks of a universe. And build a universe. Just like the one that you are standing in. And if you can't find what you are looking for in this, Not some other universe. But this one. the one that you are standing in. It's not real. And you don't know about strings? how could you have missed this one. There is talk about string theory every where. It all over the net. Even truck drivers know about string theory. Where have you been for the past 30 years? Because their are so many people like you that say that string theory will never become a science Or go no to being a technology. It would be imposable for any one to stand up at this late date and time. And say that they have produced the physical evidence of strings. There for. There has to be a layperson that stands up and states that he has produced the physical evidence of strings. What this does is. it paves the way for others to follow. It makes it safe for others to stand up and produce the same evidence and more that develops the physical evidences the strings are just as real as any thing else we find in the universe. with out strings. There would be no universe. Who is going to be the one person that does this? Your talking to him. Why. Because I know how things work like this. I'm working on it right now. Go over to Dr. Kaku's forum. And read my post there. then go over to my web page and read about my experiment that will open the door to finding and developing the physical evidence to prove that strings are real. If strings are real. And can be found any where with in this universe. I will find them. And if I can find them. Any body else can also find them. Will you say when there is a army of scientist that also state that strings are real And have the math and the physical evidence to prove it. When ever body on the face of the planet is saying that strings are real. Will you be the last person to leave the room of disbeliever's and turn off the lights. Neil help me make it happen. Make some history. Be a part of history. I know you are good. You could be the man up on point. Trust in nature. She will not make you look a fool. Use spores from powder puff and do the bottle and spores experiment. You can use your PC Camera and take pictures of the long tubes of light that can be seen there. Go post them on Dr. Kaku's forum. State how you are. And there will be people calling and knocking on your door. With a job your you. Government grants. Money. Lots of money. The people that are looking for the physical evidence of strings. Can get money for any one that can produce one. A job that will last you the rest of your life. You will go down in the history books. And if you go read about what gravity is. and if you can understand what it is that I'm talking about. what gravity is. You may be the person that goes down in the history books that solves the mystery of gravity. Any one here that read this can do the same. Larry









   Home work? Sure. There is a simple experiment that I do in my truck. I use a penny. ( el cheap-o)And after I use the penny in the experiment. usually at some time after I do the experiment. I wind up spending the penny. ( double El cheap-00) In the winter time there usually is salt spray on my windows. If I park at night to where there is a yard light near by. I take a penny out of my pocket. Roll down the side window a little so that I can get my hand and arm out side the window. I place the penny to where it is in between the light and one of my eyes. Because the windows have salt;t spray on them. ( fogged screen effect.) You can see where the shadow from the penny is hitting the window. Your eye is in the darkest part of the shadows. If you move the penny to a point where you can just start to see the light diffract around the penny. if you look at the shadow on the window. you will find that you are still in the darkest part of the shadow on the window. But if you move the penny back to where the penny is half way between the edge of the penny and the center of the penny. Because some of the info of the light is being reflected off of the salt dust around the penny. Giving you reference beam of light Now you have a objective beam and a reference beam. What is needed to form a hologram. If you focus your eye on the distant light. You can see the light. Even though the penny rest firmly between you and the light. Even thought you eye is still in the darkest part of the shadow on the window. How can this be? Have you suddenly developed the ability to see through pennies and brick walls? No. Not really. Have you just acquired the ability to make penny's disappear? No. not really. Then what's going on here. did the info in the light go through the penny? NO. Not really. if one could find a way to see the side view of light as it diffract's around the edge of a object the is round in shape. You get to see what is happening in the dynamic of the system in your experiment. Do you get to see the shadow? No Shadows are a by product of ray optics. Beams of light. Their not real in nature. Rays or shadow don't show up in the side view of light as it diffract's around objects. the shadow can turn off the info of light. But it does it for some other reason than blocking out the light. Then the only thing that you are left to work with is the path that the info in the light travails by form point A to point B. Which can be seen using the side view. It has to go around the penny. The shape that the light makes as it moves through the darkest part of the shadow has been tracked or mapped out with particle detectors. We as men do not know why light can bend around the edge of a object. But we can say the it does bend. or curve. What do you mean? You can see around corners? Gravity can still work around corners? There no such thing as frame dragging in nature. There is now. and now there is a way that you can go see it for your self for pennies on the dollar. We don't need no stinking billion dollar grant to prove that frame dragging is real. El cheap-o rides again. So George is right. we will need the data collected from the frame dragging experiment To build better models of how wormhole effect objects and to what extent will the strength of the force be. In advance. Before we do any experiments with wormholes. Have the data of wormholes before man has the ability to form a wormhole. Or is it have a way to verified what is happening in the dynamic of the system of wormholes. When we all ready have wormhole? Larry But if you theory of either is right. I It would have to explain a way why objects that have different shapes or mass. Weigh in at different weights. Produce different amounts of centrifugal force. But fall at the same rate. and both objects that are falling even though they have different shapes and mass. When they are relating back to the mass of the earth. The forces add up to zero. No other theory known to man can do this. But the two atom model of gravity can. larry









   If this is true. Then tell me how does a object get pushed out of the moth of as wormhole. If there is no particles coming from the direction of the black space to push it. At some point or time or place . the push theory fails. You have to go back to ground zero. And start over again with some other ideal. Hint. Try the two atom model of gravity. It works for me. May be it will work for you to. Larry Thanks for the links. I buzzed over it right quick. I picked up on the word Feynman. Feynman blew a hole in this theory about 30 years ago. The stated that if a object was moving through space. It would be hitting more particles on one side than it does the other. This would cause objects to slow down and stop at one point or other. Objects once set in to motion. In free space don't slow down with time. This is the main reason I past it by. Nature proves Feynman right. It talks about the horns of the bull. A yoke. The word yoke is also a technical term. They are used in many different ways. Because the path that the sun takes relative us. Here on the ground. It takes the path of the shape of a oval. because the path that the sun takes is compound and complex. You would need machinery that also is compound and complex. they were able to do this by using yokes. Just like a universal joint in your car's drive shaft. ( I had to fix my car one time. one? OK so I lied. It was a lot of times.) But knowing about yokes in advance. Helped me to solve the mystery of the ark. When I ran across them in the bible. I knew what had to be done in order to track the sun. And I also knew what a yoke could do for you. Sure enough. This is what they did. And how they did it. The ark formed a wormhole. Form a wormhole. And then you can manipulate gravity. This is the way it works. Larry









    Warm: Trouble in paradise? Boy you can say that again. Help me out here. There is some thing big going down right now. We can be eye witnesses to a history making event. At last. At long lest. The people that are doing this. Are coming out of the shadows and their hiding places. And standing in the sun light for all to see. Remember how I told you that they had cut the funding for this kind of technology. These people are out of work. They are looking for a job. But due to the no bid contracts. They are cutting the money to the companies that work on this craft. The people that developed this technology. And boy are they hot. These people are also, out of work. And gave the money and contracts to some people that don't know what it is that they are doing. What has been going on is a power grab. There are people that are using the government to yank the technology from out of the hands of the people that developed it. And give it to others That are not qualifies to do the work. They are now making big mistakes. The people that they laid off. The government doesn't have any control over them any more. The laid off people are fighting for their jobs back again. They know about the effects that a wormhole will have on objects. They know what caused the cement and steel to turn into dust. They also know how much energy it would take to turn that much concert and steel into dust. They have turned whistle blowers. They are talking to the people over at 9/11. They had a big meeting of the minds last weekend in Madison , Wi. DR. Judy Woods has a new web page. They fixed it so that nobody could go to her old web page so she had to get a new one. One out side the U.S. Like me. http://drjudywood.co.uk/ My other web page http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/9958/ But if you go to Judy's page. Then go here. http://drjudywood.co.uk/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam7.html Down at the bottom of the page. There is a lot of new stuff and links. If you listen to what they say. The "words" That they are using. Shop talk. Then go here. http://www.fas.org/main/search.jsp And type in the key words in to the pages search engine. And see what comes up. If you go here. http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=911/&sort=date&order=asc Click on list by date. The first 7 audio's that come up on top is about the meeting in Madison. There talking about the LEO things. You can find what was said in Madison. At the big meeting. The big powwooooow. Oh may God. Well. It looks like we are all going to die. Stop screaming and take the pain. The good part about dieing is. Before we die we are going to find out what makes those UFO thing fly. The force field that they talk about. The orbs. I found out how they make them. I found it in Dr. Kock's book. The drawing is on the wall behind Dr, Kock. It is coded. You have to unlock the code. I have a drawing of that the picture is like on my other web page. Because I posted my drawing in the net. I think this is why they kicked me off the net. They want let me get back on my web page. They changed the pass word. If you use one concave mirror over the top of the other. You can make a very weird hologram form. Membranes in the form of a sphere. The membrane is like a man made universe. A sphere. The craft rest on the inside of the sphere. They can take another hologram of a wormhole. Over lap the two holograms. And a wormhole will form in the sphere relative to the craft on the inside of the sphere. By being able to move the wormholes around to here they want them to be. They can make the craft go where they want it to go. So now we know "why the sphere". And we also know how they are able to make it form. And how they are able to get the membranes of the sphere to form wormholes in it. Larry









   This may be true. But what is there would not be the type of wormhole that you are thinking about. A gravitational free space negative lens. This is what a wormhole is. It is not like the ones we take pictures of in outer space. They are not composed of that much mass. They have very little mass. In a shallow stream. as the water is flowing. If you look at the bottom of the stream. Some place down stream from where the water goes by a rock. The rock will cause turbulence in the water. The turbulence is random. The turbulence then starts to interact with it's self. The water will start to spin then form a whirlpool. The sun light will form a positive lens at first. But as the strength of the whirlpool grows. The positive lens turns into a open ended positive. lens. It does the same thing as a wormhole. The focal point will invert and forma tube on the inside of the positive lens. this is the same thing that a wormhole does. On the inside of the lens is a space that is black. light will not shine through it. There is a black dot that forms on the bottom of the stream. Some people believe that the forming of the open ended negative lens is what cause the water to spin. Some people believe the forming of the whirlpool is what caused the lens action. May be they both happen at the same time. Hurricanes do the same thing. And wormhole like those that form in outer space do the same thing. When light passes through a hole in a piece of paper. It forms a negative lens. You can look through the hole and see the light of other days so to speak. If you make a hologram of the lens of light that goes through a hole. By using a resonator. At a distance you can see light coming through the hole. But because the hologram freezes the lens where it is at. If you move in closed to the hole. The hole in the paper turns black and you can't see the light on the other side. We have been able to do the same thing with gravitational negative lens in outer space. Using the same space lens. We can use it to take pictures of what is on through other side. But we can get pictures of the black empty space that is there also. Wormhole are very much like negative lenses.









   That's what why I keep saying all the weird thing that I do. If you can see the things that are there. Other than the box. See things on the inside of the box. And things on the out side of the box. It changes the way you think about what is real. If the pictures that I'm taking is of nature expressing it's self as a tube of light. (space) What in the world could any body say about tubes or strings that would make all the pieces fit together. Can a string do it all? There has to be a way. If nature can do it. Then there has to be a way in order for it to happen. Nature is all ways right. Some times man can be wrong. The best thing that i can think of is. "Why don't we look to nature to tell us how she does it." Strings don't complicate things. It simplifies the process. Having nature tell you the answer is a no brainer. larry Neil: There is some thing that is wrong with what you are saying. Atoms don't run down. They don't gain energy or loose energy. Sounds a lot like gravity doesn't it. There are atoms that have been around for 13.5 billions years. Why didn't they run down? Now I can't say that they can never run down. But as long as the electron. Is expressing it self in a timely manner and showing singes of motion. There will be gravity. And I can't say the will never run down because we haven't reached the end of time yet. The end of days. The end of every thing. But long after man as gone. Atoms will still be going. Just like perpetual motion. With out end. This is not a violation of the conservative laws of nature. a energy is accounted for. With out loss or gain of energy means just that. Some day you will get to test your theory of ether. If the particles of your ether will no go through the black empty space of a wormhole. If there can be no wind to push the object out of the mouth of the wormhole. Then what? Talk about pushing. Remember the story about the seven blind man that were asked to take a tooth pick and walk out and poke a prickly pear? And the didn't want to play any more because every time they went to poke the prickly pare. It poked them back first But if you Blinded folded some one. Gave them a tooth pick. And told them to poke the tooth pick down the mouth of a wormhole. And the instant that they pushed the tooth pick in to the mouth of the wormhole. Some thing started to push back When they took off the blind fold. They would be surprised to find that there wasn't any thing there to push back. How can this be? That's it. If the only thing there is the toothpick. The tooth pick would have to be what is pushing back. The atoms that the tooth pick is made of. Is what's producing the force. But as lone as the tooth pick is in the mouth of the wormhole. It will produce a force that doesn't run down. Kind of like that perpetual motion stuff. You know what I mean. That gravity stuff. But if you look at the toothpick is see what is it about a toothpick that is like perpetual motion. And the only thing you can find that is like perpetual motions the electron found in the atoms that the toothpick is made of. That's it. That's your answer. Who would have ever thought that gravity is like a toothpick? No wonder man hasn't been able to solve the mystery of gravity. Where do you all ways find things that you are looking for? The last place you look. What were you saying about the ether Neil? Larry Warm: Waite a minute. This is some thing I know a lot about. Rays???? What rays would that be???? There are no stinking rays found in nature. That's not the way that it works. If the lens is made out of glass. It refracts. There is no glass lens found in a pin hole camera. There is only a very small hole. The light is diffracted by the edge of the hole. And it preferences as if there is a negative lens there. But their not. The focal point in the negative lens should be forming in the center of the hole. But now. We find out that there is no such thing as a focal point in the center of a negative lens. If there is no focal point to be found there. How can here possibly be any thing like a rays optics found in nature. There is nothing found in the center of the hole. It all empty space. Warm. Take that book your readying and through it in the trash. The trot down town and buy you a new copy of "Fundamentals of Photonics" by Saleh, Bahaa E.A.; Teich, Malvin Carl Don't feel bad. I made the same mistake. Held my progress on my work backs by 20 years. I too was using an old out dated book. this was why I couldn't get any thing to work right. When I got my hands on the new book. Every thing aligned it's self with the direct observations of nature that I was doing. Nothing goes through the center of the hole. No particle. No wave. No ray optics. No ether. Nothing. Nothing a live or dead will go through it. It's "As If" some thing went through the center of the hole. So how does it work? There is a membrain that forms on the ends of the vortex of the negative lens. info hits the membrain on one end. Then it comes out the membrain on the other end. "AS IF" it had pasted through the center. But did not. The info of the particle goes down the walls of the vortex. How can this be? The membrain act like a hologram. The same hologram in two different places at the same time. But the info of the particles still acts like a point like objects that is related in time. It reaches the membrane at one end. And at just the right time . The membrain spits out a particles on the other end. With all the observations that I have made with light. I have never seen one ray of light. The so called ray will show up in the membrain "as if" it went from point (a) to point (b. There is nothing there. What can cause such an effect? We live in a Holograph Universe. If you can find strings that form membranes that has fringe pattern in them. These membranes are just like a holographic plate. I you want to understand gravity. You have to know about these things. If you want to understand wormholes. You have to know about these things. If you want to build the ark. You have to know about these things. The ark works the same way that a pin hole box camera works. Warm. What were you saying about a box? larry









   Dear Peggy: That's the problem. they aren't posting your show. I Think it's been yanked off the internet. What on earth did you say on that show that would make them do that? Think! "Source?" What source? That's the problem. There is no known source. This is a black box project. You will find no source. I know. I have looked every where. But after you have found out how they do this. It's very long story how I found out how they did it. But after you find out how they did it. If you know the right technical terms. You find out the sources are every where. It's all over the net. NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion Program. Or NASA's BPP. For short. What lies at the hart of NASA's BPP is. "Develop the technology of wormholes and manipulate gravity." There is nothing you can find in NASA's BPP that tells you how they do it. It's all bad or miss information. It will just through you off the track. The number one source that you can go to find out how they are able to form a wormhole is found in a book written by Dr. Winston E. Kock. Called " Lasers and Holography " You can find it in any good book store. Or library. http://books.google.com/books?id=VBg3rcMkH6EC&pg=RA2-PA134&lpg=RA2-PA134&dq=lasers+and+holography+dr+winston+e+kock&source=web&ots=AS0QjkNCYp&sig=3aB7bYntM4hGgPD8gjuL-AO1VKY Dr Kock worked for NASA. He was one of NASA leading scientist. Dr. Kock knew how they were doing it. Dr. Kock blew the whistle on NASA in his book. If you take a small flat mirror with you when you go to look at it in the book store. There are pictures of UFO's hidden in the pictures in his book. They come as just one half of a UFO. If you find one. If you place the mirror on the center line of the one half. It will allow you to see how the hole UFO looks. Just like if you were looking a your self and placed another mirror at your nose. In just such a way that you can see half of your face and at the same time you can see the reflection of that half of your face in the mirror. You would be seeing only half of your face. But the two half's would make up a hole face. The pictures aren't real pictures of UFO. Dr. Kock is trying to tell you some thing. is he trying to tell you about UFO's? No. What he trying to tell you in the book is how to form a wormhole. If you can form a wormhole. You can use it to manipulate gravity. And if you can manipulate gravity you could build some thing like a UFO. Dr. Kock had to go out side the U.S. to get his book published. But in order to get it back inside of the U.S. He had to find ways to hide what he had to say. The book is full of hidden massages. If you go to the "Text Junk Box" Page on my web page. It tells you a lot more places that you can go to find out about how they did it. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com The same people that are working on the technology of wormholes in order to manipulate gravity. Are all so the same people that are working on the technology of wormholes to be used as a beam weapon system. In order to do research of how other people who have did this in the past. It's history. I had to know about the physical evidence left behind by a wormhole. How it effected objects that are made of atoms. The tattletale evidence. The same tattletale evidence that you can find where others have used a wormhole. Crop circles. Coral Castle. All over the planet. Is the same tattletale evidence that you are finding at 9/11. The one that Moses made in the bible was a weapon system. By night it formed a pillar of light in the sky. (numbers :chapter 14 :verse 14 ) http://www.ufolab.info/DNA-Lights-Main.htm And in the day it formed a pillar of blackness in the sky. http://educate-yourself.org/ct/sandiegochemtrailsdarkline29nov06.shtml http://educate-yourself.org/ct/blackbeamsover%20LA25dec06.shtml http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/moredisruptorbeamactivity26apr06.shtml http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001795.html http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/orbs.shtml The same orbs that were seen on 9/11. I see all the time out west. And so do a lot of other people. I'm not trying to build a weapon system. I'm trying to manipulate gravity. The last thing I want to do is form a weapon system. You would only wind up punching holes in every thing around you. There are two ways that you can set up your equipment. Set up your equipment in the wrong way. You will only wind up killing your sell. And every one around. If you go to the "safety first" link on my page. It tells you the difference in the two ways. They say that they are small. You can hold one in one hand. They say that these thing are so power full that you can cut a battle ship in half with one. You could even cut a skyscraper in half with one. If you read in the bible under Joshua: chapter 6 It tells how Joshua used the art that Moses built in the battle of Jericho. If you want to imagine how the walls of Jericho looked when they turned to dust. Look at the pictures of 9/11. Graham Hancock's book. " The Sign and The Seal." Is a good place to read about the ark. http://www.grahamhancock.com/library/sats/default.htm But Graham doesn't know that it was a wormhole that it formed. I do. I have some evidence from the first wormhole that I formed. This is how I know that they used on 9/11. But there are a lot of other people that know this to. There talking. The same amount of mass needed have gravity in our universe is also the same amount of mass needed to form a wormhole. Which is also the same amount of mass needed to do the damage that was done on 9/11. The only government on the planet that has this kind of technology is the U.S. Government. The weapon system is like a nuclear bomb. There are fail safes, with in fail safes, with in safes, to prevent any one from setting one off by accident. The only person on the face of the planet that has authorization to give the command to use one of these things is the president of the U.S.A. The question is not what did it. Or who did it. It's why did they do it? And why isn't some body doing some thing about it? The cat is out of the bag. It's only a matter of time. There is no hiding some thing that's this big. The next time you get on the radio. Say some thing about wormholes. Black hole found in the center of galaxies have enough mass that they can rip stars in to dust. Then rip the dust into atoms. Then rip the atoms into light. vaporize into light. I read about where you talked to a man that said he say body's that were black. There is a log at coral castle where Ed bored a hole through the center of it. It is black charcoal on the inside of the hole. This is why the man didn't want to talk to you about it. The body's where black but they hadn't been burnt. There was no fire where he found them. On the 82th flour. A wormhole can do this. It did it to 250 men. But they not only turned black. They also went on to form a white ash. In numbers chapter 16, verse: 21, 26, and 35. It tells how 250 men where "consumed" When you are cremated. You are burnt to a white ash. In Grahams book it tells how They didn't bury the men. They took their white ashes and scattered them over the desert. A wormhole doesn't burn. It oxidizes you. Which is the same thing that fire does. But with a wormhole. There is no heat. This is why the man didn't want to talk to you. He knows that some thing is not right. He just can't talk about it. Larry Mass. The instant it starts to move. There is a force. The strength of the force has the ability to very. The same it true with centrifugal force. Gravity is no different. All three forces are related in mass. All three have the ability to make the strength of the force very. All three can be tracked back to the mass of the atom. But why is it when you ask some one where the source of the force comes from? You ask them about mass. They point to the atom. You ask them about centrifugal force. They point to the atom. But when you ask them about gravity. They all ways point to the space that rest between the atoms. Why is that? Gravity is no different from all of the other forces that can be tracked back to the electron found in the atom. The forces comes about by the same means. They are all instantly. If this were not true. Mass and centrifugal force would have a lag time that would reach out all the way cross the universe. The lag. The elapse from when the object first was moved or accelerated and the time when it started to produce a force would be 13.5 billion years It's not. See my road map on my home page Please. Larry









   Dear Don: Thank you for your very long letter. Checked out your web page. It's a very good page. Nice pictures. I see that you have a discussion group too. Your right on track with the DNA. how atoms are connected together plays a very big roll in nature. A lot bigger than you have been lead to believe. You just don't know how big of a roll it plays in nature but the hole universe as well. I know that the cells can divide very quickly. This means that in order for messenger RNA to round up all the atoms to build new strains of DNA. The atoms of the elements are all mixed up. Finding any one element would be like finding a needle in a hay stack. The RNA messenger would have to know where each element is at to find it at the speed that it does. I read that in order for the RNA messenger Would have to be moving at the speed of light to build new strains of DNA as fast as it does. The same brain cells that you find in your head can also be found in your stomach. The microorganisms that live in your stomach that help you digest your food. Can influence the mind and tell you what you think you want to eat. Pigeons that have the same microorganisms in their stomach. Can find each other at long distances. This is how animals are able to find each other in the wild. They have came out with a next generation of fungicide. That is killing the microorganisms in the digestive tracks of bees. The bees have gone brain dead and can't find there ways back home. They can't find food. They know longer recognize the own kind. ( bee hive their swarming. That's when a bee hive forms a new hive.) I have been running to swarms of bees in my truck. In the middle of the interstate. They are using this new fungicide to kill off termites. They are spraying fruit trees. They are putting it on potatoes to kill off root fungus. It washes off the field and gets in to the water system. salmon can't find there way back home. It gets out into the oceans and whale and dolphin keeps beaching their self. They have lost their six sense of direction. It's not only effecting the bugs fish birds, and wild animals. It also effecting people. The mother child relationship. The bonding between mothers and their children. Mothers are killing their children here in Texas and no one know why? But that new ant killer that every one is using on those fire ant really works great It kills off the bacteria in the stomachs of the ants and they die. They say that it doesn't effect people. I'm not so sure. Here is some thing that you might want to try. When a young bird first learns to fly. After it comes out of the nest. It will follow it's mother around and begging her for food. This young bird can find his mother . Where every she runs off to hind. You can take a young pigeon, crow, cat, or dog. When it is still attached to their mother. Take it a way from it's mother. Give it some thing to kill off the microorganisms it it's stomach. Put it up in a clean place. And every day take a small piece of food. Put it in your mouth and chew on it for a while. Then feed it to the animal. What this will do is. It kills off the microorganisms in the young animals stomach. which is also the same microorganisms that it mothers has in her stomach. it want be able to find their mother any more. But when you introduce the same microorganisms that are in your stomach in to the young animals stomach. the animal thinks that you are their mother. If you go hide from them. They can find you where ever you are at. You can take them off some place and dump them. They will beat you back home. Here is a little trick that I know about. If a Mother has her baby kidnapped. You can find some one that raises pigeons. Have him give you a young strong pigeon that is still attached to it mother Clean out it's digestion track of microorganism. Now the baby kid is gone and you don't know where it is, But the mother has the same microorganisms in here stomach that the child does. if you have the mother feed food to the young pigeon out of her mouth. When the pigeon becomes attached to the mother of the child. Kill off the microorganisms in the mother of the child. When you let the young pigeon go. It will go straight to the baby. If you put a small tracking device on the young pigeon. This will give you a way o find the pigeon after you let it go. Find the pigeon. Find the baby. DNA. The gut filling,or six sense of animals. And gravity. Is there a link between these different things? Yes. What they all have in common is. "Direction and over long distances.". Are they some how related. Probably. Most people believe that there has to be some kind of signal. Not really. Gravity doesn't have a single. If each atom has direction and distance locked up in side of it's shape. If DNA has some kind of code. And it does. If it is like a key. A gene. Two genes have to be a like in order to fit together. Can they do the same thing over long distances. Whether they fit or don't match. May be the difference. If the DNA is out by one. It would give you your (X) Or (O) signal. Over a long distance. Only if part of the DNA is a like. It may be able to change the DNA of there DNA over long distances. There is a lot that we don't under stand about how atoms are connected together. I believe by better understanding the true shape of the atoms. Like those found in nature. We would start making progress again. By studying the large. We may be able to find some thing out about the small. I'm trying to get others interested in what I'm doing. With out much luck. To much. To soon. It's coming out before our times. The pictures are showing us about things in nature that are beyond our years. I have seen thing in the light that I can't find any thing out about in text books. Larry L. Burks. Peggy: I was trying to find a copy of the show that you and Jim did on 5/30/07. Can you help me? Did you look at the rust red buildings on 9/11. Judy is right about the dew used on 9/11. But there is only one beam weapon system that we have that will cause a nuclear reaction. That's the one you should be looking for. Larry









   Jim your right about the beam weapon system. Jones was right when he said that he couldn't see how a beam weapon system could produce the energy to do the damage to the Twin Towers that it did. At least the type of beam weapon system that you are looking at. The type of beam weapon system that you are looking for is a wormhole beam weapon system. Can man build such a weapon system? Sure. All you need to do to prove this. Is find some one that is all ready doing this. Get some dirt samples form him to be used in a cross sample test with the dirt or dust from the Twin Towers. The man you need to see is dead. But the places in where he used his wormhole to turn rock into dust is still there to day. He used it to cut stones with. And build what is known as "The Coral Castle." In his rock quarry. Trapped in the dirt. You will find dust that has the microscopic dust particles in it. But if you look at the rock ( coral that he cut with the wormhole that he formed } under a electron microscope. You will find that the atomic structure of the atoms on the inside of the rock are like those found in nature. But a long the surface of the rock. The part of the rock that was cut. You will find that the atomic structure is found to be in a unnatural arrangement. They have been tampered with. But if you look at the shavings of the dust in the soil. You will find the evidence that you are looking. Ed also used his wormhole to bore a hole through a log. The wormhole causes the wood to oxidize. The burning of wood is a chemical process. It call oxidation. The wood on the inside of the hole is black. It looks like he burnt a hole through. If you used a wormhole to form a hole. The wood would first turn black. then it would turn into a white ash. ( the same thing that your steel beams did.) They turned to rust. You need to look at the rust red buildings in the back ground in some of your pictures. Those are really big buildings. It would take ton upon tons of steel to rust and turn those building red. As red as Jones's face. The impressment of it all. There's your answer that you are looking for. After it rained. The dust on those buildings rusted and turned red. The dust of cement would look white. The dust of steel would look black. Before it rusted. Think about. And the same evidence can be found every place on earth in which their were building built out of stone. That have no visible signs of tool marks. Their every where. And if you want to find out how they formed a wormhole you can go to my web page and find out how to build one for your self. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com Jim. If you can't stand the heat. You need to get out of the kitchen. Or get on the stick. Either you want to prove what you are saying is true. Or you don't. This is where you have got to go. Larry L. Burks Been there. Tried that. They don't work. If you build one out of atoms. But if you build one out of particles. They work. A propulsion system based on mass. I call them open loop systems. It's what makes gravity work. It's what rest at the hart of my work. Go read about them on my web page.









   Warm: The question is. "What does concave mirror wormholes and tubes have in common?" When light or space passes through a hole. A negative lens forms. It takes the shape of a vortex. The light that is made to diffraction at a 90 degree angle to the edge of the hole. This light doesn't form a straight line. The light curves. In order for the light to be reflected back the way that it came. It has to strike the mirror at a 90 degree angle. The only shape that a mirror can take in order to do this is a concave mirror. When the light comes out the top of the hole. It forms a tube of light. The same shape that the light makes on the bottom side of the hole is also the same shape that it will make on the top side of the hole. It would be a tube of light that only goes so far. Then stops. Just like a hologram does. But it's a hologram of a tube of space. That has a the same shape as does the mirror on the bottom side of the hole. Which would be the shape of a concave mirror. Or a half sphere. What is seen in the pictures. And in the Mayan pictures. The technique is called focus imaging. Lowell Rosen did work on focus imagine under the direction of Dr.Kock. In NASA 's Space Optics laboratory. Did they have concave mirror back then? Yes. In order to make a hologram they would have to have some kind of home made film. That was space shielding. Did the have shower mold back then? Yes Did they have blood? Yes Did they have gravity? Yes Did they have sun light? May be. Larry Your probably right. The observer determines the out come of the experiment. The question should be. What is happening in nature when we chooses not to look. or what is happening in places that we ( the observers) can not see. Or better yet. What is happening in nature relative to all observer? Or other observer than us. It's multiverse universe that we live in. If we can't see all parallel universe. Can we just see one? The two atom model universe? The two atom model of gravity? I think so. Check out the two atom model of gravity on my web page www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com Larry









    If you do the right thing at the right time. In the right way. Nature takes care of the rest. So how do you do this. You do it the same way that every body else does it. But if you go look at their equipment. There is a pattern that pops out They all used a first down concave mirror. And you think to your self. What in the world could there poor people have ever done with a first down concave mirror. But if you look at the other tattletale evidence. The only thing that could have produced such evidence is a wormhole. So you put the wormhole in one hand. And the concave mirror in the other. And try and see if you can get these two shapes to fit together. What do you know? They fit together. I'm still thinking about and working on my " Build That Ark Experiment." I have most of it built and it's in my back yard. May be I should take some pictures of the ark and post them on my page. If you can see how simple and cheap this thing is to build. And if it works. The bang for the buck goes right through the roof. I was thinking the other day. Ed (The coral castle guy.} Said. " the best time to work in the day time was between 9: am and 4: pm." He didn't work in the day time. He worked at night. I think this is the time when he shot the film. And I've been wondering why? I think I've got it. I know this is the time of day that the sun is brightest. But There is another reason why. I know that polarized light will turn off the ability for a tube to form fringes. If polarizes light and turn off the fringe pattern in a tube. Then it would stop the tube from expressing it's self as a particle. But what makes holograms work. Has to do with the fringe pattern that forms in the film. If polarized light can turn off the fringe pattern in a tube. Could it all so turn off the fringe pattern in a hologram? Sure it could. When the sun comes up. Or goes down. The edge of the earth causes the light to diffracted. Which causes the sun light to become polarized. This simple means that if you shoot the film early in the morning . Or late in the afternoon. The hologram want form. The best time for shooting the film would be after it reaches a 45 degree angle in the morning. And before it reaches the point that it is at 45 degrees above the horizon in the afternoon. What do you thing? I know that sun dogs form in the afternoon. About three hours before sun down. Diffracted light is what causes sun dogs to form. This is the time of the year where you have good sun light. It's a good time to be running test. I need to get back to my work. larry You have to look at how wormholes are structure. They have a wall or membrane that has mass. But wormholes . Just like tubes are hollow on the inside. The space is black looking. If you look at the picture i have posted on my home page. http://www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/gravity1.html You are looking down the mouth of a wormhole. You can see the membrane that the mouth of the wormhole is made off. But you can see only part of it. It goes so far. Then it stops. Then this blackness starts. It's as if there is a black object that rest between you and the membrane of the mouth of the wormhole. I was just as shocked when i found out that there is no black objects that rest between me and the wall of the membrane of the mouth of the wormhole. There is nothing there at all. No tube. No particle. No mass. It's like a bubble that forms in water. There is no such thing as anti water. There is no such thing as anti space. It's like a bubble or hole. Instead of looking for some thing. May be what you should be looking for is nothing. How can nothing be real? How can you prove that this nothing is real? If you can't detect the presents of it. The space that wormholes are made. How would you ever prove that there can be a bubble form in it. By way of the fact that the black space found on the inside of a wormhole would effect the gravity of any atom that goes off into this space. If we had a real wormhole in the lab. To test. We could prove this. This is why I'm trying the back door approach. form the wormhole first. Them walk through the door back wards. Start at the other end and go in the direction that you are at now. A reverse engineering approach of nature any one? assembly A first down reflecting mirror. Is the kind of mirror they used in the lab when they are doing experiments in optics. Highly polished gold bowl would be an excellent first down concave reflecting mirror. So would fired pottery with a glass finish. Silver. Copper. Brass. Chrome. And what Ed used. Lead. The poor mans gold. I made of concave mirror out of led. It worked great. But when I found out that I could use the bottom end of a coke can. Why would any one want to make one out of lead. You cold go out and buy one. Coast about 2,000 dollars. That price is out of reach for me. Larry









   Dear Judy I know that you want to prove that they used a beam weapon system On 9/11. You state that the steel beams are turning in to dust. In a free fall? I have looked at the pictures. I can see this is what is happen. The atoms of the steel have been effected. atom as been ripped from atom. The atoms were pulled a part. The steel was weaken. They were more like a dirt clod. The steel hadn?t started to rust yet. The dust should look black. Silicon should look white. Rocks are made form silicon. After it rusts. It will look rust brown. But if you add water to the dust. If it rained. The the steel would turn into rust. You are looking for your lone lost steel beams. No body know where they went to. If the steel indeed was turned in to dust. There would be proof this that can not be hidden. If you look at figure 138 The buildings in the back ground. Are all rust brown. From head to toe. Those building where covered with the steel laced dust. If it rained. And it did. By all rights they should look rust brown. And they do. There are your missing steel beam. They don't look like steel beam now. But that's where they are. Their probably every else to. There are test that can be preformed on the rust from those building. That can be tracked back to the steel beams of the Twin Towers. If any one. But any. Tells you that the steel beams did not turn to dust as they were in their free fall. Ask to tell you how the dust from those beams got on those buildings? Then show them the picture of the beams turning into dust as the fall. The show they the pictures of the building around the Twin Towers that turn to rust brown over night. Then tell them how many tons of steel dust it would take to paint all those building rust brown. Then ask them where do they think all those tons of steel dust came from? And as they are answering you. Hold the picture of the steel beams turning to dust as they fall in their face. There is no way they can lie their way out of this. The aluminum. No dust. Why? A bean weapon system will not effect a first down mirror. Every thing that was shiny and aluminum. Was not effected. The wheels. The siding on the buildings. One more thing. They Peggy Carter- Jim Fetzer show was yanked. The people that did this on 9/11. The more you can make them blink. The harder it becomes for them to cover this up. Talk about "The wormhole beam weapon system". Every chance you get. Larry L. Burks









   Zero dimensional objects are points. One dimensional objects are lines. Very small tubes are composed of a sub structure of many yet smaller tubes. But because they are so small. to us they look like lines. The polarizing effect of diffracted light. If you walk out side and look at a Telephone wire. It looks a line a one dimension objects. If you walked over to it. And closes your eyes And you put your left hand on the wire. You can say to your self. The wire is here. Because you can feel it. Then you take your left hand back. The reach out with your right hand. And grab the wire. You know the wire is there because you can feel it. Then you take your right hand beck. Then you put both hands on the wire at the same time. And you can feel the wire in two different places at the same time. And you are thinking to your self. Boy this wire is fast. It's so fast that it is in two places at the same time. You open your eyes and find that the wire is not moving at all. But it is in two different places at the same time. Higher dimensional space. Wheeler space. A space where all nows are the same. Costic sheets of light. There every where in nature. But if you go to some place else. To where there are more than one wire on the poles. If you look very closely at the place where the two wire cross paths with your line of sight. If you where going to draw a picture of the wires where they cross path. You look at them for a while. you draw two lines on your pad. You look back up at the wires. Them back down at your pad. At your drawing. Some thing is not right. What you have drawn on the pad doses not look like what you see in the sky. You find that the wires where they cross. There is this blackness that forms. Your shocked. you start to panic. You look all around you and all the wire that cross other wires. Are all doing the same thing. I you take a lot of wires and let them cross path with a lot of other wires. There is a pattern that forms. bands forme in the wire. A fringe pattern. What causes the fringe pattern to form is the polarizing effect of diffracted light. The same thing is happening in light. You can see these so called strings in nature. But the only time you can detect one is when it expresses it self a point like objects. Then how do we know that they are real? There are many ways to test for strings. Every thing in the universe is made out of matter. All matter has mass. Mass can interact with light. And cause light to bend. If the string has mass. Then it should have the ability if make light curve. This means that if the membranes of costic sheets of light are composed if a yet smaller sub- structure. Yet smaller tubes. ( one dimensional lines. Just like a telephone wire.) There would be evidence found in light that would suggest that it is composed of strings. Oh My. God. Light has a fringe pattern in it. I got pictures. Larry The field energy of your body is smeared out half way cross the universe. Due to the fact that the tube par of the atom. The gravitational field part of the atom. Even the atoms that your brain is made of. You brain tells you where your point of reference is at. Where ever your point of reference is at. That is where you are at. Whither your body is there or not. If for some unknown event. You were able to move from the bubble part of the atoms of your brain to the tube part of your brain. And started relating to the world around you. The events around you would be a now. s But would be some time in the future. Back home in bed. That if you are able to go there. With out elapse of time. And back again the same way. I'm not saying that it can't be done. But I don't see how. When Deja Vu happens to me. Was I really here. or was I some place else. when i saw the pictures in my head. Think about it. Larry The laws of nature are so weird. You just don't know how weird they really are. If you are looking at the disk of a wormhole. If you are over close to point (A) You can see the disk over there. But if you are over close to point (B). The disk is over there at point (B). And if you are looking at the disk a point (C) which is half way between point (A) and point (B) The disk is seen to be in the middle. Where is the disk really at? If you take a some monitors and place them at points (A) (B) and (C) The disk shows up on the monitors at all three points in space. All at the same time. Adrian I think your are right. There is nothing about nature that makes sense at all. "Who so ever passes through these gates. Abandon all hope." Larry The wisdom of Dorothy. "I'd turn back. If I were you" Warm: When I was doing the bottle experiment. I was seeing shapes that they don't have words for yet. They don't even talk about this stuff in the text books. When the jet comes out of the disk. In the middle of the wormhole. If the jet is going to form a tube. There is a demple that formes in the middle of the half sphere. What is fair is fair. All things being equal. If Wheeler can have his " Bar Bells? And If Ed Witten can have his " Pair of Paints. If I saw it first. This means that I get to name it. You know what the jet looks like when you are looking at both sides at the same time. It looks just like a chicken bone. And that's what I'm going to call it. I heare by dub it. " The Chicken Bone " Oh why not. Larry









    Neil: Thank you for your letter to me. I have just read it. It will read it a gain and again. You are a good teacher. I fell that you have some thing for me. Are you teaching me or is it that I'm picking your brain. Any way you look at. We will both win at this game. If you are able to teach me some thing new. I stand by my word. You can learn some thing new every day here at GreenGlow. Out strength is in our diversity. Boy do we have diversity here. Man! This is not a bad thing. This is a good thing. Leave on stone un turned. Look every where. I also admire you work. You are a dreamer. Like me. Hold on tightly to your dreams and never let them go. Those who dare to be different dare to be great. We both know this. But we both know that those that dare to be different. Also get the stuffing beat out of you. By every body around. You have to be a very strong person. In order to carry through with your work. Carry the day. Carry the weight of the world on your shoulders. But if you chase your dreams your hole life through. And at the end of your days. And you look back at your life and see how you spent it. If you have tried to do some thing all your life. And it never happens. There is nothing left behind to show for your life. Other than you tried. It's as if you never lived at all. But on the other hand. If you have what it takes to carry the day. What a life. The stuff that dreams are made of. Go for it Neil. It's as if you never lived at all. If you look at the history of men who have tried to solve the mystery of gravity. And who have fail. You can follow the path that the mystery of gravity has taken by the body's it has left behind. In it's wake. There are dropping like flies. Their dieing of old age. History repeats it self. I would say. Don't do this Neil. It's a mistake. I had a teacher to tell me this. The told me that I was the best he had ever seen. Never in his forty years of teaching has he very had a student like me. I'm not like you Neil. You are a cheese whiz kid. You can remember every thing. I'm not a cheese whiz kid. I'm a liberal art major. Can't remember any thing. I have learning disability's. Hyper active.( climbing the walls.) eye dialectal. ( my eyes have a birth defect. I have more the one nerve ending in my eyes. It's like having six eyes all at the same time. I can't see like you do. My brain has to take the info from all of the eye nerve endings. And make sense of it all. And form a mental picture in my brain. This is why I can seed pictures in my brain. I live in the picture books story world. It's just who I am. I can see different pictures in my head Much faster than most people. I can see three or four compound, complex shapes in my head. And tell you if they will fit together or no. I can also form time lines.) Short term memory loss. ( can't remember peoples names. My own phone number. Can't spell. Can't read. Can't type. Can't do the math.) Tension deficient disorder. ( Can't think about any one think for longer than a few seconds.) I stand around and think about a K- zillion different thinks every day. It is easy for me to get off the subject. And go some where else. It may look like I'm going off track. But when I go full circle and come back to the same subject. That we started out with. You will find out that I was talking about the subject. By going some where else. You can get back to where you were at the beginning. But when you get back to where you started at. The mental picture of what you were talking about has changed. You will never think those some thought again. If you want to make good grads in school. These are the traits that you don't want. But if you want to be creative. And solve mystery. This is precisely the traits. That you want. My problem solving ability go right off the page. Out the window. And clean of the radar screen. I know who I am. I have spent my hole life walking behind cheese whiz kids. And pointed out where they made their first big mistake. Every thing goes down hill after that. To other people I look like a bolts of lighting from out of the clear blue skies. I apologizes in advance. If I go look at your work. I will find your mistake. If I tell you where you are making your mistake. I'm telling you about it in order to help you. It is not my intension to hurt your feelings. Now. I want your word that you will not get mad at me. If I try to help you in your work. OK? Keep in mind that I'm not the guy that gets things right. The first time. Every time. I'm the guy that is more likely to get wrong. The first time every time. But I can get it wrong more times that you will every be able to get it right the first time. Who wins at this game that we play. I do. Because I can get the hard stuff right. That you would never be able to get right. You are like a computer. You can recall every thing that is in that computer. But when you are faced with a problem that can not be found in the computer. In the text books. In the math. In sound reasoning. I can. I have creativity, You don't. This is why Wheeler was recruiting art major back in 1968. At U.T. How would know about all of this? I was there for a short time. Then went off to war. This is why NASA's BPP was opened up to the public. Wheeler does work for the DOD. NASA's BPP is sub branch of the DOT and the DOE. That's where they got their funding. This means that Wheeler is standing back there in the shadows. Watching. They have set things up so that info flows one way. We are talking to each other. We are talking to each other here at GreenGlow. And every body is watching. They are looking at your work. Neil. Though I would let you know. Do your best. I think that we are nothing more than vibrations of higher dimensional space Strings. You believe that we are nothing more than fluctuation of the space time continuum. Things just pop in and things just pop out. At the very small level. Bohm. A unbroken hole ness. Which would be one way of looking at it. But my way works just as well. Can we both be wrong at the same time. Sure. Can we both be right at the same time? Sure. Can it be that one of us is wrong and one of us is right. Sure. It's like Einstein said. "Ever thing is still up in the air. Larry Well. I am trying to simplify things. Isn't that what Einstein said to do. larry









   A Schwarzchild space time diagram. A positive curvature of space. Einstein picked up on the work that Schwarzchild was doing on massive stars. Some thing called the Schwarzchild radius. The math of this diagram is able to predict the event horizon of a black hole. The point of no return for a star. But the math of this diagram. goes on down to where space becomes infinitely curved. All the numbers go to zero and all information is lost. You can do math with zeros. A singularity. But what I believe is. We don't have stars big enough to collapse down and form a black hole. We do have galaxies that can form black holes. But when a star in a galaxies goes off in to the black hole. It doesn't get crushed . It gets smeared out over space and time. It stretches out. And at some point. The atoms get ripped apart and turn into light. Field energy. Transit energy. It's not the star that gets ripped apart. It's the atoms. Atoms may get ripped from atoms. But at that point they do not turn in to light. The field energy that light is composed of. It all works the same way. The atoms that go into a black hole in the center of galaxies don't get crushed. 'They turn into some thing like a string. But it's not a string. It's a tube. Light in the form of a tube. I have found that in nature . All light comes in the form of a tube. One way or the other. It is my theory that when ever light expresses it's self in the form of a tube. The tubes that nature should look, and act like the tubes that nature forms. They form positive lenses. That has a focal point. A singularity. But the points of the lenses when it forms a negative lens. A tube. the point turns into a ring. There is some thing going on at these points or rings of light. The singularity that you are thinking of and the ones that I'm talking about are probability two different things. Now. Waite a minute. Worm holes are like wormholes in nature. May be we are talking about the same thing. We are talking about nature here? May be your talking about math. How they go. And I'm talking about nature and what makes them go. Go look at my home page and see what you think. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com Larry The point I'm trying to make here is. Your collage professor lied to you. The history of the universe. The history of the earth. The history of man. Our science. Could it be that our theories of gravity could be wrong. Is there a reason why we can't understand gravity to the point that we can see how it works. And how it will perform. To the point that we can an understand it and find a way it get it do what we want it to. In a way that would be useful to man. It's really hard to see what man, is doing wrong. In regards to gravity. Because there is nothing wrong with what they are saying. What is wrong with this is. They don't go far enough. They don't tell you about the big picture. The hole truth. Every thing that is relevant has to be consider. You for get some thing or leave something out. And the gravity your working on. Doesn't work. The math don't add up. The math broken down into little pieces don't fit together. Nothing fits together. With nature and with gravity. This part of the puzzle is what I'm working on. On my home page. I have pieces of the puzzle that on body else has. You can get them here. Get your pieces here. It seems the every body here has a home page. Where they are posting their work. Some of these links. Are big. Get you pieces here. Mans gravity is broken. And we are looking for ways to fix it. Here is the mind game that we play. The way we have went about solving the mystery of gravity is. It is coming to us in little bitty pieces. A little piece here. A little piece there. We were able to get a little pieces back when. We are finding new and more pieces now. Today. It seems that we find some thing new . That we didn't know before. Every day. It just keeps raining. The clue and evidence of what gravity is like in nature. Is like a jig saw puzzle. We. Man is collecting these pieces of the puzzle of gravity. We have gotten so many of the pieces of the puzzle. there are only a few left. The remaining few are the hard one to get your hands on. We are not after what we all ready know. What we are after is. What we don't know. What we don't know . That we need to know about to get gravity to work. If we know for sure what gravity is like in nature. If some one is doing some think that is effecting gravity. We ill be able to find a way to test it. To if in dead we are effecting gravity. GreenGlow is a meeting of the minds. The grand experiment. A trade fair. We tread what pieces of the puzzle of the mystery of gravity. That each person has. For pieces of the puzzle of the mystery of gravity the others have that you don't. The game hat we play is. The man that has the most pieces of the puzzle before he drops dead in his greave. Wins. But if some body is able to get all of the pieces of the puzzle. and put then to gather and make every thing work. Also wins. But it only takes one person to win the main prise. And every body wins. And that's the way it works. That's why I'm here. And it's probably why every body else is here. At this late date and time. A sad state of affairs. We are desperate. In dire straights. We will take any thing we can get. Larry.









   This is a game of high speed chicken that we are playing. The one that blinks first louses. They just blinked. Every time they blink. They show their hand. 5/30/70 Peggy Carter- Jim Fetzer show was yanked off the net. Peggy nailed it. She struck a never. This is what they don't want you to see. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com Larry L. Burks Surely you don't believe that. The earth has had water for only 500 million years. prior to that time the earth was molten lave. It had movement. All of the elements that the earth is composed of. Got mixed up in to one big blob. There is a place in Wi. it's called the Dells. There is a quartzite of pure quarts. This rock is said to be 2 billion years old. We all know that in order for the deposit to form. There would have to be water here is leach the quarts out of the lave and form the deposit. For 500 million years erosion has been eating away at this deposit. It is not building up. It is going a way. So how did it get there? There is no way the deposit could have formed on this earth. It would have to have formed on some other fellows earth. Is this what we find many different histories of fossilized records of earth. Where did the plat's come form? Two different types of plates with two different histories. Not only of like but the layers of the plates have different histories. Oh. One more thing. NASA landed a satellite on a asteroid. Before they landed the satellite. It orbited the asteroid. It took pictures. It was composed of layers. What wrong with this. asteroid's don't have layers. But what is really weird about all of this is the fact that the layers of the asteroid matched the core sample that have been taken. Here on earth. Now you have to ask your self this question. How did part of our earth get out there is the asteroid belt. Or may be we should be asking our self's. How did part of what is the asteroid belt get over here on our earth? Not just one asteroid. But two different types of asteroid's Two different asteroid's that have two different histories. Larry Some people believe that Wheeler first coined the word "wormhole". Some believe that Bohm said it first. Some believe that Einstein said it first. The Einstein - Rosen bridge. Mush is misunderstood about wormhole. If you are getting your science from Holly wood. Your clueless. You can't travail through a wormhole. You can't travail back in time through a wormhole. Wormhole don't suck. They blow. A black hole produces a positive force. A in force. Wormholes produce a outwards force. Einstein once said that a wormhole connects two different points in space. Which is true. But he didn't say how far apart the two points in space were. Einstein said that the most likely place to find a wormhole would be between the inside and the out side of a atom. This is what got me to thinking about wormholes. A wormhole is light in the form of a tube. Tube shaped. The geometry of the field energy of light. Where every in nature it forms a tube. Wormhole are so misunderstood that the only way you can find out what a wormhole is. Is by studying the ones that form naturally in nature. I have been studying nature to find out all of the places that they form at in nature. Because wormholes start out like the shape of the geometry of two positive lens. See the link. http://casa.colorado.edu/%7Eajsh/schww.html This is a good link. They have gotten some of the parts of what wormholes are like. Then the membranes go through s series of changing their shape. The points of the two negative lenses come together. The points meet. When they do the points flatten out and forma disk in the center where the two points were. Where the two points were forms a ring. You can see it. The the disk forms a small black dot in the middle of it. Out of this black dot grows on both sides is a divergent's of light. (jet) The jet starts out as a string. That opens up and forms a tube. A tube with in a tube. AS thinks progresses. The out side tube. The two positive lenses that are jointed together. It stays the same size. The tube that formed on the inside gets bigger and bigger The inside tubes form a sphere on the end of their tube. The end results is the inside tube gets as big as the out side tube. They grow together and form one tube. That is one way it doses. The other way that I have seen them form is where the two mouths of two different come together and the two half sphere form a hole sphere. All membranes have a sub structure of yet smaller tube. A larger tubes are composed of membranes. A membranes have a sub - structure of yet smaller tubes. Small tubes would be like string alike in string theory. The tube part of the atom would be what you might call the gravitational field. Positive and negative lenses are all part of the same shape. The tube part of the atom can go all the way . Half way cross the universe and connect up with the tube part of other atoms. Non - local any body. There is nothing non local about gravity. The membrain part of the atom is here and there. Gravity is all local. It's just that the atom is local and non local All at the same time. The tube part of the atom is what makes up the gravitational field. This is what makes up part of dark matter This is what wormholes are made of that have huge amounts of mass. Like those found in the centers of galaxies. The particles of energy. the mass of those particles of energy determines how much mass the wormhole will have. There are a lot of places in nature where light expresses it self as a tube. Because gravity goes all the way cross the universe. And we are some where here in the middle. surrounded by atoms that have tube like gravitational fields. Those tubes pass right through the same space the we are resting in. The tubes are there. All you have to do to get a wormhole to form. The ones that you would meed to form in order to be used to manipulate gravity. Is find w way to get the tubes that are there to forma wormhole. A Gravitational free space negative lens. And this is what my home page is about. But it is also about ways the you can prove the tubes are real. I have up on my drawing board . Experiments that produce the physical evidence that nature can form tube in all it's different forms. Like it would have to in order for nature to perform the way that it does. Now why I was out at Quartzite Az for is. They have this Fair out there every year. Old people from all over the U. S. come there the second week of February. Snowbirds They bring their arts and crafts to sell. Most of the are rock hounds. Some of them find and collect fossils. These guy have been doing this for 60 years. A lot of scientist and geologist. I have a rock collection. They are crystal rocks that are rudimented with tourmaline. Tourmaline is a semi precious gem. What got me started collecting these special kinds of rocks. Is one day I was looking a crystal rock. Crustal rocks are clear. You can see all the way through them. I noticed that the one that I was looking at. Had what looked like to be a black hair. These kind of rocks. Know body knows how old they are. Some people say they could be as old as the universe. Some say that they could be 4 billion years old. Some say that they could be 500 million years old. 500 million years is when we first got water. And this is when we find the first evidence of life on earth. Mammals have hair. Mammals didn't form till about 150 million years ago. Mammals didn't form till after the dinosaurs. This rock was older that the dinosaur. I got to thinking. What is wrong with this rock. So I asked one of the rock hound standing near by. He told me that what was in the rock was not a hair. It was tourmaline. Crystals are composed of silicon. tourmaline has trace elements in it that are carbon basses. Well there my answer. No problem here. I got to looking at a lot of crystal rocks that were rudimented with tourmaline. I found out that tourmaline comes in different colors black, yellow, red, green. I asked a rock hound why they have different colors? He stated that are formed of different elements that have a carbon base to them. And he named them off to me. But I found this one that looked really weird. It looked like moss. I got out my eye glass. And got a better look at it. It was giant tubular allege. You could see the cell wall and you could see the nucleus of the cells. They were big. I had never seen cells that big. Then it dong on me. The same trace elements that are need to from the different colors of tourmaline. Were the same elements need to form like. But here is the problem. When ever some thing gets caught on the inside of s crystal. They call it entrapment. Like a phantom crystal. A crystal with in a crystal. Here the problem. It takes crystals thousands of years to form. Any thing made of something made of like. The life like objects would not last long enough in order for the crystal to form around the life form. It takes billions of years for the carbon based elements to form in to tourmaline. Knowing all of this. What,s a fellow going to have to say to make all of this right by the laws of the history of nature. This. Comets are life carrying snow balls. Pam Spermia It is a theory that states that life didn't start here on earth but was seeded by life carrying comets. They believe that comets have a black core composed of all the elements that are required to form life. It is mostly composed of silicon. The core is composed of tourmaline. When the comet comes in close to the sun the water being in a vacuum. Evaporates at a high rate of speed. When the water evaporates the silicon quickly turns in to crystals. Crystals form so quickly in outer space that they would have time to trap the life forms on the comets. This means that life didn't form on this planet but on some other fellow's planet. That the comets have hit. These early life forming plaints formed early life. Ran in to each other. Which blow up. And pieces of the two other planets landed here on earth. Let me remind you. It is a scientific fact that it takes at least two planets to have an accident. I mean do the little math. You will see hat I mean. Their not like wormholes that eat their self. Kind of like mouths that eat their self's? ( I did bit my self on the in side of my jaw one time.) There fore we have a planets composed of three different planets. The hot dry molten lava one. And the two other planets that have different histories. Locked into the layers of how they were form. Life and water. Don't think it's true. Can you say that and get a way with it for ever and a day. Some day soon . Man will go to a the asteroid belt looking for life. If the find the same kind of fossils that we find here on earth. It's true. I know that it's true even before we go there. I got rocks. Larry









   Geroge; That is a true statement. Well all most true. Well only half true. We do measure gravity as a unit of work. But to see what gravity is. Not what it does. We have to look a little deeper in to nature. Feynman's approach is a good starting point. Feynman looked on gravity. not only as a unit of work. But also started looking at the strength of the force. But lets go a little deeper in to nature. And look for the source of the force. Where does the source of the force start from. Lets say a rock that you are holding in your hand. As you hold the rock in your hand. ( every body can do this at home while you read this. And fill the force for your self.} As you hold the rock in your hand. Because some one told you that what you are filling is the weight of the rock. You believed it because you can fill it. If you can fill it. That makes it true. Right. Well may be. What you are filling is a force. What you are filling is static thrust. Another way of defining this force is to say. The rock is a propulsion device. Rocket are man made propulsion devices. Rocks ( the atoms that make up rocks ) are propulsion devices produced by nature. Their is no difference on what makes them work. They are both based on mass. The acceleration of mass. The fuel in the rocked is accelerated out the back. The electron of the atom as it goes around the front half of the atom has to change it course by 1800 degrees. And go back in the direction from which it came from. Like bouncing a ball off the ground. It has to slow to a stop. A complete stop. Then the energy that is collected from stopping is used to make it go back in the direction it came from. Even though the atom is very small. The mass of the electron has to be accounted for. For every reaction there is an opposed and equal reaction. The same force that makes the electron do a u- turn is realized by the atom as a hole. The atom moves in the opposed direction that the electron does . Just like the rocket moves in the opposed direction the rocket fuel does. This is no difference between the two. They both work the same way. One bid differences is that rockets run out of fuel at some point in time. Atoms are a never ending cycle. They never run down. Or out of fuel. Feynman pointed this out to us. He stated that rocks. ( atoms ) can produce a force. As a unit of work. Which is equal to so much energy. The force of a atom is equal to more ( by a mile mile mile) Than the energy of the atom it's self. Net gain over unity. Which is equal to free energy. If gravity was a force due to it's charge. The laws of nature would not allow it to happen. There is no loss or gain of the energy of the atom. But nature will allow the atom to use the mass of it's electron. Over and over and over again. If the atom is a round sphere. It can not do this. Well there is your answer right there. The shape of a atom is not round. It is a half rounded sphere. The atom is composed of two half rounded sphere. The atom is composed of many half rounded spheres. Multiverse. Finding the source of the force is just the tip of the ice burg. Of all the things that gravity is in nature. larry George: I know that you are truly interested in gravity and how it works in nature. But after you study gravity for a while. You find out the gravity does so many this the we know are imposable. for point like objects to do. Is there a mystery hidden deep in nature that allows nature to do the thing that it has to be doing in order for nature to perform like it does in nature? Sure. The rules change at the quantum level. The laws change fore the better. The laws of nature allows the information of the particle. to do what we good and well know that waves and point like objects can not do. Atoms live and die by two different sets of rules. They play by the rules of point like objects. But at the very same time. What atoms are composed of. Field energy. Field energy plays by a different set of rules. "Who so ever passes through these gates. Abandon all hope". Because the rules change. You thinking also has to change. This is where you have to go to win at this game. Larry









   Warm: Wormholes are very well understood. The only thing that most people understand about wormholes is what there getting from Hollywood. Or theory. There is not much we know about wormhole that we do have right. They do start out as two apposing positive lenses. The disk and the tube types. they go through a life cycle of changing their shape. Like the like cycle of an insect. They evolve They split and form two half's. Two different tubes shapes. The two different tubes at a later time go back two gather and form one tube. The Wheeler Feynman Y- diagrams. The tubes that form a Y. The Y-string. This is some of the ways that they are expressed in math. But in nature they don't look any thing like a "Y". They look like a negative lens. They are negative lenses. They act like negative lenses. Inverse vortexes. Light in the form of a tube. Strings are tubes. The gravitational field part of the atom is a tube. Wormholes are made of the tube part of the atoms. The dark matter. Did you see the picture? Wormholes are composed of gravity. Now if atoms are real. And they are. Knock on wood. They are real as it gets. But the same membranes that make up the spear part of the atom is also the same membrain that makes up the tube part of the atom. All the same shape. All the same membrane You can't say that the membrane of the sphere is real and the tube part of the atom is not. due to the fact that it is not two different membranes. It all the same membrane. But if the membrain of wormholes are composed of the tube part of the atom. Then wormholes are just as real as any thing else in our universe. Because people keep saying that string, gravity, and wormholes. Are not real. We are being held back. If they have mass. And they do. It causes light to bend. That's how they were able to get the picture. That I posted. I have this believe that every body that is playing around with gravity knows this. I'm shocked every time I find out that they don't. Some people believe that you have to understand all of this before you can manipulate gravity. But if you don't under stand what is happening in nature. It is hard to understand what mold spores, holograms,wormholes atoms and gravity has to do with each other. It don't matter if you don't under stand all of this. If you do the right thing at he right time. In the right way. Nature takes care of the rest. and the wormhole will form. This is the way that monkey man was able to do it. Why is it that Monkey man can do it. But the George's and Neil's of the world. Can't? I don't know. I'm just not smart enough to figure this one out. Help me here. Tell me what. What am I missing about all of this? Larry









   Dear George; The chain reaction that is linked to the particles of atoms. Is smeared out over space and time. Every thing in the universe is attracted to every other thing in the universe with force that is directly in proportion to the mass of each. This means that ever thing in the universe is connected to ever other thing in the universe. The same membrane that makes up the atom is also the same membranes that makes up the gravitational field of that atom. And the gravitational field goes out in every direction in which there are other atoms. The positive energy and mass of a atom is equal to the negative energy and mass of it's gravitational field. There are a lot of atoms in the universe. The mass of the atom rest where the atom is at. The mass of the atom can also be found in the space that rest between the atoms. Every point in space in the universe has the same mass as does every point in space in the universe. The same mass needed to form a wormhole in the center of galaxies is the same mass that is found right before your nose. These mean there is enough mass present to form a wormhole in your back yard. If wormhole are not real. Why are we taking pictures of them? Black hole and wormholes are all part of the same thing. Positive lenses and negative lenses are all part of the same thing. There two different shapes are interlocked together. They are all part of the same shape. If black holes are real. Wormhole are equally as real. A galaxies has the shape of a disked shape wormhole. There are two kinds of wormholes. The tube type and the disk type. They both form a disk in the center of them. And if you give them enough time. The disk in the center will form a jet. The tube type will forma jet. The disk jet will open up and forma tube. The tube type's jet will open up and form a tube. Why do you think I posted the link with the picture of the wormhole on it. Wormhole are gravitational free space negative lenses. They are using the gravitational;l lens as a negative to take pictures on the there side of the tube. That's why I posted the other link. The other picture. The second picture was taken through the hole part of the tube they found in a disk shaped galaxies. Oh. By the way. The picture is of dark matter. The stuff that dreams and pixy dust is made of. You go look at the pictures of the wormhole. You come back here and say. There is no such thing as a wormhole. Are you sure? Before you answer. There are other people here that also looked at the pictures of the wormholes. Saying that there is no such thing as a wormhole. Is not working any more. You loss. Nature wins. That's the way it works. Larry









   Dear Theofilos: Thank you for reading about my work on wormholes. It's not the mold that effects the field energy of gravity. It's the spores that the mold produces when it goes to seed. When it starts to die off. Spores are space shielding just like super conductive metals. Space shielding. The key word is space. Space is thew light . Just like simple sun light. That has mass. What they are talking about is the particles that have mass. That is found in sun light. Which are the radon and the electron particles. The radon particle will not pass through a spore. Nor will the electron. Nor will the photon particle. A spore will stop all the particles that sun light has in it. It is opaque to sun light. Space shielding. If you take a disk that is a superconductor. And take a x-ray of it. The disk shows up as a black dot. On the film. If you take a disk that is heavy with the spores of mold. And take a x-ray of it. It to will show up as a black dot. On the film. Just as T.B. does on your lungs. Just like it does when they take a r-ray of your lungs when checking for T.B. The effected area shows up as a black dot on the r-ray film. T.B is a fungi. It produces spores. Why I'm suggesting to use mill dew? It talks about the mill dew in the Bible. "The manna was places before the ark at all times". Manna is mildew. The other reason is that every one has access to mill dew. It's also called shower mold. You can find it in all most any home. And it's free. A very simple and cheap cross comparison experiment that you can do a home that will show you the effects of spores on space. Using the bottle experiment. Is take two bottle. One you mix some dust in the juice. Put the juice dust mixture in the bottle and let it dry. Then check it. Then take a bottle and take a swab and collect some spores from mill dew. rinse out the swab in a little juice. Put the juice spore mixture in the bottle. Let it dry. Then check it. The spores are very small. They show as very long positive lens. Looks like hair. Spores is the one and the only thing that will do this. No other element will do the same. Small dust will not do this. But spores will. Why? Spores are effecting the particles that have mass. Super conductive metals will not stop gravity. Spores will not stop gravity. So how does it work? Spores effect space. That is all that it will effect. Then the question becomes. In what way does it effect space. It is not the part of space that it stops. It's the part of space that passes by the spore. The part of space that passes by the edge of the spore. Your Fraunhofer diffraction effect. People that have studied holograms. Using simple light. Have looked at the fringe pattern in the film of holograms. With a high powered microscope. They though they would find a lot of little dots. What they found was the pattern of little fragmented lines. It looked like little pieces of string. They found out that the black and white bands that form the fringe pattern found in the film of holograms Was not caused by the constrictive and destructive interference pattern by wave. But the polarizing effect of the diffraction of hole unbroken strings. That show up in the film as a fragmented strings pattern. This fringe pattern can be seen when there are two picked fences that over lap each other. In your line of view. The boards of the fence is not fragmented. But there is these black bands that show up. As a fringe pattern. Here is the one of the keys that makes it work. If you have some thing that is opaque to space as some objects are opaque to simple light. You could use the spores to form a hologram. Then the question then becomes. A hologram of what? A negative lens. Wormholes are negative lenses. Dr. Winston E. Kock ( That's the way that Germany spell Cox)worked for NASA. In his book ( Lasers and Holography ). There are many hidden massages in it. One of the massages if. He states that you can take a glass lens. And place it before a news paper. Record it as a hologram. And it will form a virtual lens that works just as if there is a real lens there. You can use it to read the print of the news paper. But that's not what he trying to tell you. What he wants you to know is that you can take a hole in a concave mirror. See picture in his book. The light that passes through a hole acts like a negative lens. A inverse vortex. A wormhole. And you can record it as a hologram. But if all of your equipment is space shielding. First down mirrors are space shielding. And the film that you are using is also space shielding. If you record the negative lens that a hole forms. It's a real wormhole. It will be a negative lens that has mass. If you set up your equipment in the right way. It will form a wormhole that has the same amount of mass that wormhole that form in the center of galaxies. So what is it that's allows a wormhole to effect gravity. Tubes are hollow on the inside of them. You could say that wormholes are hollow on the in side of them. But that's not the way they work. You could say that it has hollow space on the in side of them. But that's not right either. It has the absence of space on the inside of them. That's why the space on the inside is black. If you look at the picture that I posted on the link to "simple theory of gravity. There is a picture there. Where you are looking down into the mouth of a negative lens. Part of the mouth of the wormhole is missing. You can see only part of the mouth. If you are looking at it from the side view. You get to see the hole membrain of the wormhole. Is what's the difference? When you are looking down the mouth. There is some of this absence of space there. that rest between you and the in side wall of the membrane of the mouth of the wormhole. The information of the membrain gets turn off. Every thing in the universe is connected to every other thing in the universe. This consecutiveness is part of what makes gravity work. If this consecutiveness gets cut off. Or turned off. Gravity fails to work. Recording the lens as a hologram holds the wormhole open. And when an objects goes down into the mouth of the worm hole. What ever objects that rest behind this abstinence of space. For it. Gravity gets turned. That's every thing in that half of the universe gets turned off. It works just like a high speed switch does in fiber optics. There is a lot of places that you can go to read about the hight speed switch of fiber optics. They are some times called gates, or switches, and wormhole. Type these three words in to your googles and see what you get. Bohm worked on this effect a lot. Here is how it works. You use spores to effect space. You use the effect that spores have on space in just the right way. And get it to form a wormhole. You use the black empty space found on the inside of wormhole to effect gravity. And turn off gravity. Yes mill dew is not good for you. But we are growing small amounts of it. If mill dew was going to kill you . You would have die the last time you took a shower. Don't breath it. Don't eat it. Wash your hand real good every time your around it. Don't touch it. And any of it that you don't use. Flush it down the stool. Don't keep it laying a round your house. Keep it in a closed container. Simple lab safety rules. They used copper and silver for a while. Cost a lot of money. And you need special equipment to do it. And you have to use liquid nitrogen to get it to work. NASA wanted to know how to do it at room temperature. And the cheapest way to do it. This is it. I have studied the history of all the people that have did it this way. There were a lot of Germans doing this back a round 1300 B.C. In W.W.II. Germany sent scientist all round the world trying to rediscover this lost German art form. They never found it. Their was a man that came to the U.S. from some where around Germany. He found out how to do it. His name was Ed. Check out the "Coral Castle" In googles. The equipment that he used to get his wormhole to form is still here today. And it's still in perfect working order. If you have his equipment. It's like having a working model. Or the blue prints. How do you thing I found out. Larry L. Burks









   Dear Rob: I and I alone. I am the person that is responsible person for bring up the subject of the beam wean system and 9/11. I and I alone. Must be the person that bears the weight of any blame. But before you pass judgment on me. I beg of you to be the horrible man that you are. A gentleman and a scholar. And Let me have my day in court. When the subject of how we should move to find was to manipulate gravity was brought up. I stated that we should do the same way that other men have done it. The same way that other men have done through out the history of man. How we are doing it today. And how we will be doing it in the future. In a way that has with stood a test of time. Whish is . Get a wormhole to form. And use the wormhole to manipulate gravity. Neil stated that he found that my statement was rather hard to believe. As if to say. "If this is true. Where is your my proof." Which is the right thing to do. Extra ordinary claims requires extra ordinary proof. This just one of the problems that plagued Marc Milli's NASA's BPP. What lies at the hart of NASA's BPP. Is develop the technology of wormholes and manipulate gravity. NASA's BPP was funded as a sub branch under the DOD, part of the government. The DOD has what they call "Black Box" projects. These Black Box projects are protected by law. NASA wants to use the all ready developed technology to go back to the moon and on to the stars. For a number of reasons. It's cheaper. It's safer. It is the only technology know to man that can get a craft up close to the speed of light. The technology of rocketry can not fore fill these requirements. Rocketry coast to much. It can't be made safe. It may get use back to the moon and on to mars. But rocketry will never be able to take us to the stars. Why doesn't NASA just take the technology for the Black box projects and use it? The law for bids it. If NASA uses it on a craft to go back to the moon. What ever NASA does is before the eyes of the public. They would have to go public with this technology. So one of the problems the NASA's BPP faces is how do they get there hands on this technology with out having to turn to the government's Black Box projects to do so. The answer is. The laws of nature are universal. What the laws of nature will allow one man to do. The laws of nature will allow any other man to do. NASA now must turn to other places other than the government. And do the ground work and build this technology from the ground up. They are looking for places that they can go that are safe. No one has to go to jail. So that NASA can build a case that they didn't get their info on how to do this from the government. As if they and they alone developed this technology from scratch. The ground up. The only places that one can turn to where info, technology, or evidence from these black box projects. That are safe to use. Is where the government has used it before the eyes of the public. Ant time that they use this technology before the eyes of the public. It has been leaked to the public. This is some thing that the government did. And not the people that saw it happen. There is ton of evidence that is lift behind every time that they use it. Not only pictures . But hard evidence left in the objects that it effects the evidence in the soil. A wormhole can not be detected by direct means. But it can be verified by the evidence left behind by the effect that a wormhole has on the elements in the soil. And there many different effects that it has on objects. Lift heavy objects.( curve space and manipulate gravity) Turn stone to dust. curve space to the point that the electro magnet force is over ridden and atoms get rip from atoms. Catalytic effect and nuclear effects. The same effects that heat has on elements when they are caused to be expanded by heat. There are two different ways in which you can set up your lab equipment. In which it will produce two different types of wormholes. One way will produce a wormhole that can be used as a weapon system. Punch holes in any thing. It is dangerous. Can not be used to manipulate gravity. The wormhole that it forms. Goes on fore ever. A very long tube. The other way. It forms a wormhole that goes out so far. And stops?? Light that stops?? This type of wormhole can be made to be safe for the use of manipulating gravity. If one want to form wormhole to be used to manipulate gravity. One would have to know about the two different ways. The people that are now, and in the past. Would have to have had the knowledge of the two different types of lab set up. In order to have done what they did. The low earth spy satellite drones. (The manipulate gravity, way.) The dust of 9/11. (The weapon system,way) I used 9/11 to point the unsafe way to do this. When I said 9/11 everybody else here went bananas. So Rob. I'm the one that you are looking for. I started it all. It is on the subject matter that we are looking for. At GreenGlow. But as You all ready know. If you are not familiar with the subject matter. It is new to every one. It is very easy to say one thing. And some other picture pops in to every body else head. And every one gets distracted. And goes off course. This letter. I hope will clarify to you and every body else here at GreenGlow. That My intension's and statements are truly horrible. They were not intended to be a slur on any man's good name or character. You have my sincere and deep apology. Larry L. Burks.









   Why is it when scientist talk about wormholes. It true. And when truck drivers say worm hole are real. It don't mean jack. The very same think that scientist are saying about the forming of a wormhole by the meeting of two black hole (two positive lenses) to form a wormhole ( negative lens). Is the very same thing that I'm saying on my web page. The only difference between me and them is the fact that they are using line drawings. ( cartoon are composed of line drawing)and math. Of how wormholes form. And on my web page. If you use the bottle experiment. You get to see in real time. In real life. The forming of a wormhole. The way they form in nature. Nature proves us both right. I got real life pictures. If one wanted to. They could get real related in time pictures. Home movies. Of how wormholes form. Some thing that man has never seen. Well some of us that is. Here's is a link. http://casa.colorado.edu/%7Eajsh/schww.html Oh My God "The light of other days" you have got to see this. http://cosmolog.org.uk/ringneb.html and a picture of dark matter. The stuff that wormholes are made of. http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2007/17/image/a/format/zoom/ What is real neat about this link is the fact that you can zoom in and move around. Kind of like your the one that has your hans on the knobs of the hubble telascope. And your having a look see. Larry









   Have you ever heard of the whistleblowers law. It's a law that states the If you know that the government is doing some thing illegal. Highly illegal. It is legal for people that are working on top secrets projects to come forward and speak out. They have been looking for a way around the laws that bar them form telling the American people. What their tax money has bought. 9/11 is illegal. So this is there big chance. and their taking it. Jerry Leaphart. Judy's lawyer. There are people that work on the technology of wormholes that are used to manipulate gravity and the technology of wormholes to be used as a beam weapon system. They are telling Jerry how they work. and what evidence to look fore in the pile of the after math of 9/11. I would take natures and the people that build there thing for the government over your's. Any day of the week. I don't know how much money you payed for your education. but if I was you. I would go ask for my 300,000 dollars back. After the dust settles. And after what you have just said. How clueless that you are. You could probably sue them in court and win. Thank about it. Me. I didn't pay any thing for my education. I flunked the third grade three times in a row. Quit school. And now. I drive a truck for a living. Probably make more money than you do a year. Now I ask you? Who is the smarter here. If you are not smart enough to figure out that your collage professor lied to you. We have just lost George. If I was you I would go read Judy's page very carefully. It's not what Judy's saying. It's what the 10,000 of the smartest people scientist on the fact of the planet. That are standing right behind her. Are saying. And Mother Nature is standing right behind the scientist. And she is mumbling some thing to thew effect of. "That goes double for me. What every she said." Mother Nature never went to school either. But She's the word's leading authority on the laws of nature. Larry lying. I thing some where I read we are suppose to be defending the constitution against foreign and domestic enemies. I don't weary about foreign enemies. If you know what aces we have hidden up our sleave. There is nothing you are any body else can tell me that would make me fear for the safety of America. Lets talk about domesticated enemies. The ones that Put their hand on a Bible and stand before the American people. And states to defend the U.S. constitution. The Law of the land. The piece of paper that gives us our freedom. And in the same breath states that he is reading my love letters. My right to privacy. Is a freedom that is protected by the U.S. Constitution Form time to time you have to remind them . Less they for get. I could flood the this web page. About all the things that are going on in America right now as I speak. And there are a lot of people here that know what I'm talking about. We know all about lying. There is lying. And Lying. And then there IS lying. But once you catch some one lying to you. And you tell them about. Their defence is. Now you have insulted me. I'm a truck driver. Go from coast to coast. Border to boarder. Being a truck driver. Is like the night has a thousand eyes. We are three million strong. We go down back alleys and in and out of back doors and day and all night, long. 24 hours a day. We never sleep. We stand around on the back row of the truck stop. And talk about things that are going on in the U.S and world. We don't get our new from the media. We get it from other truck drivers. We use to use c.b. a lot. Now we use cell phones. They can call out coast to coast. Most truck drivers are about sixty years old. And on there third career. When you make it to the top of your field. They don't want to pay you what you are worth. So the fire you. We have been every where. Done every thing. There is some thing called blacked out Media. In some parts of the country. They are only telling you half the truth. By only telling you half of the hole truth. They can lie to you. It's lie after lie after lie. And the people that are listing to the half truth. Believe them to be the hole truth. And when you tell them about the other part of the truth. They are insulted. Instead of admitting that they have been duped. They attack you, Now when some one makes a slur on your good character. With out ever having known who your are. Are with out ever going to check out what you have said. They prejudge you. They are bias. This is who they are. This is what they are like. Is there a reason why they are doing this? Sure. More often than not. It's your money that their are after. When the American people find out to what extent that they have lied to you. And just how much of your money they have stolen. Boy. Are they going to be hot. The bad thing about all of this is. It only takes a few words to make a lie. It takes a lot of words and a lot of time, to point out that it is a falsehood. The good thing about all of this is. You can spend billions of dollars to try and make a lie stick. It only takes two scents worth of truth to cause all of the lies to go puff. And vanish. I think it funny that they have spent that much money on all of their lies. And now the truth is coming bubbling to the top. They can't stop it now. Their money and lies can't help them now. Some body's going to go to jail. And in the mean time. We are going to find out just how they make those little UFO thing work. Larry You missed my post a few weeks ago. A wormhole can cause atoms to be smeared out over time and space. The same effect can be produced by heat. Heat acts like a catalyst to speed up chemical reactions. But at the same time a wormhole can smear out atoms to the point that a nuclear reaction takes place. The way the find wormhole in the center of galaxies is they look for the black body radiation. With a wormhole you can speed up the rate of separating atoms from atoms and produce hydrogen a very fast rate. And at the same time you cam get cold fusion to work using water. At room temperature. Because of the chemical and the nuclear effects found in the soil or dust. We know what type of weapon system they used. There is only one thing that can produce the kinds of hard evidence on 9/11. Wormhole. Larry









   Scale invariant. Big ones act gust like the small ones do. Big circles act like small circles do. Big triangles act just like the small triangles do. Big tubes work just like the small tubes do. If you wanted to find out what the info of a particle does when it's a small tube. You could find out what it is doing by looking at what it does in a big tube. One particle does the same thing that it does in small and large tubes. No tube. No particle. Larry









   Dear Jerry Leaphart And Dr. Judy Woods: Thank you for your responds. I was starting to think that I was lonely voce crying out in the wilderness. I have read your letter through several times to make sure what you are saying and what you are asking for. Words like "classified information" and "non-public information". I understand what these words mean. I all so understand what "public domain" and "public information". I have had to deal with the meaning of these words for the past ten years. Let me tell you about my self. I 'm a layperson. I study this technology as a hobby. The only way that you can get to where I'm today is if you are told. I didn't invent this technology. I was told about it. I do not have access to any classified information. Or non- public information. I have been going a mile out of my way in order to not come in contact with any body that would have knowledge about this technology. What information you are looking for is the information that is common knowledge, information that is before the eyes of the public, and information that is on public display. Who are the whistleblowers. And there are whistleblowers. Where has this information been leaked out to the public. Where is it being leaked even to this day? You have come to the right man. I have insider information with out ever going inside of the system. I may be the only person that is not on the payroll. Does not work for the government. That has never talked to any body in the government that knows about this technology. But I believe that I'm not the only one that is talking to you. There are others. I have company. There is a law that states that if the government is breaking the law. It's legal to come out of the shadows and tell all. It's called the whistleblowers law. It's on the books. The history. If we have such a technology. There would have to be a break through. A discovery. But there would also have to be a on going process that lead up to the break through. A history before and a history after the break through. And there is. Here are the clues. In 1947. There was a leak. The Famous run a way radar shielding experiment from the now days. Alamogordo N.M. White Sands Space Harbor. It's on the map. Has nothing to do with Roswell. It's safe to talk about it. The same people that were there in 1947. Are the same people that are there today. After WW II. radar played such a big roll in winning the war. That after the war The Uk and the USA was participating in a joint adventure to improve radar. They were also working on ways to evade radar. It's called "stealth technology". John A. Wheeler and Dennis Garbor were both a part of this group. Dennis Garbor published his papers on holograms in 1947. This means that he worked on holograms for about four years before he published his papers. In 1947 Harry S. Truman singed in to law the first home land security bill. In 1947 was when the CIA was formed to keep this technology secret. The US government blinked when they went after Robert J. Oppenheimer and David Bohm. The man that blew the whistle on this technology was Dr. Winston E. Kock when he published his book "Lasers and Holography". He had to go out side the US to Canada to get it published. In order to get it back inside the US for sell. He couldn't put some select words in the type in his book. He hid them in the pictures. There are a lot of hidden messages in the pictures. He hid pictures of UFO's in the pictures. The main thing that he is saying is. This is how we are able to get a wormhole to form. This is how it's done. He should know. He worked for NASA. This is how I found out. This book was copy righted. Published. Went out for sell to the public. Has been before the eyes of the public for longer than six months. ( first published in 1965) That 's longer than six months. It's safe to talk about what's in his book. Dr.Kock has since died. A energy form laser can't get a wormhole to form. Microwave energy can't get a wormhole to form. The only thing known to man that has enough energy in it to form a wormhole is space. Like that found in nature. But after I found out how NASA was getting there wormholes to form. It didn't take me long to find out that man had been forming wormhole for a long, long time. NASA's BPP." develop the technology of wormholes and manipulate gravity. In the 1998 February issue of Scientific America. There is a 18 page article on NASA's BPP. In the very last paragraph You can find in black and white type. " develop the technology of wormholes and manipulate gravity" It's safe to talk about it. NASA was on it's way to opening door to this technology to the public. So that NASA could use it to go back to the moon. But Bush pulled the funding to this program. He used the technology on 9/11 so that they would have to slam the door shut again on this technology in order form him to keep his dirty little secret quite. And the oil men would keep making money. The same people that are developing the technology of wormholes to manipulate gravity. Are the same people that are developing the technology of wormholes to be used as a weapon system. There are two different ways to set up your equipment in the lab. There are two different types of wormholes that you can make form by setting up your equipment differently. The way that Moses did it is like a weapon system. It was like the finger of God. You could write your name in stone. You could also use it to cut stones into blocks in order to build temples or pyramids. The other way that you can make a wormhole form is safe to be used to manipulate gravity with. The people that built the pyramids would have to have know about both ways in order to build the buildings that they did. One way to cut and shape the stone. And the other way to lift the heavy stones. 900,000 tons. But the same is true today. The low earth satellite drones that Bush keeps talking about. Five feet and up to 200 miles. The no zone. The only way that you can get a satellite to stay in orbit at five feet. Is if you have found a way to manipulate gravity. The test that the US Navy did about six years ago. The satellite staged it self at 100 miles up. That's in the no zone. Satellite can't stay in orbit at 100 miles up. And was able to shot down a missile at 100 miles. It was in the Huston Chronicle news paper. In order for them to do this. They would have to know about the two different ways of forming a wormhole. It's safe to talk about. The same hard evidence that can be found by testing the soil and checking for signs of the use of wormholes at 9/11. Are found all over the planet. The supper fine dust. The changing of the atomic structure of objects. Like the stones that they cut. Things run like hot wax. Certain Elements be come flammable. The wormhole acts like a catalyst and speeds up chemical reaction. Things will rust right before your eyes. The interaction of radon particles with certain elements in the soil. A laser nor microwave energy can cause atoms to produce a nuclear reaction. A wormhole can. There is only one thing known to man that can vaporize a diamond into light, manipulate gravity, and cause a nuclear reaction between atoms. At room temperature. And that's A wormhole. It happens every day. Black holes. Like those found in the center of galaxies. Eat hole stars every day. They talk about these things on Coast to Coast every night. I can't think of any thing that you could say. That hasn't already been said. Talking about wormholes is safe. Talking about the effects of wormholes. Is safe to talking about the evidence produced by wormholes. Talking about the laws of nature is safe. Talking about the history of man is safe. Talking about what other men have done is safe. Talking about what is said in the bible about how to form a wormhole. Is safe. NASA's BPP. Here's how it works. Here is what they do in order to make it safe. It's called " foster collaboration". How does it work. I'm on the out side of the loop. They wanted to make things so that I can talk to others. And Others can talk to me. I post my work up on the net. Before the eyes of the public. So that any body that wants to come there and read about my work. Can. It's safe. No body goes to jail. In turn. The people on the inside of the loop. Publish their papers. And those papers go before the eyes of the public. That means that any body that want's to go there and read about it. Can. I couldn't believe my eyes when I found this out. That this is the way that they are able to talk with each other. It's out in the open. Before the eyes of every one. It has all ways been out in the open. The only thing is nobody knows what it is that they are talking about. But the people that know how it is done. There are mountains and mountains of information. Tons of it. It's every where. A little piece here. A little piece there. The key to all of this knowing how all those little pieces are put together. This is what my web page is all about. There are beam weapon system. And there are beam weapon system. And there are beam weapon system. There are lasers beam weapon systems. There are microwave beam weapon system. And there are wormhole beam weapon system. Only one of there beam weapon system can match the hard evidence found at 9/11. And that's the wormhole weapon system. There are pictures of black line posted on the internet. These black lines in the sky are before the eyes of the public. It OK to talk about them. The pictures of the blackness that can be seen produced by a wormhole. Can be seen on my web page. These wormholes form naturally in nature. The defence that Oppenheimer and Bohm used in their trial. Is any thing that forms naturally in nature. Can never be a government secret because there is no way that the government can hind the laws of nature from all men. The government can't clam the right's to the laws of nature. The laws of nature belong to no man. Things that happen naturally in nature. The laws of nature it self. Is safe to talk about. If you take a picture of the black lines in the sky. Seen by all on the internet. On public display. And place it next to one of the pictures of a wormhole on my page. Like those found in nature. Safe. Then state that there is no such thing as a black laser. And that microwave energy can not form a tube. Then state that wormholes are black in nature. And why this black line in the sky is black is because it is a wormhole. The satellite drones. The orbs. There are pictures of orbs. All over the net. There are places that you can go and see these satellite drones come up off the ground. There picky about taking pictures of them. In some places. So here is how you do it. Dirty little lawyer trick. It's fair play. I know the people that did this knows what kind of weapon system they used. They are watching Judy's every move with held breath. They know that Judy is right there knocking at their door. The next time that Jim and Judy get together on national radio. If they both know what questions that are going to be asked. And they both know what the answers are to those questions. If Jim asks all the right questions. And Judy has all the right answers. Judy nails it on the head. With out any beating around the bush. It will send a strong message to the ones that did this. Judy knows. And at the same time it will send a strong message to all the others that know who did it and how they did it. That haven't come forward yet. If Judy nails it on the head. Gets it right the first time. All the time. Judy will be opening the subject up for discussion. It's what has to be done in order to plow a roll. And make it safe for others to come forward. And speak out. If they believe that others are coming forward. If Judy makes it safe for others to talk about wormholes beam weapon system. And their effects on objects. They will come. Ounce every thing is out in the open. Once the ball gets rolling. There is no stoping it. It's all over with but for the crying. The only way that the truth will every come out is if you take it to the people. Take it to the streets. The only way the truth will every come out is if it is on the lips of every person on the face of the planet. As Judy's lawyer. You need to stress the point to Judy. How serious this is. If it is true. It has deep legal implications. It is high illegal for a president to do some thing like this. The worst kind of crime that any one can commit against their country. Because there has been preliminary evidence found. The question has to be asked. And the question has to be answered. It just can't be blown off as fluff. There will be no peace in any body's hart till we have the right answer. The country has been wounded. There can be no closure till the truth is know. My phone number is 1-214-251-5977. Call if you like. I will try and help you the best that I can. Larry L.Burks









   Neil: If the info of the particle is smeared out over space and time. Not here nor there . But here and there. Not limited in space. Not limited in time. Just how small are particles. No. that's not what I meant to say. Just how big are particles. Not that's not right either. If particles are not point like objects. Then trying to see the small are the large would be imposable. But nature chooses to express her self in this way. Is it a particle that we are trying to see. What I'm trying to say is. Scale invariant. The big and the small ways it can express it's self. Seeing the geometry of field energy. The smeared out over time and space part of nature. The way things are. If you try to see the big. You can't do it. If you try to see the small. You can't do it. But if you try to look at the in between. Some times it can be done. I got pictures. Scale invariant means just that. The big works the same way that the small does. Because this is true. You can find out what the big and the small is doing by looking at the part of nature that you can see. This means that you can find out what the big and the small is doing with out ever having to going there. And if you are looking at the point like object part of nature. With out looking at the smeared out over space and time part of nature. You will never find gravity. The same mistake that others are making. Neil make it different this time. We are over due for a win. You can do this if you know where your making your mistake. Larry Neil; Atoms are not a point. They have the traits of point like objects. Atoms are 3d objects. But the stuff that atoms are composed of is field energy. It is smeared out over time and space. The dynamics of the atom is smeared out over time and space. The dynamics of what makes gravity work is also smeared out over time and space. If you are never able to get the smeared out over time and space part of nature. In the atom and gravity right. You will never be able to get gravity right. The smeared out over time and space part of the atom. And the smeared out over time and space part of gravity. Are not two different things. They are the same thing. "They are as one" I don't know who said that but I believe it to be a true statement. I haven't had time to check out your web page but I still have your like. I'll make it over there some day. And take a look. And tell you how to fix it. Larry









   Dear Allen: We have been talking about the beam weapon system that they used on 9/11. We are not interested in the weapon system. We are interested in the satellite drones that carry the weapon system. They did a test with one of these satellite drones back around 2000. It came of the desk of a ship and went up 100 miles. and staged it's self. And shot down a missile at 100 miles. The words staged it's self means that it was in orbit at 100 miles. 100 miles up is what is called the no zone. Satellite can not stay in orbit at 100 miles. There are tons of pictures of these satellite in low earth orbit. I mean real low earth orbit. Like the one in Warm's link. Five feet. Now that's a low earth orbit. We know where the picture was taken. We know who doing this. But you can't talk to them. They can't talk to you. If some body talks to one of these persons. Some body got to go to jail. How do we talk to each other in just such a way that no body doesn't have to go to jail. We get to talk to them. And they get to talk to us. We post stuff on the inter net. They publish papers. If every thing get posted be fore the eyes of the public. If it is before the eyes of the public. If we are talking through the eyes of the public. If we are talking about the laws of nature. It's safe. No body has to go to jail. Now if we are talking to them. And they are talking to us. Just how real are these low earth satellite. Just how real is manipulating gravity. Just how real are wormholes. Just how real is gravity? Some thing has got to be real about all of this. What is it. I got pictures. Want to hole one in your hand? Larry









   Warm.; I sent you a e-mail on the 16 th. It never made it. I'm making a new one. You know the picture of the UFO that you sent me. http://www.rense.com/general40/daydisc.htm I have been studying it. The man in the picture is not holding down the balloon. The man is not holding up the balloon. He is pushing it. It's one of those satellite drones that Bush has been talking about. But there is some thing else that I noticed. Who ever took this picture was not standing. Say 300 feet from it when the picture was taken. It was taken from a long. Long ways off. Now where on Gods green earth do i know about that people take pictures of UFO's from a long ways off. Area 51? No. NASA"s White Sands Space Harbor. It's on the map. Look and see. Back about 1997. Art had a man on that was from Alamogardo N.M. He was a guest. He was telling Art about his marry band of men that were setting on top of the bluff on the east side of the valley. and how they were using long ranged lenses on their camera's. and taking pictures of UFO's as they took off from the Space Harbor. The radio station got shut down for about five minuets. And when they came back on line again. The Guest was gone. And Art has never had this guest back on this show again???? There for a while when I drove down Hwy 82 off the bluffs into Alamogardo. You could see people Along the bluffs with high powers cameras. Now they have every thing blocked off. And there is no parking along the side of the high way. And if they catch you up there on the bluffs taking pictures. It's a hefty fine. They were turning them loose. And they would go up. And later they would come back home These is where they turned loose the first one back in 1947. This satellite weighs more than a car. probably cost about 1/2 billion dollars. They spend about 3 to 4 billion dollars on these things a year. A balloons don't cost 4 billion dollars each. Think about it. This is the only close up picture of one of these things that I have ever seen. Thanks for the picture. Larry









   Warm: I have been looking at orbswar. For about an hour. I've been looking at the man and the balloon on your web page. If this thing is a satellite. It probable weights more than a car. If you put a large boat in the water. One man can push it around. But if this thing is in orbit. He could be pushing it out side the building. If you look closely at the picture. He's not holding it down. He's not holding it up. He's pushing it. With out a drag line attached to the balloon. If he lets it go. How is he going to get it back. What kind of balloon is it that you can let it go. And it will come back home to you? Here is some more food for thought. I know that the government spends four billion dollars in the project a year. They have been spending about four billion dollars a year for the past fifty years. That comes to about 200 billions dollars. I'm a tax payer. That's my money that they are spending. If they have spent 200 billion dollars on a balloon. I want my money back. And I want it back right now. And if I don't get it back right now. There going to be trouble. Now let me ask you this. Do you thing it's a balloon are a low earth satellite. Larry









   You know I've been thinking From time to time you have to remind them less they for get. They say that the universe is 13.5 billion years old. This means that the galaxies that we are looking at in deep field space. The light took 13.5 billion years of the light from those galaxies to reach us. Right. But if this is where they were 13.5 billion years ago. How long did it take for the to start out as a point. And travail to where we see them to day. 13.5 billion years? Right? But if this is so. This means that it would take them 13.5 billion years to get to where they were 13.5 billion years ago. Plus 13.5 billion years for the light to reach us. Right? This means that where they are to day is no where they were 13.5 billion years ago. This means that they have move by 13.5 billion years. Right? 13.5 + 13.5 + 13.5 = what. I'm not every good with math. You tell me. What I mean is. Go do the little math. Go figure? Larry Warm: You know. I've been thinking. You say that they talked to you through your brain. I would be willing to bet that they hid other info in your brain. That is there that you don't even know about. There is a way to pick your own brain. It's dangerous though. They say that Einstein did his best thinking in the morning when he was shaven. This is when I do all my thinking also. I don't shave. Morning coffee and smoke. I take about two hours off to my self and think about stuff. They say that things all ways look brighter in the morning. If you were there. And they talked to you. There is more there in your brain than you think. Here is what you do. Eat early in the day. Put a large glass of water besides your bed before you go to sleep. Also write a note to your self on what you should think about when you wake up. When you go to sleep. Don't do any thinking. In the morning. The first thing you do is drink the water. Your energy levels are at it peak. If you go some place to where it quite so that you want be distracted. And then think about the day you went into the craft. Let every thing go through your mind as if you where back on that day. Do it over and over and over again. If there is any thing there to be found. Over time. It will come out. It's a slow process but it works. It may take years. If some thing new comes out. Write it down. On a note to your self. And this is the note that you put beside your bed at night before you go to sleep. Once you get the ball rolling. It will grow. If there is some thing hidden in the back of your mind. It will come out in the end. It will come out like a bolt of lighting from out of the clear blue sky. The brain is very powerful. It can do stuff in your subconsciousness that you can't make it do when your a wake. This is how you access it. There is one more thing that you can do to kick this process in to high gear. It's called "panic attack. Or a self induced panic disorder. Whenever a animal get cornered. The first thing he does is look around to see if he can find the way out. When he can't find it. Some thing deep in side of him snaps. The fight or flight thing takes over. If he chooses fight. He will come out fight against all odd. But if he chooses flight. His body chemistry goes through the roof. And he will think of ways of how to escape. That he would have never have thought of other wise. What ever it is that set you off. Think of that till you have smoke coming out of your ears. Turn your attention a way from that and start thinking about the problem that you are trying to solve. Different ideals will start popping in to your head like bolts of lighting from out of the clear blue shy. In the morning your energy levels are at their highest. If you use the panic attack thing. It get's moved up about three notches. But if there is a noise in the back ground. Like a pulsating white noise. It will put you into a sleep state. You can access your most inter self. Thoughts and info that only your mind knows about. And you don't. It will come out over time. This is a powerful technique. But there is a danger. Ounce things start to come out. Ounce you start this. You can't stop it. Your brain becomes so powerful. That you hole body will be shacking like a leaf on a tree. It's like taking drugs. It takes a lot to get it started. And it takes a lot to stop it. Larry probably Dear Adrian: I know that I come off looking like a nut. But when you used a different approach to solving the mystery of gravity. That no one else is using. Direct observations of nature. Nature is cold hearted. There is no room for error. She is quick to point out your mistake. You can't fake it. Either you are right or you are wrong. Playing around with geometrical shapes is like doing math. It called geometry. But when you are copying your shapes directly from nature. Nature is never wrong. Your right first time. Every time. I was telling Jack about the geometry. He said I was crazy. I asked Jack. What are you going to when you find out you are wrong. Tell Mother Nature she crazy too. He blew up. And I was history. It's funny to me. I wasn't trying to be mean to Jack. I was trying to get him to see his mistake. I was trying to help him. If we could get Jack to see thing like they are in nature. Jack would go places. And this is why we need Jack. When you are pit your self against the laws of nature. She is unforgiving. It's her way or the high way. I think she was a truck driver in a previous life. I under stand these thing. Did I ever tell you that I'm a truck driver. I can understand this type of thing When you are stealing your geometry from Mother nature. It has nothing to do with being smart. It has every thing to do with being right. If mother nature told Jack he was some how wrong. Jack would kick her too. Here the hard part to seeing what Jack is doing wrong. Jack is doing nothing wrong. What he is doing is right. If this is true. Then how can he be wrong? The only thing is. What he is doing is not gravity. There is more to gravity than the interaction. I wanted Jack to move on to bigger and better thing. To expand on this knowledge. To go on beyond what he's is doing. To go look at the part of nature that you have to go to in order to find gravity. Jack believes that he is right because he is right. How can you be 100% right. And still be wrong. He's looking in the right place. He's not looking in all the right places. He told me that when you record the particle. The end results is all that counts. That is not true. The end results is only 1% of the history of the particle. He want to do science using only 1% of the facts. He wants to use 1% of what nature is doing. and build 100% science. Well the The 1% of nature works great up to a point. Up to the point where you are working on some thing that uses 100% of nature. Jack wants to use part truths. Or half truths. The half truths that Jack has is not a wrong half truth. It is a right half truth. If this is true. Then why doesn't gravity work? In order to get gravity to work right you have to have both half truths. Jack doesn't want to go to where you have to go to find the other half truth. The big picture. The history. The way by which it goes. The geometry. The dynamics within the system. He doesn't want to look at the life cycle of the particle. The closed loop system. The geometry of the closed loop system. How the dynamics of the closed loop system performs as a open loop system. The parallel universes. The list goes on and on. Put if jack will not move on. Jack is stuck right where he is at now. He will never be allowed to progress past that point. It's a shame to see a good man like Jack. Wast his hole like. I sorry to see some thing like this happen to jack. And there is nothing that I can do to stop it. We have lost Jack. Larry









   Absolute time and Absolute motion are one and the same. They are both equal to zero. Time and space are interchangeable. A standing wave does not move. But at the same time. It is in two different places at the same time. Nothing can move faster than some thing that is all ready there. Some thing that is in two places at the same time. Is not related in time. Instantaneously. or Simultaneously. Events that happen simultaneously. Is a K-zillion times faster than the speed of light. When times goes to zero. Space becomes infant and all nows are the same. What happens in the past effects what happens in the future. Your now. Your now. What you do now. Will effect the past. The past, the now, and the future are all one and the same. What in the world have these poor people ever seen that would make them thing such thoughts? Standing waves. What are standing waves? Costic sheets of light. What are costic sheets of light? They are composed of the geometry of field energy. Like that found in nature. I got pictures. This is the path that info goes by. The Info that comes out of the field energy is relative. The observer determines the out come of the experiment. The observer effects the out come of the experiment. In order to get time and space to work the way it does in nature. You would have to cook the books. And this is how nature does it. The speed of light is constant to the observers. The speed of light is a constant to all observer. The only way this could be true. Is if the speed of light is different. to all observer. Only if the time has the ability to be different can it all be the same. In order for nature to be able to do this. It would have to have a nature ability. to very. Both to the furthest extremes ends of time and distances of space. Which are equal to zeros. Or infinity's Larry I didn't give up on Jack. He gave up on Me. I still haven't gave up on Jack. We all need Jack. In order for me to win at this game. I have to win the hart and mind of Jack. I have to get Jack to see things as they are in nature. I can see his mistake. But he can't. Gravity is different. Gravity is way different. Jack is stuck in a rut. What we should be doing is trying to help Jack. He is good with the interaction of particles. You can't have gravity with out an inter action of particles. It's through this interaction of particles that in the end we will produce the proof for a new theory of gravity. If we can't get Jack to see things as they are. He's going to miss the boat. He will miss the history books. I can win Jack over to my way of thinking. Nature will win Jack over. When things start popping. And sooner or later they will. Jack will move. But if not Jack. Then who. Kaku? Witten? Some body else? I'm a truck driver. It don't count when truck driver do it. It only counts when some like Jack does it. Larry









   Warm: My name is Larry. I've been Larry all my life. And that's the truth. Never been able to think quite right some how all my life. And I can prove it. Time? What Time? What time would that be? Your talking about how clocks slow down. When accelerated. Or when in a state of acceleration. There are two forces that can be tracked back to the acceleration of atoms Mass and centrifugal force. An object that is made of atoms can be accelerated and be producing centrifugal force . All at the same time. Which clock are you going to use? Both of the forces can be tracked back to curvatures of space. Go figure. Now a atom can produce only one force due to mass at a time. It is point like. it can produce a force due to mass in one direction. A atom can produce centrifugal force in one direction at a time. Again I say atoms are point like. But that only the tip of the iceberg. That's not the problem. There is a third force that can be tracked back to the mass of the atom. Gravity. When a object is composed of atoms is close to say. The earth. Because the earth has mass. Space becomes curved. And the rate (time) at which atoms beat. Is just so.so. But if you put a object in space half way between the moon and the earth. The moon has mass. It too has a gravitational field. The people here on the earth would see the atom's clock running at one rate. And the people on the moon would see the clocks of the atom running at a different rate. What time is it. Atoms are point like. But that not the problem. Look at how many stare and planes there are in the universe. From each reference point the same atom's clock would run at a different rate. How can this be? There is just one atom here. Warm I now ask you." What time is it now." My clock says 5:42 cst. Multiverse. Multiverse. Multiverse. Go figure. The math don't add up. What were you saying about "This way or that way". That's not the way it works. Only if the math doesn't add up. Does it work. Like it does in nature. For all these years we have been trying to get the math to add up. And all we have found out is that it doesn't add up. It not supposed to add up. Only if the math doesn't add up. Do objects fall at the same rate. But there is a to work the math that doesn't add up. And make objects that have different mass's fall at the same rate. It's on my web page. And that is my web page. And I've been Larry all my life. And Warm. If you go and read my web page. It will poison your brain. You will never be able to think quite right again. Some how. But objects that have different mass. Will fall at the same rate. You can test it for your self. And see if I'm right or not. At home. One more thing. There are suppose to be zero's. That is the answer to the mathematical proof. I have just found the answer to Einstein's G.U.T. It zero. You add up all the math. And it adds up to zero. This is what it's suppose to do. Not one more. Not one less. If it doesn't add up to zero. It's not gravity. It's true. Check out my web page. The trick. is know what adds up to zero. When you find out what is adding up to zero. Then every is OK. When you see what in nature is adding up to zero. It's nice to know your not crazy after all these years. Try it. You'll like it. Larry all my life. And I'm still Larry. Warm: Is that your web page? Is that you in the picture? I read your post three times. I pick peoples brains. May be I can pick your's. What makes you thing that. What was insides the glass tubes, was mercury? The tube. You said that it had no air bubbles in it? I know that if you filled a round tube up with mercury. Mercury is shiny. You wouldn't be able to tell if it was moving or not. But if it was in a glass tube. Really all that you know is the what every was in the tubes was shiny. Right? Mercury is mirror like. But if the inside of the tube was mirror coated. Mirror are space shielding. Tubes are a shape that is found in nature. Their optical equipment. Space shielding optical equipment. Fiber optics are tubes. The inside of the fiber optics is smooth. It is mirror like. This is what makes them work. A tube that is round in shape. A doughnut. Is also a space shielding equipment. Fiber optics will work even if you put a bend in them. Light will travail for every down fiber optics. They say that a fiber optics tube is like a wormhole. What ever info that goes down one end of a fiber optic comes out the other end. instantly. The light will out run a transmitted radio wave. But if you made a fiber optic in the form of a tube. It would be like a wormhole that goes on for ever. The only thing is. After you form the tube. There is no way of getting any light to go into the tube. But think of this. There is something in optical equipment called a slitter. You can make the info that is in light go in two deferent direction at the same time. Kind of like parallel universes. But there is some thing called a two way mirror. Light will go in one direction through the mirror. But will not go through the mirror in the other direction. This means that if the glass tube was coated with a two way mirror. On the inside. What ever info went in to the doughnut . Stays in the doughnut. You say the coils were next to the tubes. I know that you can take a coil magnet and make light change its direction. Make a 90 degree turn. This means that light going into the tube at a right angle. If the light hits the edge of the tube square. It will enter the tube. But once it is on the inside of the tube. It makes a right angle turn and then starts going down the tube. Round and round. Faster than the speed of light. Tunneling. Light all ways expressed it self as a tube. If by some way is effecting the space that rest between objects. The gravitational field. If you could get the mass of the gravitational fields of the universe to form a wormhole in the never ending tube. The wormhole ring may form a larger worm hole out side the craft. The disk shaped craft. Acts like a concave mirror. There is a ring of light that the negative forms on the mirror when the optics are right in the ark. If the mirror ring is inter action with the concave shape of the craft. It would make a wormhole form bellow the hole craft. Which in turn would make the atoms in the craft . Produce a force and fly. Larry L. Burks









   I know what you are talking about. Tooth fairy's. Well it turns out that the Tooth fairy's are real. Light has the ability to express it's self as a tube. David Bohm. Nature proves him right. Dr. kaku. Nature proves him right. History. Man's ability to form wormholes here on earth as with stood a test of time. What works for one man will work for any other man. I checked out the history. I'm a hands on guy. NASA doesn't need me to tell them how to form a wormhole. That they know. What they are looking for. Goes much deeper. What are they. And what makes them worm. The laws of nature. Not man's laws of nature. Man's laws of nature don't work when it comes to gravity, wormholes, and how objects interact with wormholes. Manipulate gravity. They also want to know what is the cheapest way to this. And this is what my webpage is about. Larry L. Burks









    The point that Warm is trying to make is. If you try to fake it. In a move or a picture. You will get caught. You can't fake it. No one can. Can't be done. I'm a liberal art's major. Fantastic realism. As far as art goes. It's top of the line. Study art for eight years. Draw what you see. Not what you think you see. Draw pictures so real like they float. in space like 3d pictures. I was in the printing business for twenty years. I have a journeyman's printer's card. I was a head pressman for ten years. The FBI has a folder on me. Why? I'm good enough that I can print money that would better than what the U. S. mint prints. Why don't I just go out a print a lot of money? I know the same things that the FBI knows. You can't fake it. They say that there are seven different things in prospective that gives us our sense of time and space. There are real about twenty. It doesn't matter if you are drawing a picture. Dubbing some thing into a picture. Or move. There are ways to test that you can do that will have tattletale evidence that state. It's a fake. With out even running any test. There are things that are there that can be seen with the eye. That state . This is not real. The clothing fastener buttons. The plastic pie plate. The writing. The shape. It doesn't have symmetry. It's unstable. Oh. There is this other thing. Marc Millis makes models. I make models also. Been making models sense 1954. The models that Marc makes are plastic, and don't fly. The ones that I make. Do. I make mine from scratch. Home made. I know a model when I see one. I have made one of every thing. From 1976 to 1991 I worked on ornithopters. 500 different designs. The only model that I haven't made yet is a real UFO. One that flies the same way that the big dogs do. The real UFOs. This is what I'm working on right now. Started working on UFO's back in 1991. In 1993. I started reading about Dr. Kaku. His first block buster came out in 1994. There were a lot of good books that came out around 1994. Give or take ten years. Read about fifty books on gravity. Back in 1995. I started reading about Jack. How many of you here know that Marc's NASA's BPP. Jack and Kaku. Were on the pay roll. I've been sending letters and e-mails to Kaku sense 1994. Now I find out that Wheeler and Witten is working under the same roof. There is something going on there. How many of you know Nick Hubert? He helped me a lot. It was Nick that told me to go study costic sheets of light. Nick's got a real neat web page. A lot of good stuff on it. A lot of links. Dr. Austin Glesson Of U.T. helped me a lot. He's a Feynman buff. So did some other people that work for NASA. Neil There is not much on my web page that I didn't get from some where else. You take and copy down text from other scientist and send it back to them. They tell me I'm crazy. Go figure. Most people believe that it is man against man. It's man against nature. And as we all know. Nature all ways win in the end. I'm a hands on guy my self. And I've did stuff all my life. I've did a lot of stuff. Larry









   Warm; When i said "black dot" may be what I should have said was "silver orb" Like the one I saw. Looking east from Moriarty N.M. Back in 1998. It was a silver orb. It did not move for about ten minuets. Then it took off like blue blazes. I mean fast. I have never seen any thing move that fast. It left a wake. Like a boat in water. It was gone for about two minuets. Then it was back again. If a UFO. The hole craft. Goes down into the mouth of a worm hole. The space that rest between objects gets turned off. The same space that gives atoms it's gravitational field. Is also the same space that is able to give a atoms it's ability to produce mass. The resistance from accelerating. So when the craft goes down into the moth of the wormhole. It not only accelerating. But when it accelerates. It produces no resistance from accelerating. It's like a bolt of lighting. I mean fast. Real fast. If you accelerated an object at the rate that this thing does. It would get mashed flat like a pancake. It would kill any man that tries to accelerate that fast. The G forces would go off the chart. The orbs are the big dogs. Their bad to the bone. This is why NASA wants to use them. The only thing that can get man up to the speed of light. May be? A lot of may be's there. Even at the speed of light it would take eight years to make a round trip to the nearest star. Man starts to die after about a year in space. So if we can't use it to go to the stars with. (NASA's BPP) May we can use it to produce free energy with. We could use a little free energy about now. My energy bill is going through the roof about now. I was thinking that may be he has got a real picture of a real UFO and didn't know it. It happens a lot. What do they look like? Well like this http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/orbs.shtml But if you want to see a lot of pictures of real UFO's go here. http://www.ufolab.info/DNA-Lights-Main.htm There must be at least 300 pictures. Look at them all. I did. The ones that don't move and the ones that do. Pssss. Pssss. These people have a phone. If you call them they will talk to you. And if you like you can drive down there like I did. And you can see it for your self. Or take your on pictures. Hint Hint. Mile marker 111, due south of I-10 in N.M. You can see it all. For free. Stop wasting all your film on those little baby's. Go out and get you a full grown one. Let me give you some tips on how to get a picture of UFO's Location. location. location. If you go fishing in a lake that doesn't have any fish. Your not going to catch any fish. BUT if you go to a lake that gas fish in it. But it has fish in some places and not others. If you go to the places where the fish are not. You not going to catch any fish. But fish don't eat all day long. Only at a specific time. If you go fishing at the wrong time in the right place. Your not going to catch any fish. If it's the right place and the right time. But your doing the wrong thing. Still no fish. There is this human element. The people that work on these thing get payed a lot of money. They don't work on holidays. Week ends. They work a little bit during the day. But mostly at night. A night your not going to see much. Some times at sun down and at sun rise. You might see some thing. The place I go is mile marker 111 and mile marker 68 and look south of the interstate on I-10 in N.M. Deming N.M. Is a UFO hot spot. It quickly becoming the number one tourist attraction t=on the face of the planet. Because it's the only place on the planet that you can go and see UFO's on a daily bases. I've seen the black triangle UFO two times now. This thing is a hybrid. It 's a airplane. It has a gravitational propulsion system on it. No sound. It's a drone. It can't do the same thing that the orb can. The orb is a satellite. It's also a drone. It's in orbit. Low earth orbit. Five feet off the grown and up. If it is in orbit at 50,000 feet. Right after the sun goes down. And before the stars come out. You can find it in the sky. Because the sun is still shining on it. It looks like a first star. But it's not. The stars haven't come out yet. On some nights when the is a over cast of clouds. 30,000 feet. All the stars are blocked out by the clouds. Except this one star. And your thinking to your self. The clouds are at 30,00 feet. This means that this star is below 30,000 feet. Why is that. The answer is simple. It's not a star. If you get your try-pod and telescope out and get a fix on it. Lock it in. Waite till day light. Then look at it. You may find some thing. But also down at Deming NM. You can see the U.S.Navy's WW II dirigible it to is a drone. Why would it need a drag line if it's a drone????? http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/10303.jpg You can see this at Mile marker 68 south of I-10. in N.M. You could say that it's a UFO because it has a gravitational propulsion system on it. They say that the same system that this balloon has on it. Is the same system there going to but on our cars and trucks and free our self from oil. Here is some more tips. To find meteors. They have a system called a motion detector. They take a picture of the night sky. Waite about five minuets. Then take a another picture. They have a computer program that will check the second picture with the first picture. If any star has moved. It will pick it out. If you have a camera that is tracking the stars. It moves at the same speed as the earth turns. If you have a geostationary satellite. the stars will look like points and the satellite will be a streak. What some people do is they go to where they will find UFO's Set up there cam recorders on a try pod. And point it straight up. They will focus the lens to where it comes up on line with a cloud at about 30,000 feet. If it is focused at to far. You want see a thing. If it is focused to close. You want see any thing. Turn it. And let it run for as long as it will. Then look at it frame by frame. Some times they will get a picture. Some times they point it in one direction and zoom it in and out real slow. If there is some thing there it will show up. You can be looking right at one of these thing and never see a thing. Their up there so high and their so small. You can't see them. You have to learn this little trick. I use to fly R.C, airplanes a lot. I liked to take the plane up high. trim it out so that it would fly in a large circle. I found out that if you do this. It's more like flying a kite. You can lay your radio down. set down and lean back and relax. . and just watch it fly it's self around. I had this one plane that would stay up for about 45 minuets. But while I was watching the plane. I would see some thing move in the back ground. A bird or plane. Because your eyes are focused at a long way off. You can see other stuff that's up there. That you would never see if you just looked up in to open blue sky. Because your eyes aren't in focused. If you get your eyes focused just right you can see stuff way on up high. The same is true if you use a good set of binoculars. If you are just looking up into the blue sky. Your not going to see jack. But if you focus your binocular on a cloud , high flying airplane. Bird. And watch it. Your not looking at clouds airplane and such. What you are looking for is some thing that moves in the back ground or fore ground. Well if you are use binoculars to view the open sky. You don't have time to put down the binocular sand pick up the camera and get off a snap shot. But you do get to see the UFO's Last year I saw a drone. At mile marker 68 On I-10 in N.M. It was small. It was delta shaped. Had a little bit of a noise out front. I haven't seen a picture of it any where. It was a creamy brown in color. And the body part of it was a little darker brown. It was fast. And it didn't make any noise. That means that they are putting this gravitational propulsion system on the drones. This means that they can fly all the way around the earth. And come back home with out every fueling up. They can put one of these drones up. And keep it up for months at a time. 24 hours a day. Larry L. Burks









   Judy Judy Judy; Your killing me. I'm about to die from anxiety. The evidence that you need to blow these S.O.B. out of the water is right before your eyes. You don't know what to look fore. I do. The type of weapon system they used on the Twin Towers 0n 9/11. Is a wormhole. It's the only thing that happens naturally in nature that can make a star. First turn into star dust. Then evaporate into light. Where does it get it's energy from? When they talk about he energy of a wormhole. They don't speak in terms of energy. They use the word "Mass". Or missing mass. Or strange dark mater. The positive energy of a star is equal to the negative energy of it's gravitational field. The positive energy of the stars in a galaxy is equal to the negative energy of it black hole. ( it's wormhole.) But this is not right. We have found out that the negative energy of the stars of a galaxy does not have enough mass to form a wormhole. There is missing mass. Missing mass? Where does it come from? The positive energy of the universe is equal to the negative energy of it's gravitational field. Still not enough mass to form a wormhole? When a super nova explodes. Only 10% of the energy that comes out of the explosion forms atoms. The rest (90%) becomes light. Still not enough mass to form a wormhole. Stars produce sun light for billions of years before they die. The mass from the sun light forms the space that rest between objects. still not enough mass to form a wormhole. When the universe first formed. Only 10% formed mater. The other 90% of the energy formed light. Or space. So. You take the light from the big bang. Plus all the light from all of the stars sun light that it produced in it's life time. Plus the light from super novas. Plus the negative energy of the gravitational field of the hole universe. Then and only then does the space that rest between object have enough energy or mass to form a worm hole. But every square inch of space that space is composed of has the same amount of mass as does every other square inch of space. In the hole universe. This means that the some space that forms a wormhole in the center of galaxies has the same amount of mass as the space does that rest before your face here on earth. We have with in our reach the type of space a with the right amount of mass needed to form a wormhole here on earth. The type of wormhole needed to produce the tattletale evidence on 9/11. The ripping of atoms from atoms. Whish has a long list of hard physical evidence. Dust, and chemical reactions. But when atoms their self get ripped apart. This is a nuclear reaction. It produces a large spike of radiation particles. Which would show up on our satellite. But no radioactive wast. A friendly nuke. Then there would be hard chemical evidence interacting with compound elements found in he soil. But there is this other evidence that would be produce that would not show fore a lone time. Cancer. birth defects, and sterilization in the third generation of the people exposed to the radiations on 9/11. Which would not show up till 60 years later. But the trick is? How to we get a wormhole to form? Wormholes don't form here , on earth, naturally in nature. There is this human element in play here. Man? So if they used a weapon system like the one that I'm talking about. There would be hard evidence that you could test for in the lab. But there would be evidence that would show up in he photograph. he technique that they use is a holographic technique. A hologram polarize the space. The part of space that has mass. But light is also part of space. When every you polarize space. At the same time you polarize light. When I say right before your face. There is a picture on your web page. A picture That was taken as the buildings were falling. On your link with Greg Jenkins. Close to the very end. It's not numbered. There is a building to the right of the Twin Tower falling. It is made of glass. It is white with black stripes. There bands are called "a fringe patterns". When ever you use polarize light. They show up a lot. If the mirrored windows are tended with a polarized screen to keep out ultraviolet light. If the sun light gets polarized. These fringes will show up. It is very unnatural for sun light to become polarized. There is a human element. When you use this type of weapon. All light gets polarized. I see them testing this weapon system a lot out west. Many others have seen them too. But they don't know what they are. I do. http://educate-yourself.org/ct/sandiegochemtrailsdarkline29nov06.shtml http://educate-yourself.org/ct/blackbeamsover%20LA25dec06.shtml http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/moredisruptorbeamactivity26apr06.shtml http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001795.html I know if you are up close. You want see these black beams. Oh. By he way. There is no such thing as a black bean. There is no such thing as a black laser. Microwave energy can not form a black bean. Wormholes are black. But when I'm driving . I ware sun glasses. They stand out better with my sun glasses on. If you have some pictures of the Twin Towers when they are falling. If you use a polarized screen on them. The black beam may pop out of them. If you had a picture of one of these black beams on he Twin Towers as they were falling. You could bring them o their knees. They can't lie their way out of this one. So, the next time some one brings up the energy problem. It may not be energy that we are looking for. I might be mass. Then tell them how black holes can eat hole stars at one time. Now if a wormhole can eat a hole star. Could it not also eat rocks and metal. he same way. Sure. And ask them how is it that solid rocks can turn into dust. In a free fall. Then show them the pictures of free falling rocks turning into dust as they fall. Show then the evidence of polarized light. Show them the pictures of the black beams. Then ask them to tell you all they know about the black laser. And when they tell you. There is no such thing as a black laser. Tell them that they are right. There are no black lasers. There thing found in nature called wormholes. Larry L. Burks Judy: There is one more ideal that I got. I know that there are others like me that know what happened on 9/11. From day one. That would be more than willing to help you. What you need to do is put a " 9/11 D.E.W. whistleblower hot line asking for help". A link. What I'm asking for you to do is. Try your luck. Go fishing. I know that they are out there. All you have to do is bring them in from the cold. You build it. They will come. Larry L. Burks. the reason we are tracking this is because the same people that are working on the technology to form wormholes to manipulate gravity . Are the same people that are working on the technology to form wormholes to be used as w weapon system. Their all the same people. Look at how many different people they were able to find on the net. http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/DEW_Contractors.html If th truth about the beam weapon system comes out about 9/11 and it is. In the end. The other part of this technology will come out with it. It's a packaged deal. It all the same stuff. Here is why the truth is going to come out. There were a lot of police offers that got killed on 9/11. There still dieing today. There not all through dieing yet. Do you know what they call a person the Kills a police officer? " a Cop Killer. " Do You know what happens to cop killers. There is no place on God's green earth that the people that did this can hide that they will not be able to find them. They want them caught. And brought before the courts. They don't care who did it. Some body's going to jail. The right person is going to jail this time. And it not only the police officers in NYC. It's police offices all the way cross the country. The FBI, CIA, ATF, DEA US Marshals. The hole nine yards. The officers of all the courts in all of the land. Their are a lot of good men left in America. Their tracking Judy Wood's web page too. And Boy are they Hot. Larry









   Dear Warm: I keep asking my self why is you device only producing a weak effect instead of a much stronger effect. I know that if you are only using electrical coils and circuitry. You would only be effecting the electron particle of space. But if you start using superconducting circuitry and coils. It should give you a much stronger effect. But it doesn't. The reason why a hologram can get such a strong effect. Can be found in Dr. Kcok's book. When he used a resonator with a hole in the middle of it. And recorded the geometry of the field energy of a negative lens. With simple light. If you take a flat washer. And look through the hole in the middle. When you hold the washer at arms length. You can see objects on the other side. Information is still making it through the hole. And if you move it up close to your face. The same thing happens. You can look through the hole and you can still see objects on the other side. But with Dr. Kock hologram. At arms length. Every thing is working like the hole should work. But when you move it up close to your face. There is a blind spot that forms in the hole. The hole turns black. Go see the two different pictures in his book. Close and fare. No information held in the simple light is making it through the hole. It works like a high speed switch in fiber optics. The little light gets turned off. What do you know. But when you switch the hologram over in to a space shielding hologram. The same thing happens. But this time it not only effects the photon part of the light. It also effects the radon and electron particles part of light. Which is space. The mass part of space. Which in turn. Turns of the gravitational field. A black empty space. No information can pass this way. There is a simple and cheap. (dirt cheap. El Cheap-O) To see this black space for your self. The next time that your out walking along a edge clear stream. On a bright sunny day. If you look at the bottom of the stream. As the water moves past a rock or a edge of some kind. Down stream a little ways. There will be whirlpools forming. If you look at the bottom of the stream. As the whirlpools start to form. It will form a positive lens. You will see a point of light. Just like a magnifying glass makes. But as the whirlpool gets stronger. The positive lens turns from a positive lens to a open ended positive lens. ( which is the same thing as one half of a negative lens. Which is a tube and not a point. There is this big black dot that forms where the tube is at. You can tell how big the inside tube is by looking at the black dot. ( shadow). But if you look up into the sky and then back down at the bottom of the stream. You will find that there is nothing between the sun and the bottom of the stream But empty space. Thin air. And clear water. Why is there a shadow forming on the bottom of the stream? This is the true way that negative lens are like in nature. So Warm. What I'm trying to tell you. If you want to get your device to work better. If you can think of a way it get it to form one of these blind spots. May help. I know that they used superconducting disk with a hole in the middle. You could do the same thing with a superconducting flat circuitry disk. Like Marc made. Just make it with a hole in the center. But if you try this. Here is some thing neat that you might try. If you make a resonator along the inside edge. If it's forming a blind spot. You would get to see it. Larry L. Burks









   Dear Judy. Back around 1986. Give or take few years. The government produced a film of the government use a beam weapon system on a small building. In order to get support and funding for Reagan's star war program. It was made by the government but given to the main stream T.V. stations to show at news time. All of the stations had it on. You can see the buildings turn to dust. The T.V. news stations may have it on file. But if they want give it to you. You can file a freedom of information request and get it from the government. It's part of our national archives. You have a right to this footage. It's the only film of the use of one of these type of weapon system available to the public. Having and holding this film in your hand. And seeing it for your self. Would go a long way to helping your self. To believe in your self. Your not nuts. But if you hold this film in your hand and a solid rock in the other. When you speak out to others about 9/11. No one will ever be able to look you in the eye. And tell you that solid rock can turn to dust. Out in the open. With nothing touching it. But the air. In a free fall. Naturally in nature. And if they say that it is naturally for solid rocks to turn to dust when they in a free fall. Hand them the rock and ask them to demonstrate it to you. And when they can't make a solid rock turn to dust when it is in a free fall. Hand them a copy of the film on dvd. That they showed on national T.V. Back in 1986. And on the same dvd. Have a copy of the solid rocks of the buildings turning into dust as they were in a free fall. On 9/11. And tell them that rocks can not turn in to dust while in a free fall. Naturally in nature. But on 9/11 solid rocks turned in to dust while in a free fall. Why? There is this human element to the free falling solid rocks on 9/11. The only military on the face of the planet that has this type of weapon system. Is the U.S military. And the only person on the face of the planet that has the authority to give the command to use this weapon system. Is the president of the United States. George W. Bush. It goes all the way to the top. There is only one way that this could have happened. There is no need to follow a trail from the bottom up here. Because of the kind of weapon system that they used on 9/11. It all ways starts out at the top. And works it way down. This is the way it all ways works. Larry L. Burks









   For two months now I've been setting here and reading about ways to manipulate gravity by use of electrical coils magnets. And different types of electrical circuit board. And I've been setting here thinking to my self. " what on earth have these people ever seen that would lead them to believe that all this has any thing to do with gravity". Then I went to the NASA link that Warm posted. This explains a lot. I was shown an experiment much like the one in Warm's NASA post. Back in 1968. In the experiment. They took a bar of iron. Took coper wire and made coils around the iron bar. A bar magnet. They placed i in a flask. Filled it with liquid nitrogen and cool the coper wire down to almost zero. Plug a battery into the copper wire. And when the copper became superconducting. The bar magnet would start to act like a superconducting magnet. Because when they would place a square bar magnet above it. It would levitate. They could spin the magnet in any direction and it would continue to levitate. The Super conductive electro bar magnet acted like a superconductor disk. When you place a square bar magnet above it. They call this the mirror effect. But it will not make a rock levitate. This is a force due to it's charge. It is not a force due to it's mass. The right way to test a experiment like this is to weigh each piece of equipment independently. The put everything on a scale. Weigh it when it's not turn on. The weight it when it is turned on. It should weight less when it's turned on. Then turn every thing up sides down and check it. There is no up in space. Gravity works in every direction. It should weigh more when turned on. The turn it on it's side. It should still be able to produce a force in every side ways direction. If it can pass this simple test. You may have some thing. Mean while back at the ranch. Back in 1968 the lab at U.T. was called Wheeler's lab. I never got to talk to Wheeler. The people that was showing me the experiment was some of Wheelers' students. They where repeating some thing that Wheeler had told them. "If we can find out what superconducting has to do with gravity. Some day we will find a way to manipulate gravity". The only thing is this. This is a force due to it's charge. It has nothing to do with gravity. But men of this caliber. (Wheeler) Don't make stupid mistakes like this. So for 30 years I have been thinking to my self. " What on earth as this poor man every seen that would make him believe that superconductivity has any thing to do with gravity. What so every. If any thing". Wheeler knew that superconductivity had some thing to do with gravity even before 1968.But he didn't have any thing to do a cross comparison test with. This is what my experiment is. It's across comparison test. A test is see if the space shielding effect of superconductivity is the same as the space shielding effects of spores. From what research that I have done. It's looking good. But when I skimmed over the link. I picked up on the words "circuit board". he picture of the flat coil circuit board, and frozen. This explains a lot. If you make a flat disk circuit board. You can get thousands of winds on the board. If you coil it The copper becomes super conductive. But if you apply an alternating current to the wires in the board. It will act as if it is a spinning alternating superconducting disk. Now where? Oh where? Have we herd this words before? Does it have any thing to do with gravity. Sure. Well may be a little. A big enough effect that it can be measured. You could use it to study gravity. But we haven't found a way to make it strong enough to go to the moon with. But what is good about all of this. Is that My space shielding spinning disk experiment may produce the same results. We would have three different experiments to do cross experiments with. If all three experiment are able to effect field energy. It would tell us some thing new. Some thing that we didn't know before. But you know what a coil circuit board would look like? The fringe pattern produced by light. Have any of you seen how they make circuit board? I was looking at a kit in Fry's Electronics store a few years back. You can buy the kit and make your own circuit board. It's a really neat process. They make the plates for off set printing the same way. I was a printer for about 20 years. There is a different way to make circuit board. It's much like a ink jet printer. They can even make 3D objects using the same technique. There is a piece of metal hanging on the wall in the UFO museum in Roswell N.M. At first glance it looks flat. 2D. But they sent it off to be tested back in 1997. Fifty years after 1947. They sent it off to a lab in Socorro N.M. Do you know where Socorror N.M. Is? It's the largest congregations of radio astronomers on the face of the planet. They are all experts on the wave function of energy. They cut a small piece of the metal off and looked at it under a microscope. I had a copy of the report. At one time. Really nice pictures. The metal was composed of 19 layers of alternating layers of copper and silver. 19 is a prime number. There is only one way that it could have been made. One layer at a time. They saw the same thing that I saw in. It has the fringe pattern of light recorded into it. Copper can become super conductive. Silver will not. When they asked the scientist "What would the piece of metal most practical application be"? They said "superconductivity".To make this piece of meal you would have to use a photographic - photo copying technique. The 3d type. The object is 3d. Not 2d. When I read the report. I was thinking to my self. " Now that is weird ". I had been studying books on light and holograms. Trying to find out about the pictures of light that I was taking. What kind of technology does man use where he records the fringe pattern of light? Holograms. It just so happen that one of the books that I bought was Dr. Winston E. Kock's book's " Lasers and Holography". When I found those three different picture Of UFO's hidden in his book. I about died. I was sick for weeks. It's all true. Wheeler's famous run a way radar shielding experiment. Have you ever here Wheeler talk about his perfect absorber theory? He said that light( radar ) Would not work in the direction of a perfect absorber. ( down the mouth of a wormhole. The black space that is found there. It acts like a all optical high speed switch. But in order for it to work. It would have to effect the radon particle. It had to be a space shielding hologram. But when it not only effected the radon particle. It also effected the electron particle as well. The radon and the electron particles are the particles that make up space that has mass. It effected space. It had an effect on gravity. ) The rest is history. I could talk for hours about all the stuff that is hidden in code. In DR.Kock's book. About how to form a wormhole. They found a way to effect gravity. With out using electrical current. Or having to spin any thing. By making a space shielding hologram of a negative lens. They Still had to use liquid nitrogen to cool it . In order to get it to work. But what they couldn't do was find a way to get It to work at room temperature. They spent 100 billion dollars and fifty years trying to find a way to get it to work at room temperature. So that they didn't have to use expensive liquid nitrogen. A stand alone device. With out gain or loss of electricity. With out gain or loss of motion. With out gain or loss of temperature. With out any fuel or energy of any kind. Or coolant. For fifty years the brightest of the brightest and the best of the best. When out in to the back yard at night. And beat their heads against a flat rock. Trying to solve this problem. I'll bet they just about died when I told them to use spores from mold. The same thing happened with gravity. The same thing happen with what wormholes are. This is why I keep telling every one to go over to my home page. And get up to speed. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com larry L. Burks









   Thanks Ralph I did whay you said and i go me in. Oh!!!! my!!!! God!!!! Marc Millis. Wheeler???? This is where we were at back in 1968. Down here at U. of T. in Austin Tx. I was there. They were doing experiments like this. They told me stuff. Things that I knew was no true. Even way back then. I didn't gey to talk to Wheeler. It was what his students were telling me. Wheeler does not make stupid mistakes like this. It took me 30 years o find ou what Wheeler men when he said. " If we can find out what superconductivie has to do with gravity. Some day we will be able to fly from point A to point B. The same way the crow flys. The flat wound coils. It's close. Bu not right. But I can use the flat wound coils. To move you in the right direcion. and get every one up to speed. I go to fix my key board. And wrie a paper to post on Green Glow. Be back after later. To tell you all about it. Larry









   Hi Warm; How's it going? I'm still working on my experiment. I still trying to get some mold to grow. I got some dirt from beneath a apple. This dirt has mold in it like no other. I'm growing it on slices of potatoes. Should work. I still have hope for the 9/11 thing. It heating up. They are talking to the people that make this type of weapon system for the government. In the end what I'm hoping for is. We will not only find out about the wormhole weapon system , but the wormhole manipulating UFO things as well. I've been all over the net the past two weeks. You know. I was just thinking. With a wormhole. There are three different kinds of green energy that can come out of the technology of wormholes. I know that a wormhole will glow in the dark. That's because it is ripping atoms apart. Why it is doing this is because it is curving space to the point that atoms their self are being pulled apart. It's causes them to smear out over time and space. They puff up. This is the same thing that heat does to atoms. This is why we have hot fusion on the sun. But if you use a wormhole to make atoms puff up. You could get fusion to work at room temperature. Cold fusion Think about. But heat acts like a catalyst. To speed up chemical reactions. But with a wormhole. It does the same thing. If you were trying to get hydrogen out of water. With a wormhole. You could do this so fast. ( instantly) That you could take a glass of water. And run your car off it. Right a way. Which would be nice. But if a person can get a wormhole to form. And use it to manipulate gravity. Why. Oh. Why. Would any body want to fool around with cold fusion or hydrogen? Think about. Larry Weight loss and weight gain, That's a good sign. But if it's effecting gravity. It would have to be effecting the gravitational field. Are any of you doing stuff like this at home. Or are you just studying this effect. Why I'm asking is. If it is effecting the gravitational field. You need to be looking at what the field energy is doing. You know that you can do this by using light and resonators. Like I'm trying to do. If you can watch and see what the geometry of the field energy is doing. You can learn a lot faster. larry









   5/3/07 Judy Judy Judy Your killing me. I just listen to you and Jim Fetzer. You said every thing right. But your not saying "WORMHOLE". Start saying the word "wormhole" Light or energy in the form of a tube. They call them a "high speed switch." There is a way to smoke them out of the wood pile. There is a way to find out if I'm telling you the truth or not. The very next time that you get on the radio with Jim. Start to talk about wormholes. What they are like in nature. How they are able to rip atom from atom. And even rip atoms their self's apart. And if they tell you that you are some kind of nut. Tell them to put up or shut up. Tell them that you have found a web page. On the net. That shows you how to build a wormhole beam weapon system in your back yard for less than $100 dollars. That's powerful enough that you can use it to cut skyscrapers in half with it. Then put a link to my web page up on your page. http://www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/ If you hit a home run. Nail it on the head. Things are going to go through the roof. Up the ante. Then wait and see who blinks first. They will have to come out of the wood work. And expose their self's. And when they do. You will know who they are. They will beat the stuffing's out of you. And when they do. You just point you finger at me. And when they come after me. I'm not going to jail for any body. I'm going to scream my head off. I'm like Santa Claus. I know who they are. And I know where they live. I got names and addresses. White Sands Missile range is where they work. ( space port. or space harbor. Look on map.} And live. You can find them in the towns around there.) look on map. These are good people. They will talk if you ask the right ones. They are just like me. They have know from day one what happened on 9/11. We know who did it. And how they did it. They are just like me. They aren't going to jail for any body else ether. It's time to play put up. Or shut up. We will see who blinks first. They hang people for what they did on 9/11. And it's not going to be me. I didn't do it. But I know of a way to find out who did. It goes all the way to the top. Their is only one person on the face of the planet that has the power to give the command to use this weapon system. There must be at least 100,000 people that have worked on this weapon system. They all know the same thing that I know. "Your not nuts". They will stand behind you if you speak out. And tell the truth. Trust Mother Nature. She will not make you look a fool. They know. And I know. Your right on track. Just keep going in the direction that you are going. You will get there in the end. Here is how it works. The first person to stand up and tell the truth. Plows a row. And makes it safe for others to stand up as well and speak out. Tell the truth. Once the ball gets rolling. It can't be stoped. And the truth all ways comes bubbling to the top in the end. There is no way around it. Larry L. Burks









   Dear Judy: I Don't need to tell you that you have a new link up. What you are looking for can't be found on this page. But what it does have on it. Can lead you to what you want to know. The blimps. They are drones. They are made to move around. They can be cut loose. And they have he ability to move up and down and side ways. They are controlled by radio. That's why they call them drones. If they are tied down to the ground. And can't move. They don't need no stinking radio. Their drones. http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/DEW_Contractors.html I don't think you will find any thing about wormholes on this page. But what they are looking for is right under your noises. The white blimps with three tail fins. They have about five of the up and running. Most of them have a tie down line on them. See pictures. Note. No motors to move them by. No visible means of propulsion. The same thing they said about the thing at Roswell N.M. But the one found due south of I-10 at mile marker 70, in Deming N.M. is different. Looks the same. But this one is different. Way Different. The tie down lines are about 100 yards long. They can cut the tie down lines loose and it will go up to about 300 yards. Not only does it go up. But it can also move side ways. I look at it every time i have to go across I-10 in New Mexico. One time when I was going out west. I picked it up at mile marker 117. It was about seven miles due south of the interstate. I was moving west also. I was doing 75+ mph. It was about five miles a head of me when we got down to mile marker 70. Where it stoped. And I caught up to it. I want say how fast my truck will run. But when Big Dan ( my truck ) Gets up on top end. The head lights start to brown out. And all the radios go dead. Big Dan is the fastest camel on the desert. The same Blimp that can be seen at Deming. Can also be seen in Willcox, Az. Which is about 120 miles a way. When I talked to the man that works at the truck stop there. He told me that when this blimp goes over your head. It don't make no noise. They say that the same gravitational propulsion system that this blimp has on it. Is the same set up there going to but on our cars and trucks. And free our self from the dependency of oil. So says George W. Bush. Bush stated that out of NASA's BPP comes a technology that goes beyond your wildest dreams. What is NASA's BPP???? Develop the technology of wormholes and manipulate the gravitational force. The same scientist that are working on wormholes in order to manipulate gravity. Are the same scientist that are working on the technology of wormholes to be used as a beam weapon systems. What is so interesting about all of this is the fact that the scientist that are working on the evidence of 9/11 are now starting to put two and two together. And as we all know by now. The scientist that are working on this black box technology. Have been looking back over their shoulder. For fifty years now. Knowing that at some point in time. The rest of us will catch up to them. That day has come. NASA's Advanced Space Optics propulsion laboratory U.S. Navy's Advance Space Optics Weapon Division. The U.S Navy is running the blimp at Deming N.M. If you google the words " NASA's space optics laboratory." You will get a blank. But if you go out and buy Dr. Winson E. Kock's book. "Lasers And Holography". Copyrighted. published and has been before the eyes of the public for more than forty years now. You will find the words " NASA's Space Optics Laboratory". One more thing. When they first started to test the blimps. They had a town meeting in Deming. The US Navy was there. When they asked the Navy what made them move side ways. They said that it has one of NASA's new propulsion systems on it. The chickens come home to roost. Larry L. Burks









   It is rue that the force that is being produced is to weak to be used be man. But it is strong enough to be used to study and run test on. his is not a bad thing. This a good thing. They state that is 2% of gravity. 2% of what gravity????? 2% of the earth's gravity??? 2% of the weight of the object relative to the mass of the earth? If you did the same experiment on the moon what percentage would you get? 16%?? 32%??? 2% of the earth's gravity is way less than .0000000000000001% of what gravity is capable of producing. (9/11???) 2% is safe. The other is not. Not unless you do it the right way. I think I have it right now. Well see. Ed said that their wasn't any thing in his house that was flammable. What a wired statement to make???? Did he have problems? May be. Did his chicken house go through the roof and burn to the ground? In the bible it talks about how people caught on fire and burnt to the ground. How in the world can a person catch on fire and burn? From time to time. You have to remind them . Less they for get. People are composed of 70% water. H20. And some of the other elements like protein. Which is a carbon bass element. A wormhole can rip atoms from atoms. people then become. Oxygen + hydrogen + carbon + heat = fire. Hummmmm??? Think about it. I had a big problem with fire the first time round. Like high carbon steel. And then their is all that other unsafe stuff to think about. If you were going to try and make a wormhole form. How would you know if you were doing it safely or not? Spinning space shielding disks are much safer. I going to wait a little longer before I do the other experiment again. I have a hard time picturing my self running around with my head on fire and my tail catching. Larry









    Dear George: I did say "fluff" Didn't I? This is just wishful thinking on my part. This has nothing to do with Bush. But if Dr.Fetzer is going to make his case. At some point in time. He will have to drag out the big dogs. He will have to find some one that knows what he is doing. Knows what he's talking about. There will be film clips with them talking about wormholes. People that are making wormholes form. This means that we will get to listen in also. Some one is doing this. And it's not me. If not me . Then who? There are others that are doing the same things that I am doing. Is their a way that we can get them to talk to us about how to make a wormhole form. Probably not. Can we have our cake and eat it to? May be. Their may be a way. But, what Bill is doing. If you look at what the geometry of the field in experiments is doing. That get a gravitational effect. Their is a pattern. If you use a spinning disk. The point of the positive lens opens up and forms a hole. Where the point should be. An open ended positive lens. If you use a disk with a hole in the center of it. ( Bill is using a ring.) The hole forms a negative lens. Again we have a hole. But when you use a concave mirror with the geometry of a negative lens. Only a concave mirror is compatible with the negative lens. Wormhole that are found in the center of galaxies form the geometry of negative lens. A negative lens is one of the places in nature that man finds this black space. That acts like a high speed switch. And turn off. Or shut's down the gravitational field. The only way hat we can get the wormhole to stay open is record it as a hologram. This is what Dr.Kock's is telling us. This is what the piece of metal on the wall in Roswell N.M. is telling us. It has the fringe pattern of light recorded in it. It is made of layers of copper and silver. It's a space shielding hologram. It didn't come from a UFO. It came out of some one's lab. The bowls. The concave mirrors. The pattern is there. And you can go look at it the same way that I did. But am I he type of guy that just talks about stuff? I'm still working on my spinning space shielding disk of spores. I've been out collecting samples of mold. I have about 15 deferent samples. I've been going up and down the west coast this week. I went down I-5. Wa., Or. Ca. etc etc. A lot of mold out there. This week end I'm going to buy some potatoes. If you cut them into thin slices's. And use them to grow mold on. I should find some thing. Larry









   Warm: This 9/11 thing that I've been telling you about is starting to heat up. You can find out about it here. http://www.911scholars.org/ and http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/ But that's not where I want you to go. Here is where I want you to go. A clip. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9046804812765633069 Dr. James H. Fetzer and Dr. Steven E. Jones Debate what happened on 9/11. Fetzer Feels that They used a beam weapon system. Jones believes that they used some thing else. Jones hangs Fetzer out to dry when he makes the statement. " A laser, nor a micro wave weapon system is in capable of producing the energy that would be needed to do the damage to the Twin Towers on 9/11." Which is a true statement. In order for Fetzer to make his case. He will have to show how this beam weapon system is able to produce the energy needed to do all the damage to the Twin Towers on 9/11. Fetzer lost his debate. But he is going to win the next debate. Coming up this summer. Why? for this reason. http://educate-yourself.org/ct/sandiegochemtrailsdarkline29nov06.shtml http://educate-yourself.org/ct/blackbeamsover%20LA25dec06.shtml http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/moredisruptorbeamactivity26apr06.shtml http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001795.html I see these black beams in the sky all the time out west. They are testing this weapon system out. In the west. Their every where. Are they real wormhole? Sure. For this reason. They are not chemtrails. Chemtrails are white. It is not a microwave. A microwave can not make a beam of light. Their is no such thing as a stinking black light laser. The same blackness that you see in the sky. Is the same blackness that you can see in the wormholes on my web page. ( see pictures.) A wormhole. And only a wormhole, can produce a black tube of light. Only a wormhole can produce the energy levels needed to produce the damage and the kind of evidence on 9/11. I need to write Dr. Fetzer a letter. But this is all fluff. Not here, nor there. What it's going to do is put the fact the man can get wormholes to for. Why would this interest us here at GreenGlow? If you can get a wormhole to form. You can use the wormhole to manipulate gravity. NASA is all ready doing this. What NASA would that be?????? The other NASA stupid. The black box NASA. How would I know this? They have passed a new law. To where they have moved out space ( The U.S.) From 12 miles to 36 miles up. Why would they do this. It is illegal for us to put a weapon system in to space. There is still an atmosphere at 36 miles up. If they put a drone satellite up at 36 miles. It's not in outer space. We are illegal. If it drops down to 30 miles. It can shot any thing on the ground. If it goes up 5 mile. It will be in outer space. It can shoot down any thing at 100 miles. pretty slick huh? Are they doing this? Sure. We got pictures. Look at the chemtrails links that I sent you. Those orbs that you see are not UFO's. There are spy drone satellite. Their in orbit at 36 miles up. The no zone. Nothing can stay in orbit at 36 miles from the earth. You could if we had a way to manipulate gravity. You can't hide from them. You can't out run one of them. And you can't out gun one of them. They work great. Look at 9/11. So says George W. Bush. Now how would he know that???? Think about this. If this beam weapon system is so power full. That it can form a hole as big as a house in soiled rock. Could it not also put a hole in dirt? What am I talking about? The dikes or dams in New Orleans. Larry L. Burks









   Dear Bill: Your on the right track. Your experiment is effecting gravity. And many others are getting an effect. What you are doing is the one. The only way. That man has found to effect gravity. But there are many themes and variation. Of how to do this. but there are some things that I have found out objects that are space shielding. That you might find interesting. This field of experimenting with space shielding is much bigger than you have been led to believe. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com My web page. I know that these things are hard to find out about. You may find some thing there that you can use in your work. In my work. I have found out that their is a pattern to be had in all of this. The geometry of field energy. Their is a one on one effect with the shape of field energy and the effect on gravity. I know that you are running a lot of test on your experiments. But I see that you are not running any test on what the shape of the field energy is doing. I have a simple way of finding out what it is doing. If you do this. I feel that you will find out the same things that I have found out. That the shape that the field energy is making. Is a factor. Their might be a way to use a cone cave mirror. With your ring and get a much stronger effect. I have an experiment on my web page. That will produce an gravitational effect. That is the best that any one could hope fore. You might know some one that would be willing to give it a try. Tell others about it. Larry L. Burks









   Dear Joe; There are some things that are going down on the internet that you may find interesting. They are saying that a beam weapon system is what brought down the Twin Towers on 9/11. They can't get the evidence from the government to prove this. They are using a wormhole as a weapon system. Ed made a wormhole form. If this is true. then there would be evidence of this. Just like on 9/11. What you should be looking for is very fine dust. The type of dust the you would produce if you were using a wormhole to cut stones up into blocks. Ed cut most of his stones at his first site. If you can find his first site or can get access to his second site. You can take soil samples and have it tested for unusual high numbers of fine dust particles. No visible singes of tool marks. The stones that the Coral Castle is made of. If ED was able to get a wormhole to form. And if he used to cut stones from out of the ground. And he did. There will also be a lot of fine dust to be found there. Just like at 9/11. Larry.









    If they used DEW weapon system on 9/11. And if it was a wormhole. There are some things that you can look for that can only be produced by a wormhole. Because a wormhole can rip atoms their self a part. It produces a electron , a photon, and a radon particle. The evidence may look like their was a strong microwave. Present. The presents of radon particles. Film will be exposed. And will no longer be useable. Sun burn. Red blotches on the body. On the shin. That will turn brown later and peal. Just like sun burn. Some thing that you might look for. That might show up in the pictures. Is the fact that a nuclear reaction will produce an electro electromagnet pulse. If you put a neon or fluorescent light bulb next to a wormhole. The light bulb will come on. Just like when you put a fluorescent light bulb next to a CB radio antenna. When you key up the radio. The fluorescent light bulb will light up. Try it. This means that if they turn off the electricity to the building. Due to the fires. When they used the wormholes weapon system on the buildings. All the lights will come back on. Even though the electricity is turned off. Radios will stop working. They will only have a white nose on them. Check the photos of the falling buildings. For light coming out of the windows. Larry L. Burks.









   They call it a beam. It is not a beam. It light or energy in the form of a tube. A wormhole. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com It is formed by the energy that makes up the gravitational field. They are shooting down missiles at 30 miles. You would not see the craft from where the beam comes from. It will work from 100 miles if it was used from outer space. If the beam came from right above the building. It would cut out the inside of the building And leave the shell of the buildings in tack. 9/11???? Sure. There is nothing Man or other wise. Know here on earth that will stop gravity. Put a fifty foot hole in solid bed rock. Sure. The only thing that can do some thing like this is a wormhole. The only government on the planet that has this kind of weapon system is the U.S. Government Larry L. Burks You say that you want proof that wormholes are real. Ed that man that built the Coral Castle. Used his wormhole to cut rocks in to blocks. And made the Coral Castle. He also made a gate. To make this gate he had to bore a hole through about six feet of solid rock. Can a wormhole do is? Sure. The the question becomes. Do we have the technology to form a wormhole and use it as a weapon system ? Sure. On 9/11 holes as big as houses and fifty feet deep, formed in solid bed rock. All with in the blink of an eye. Do you know what was between the holes in the bed rock and the craft that shot the wormhole. ????? The Twin Towers. Now it's all over the net. The 9/11 holes. First, it was the cars. Now it's the holes. How long is it going to take for, them to figure out. It's the wormholes stupid. Not long. Their all over there looking at my web page. The big dogs are going there. Lets watch and see what happens. The bubble is about to burst Larry L. Burks









   George, Neil; To help you get a feel on from where I coming from. In my worm. I once had a math teacher tell me. "Ant thing that mechanically sound is also geometrically sound. Which in turn is also mathematically sound. Because I am getting the geometrical part right. (One out of three is not bad work.) And in the end I was able to get the mechanical part right. It's like a mechanical triangle. If you have two pars of the puzzle. You can find out what the third part of the puzzle is. This is why I want you to come on over to my way of thinking and help me on this. Two atom model of gravity. I have the Geometry and the Mechanical parts of the puzzle. All I need now is the math. Now Who. Oh who. I wander who. Has the math??????? George. Neil. Any body ???? I need your help. Help me with this part of the puzzle. "Nature will not make you look a fool". Larry









    Neil: How do you change the positive curvatures of space in to the negative curvatures of space. You do it the same way that nature does it. It takes two positive lenses to forma free space negative lens. The shape of the geometry of field energy. In nature it can be done in two deferent ways. May be more. The tow main ways are the tube type and the disk type. In both there can be found two positive lenses and one negative lens. Or two negative lenses. Depending on how you look at it. There are two jets that come out of the galaxies. One on both sides. But at the same time. It is all the same jet. The two jets "share" the same geometry. ( I just found out that I have been misspelling "share" I had been spelling it "shear" Which is some thing else. Sorry about that.) The point that I'm trying to make is the geometry of field energy is scale invariant. Big ones work the same way that little ones work. One's that are composed of huge amounts of mass work the same way the little ones do that don't have very much mass. This is your pattern. I found it. " look ... there goes one now. " I tell you. I'm on to some thing big here. These thoughts work. Larry









   Warm: That's probably true. Through out history. Time and time again. It happens. Those that do not learn by history . Are domed to repeat it. It happened to me. But I didn't die out right a way. I got the shot a cross the bow. But I did get radiation burns. I may be dieing right now but don't know it yet. May be shin cancer. I had seen pictures of Mayan that were doing it. Drawings on walls. They have these red spots about the size of base balls. All over there body's. I got the same red spots. At first I didn't know what they were. I thought they had some thing to do with my nerves. Hives or some thing. But after a few days. They turned brown. And then later. My shin started to peal off. It was sun burn. Sun burn. Not from the sun. But from the wormhole. It gives of radiation. I had sun burn under neath my clothing. And this is what kills off every body that does this. It effected their DNA. And their hole race died out. In the end. It kills every body. They didn't know about radiation poisoning. We do. We also know what to do to stop the radiation poisoning. Keep the wormhole in a vacuum. I Have a large pickle jar ready. So that I can put it in. If I every get a another one to form. Now. Know body told me about this. They one's that are alive today. That are forming wormholes. Want tell you about this. They want you to die. This way they can keep their secret. They are betting on you dieing. If man is every going to make it over the hump. Past the danger point. It has to be done safely. Or not at all. This is why I'm giving every body here a fore warning. It's the right thing to do. I don't want to take what I know about the dangers of forming wormhole to the greave with me. It's kind of like the Wizard of Oz. " The last one to go. Gets to watch all others go before them" It's called the wisdom of Dorothy. And Toe Toe too. When your going to do some thing that is extremely dangerous. If you are willing to lay your life on the line. And try your luck. Take your chance. You may only get one chance. You want to make sure that you tell every body what you did. Take notes. Tell some body what you are going to do. So that if they want to try it. They will find your mistake. So that they will not make the some mistake that you did. In the end. Some day we will be able to do it safely. Warm. What do you think I'm doing here. I'm marking my trail. That all have marked their trails. They left clue's. Evidence. Written word. Drawing. Objects. Artifacts. After you find out how they did it. You can go look at their marked trail. Just like I did. It's there I have seen it. " Look....there goes one now". I know what's safe to do. And I know what is not safe to do. I'm over the hump. I have found my mistake. I'm ready to try it again. Larry L. Burks.









   Johannes; Do you have a project that you are working on? Every one here is doing some thing. Most of us are trying a lot of deferent things. We are leaven no stone unturned. We have even tried Pixy Dust a few times. I'm trying to work with space shielding spores from mold. Every one here thinks it looks more like Pixy Dust. We would be glad to here from you. Are any body else that you can dig up. Come one . Come all. Larry









   Hi Adrian: Worked on my spinning spore disk experiment to day. I've been trying to grow mold. No luck. Never I my live have I seen a time that I couldn't grow mold. I'm here to tell you now. I have grown mold on two week left over spaghetti in the ice box. Of biblical proportion. And now? Nothing. So Today I went down town and bought some infant baby formula. The milk based Type. The power kind. ( the smallest and cheapest they had. (El-cheap-O) I got enough of this stuff to last me a like time. In my microbiology book. It has a list of all the stuff that you need to grow mold on. The same stuff is found in baby infant formula. I know that Ed was using Malted Milk to grow his mold. ( malt. that's the stuff you use to change starch in to sugar. Sauger is what molds eat and like on.) I know that in the bible they added a little grape juice to the blood. Why? Blood has a ph factor of 7.2. Mold grows best at a ph factor of 5.6. The grape juice is an acid. It will drop the ph factor down to 5.6 . I need to by some ph strips. So that I will know what I'm doing. But milk has a ph of 7.0. So I put some orange juice in the mix. Not much. Just a little. When around and found a bunch of new mold. I took samples with a Q-tip. And put it in a sand witch zip bag. With a paper towel and some of the baby mix stuff. By this time next week I should know if it will grow mold or not. One more thing I thought of to day. Heat acts as a catalyst. Which causes a chemical reaction to speed up. Heat caused the atom to expand. If you used a spinning disk to cause atoms to expand. You could have some thing like cold fusion. But there is the chemical Think. If you were trying to get hydrogen and oxygen from water. You could use a wormhole to cause the atoms to expand. Which in turn would cause the rate at which hydrogen and oxygen to come out of water. You could run your car off of a glass of water. Think about. Larry L. Burks









   George said "The fact that non obvious predictions arising from a space-time curvature model have been subsequently confirmed, further increases the probability that space-time curvature is a sound model." This is probable true. But ask your self this question. " Where am I making my mistake.?" They all way tell you what is right about space-time curvature models of gravity. But they don't tell you what wrong with it. I know what you are thinking. How can any thing this right. Be wrong. ? Einstein even knew that Curvature's of space-time was not right some how. He was looking for his mistake in his last days. He never found it. He knew that there was some thing hidden deep with in nature. Some thing that was real. As real as any thing else that we find in nature. He was able to track it back to the shape of the atom. So did Feynman. So did Wheeler. And now Ed Witten and Kaku. After years of work. This where I wound up at. You want to know where I'm getting all my weird ideals at? Now you know. Regardless of what theory of gravity you are working on. If it's the right one. This is where it's going to end at. By the time you find all of your mistakes. This is where it ends. Why? Nature as to be satisfied first. Is her way or the high way. This is one of many test that your theories will have to pass. Wouldn't be much wiser to start at the end . And work our way back to where we are now. Where you are now. The short cut. The quick fix. Sure it is. If we start burning the candle at both ends. Use both ends of the stick on it. At some point in time and space. When we reach critical mass. It's going to pop. Einstein's Two atom model of the universe. His two atom model of gravity. Was what he was working on when he die. He spoke about it in his book " Relativity" Go read it. It's there. Dudes. I have but every thing that I know about the two atom model of gravity on my web page so that every body can go there and see what I have. his could be said to be a Q theory of gravity. There is nothing that I can find that can't be proven in the lab. Here is some thing else that I know. After we find this quantum theory of gravity. You know what theory of gravity we will use? Einstein's G.R. Theory. Why. It the right way. There is nothing real about G.R. G.R. is not some thing that is. ( a noun )It is some that some thing else does. A verb. A action verb. It is the right way to track gravity. Then why do we need a Quantum theory of gravity? We need to find out what is real about gravity. NO. NO. NO. That's not right. " We need to find out what gravity really is. The way it is in nature." See gravity for what it's really like. As seen through the eyes of nature. How does nature chose to express her self in nature. What is real. And what is not. Listen up now. Nature has this bad habit. Of doing one thing. and creating an a illusion that some thing else has happened. Mother Nature simple fails to play fair. She has been playing man for a fool. And man has been non the wiser. It's not nature that we need to work on first. It's man. But that is changing fast. So George. Don't throw that new theory that you are working on a way. In the end. We will be back to George's curved space. So why don't you try working on the two atom model of gravity. In the end. You might end up with two new theory's of gravity. Where both of them are right. One is right by nature. The other is right because it's the way to go. Gravity done right. If you know why the first theory of gravity is right. Then there will be no doubt in any body's mind. Why the second one is right. Larry L. Burks









   Hi all; Larry will speak now. Thank You. Thank You. Thank You. For your time. Read everybody's email. Ether, curvatures of space. Q. M., Field energy. We all seem to think That there is some thing that rest between objects. That connects every thing in the universe to every other thing in the universe. It is know by many names. This is called shop talk. People tend to call it what every is best for them. It helps the picture some thing in their minds. Some thing that has a reason or logic to it. A way of applying math to it. I'm trying to see nature through the eyes of nature. I'm starting out at the other end of the spectrum. And trying to work my way back wards to one of you. Or may be all of you. It's called reverse engineering nature. It's not science. But it is nature. I'm looking at how nature chooses to express it's self. What is happening in nature between tow points in space. Is this what ether is doing when you look at it. Is this? what gives us our sense of space and time. If what is resting in between objects is a point. A point like object. The universe can not be connected. But if it is a membrane like we see in nature. It can be connected. But the membranes can express their self as point like objects. When they cut a hologram negative in half and look at it with a microscope. What they see is fragmented squally lines. If the fragmented strings were vibrating. They would not make a line. They would make a shape. Only at the very end . Does some thing happen. This is where the strings vibrates. There have been many study's on positive and negative lens. We know a lot about them. We know how to record them as holograms. what a lot of people don't know is. We have some thing called a transit hologram. This is where you make a hologram of the hologram of a negative lens. Where ever the real image of the negative lens is. They use the plate of the second hologram. The transit hologram. And make a cross cut section of the negative lens. If you make enough cross cut sections of the negative lens. It's like having the pages of a book. You can place them next to each other. And you have a 3d shape of the negative lens. The have mapped out the space of the negative lens by making thousands of text with particles detectors. The pictures of the side view of a negative lens that I'm taking does not form any conflict of interest with the other data that we have. On negative lens. If you theory's don't conform to nature. If your theory don't meet this test. You will have to fix it some how. Now Neil I know that in order for these sheets of light to perform the way that they do. There would have to be some thing smaller that what's here. You sub sub thing. You may on to some thing. Neil why I think that there might be some thing in nature. Some thing like ether. Is. The field energy of magnets get to weak to soon for gravity. Gravity is long ranged. But it to gets weaker with distance. If gravity gets so weak between galaxies that if there was some thing like solar winds or ether. If this ether can flow. Some thing like a river. At the distance the we find some galaxies in space. The gravity between the galaxies may be so weak. That this ether may the become the dominant force. And be pushing galaxies a way from each other. Who knows. May be the universe is expanding. The Wheeler foam. Or KaKu's tiny bubbles. If Wheeler and Kaku can think these thought. Why not Neil. Well we know that the field energy of magnets can't be gravity. But in order for objects to perform in space. We may fine the are two reasons what objects perform the way that they do. Two deferent forces due to mass. Two deferent forms of gravity. But if the ether form of gravity is the waker of the two. It would be to weak for man to use. So may be we should just think about the common forms of gravity. The gravity that can be strong enough for man to use. Your stick in the mud gravity. The kind that you find in your back yard. Like the kind that I'm working on. All that I'm asking for is. Just let me do it a little bit. Just one time. Back in 1968. They told me that some day soon. We would be flying around in these things. Where's my ride? It's starting to look like that only ride that I'm going to get is the one that I make for my self. Is this the way is with the rest of us here? Larry









   There was some thing like solar winds or ether. If this ether can flow. Some thing like a river. At the distance the we find some galaxies in space. The gravity between the galaxies may be so weak. That this ether may the become the dominant force. And be pushing galaxies a way from each other. Who knows. May be the universe is expanding. The Wheeler foam. Or KaKu's tiny bubbles. If Wheeler and Kaku can think these thought. Why not Neil. Well we know that the field energy of magnets can't be gravity. But in order for objects to perform in space. We may fine the are two reasons what objects perform the way that they do. Two deferent forces due to mass. Two deferent forms of gravity. But if the ether form of gravity is the waker of the two. It would be to weak for man to use. So may be we should just think about the common forms of gravity. The gravity that can be strong enough for man to use. Your stick in the mud gravity. The kind that you find in your back yard. Like the kind that I'm working on. All that I'm asking for is. Just let me do it a little bit. Just one time. Back in 1968. They told me that some day soon. We would be flying around in these things. Where's my ride? It's starting to look like that only ride that I'm going to get is the one that I make for my self. Is this the way is with the rest of us here? Larry









   I think you guys have been sand bagging me. It didn't take long for you to convince me that wormholes are Mickey Mouse. But I'm not the one that you have to convince. Go tell that to a Marine. No.No. That not right. Go tell that to Mother Nature. When I say wormhole. I'm talking about the geometrical shapes Of field energy. Who's Membranes produce the shape of negative lens. The geometrical shape of free space negative lenses. Are free space negative lenses real? By way of nature? Sure. Do they produce a envelop. A membrane. Like those found in nature? Sure. Do these membranes have mass? Sure. Are there particles that are directed related back to these membranes. Like those found in nature? Sure? I am studying free space negative lenses. Like those found in nature. Direct observation of nature. I got pictures. I am studying the geometrical shapes of field energy, the membranes of free space negative lens. As simple optics. All free space negative lenses in nature. The field energy part of them. All work the same way. They all perform the same way. They all cause the same form of optics. They all have the ability to form tubes of light. The ones that we find in the center of galaxies perform the same as the ones in my back your. the ones that have little mass. Simple optics. And the ones that have huge amounts of mass. Enough mass to curve space to the point that they can rip atoms apart. the only deference between the tow is their mass. How can this be. The positive energy of a star is equal the negative energy of it's gravitational field. The positive energy of the stars in a galaxies is equal to negative energy of it's gravitational field. The positive energy of the stars in a galaxies is equal to negative energy of it's gravitational field. Or it's black hole. This is not a true statement has much more energy. Or mass, than we have been led to believe. For this reason. The positive energy of a universe is equal to the negative energy of it's gravitational field. The same amount of mass needed in order for the universe to have gravity. Gravity is the same through out the universe. The same amount of mass that is found in the space between objects. In order for the universe to have gravity. Is also the same amount of mass that can be found in the space that rest between object. That forms the black hole in galaxies. Which in some galaxies produce a jet. Jet's blow. They do not suck. That's why they call them a jet. which in turn is the same amount of mass that the space has that rest in between objects. That can be found in the space that rest in my back yard. Which is the same space that rest before your eyes. Or nose. How can this be? The mass is the same on all sides. What I mean by all sides. IS. The inside and the out side of atoms. No. NO. That's not right. Why we don't know that it is there is because. The same membrane that makes up the atom. Is the same membrane that makes up the gravitational field. You can't feel the mass of the atoms that your body is made of. You can't detect the same mass that the detector is made of. When you move . The gravitational field moves with you. It's like your shadow. You can't out run it. You can't catch up to it. It's a part of you. It's a part of your particle detector. It just right there. At your finger tips. But you can't touch it. The wormhole's inside has no mass. It is the walls of the membrane that has the mass. It is the tube part of the atom. It's gravitational field. That is found in between objects. That the walls of wormholes are made of. Wormholes are composed of the mass of the geometrical shapes of the tube part of field energy. Of atoms. Are atoms real? You tell me Neil. But if the membranes of atoms are real. And they are. Then the tube part of the atom is just as real. It's not two deferent membranes. It all the same membrane. It's gravitational field. And we do have gravity. And because it is the tube part of the Atom that make up the membrane of The wormholes. Then wormhole are equal real. Wormholes are just as real as any thing else we find in the universe. You can see Them. (look.... There goes one now. ) They are nouns. Just like atoms are nouns. They are a part of the atoms. I got pictures. Did you ever go read my web page. The way that every body talking. Makes that no body has read my web page yet. Any body try the bottle experiment yet? You can detect this mass. But you can find out if it is really there or not if you form a wormhole. If the mass is not there. No wormhole will form. But if the wormhole forms. You can verify it is the due to the fact that the inside of wormhole have no mass. If you can't detect the presents of the mass. You could feel the effects of the absents of it. Larry L. Burks Rotating rings have a center of gravity. But the center of gravity of rotating rings have no mass. How can this be? The center of gravity of rotating rings. Is a verb. They are not nouns. Their not real. The ring is a noun. larry Neil; You are talking black hole. I'm talking wormhole. There is no such thing as a black hole. It's the geometrical shape of the field energy of negative lenses. But in space where we find galaxies. What should have been a tube shape. A wormhole. collapses down in to some thing like a pancake. It's not the mass of the black hole. It's the mass of the stars that the galaxy has. + the mass of all of the other stars found in the universe. When the atoms of the stars become rip apart. Gravity go's a way. Then it becomes the laws of nature, of field energy. The same disk That forms in the canter of the galaxies. Is the same disk that forms in my negative lens. See picture. How can this be? It's field energy. The same black dot. That forms in the center of the disk of field energy of negative lenses. Is the same black dot. That forms in the center of membrane of the disk that forms at the center of galaxies. The same jet that is produced by the black dot that forms in the center of the disk in galaxies. Is the same divergence of light that forms in my lens. How can his be. They both are obeying nature's laws of field energy. I put the picture of jet galaxy M87 next to the light coming out of the disk in one of my negative lenses. I tell you. It could win a look-a-like contest. Why do they both look a like. They are both. The space that rest between objects. Field energy The geometry of field energy. This is what gravity is. The stuff that every thing in the universe is made of. I got pictures of nature in the act. Is what is a black hole? And what is a wormhole? They are both the same thing. They are composed of the same membrane. They both shear the same geometrical shape found in nature of field energy. Because they are shearing. They are not two different things. Things? This means that they are nouns. They are one and the same. Because membranes are noun. The gravitational field is a noun. Gravity is a force. Gravity is a verb. Go see pictures. ( look... there goes one now. ) Larry L. Bur What should we test. I know. We can test the disk in one of my negative lens. To see if it really has a disk. And if it really can form a jet. We will test it to see if it is really field energy or not. Of course we all ready know that Light is field energy. But I all ways like it when I'm right. Even before we do the test. But what about the geometry? It's past history? Can light make two different turns in free space. Can light do a zig - zag. In free space. I all ways thought that light travailed in a straight line. warm have you every went down there to the collage. And tried to tell those professor that they are wrong. did. It didn't work. Mother Nature tried the same thing. It didn't work for her either. Go figure. I mean. Do the math, man. Larry









    Warm: I watched your link. It was very interesting. I would like to find out more about how They did it. They don't tell you this. A lot of people have been fooled. By stuff like this. Even the big dogs. You can get things to move with a force due to it's charge. But there are some simple test that you can do that will you if it's gravity or not. He tells you that the objects are loosing weigh. They came up off of the ground. But if it is really gravity. You could place the experiment on a scale. And watch what the weight is doing. If it is really effecting gravity. You can turn the experiment over. By 180 degrees. And it should weight more. Or you can place it on its side. And it will produce a force. in the side ways direction. Gravity can work with out any out side source of energy. It can stand a lone on it's own force. It don't need no out side force. When he talked about an out side energy. This is what made the red flags pop up. Why is it that truck drivers know this and he doesn't? Warm Do you have a project that you are working on right now? Would you like to tell the rest of us about it? What are your thoughts? Larry









   Warm; Here's the trick that we have to do. It is a trick. NASA want's to use the technology to form wormhole. And manipulate gravity. And use this technology to go back to the moon. We also want this technology to produce electricity with and make our cars and trucks run down the road with out using any fuel. There is a short cut to having your cake and eating it to. We know how to do this. It is a black box project. For fifty years now the government has been looking back over their shoulder. They know as I do. that at some point in time. The people on the street will catch up to them. The sooner we can make this happen. The sooner we will get out gravity. We will get ours gravity. When every body else gets theirs. NASA doesn't need me to tell NASA about what they are all ready doing. They need me to tell every body else what NASA is doing. I don't work for the government. I'm the only one that is out side of the government that know what NASA is doing. If they (NASA) tell you what they are doing. Some body has to go to jail. This is why I can't talk to them. If I every talked to one of these people. And this information hits the streets. Some body has to go to jail. But if I never talk to these people that are working on this technology. And it finds it's way to the streets. No body has to go to jail. This means that I have to find another way to show how I found out how to do this. With out every talking to any body in NASA. And post what I have found on the net. Put it before the eyes of the public. This means that the people that are working on this technology can talk about what I'm doing. With out every telling any body about what they are doing for the government. This means that if every body is talking about how to do this. Then it makes it safe for NASA to sneak out and talk about it a little. Only when every body is doing it and talking about it. Does it become safe. When we catch up to NASA's black box project. Then it becomes safe. Do you have to go out and do it. No. All you have to do is talk as if your are doing it. And talk about others that are doing it. Just start talking about. Get every body talking about. At some point in time. Some one in the government will stand up and say. "NASA now has the technology to manipulate gravity." Now do you get what is going on here? What I'm doing. It's called "nook or crook" Get it?. The good part about all of this is. You don't have to lie. All you have to do is start talking about the truth. And every things comes out O.K. In the end. larry Warm: I think you are missing the point. It not magic. It's science. It not Voodoo. It's nature. I went down there and looked at every thing for my self. Did you read all of my web page yet? You use the mold to get the wormhole to form. Ed bored a hole through a log. It is no bigger than an egg. An egg would pass through the hole. Ed's worm hole is no bigger than an egg. But if you have a wormhole. There is some very weird things that you can do with them. Have you every looked at a chain? The links are inter locking. Take your fingers on each hand and make a loop with your fringes. You can make them interlock with each other. Like two links in a chain does. but if you put a wormhole in between your linked fingers. Where they are touching. You would never be able to get your fingers to touch. The wormhole would prevent them from touching. If you make some very big links like ED did. There is a link that he made. It is about two inches wide and about 1/2 inch thick. It's in the shape of a square. It all square but the bottom half. Is in the shape of a "V" The "V" part of the square link is where he placed the pulleys. If you placed a board below the top half of the link. A place to rest the egg sizes wormhole. AS you ratchet up the rock. There would be no weight of the rock felt on the tri-pod. The legs. The three post in the picture. To get it to work he had to build a from work to hole the link steady. You can see the box at the top of the tri-pod. If you put the leg of the tri-pod on some scales. And weighed it. As you lifted up the rock with the pulleys Block and tackle. The weight of the 30,000 pounds of rock would not show up on the scales. After Ed lifted the rock in to the air. In order for Ed to move the tri-pod around. Walk it like a three legged dog. With the rock in the air. Ed would have to lift one of the legs up off of the ground. Of the tri-pod. If the full 30,000 pounds of the rock was on the legs of the tri-pod. one man. ED would never be able to lift one of the legs. But if the weight of the rock was not realized on the legs of the tri-pod. Due to the wormhole that he was using. Could he have lifted one of the legs. Was Ed strong enough to lift one of the post. Sure. How do you think he got the tri-pod to stand up on it's ends. In the first place? Ed lifted each post. One at a time. And erected his tri-pod. May be I should draw you a picture. And that's not a bad ideal. How do you think I found out how to set up the wormhole. In order to get my truck to run down the road? Ed's Tri-pod set up. Go look at my web page. It's there dude. Larry









   Hi Don; Welcome to the world of GreenGlow. I checked out your link. Lot of good stuff there. Well, I can't speak for ever body here. But I'm a stick in the mud kind of guy. Common as home made mud. But I have this project that I'm working on. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com. You can read about it there. You might find some thing there. There are a lot of others here. That also have projects that they are working on. There is more going on here than any place that I've been. Larry L. Burks Hi George. How's it going. I'm still working on my spinning mold disk experiment. I've got the The electric motor bolter to a board. And I've got a board disk made, and it's on the motor. Runs great. I'm trying to grow some mold on it now. I can't get the mold to grow. I need to back track. And find out why the mold's not growing. If I can't get good a growing mold. I'll never get this thing to work. I need to find a new strain of mold. One that will grow against all odds. I see that we are talking about math. There are worded math problems and there are number math problems. There is some thing called " order of operation." In order to get the math to work right. It has to be done in the right order. This means that you have to get the interpretation of the mental picture of what you are seeing happening in nature right. I know that in the two atom model of gravity. Each atom has to have a gravitational field. Each gravitational field has to be independent from the other. Each gravitational field has it's on geometrical shape. The two gravitational fields have to be united. In order to get this reaction at a distance. The way that the gravitations fields are united. Is by way of their shape. Some people think that there has to be some hind of single. A go between. Some how the atoms are interaction with each other? A wave. A interaction of particles. But it is none of these. Wheeler called it a hand shake. How does nature do it? Each atom's geometrical shape is united with the other. It forms a third shape. Each independent atom's geometry( it's gravitational field.) shears the same shape of the third formed geometrical shape. If each atom is shearing the third geometrical shape. Then they can have tis reaction at a distance. There doesn't have to be an interaction of particles. Or any gravitational wave. Nature proves Wheeler right. It is a hand shake. The key word here is "sheared" If you think of gravity in this way. The gravitational field between two atoms. Is a binary system. Just like two binary stars. It is seen as one gravitational field. That rest between them. AS One. But the chain of interaction of particles of each atom as to be independent from the other. To get the math to work out right. Which brings us to this. Is it one gravitational fields. Or one gravitational field. It is both. Isn't that a lot like cheating? Sure it is. How does it work? It works great. In order to get the math to work out right. This is one of the little things you would have to know about gravity in nature. Just like all negative lens. They start out as two positive lens. They unite together and form one tube. ( wormhole. gravitational field.) One wormhole. But are acting as two independent half of a wormhole. Wormholes are composed of two half's. It just looks like one tube. But if there is just one tube. Then each atoms would be producing the same amount of force. And this is how gravity works in nature. All gravitational fields work as a binary system. Larry









    Just read my email. Wow!!!! May be I shouldn't have said any thing. But your missing the point. I'm not trying to prove that they used a beam weapon system on 9/11. I'm trying to get every body here at GreenGlow to see that we do have the ability to form wormholes. If we have a wormhole weapon system. We have thew ability to form wormholes. If we can form wormholes. We can manipulate gravity. We are all ready doing this. The question then becomes? Can we find a way to do it. Sure. This is what my web page to all about. If the truth about 9/11 comes out. Then the fact that man can manipulate gravity comes out with it. This is why I'm tracking this story. Here are some links. It's all over the internet. http://physics911.net/stevenjones http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/whistleblower.html http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/ http://www.serendipity.li/wot/bollyn1.htm http://www.rense.com/general76/missing.htm http://www.rense.com/general76/missing.htm Last week. There wasn't any new emails. So I wrote a letter to Judy Woods. This is it. Check this link out. http://physics911.net/stevenjones The key words to look for are. iron oxide, molten iron, days after, evaporated and explosion. Cast iron is a compound. It is composed of two deferent atoms. Iron and carbon. Iron is not flammable by it self. Carbon is flammable. Iron oxide. Rust. Plus carbon. Is highly flammable Oxygen plus carbon will burn like no other. But if you use a bean weapon system (DEW) on high carbon steel. It will effect the atoms at the molecule level. It will cause the iron to deteriorate. Turn to rust. It will cause the iron to oxidize. If you add heat to it. as the temperature get higher. At some point. the high carbon steel will start to burn. On it own. You can do this at home. And see it for your self. If you take a Bic or a Zeppo cigarette lighter. The flint in the lighter is not flint. The element. It is a little stick. A rod. Of high carbon steel. If you move the grinder slowly and grind off little flaks of the steel. Grind out enough flaks to where can scrap them up in to a pile. Light the pile with a match. It will go up in smoke. Just like gun power. It will burn hot enough to the point that the steel will turn in to a liquid. White hot. And bead up in to little small balls. Why will it burn when it is in the state of being flakes and not as in the state of being a rod? The flint. The flakes have access to the air. Air has oxygen in it. If you get the oxygen to carbon ratio up high enough. It then becomes flammable. If you add heat to it. But when iron turns to iron oxide. The oxygen ratio goes up. And it becomes flammable. Then there is this other thing. When you take flakes of high carbon steel. At atmosphere pressure. And light it. It will burn as a specific rata. The flash in the pan. effect. They use to use gun power to get a flash. To get the light up strong enough to take the picture. Now days we use flash attachment. But here is. If you raise the pressure of the air. It pushes the oxygen molecules closer together. Makes the oxygen to carbon ratio go up. And it will burn at an acculturated rate. If it burn faster than .0025 thousands of a second. It seen as an explosion. Which in turn makes the pressure in any give burning element that is contained. Go straight through the roof. The faster it burns. The higher the pressure goes. The faster it will burn. The faster it burns. The higher the temperature will go. Because of this. The temperature and the pressure goes through the roof. This is what a detonations is. This is what an explosion is. At some point what ever is containing the burning element. Will fail. Due to the weakening of the container due to the heat of the temperature. And also due to the force of the pressure. so on 9/11 you not only have to show what is burning. That will cause the steel to turn to a white hot metal. And run like liquid. But you will also have to show why the metal was still burning 21 days later. And in addition to that you will also have to show. What was causing the explosion in the buildings. The boom. boom. boom. effect. When ever you clap your hands. There is this popping sound. Much like a gun shot. When you clap your hand. The air is being compressed. It sends out a shock wave. Just like a bomb sends out a shock wave. A compression wave. When I was training coon dogs. I had to train them not to be gun shy. When ever you shoot off a gun around a dog that has never heard a gun shot. The loud popping noise that a gun makes. It will scare the dogs and they will run off and hide. So when they are still puppy. Before I would go out to feed them. I took two boards. 1/4 inch thick. $ inches wide. And two feet long. I put a hinge at one end and glued a small block of wood to the out side of the boards. About half way down. On the out side. It's called a clapper. You can clap the two boards together and it will make a very loud popping sound. I would step out side the door. And clap he boards a few times and then feed the puppy's. Clapping the boards is the same thing as ringing the dinner bell. When the dogs got older and we went hunting. When the gun went off. They didn't run a way. It works. Which brings us to this. When the upper floors in the Twin Towers collapsed in on the lower floor. The the high carbon steel's atoms had been effected by the bean weapon. But they were not on fire. There was no heat there. But the compressing of the steel. caused the temperature of the steel to go through the roof. It got the steel hot enough to burn. But when the upper half came down on the lower half of every floor. It caused the air to be compressed. The burning of the oxidized high carbon steel. Moved from a slow burn rate. To a high rate of burning. Your explosion. It happened from floor, to floor, to floor. A chain reaction. It was doing it all in the blink of an eye. It all happened very fast. Every flour was a time bomb waiting to go off. Your boom. Boom. Boom. Effect Mystery solved. Does the evidence support this. Yes. Can it be proven in the lab? Sure. That this is what happen on 9/11. Yes. You can prove it to your self. Right there at home. And here is how you do it. Make you a clapper just like I told you ( above.) But this time. Close to the end. Make a little cup. In the center of the board. I said a little cup. Or bowl. Pan. What every you want to call it. Fill it with flakes of high carbon steel. Light it with a match. And as the filings are burning. Clap the boards. It will blow those boards to smithereens. I was doing this one time. I was mixing diesel fuel and either together. But a few drops of this mixture on the boards. It blew up. It split the boards. All you have to do with diesel fuel is compress it. And it will start to oxidize. And of course. The either has a low ignition temperature. But if the flaks are all ready burning. And you raise the pressure. You will get a louder pop. And explosion. Which brings us to this. They are using this beam weapon system as a Nation Missile Defence System. What they like about this set up is. The fact that it not only knocks the missile out of the sky. But they have also found out that it also knocks out the electronics of the guidance system. The missile go blind. And it goes off course. And misses it's target. The radios of the firemen and the police. Went brain dead for a little while on 9/11. How in the world did burning jet fuel cause this???? Would a wormhole weapon system cause some thing like this to happen. Sure. it would. But what they like best about this system. Is the fact that all nuclear bombs have a certain amount of electronics to them. If you shoot the missile with this bean weapon system. It will fries the electronics to the bomb. Defusing the bomb. How good can it get? Which brings us to this. The D.O.D. has some thing like a Cook Book. A Game Plain Book. What to do in case the U.S. ever comes under attack. They had a meeting of the mind's. A think tank. They came up with a plain of action of what to in case we ever came under attack. This book has in it any and ever way possible. That we could come under attack. And a plain of action of what to do in any case scenario. When it finally dong on them hat Americas was under attack. They rush every body off into some kind of bunker. This bunker is also a control center. A command center. In this command center are military advised. Science advisers. Political advisers. Every kind of adviser that you can think of. Their there. They open up the plain book. They looked under "Under Attack." And in the out line. They looked below. "Under attack". And found "under attack by suicide bombers. Below that they found. "Under attack by suicide bombers flying airplanes". And below that they found "Under attack by suicide bombers, flying airplanes carrying bombs". And below that they found. " under attack by suicide bombers carrying nuclear bombs". The worst case scenario. They went to the other side of the page to see what course of action to take. And they found the right course of action to be used use. It said. " use the bean weapon system on every place that the nuclear might be. NOW. NOT LATER. BUT NOW. right a way. They did it by the book. It was a text book maneuver. In cases like this. The president doesn't make these decision. The advisers tell the president what to do. And all the he does is nod his head. The go a head signal. The people of the D.O.D. Where thinking the same thing that I was thinking. Those airplanes were caring suit case nukes. That were designed to with stand a airplane crash. They had a time delay device on them. They were time bombs. They wanted every body in America to be watching there T.V. And while every body was watching It all On T.V.. They would set the nukes off. They couldn't get a crew in there to find out if it was carrying a suit case nuke. Every thing was on fire. The clock was ticking. How long could they wait? No body know? They had to make a decision. If the air planes were not carrying any nuclear bombs. And they did nothing. Only About 500 people would die. If they used the bean weapon system on every place they thought the suit case nukes were. The Twin Towers. On top of the other building around the Twin Towers. Where the bombs might have landed. The Pentagon. The plane over Pa. If they did nothing. and those planes where caring suit case nukes. And if those suit case were allow to go off. It would have killed 50 million Americans. That day. The lesser of two evils. This is what they did. No one but no one. Expected for the Twin Towers to do what they did. Un seen consequences. About 3oo Americans died that day. You can't go and start beating up on the Naval Officers. That did their duty that day. They did what they were told to do. Those Offers's duty is to do what every they are told to do. It's their job. With out every blinking an eye. It is their job to defend America to the tilt. The people in the government can't tell you what happen that day. It's illegal for them to tell you. It's their job to keep their mouth shut. Keeping their mouth shut is what keeps America safe. "Loose lips sink ships". Were those planes carrying suit case nukes? May be they were. May be they weren't. But what they can't say is. We don't know. They know. It's just that they can't tell you. It's there job not to tell you. What you saw in action on 9/11. Is the tip of the ice burg of what we have. But at the same time. It is our duty. As Americans. To ask questions. But ounce you find out the truth. The truth has to come out. What was done was done. And there is nothing that any body can do about it. Once you are able to see the truth as it. If you can see things for what they are. Some thing deep in side of you changes. You are able to let go. Once you are able to just let go. Then you can have closure. The healing process begins. Don't let this linger on for years and years. Let the healing process begin. But, a few days a go Some thing else donged on me. Waco. If they used a crow control weapon system on the people at Waco. The people on the inside of the building said, that there was a wall of flames that rushed through the house. Tear gas is not flammable. But if some thing happened to change the chemical composition of the tear gas. It could become flammable. Is this what happened? Could be. And why I'm talking about all of these thing is this. " It's is a wise man hat learns from his mistakes. It is a even wiser man that can learn from the mistakes of others." Making a wormhole form is easy. Doing it safely. Is a deferent story. There are unseen dangers. That mast people would never think of. The danger of fire is one of them. No body told me about this. My truck burnt to the ground. This is why I'm telling you. Be careful. Larry L. Burks









    Check this link out. http://physics911.net/stevenjones The key words to look for are. iron oxide, molten iron, days after, evaporated and explosion. Well. I'm going to have to write one more letter and send it out. Before I call it a day. Cast iron is a compound. It is composed of two deferent atoms. Iron and carbon. Iron is not flammable by it self. Carbon is flammable. Iron oxide. Rust. Plus carbon. Is highly flammable Oxygen plus carbon will burn like no other. But if you use a bean weapon system (DEW) on high carbon steel. It will effect the atoms at the molecule level. It will cause the iron to deteriorate. Turn to rust. It will cause the iron to oxidize. If you add heat to it. as the temperature get higher. At some point. the high carbon steel will start to burn. On it own. You can do this at home. And see it for your self. If you take a Bic or a Zeppo cigarette lighter. The flint in the lighter is not flint. The element. It is a little stick. A rod. Of high carbon steel. If you move the grinder slowly and grind off little flaks of the steel. Grind out enough flaks to where can scrap them up in to a pile. Light the pile with a match. It will go up in smoke. Just like gun power. It will burn hot enough to the point that the steel will turn in to a liquid. White hot. And bead up in to little small balls. Why will it burn when it is in the state of being flakes and not as in the state of being a rod? The flint. The flakes have access to the air. Air has oxygen in it. If you get the oxygen to carbon ratio up high enough. It then becomes flammable. If you add heat to it. But when iron turns to iron oxide. The oxygen ratio goes up. And it becomes flammable. Then there is this other thing. When you take flakes of high carbon steel. At atmosphere pressure. And light it. It will burn as a specific rata. The flash in the pan. effect. They use to use gun power to get a flash. To get the light up strong enough to take the picture. Now days we use flash attachment. But here is. If you raise the pressure of the air. It pushes the oxygen molecules closer together. Makes the oxygen to carbon ratio go up. And it will burn at an acculturated rate. If it burn faster than .0025 thousands of a second. It seen as an explosion. Which in turn makes the pressure in any give burning element that is contained. Go straight through the roof. The faster it burns. The higher the pressure goes. The faster it will burn. The faster it burns. The higher the temperature will go. Because of this. The temperature and the pressure goes through the roof. This is what a detonations is. This is what an explosion is. At some point what ever is containing the burning element. Will fail. Due to the weakening of the container due to the heat of the temperature. And also due to the force of the pressure. so on 9/11 you not only have to show what is burning. That will cause the steel to turn to a white hot metal. And run like liquid. But you will also have to show why the metal was still burning 21 days later. And in addition to that you will also have to show. What was causing the explosion in the buildings. The boom. boom. boom. effect. When ever you clap your hands. There is this popping sound. Much like a gun shot. When you clap your hand. The air is being compressed. It sends out a shock wave. Just like a bomb sends out a shock wave. A compression wave. When I was training coon dogs. I had to train them not to be gun shy. When ever you shoot off a gun around a dog that has never heard a gun shot. The loud popping noise that a gun makes. It will scare the dogs and they will run off and hide. So when they are still puppy. Before I would go out to feed them. I took two boards. 1/4 inch thick. $ inches wide. And two feet long. I put a hinge at one end and glued a small block of wood to the out side of the boards. About half way down. On the out side. It's called a clapper. You can clap the two boards together and it will make a very loud popping sound. I would step out side the door. And clap he boards a few times and then feed the puppy's. Clapping the boards is the same thing as ringing the dinner bell. When the dogs got older and we went hunting. When the gun went off. They didn't run a way. It works. Which brings us to this. When the upper floors in the Twin Towers collapsed in on the lower floor. The the high carbon steel's atoms had been effected by the bean weapon. But they were not on fire. There was no heat there. But the compressing of the steel. caused the temperature of the steel to go through the roof. It got the steel hot enough to burn. But when the upper half came down on the lower half of every floor. It caused the air to be compressed. The burning of the oxidized high carbon steel. Moved from a slow burn rate. To a high rate of burning. Your explosion. It happened from floor, to floor, to floor. A chain reaction. It was doing it all in the blink of an eye. It all happened very fast. Every flour was a time bomb waiting to go off. Your boom. Boom. Boom. Effect Mystery solved. Does the evidence support this. Yes. Can it be proven in the lab? Sure. That this is what happen on 9/11. Yes. You can prove it to your self. Right there at home. And here is how you do it. Make you a clapper just like I told you ( above.) But this time. Close to the end. Make a little cup. In the center of the board. I said a little cup. Or bowl. Pan. What every you want to call it. Fill it with flakes of high carbon steel. Light it with a match. And as the filings are burning. Clap the boards. It will blow those boards to smithereens. I was doing this one time. I was mixing diesel fuel and either together. But a few drops of this mixture on the boards. It blew up. It split the boards. All you have to do with diesel fuel is compress it. And it will start to oxidize. And of course. The either has a low ignition temperature. But if the flaks are all ready burning. And you raise the pressure. You will get a louder pop. And explosion. Which brings us to this. They are using this beam weapon system as a Nation Missile Defence System. What they like about this set up is. The fact that it not only knocks the missile out of the sky. But they have also found out that it also knocks out the electronics of the guidance system. The missile go blind. And it goes off course. And misses it's target. The radios of the firemen and the police. Went brain dead for a little while on 9/11. How in the world did burning jet fuel cause this???? Would a wormhole weapon system cause some thing like this to happen. Sure. it would. But what they like best about this system. Is the fact that all nuclear bombs have a certain amount of electronics to them. If you shoot the missile with this bean weapon system. It will fries the electronics to the bomb. Defusing the bomb. How good can it get? Which brings us to this. The D.O.D. has some thing like a Cook Book. A Game Plain Book. What to do in case the U.S. ever comes under attack. They had a meeting of the mind's. A think tank. They came up with a plain of action of what to in case we ever came under attack. This book has in it any and ever way possible. That we could come under attack. And a plain of action of what to do in any case scenario. When it finally dong on them hat Americas was under attack. They rush every body off into some kind of bunker. This bunker is also a control center. A command center. In this command center are military advised. Science advisers. Political advisers. Every kind of adviser that you can think of. Their there. They open up the plain book. They looked under "Under Attack." And in the out line. They looked below. "Under attack". And found "under attack by suicide bombers. Below that they found. "Under attack by suicide bombers flying airplanes". And below that they found "Under attack by suicide bombers, flying airplanes carrying bombs". And below that they found. " under attack by suicide bombers carrying nuclear bombs". The worst case scenario. They went to the other side of the page to see what course of action to take. And they found the right course of action to be used use. It said. " use the bean weapon system on every place that the nuclear might be. NOW. NOT LATER. BUT NOW. right a way. They did it by the book. It was a text book maneuver. In cases like this. The president doesn't make these decision. The advisers tell the president what to do. And all the he does is nod his head. The go a head signal. The people of the D.O.D. Where thinking the same thing that I was thinking. Those airplanes were caring suit case nukes. That were designed to with stand a airplane crash. They had a time delay device on them. They were time bombs. They wanted every body in America to be watching there T.V. And while every body was watching It all On T.V.. They would set the nukes off. They couldn't get a crew in there to find out if it was carrying a suit case nuke. Every thing was on fire. The clock was ticking. How long could they wait? No body know? They had to make a decision. If the air planes were not carrying any nuclear bombs. And they did nothing. Only About 500 people would die. If they used the bean weapon system on every place they thought the suit case nukes were. The Twin Towers. On top of the other building around the Twin Towers. Where the bombs might have landed. The Pentagon. The plane over Pa. If they did nothing. and those planes where caring suit case nukes. And if those suit case were allow to go off. It would have killed 50 million Americans. That day. The lesser of two evils. This is what they did. No one but no one. Expected for the Twin Towers to do what they did. Un seen consequences. About 3oo Americans died that day. You can't go and start beating up on the Naval Officers. That did their duty that day. They did what they were told to do. Those Offers's duty is to do what every they are told to do. It's their job. With out every blinking an eye. It is their job to defend America to the tilt. The people in the government can't tell you what happen that day. It's illegal for them to tell you. It's their job to keep their mouth shut. Keeping their mouth shut is what keeps America safe. "Loose lips sink ships". Were those planes carrying suit case nukes? May be they were. May be they weren't. But what they can't say is. We don't know. They know. It's just that they can't tell you. It's there job not to tell you. What you saw in action on 9/11. Is the tip of the ice burg of what we have. But at the same time. It is our duty. As Americans. To ask questions. But ounce you find out the truth. The truth has to come out. What was done was done. And there is nothing that any body can do about it. Once you are able to see the truth as it. If you can see things for what they are. Some thing deep in side of you changes. You are able to let go. Once you are able to just let go. Then you can have closure. The healing process begins. Don't let this linger on for years and years. Let the healing process begin. Larry L. Burks Warm; Here's the trick that we have to do. NASA want's to use the technology to form wormhole. And manipulate gravity. And use this technology to go back to the moon. Larry









   Hi; read every body email this week I see that we are talking about gravity. This is good. If you want to do some thing. To get good at it. You have to do it a lot. You have to think about it a lot. You have to study it a lot. The more you think about gravity. the better metal picture you will have of what gravity is and how it works. But at some point and time. It suddenly dongs on you. That gravity can do so many different things . All at the same time. How is it that one could have a theory of gravity that is simple and beautiful. How could some thing like gravity be so complex. and at the same time be simple and beautiful? Because it is. There is a logic that it obeys. It is a simple logic. And it is simple to follow once you get the hang of it. Which is??????? Things all ways fall in the down direction. Period. End of story. Gravity is a attractive force. All objects are attracted to all other objects. All at the same time. But their are forces that can be tracked back to the mass of an objects . Other than gravity. inertia. Mass. The force that resist acceleration mass at rest. Mast in motion centrifugal force. If you are in orbit or if you are not in orbit. The forces are acting on your body right now as I speak. And for the most part. You can't fell a thing. Did you just fill that? I just felt some thing......It felt as if the ground just then. Moved below my feet. What do you know. I didn't fell any thing either. It part of my every famous. "Take a trip and never leave the farm. Theory" We are right now at rest. We are not moving. No. Let me think.... We are not at rest. We are in motion. The earth is spinning around. That means that we are going around in a circle. Right? No that can't be right. We have a moon. The moon is going around the earth. This means that the earth has a wabble. A small orbit. Around the moon. The moon is in orbit. But the earth is in orbit with the moon. The earth and the moon is a binary system. We are in orbit with each other. But the earth is going around the sun. All at the same time. This means that the earth is going through space like a cork screw? A cork screw that is all bent out of shape. Right. No that can't be right. There are other planets in the solar system. Their mass will effect the path that the earth takes in space around the sun. So Now we have two different cork screw paths. A wabble. The curved path of all of the planets and what else is out there and the curved path of the orbit around the sun. Right. No that can't be right. The sun is a star in the galaxies that we live in. The galaxies is spinning around. And the galaxies is moving through space at 300 thousand miles per hour. Now. What were you saying about a straight line to the moon. What straight line would that be? A straight line relative to who? What would be a straight line to your. To other obverse. The object would be going like a snake doing double summer salt back word flips all the way to the moon. What you would see an object traveling millions of miles. An other person would see the object travel 1oo millions. A another a billions of miles. I tell other truckers that I'm levitating in my truck. It true. Even though I'm setting in my set. Here on earth. At the same time I'm in orbit around the sun. The same gravity that holds the earth in orbit around the sun. Is the same gravity the hold my body in orbit around the sun. This means that if the earth should suddenly vanish. I would not fall to the surface of the sun because I'm still in orbit. If I am in orbit. I am levitating above the surface of the sun. It true. My truck makes a trip the distance around the earth every 24 hour. Whither I leave the parking lot or not. Are you sure you didn't feel the ground move. just a little bit? We are going in any thing but a straight line. And you can't fell it. Einstein once said. " You can't fell your weight when you fall ". If the atoms that your body is made of. Is also the source of the force that makes you move. You will not feel your weight when you fall. Thank of it this way. If the atoms of you body is the source of the force that makes you levitate. I all ways wanted a UFO. Now. I are one. You know. When you listen to the experts on the subject talk about gravity. The Big Dogs. They talk about string field theory. Wormholes. Multiverse. Holograph universes. Mirror worlds. The "Take a trip and never leave the farm. Theory". Is starting to sound better all ready. The sad part is. There right. This "is" the way nature is. I know that it sounds imposable for one to under stand. But if you can see nature in the act of doing what they are calling, string field theory. Wormholes. Multiverse. Holograph universes. Mirror worlds. There's nothing to it. What I'm trying to say is. Gravity is nothing like what you think it is. It's deferent. It's way deferent. But it's simple. Just because it is deferent. does not mean that it is hard to understand. Don't let any body tell you that you can't under stand gravity. You can. Larry









   You are stating it wrong. It is not a beam weapon system. Saying "beam". Is the same as saying a "ray". There is no such thing as a ray of light. Light all ways comes in the form of a tube, It is a wormhole. Wormholes can curve space to the point that atoms can become ripped from atoms. You can say that the steel is turning to dust. The question you should be asking your self is. "Why is the steel turning to dust". Cast iron is a compound. It is heat resistant. It will melt only at very high temperatures. But if you use a wormhole weapon system on it. The atoms of the molecules of the compound will rearrange their self. And a high carbon steel which is not flammable. Then becomes a metal that is highly flammable. When high carbon steel burns. It burns a very high temperature. A temperature that is so hot. The steel becomes white hot. And will flow like water. The cast iron engine of the 9/11 cars caught on fire and it was the cast iron steel that was burning. metal that does not have carbon in it. Will not burn. But will move from being in a solid state. To being in a liquid state. It melts. There must be at least fifty thousand people in the States that know the same things that I do. Why don't they come out and tell the truth? They are. They are beginning to step forward and tell the truth. The dam has burst. Larry









    Solve the mystery of why the cast iron parts on the cars burnt Cast iron is a high carbon steel. Hi carbon steel will catch on fire and burn. Take a Zepto lighter. The flint in the lighter is not a flint. What I mean is . It is not made out of flint. The rock. The flint is made out of high carbon steel. A little rod of high carbon steel. Take out the wick. And turn the grinder wheel slowly. Grind out a little pile of dust scrape it up into a pile. Then light a match to it. It will burn up like gun power. It burns so hot the metal will get white hot. After it burns. Look at it under a magnifying glass. The metal beads up into little balls of metal. The dust around 9/11 was heavy. It was heavy because it had little balls of metal in it. BBs. If you take a spoon full of the dust. Put it in a glass of water. Spin it around. Pour every thing out but a little bit left in the glass. Do this a few times. The last time that you do this. The water should be clear by now. When you spin the water in the glass. It will form a vortex at the bottom of the glass. You should be able to see the BBs in the center of the vortex. Every thing that was made out of high carbon caught on fire and burn to the ground. Engine blocks, spindles or axles, tires, door handles. Body's The steel that did not burn was not made of high carbon steel. This new beam weapon system that they have now will effect metal in this way. As the carbon burns up. In the end what is left is iron. The carbon is depleted from the metal. Want to find out what happen on 9/11. Do a cross comparison text on the high carbon objects. The before and after effect. If in deed. The high carbon steel was burning. The steel it's self was what was burning. It will have less carbon after it burns. Than it did before it burns. If this turns out to be true. Then you will know what happened. And there is only one way. And one way only . That some thing like this could have happened. They are testing a weaker system on people as crowd control. They say it makes your skin fill as if it is on fire. The people that jumped form the Twin Towers. Didn't just go to the edge and jump. They came out of that building at a dead run. They would rather face death it's self than stay in that building. They were running as if their clothing was on fire. But was not. It was not hot where they were at. They are using a weaker version of the system for crowd control. They say that it makes your skin feel as if it is on fire. It will make you run from the beam as if your skin is on fire. The people that jumped from The buildings On 9/11. They just didn't stand on the edge and then jump. They could come out of the building on a dead run. I watch a woman run out of the building to her death. I couldn't under stand why she would sooner jump to her death. Than stay in that building. What on earth could have been happening in the twin towers that day that would force a person to make such a decision? Choose death over pain? Now we know. They same beam weapon system that will make objects that are made of carbon flammable. Will also make your skin burn. It will also turn objects that are made out of silicon. Which is what most rocks and glass's are made out of. Turn in to dust. Was there any dust to be found around the Twin Towers? The real fine dust. Like what is needed to get into your lungs and form black lung. Turn mercury from a liquid state to a gaseous State. If you breath this gas. It will wind up in your brain. Your dead. This beam weapon system I s called Reagen's Star Wars Program. A space age type of weapon system. They show a film clip on the news back in 1985 When they were pushing the weapon system. They filmed a building that they shot with it. If you look at this film and the film of 9/11 they look the same. Both buildings turned to dust. All in the blink of an eye. At first I couldn't under stand. I thought to my self. Why Oh, why would any body want to use this weapon system to shoot airplanes that have all ready crashed. The one in the air I could see. But the ones that are on the ground? Why. Then it donged on me. The best part about this weapon system is the fact that all nuclear bomb have to have electronics in them in order the bomb to work. This weapon system will fry the electronic on the bomb. Defusing the bomb. It will melt the wires at room temperature. They thought that the air plains were carrying suit case nuclear bombs. They did it by the book. It was a text book maneuver. They had to do what they had to do. It's their job to do so. Sad. But true. Larry L. Burks. Every body else starts running through screen doors or jumping out windows. Larry









    Dear George. I'm in to a lot of deferent things. I have this new theory of gravity. Which to under stand it. You would have to develop the physical evidence to a lot of deferent things. I'm trying to find the quickest way from point (A) to point (B). Which would be. Develop the technology of free space negative lenses. It's not what we have. It's what we don't have. The missing parts of negative free space lenses. We know what is happening a Point (A) and we know what is happening at point (B) But we don't know what is happening at point (C). Half way between points (A) and (B). From the data that I have looked at. We don't know what is happening at point (C). And there is no way to find out. What is happening when we chose not to look. What is happening in places that we can not look at. The past history of the particle. One half of a free space negative lens is the same thing as ED Witten's building blocks of nature. A particle detector can tell us what is happening at point (B). But it can not tell us what is happening at point (C) when the detector is at point (B). Big problem. It can not be verified by direct means. But can be verified by indirect means. If you can solve the mystery of Ed Wittens building blocks of nature. Map out the geometry of the field energy of the atoms. You can use the data to build Einstein's two atom model of gravity. And then use Einstein's two atom model of gravity. The building blocks of gravity. And solve the mystery of gravity. I am taking picture of what the geometry is doing in a free space negative lens. But pictures are not good enough to carry the day. It has to be mapped out with a particle detector. Dr.Kaku said some years back. That what we need. Is to see how wormhole forms in slow motion. What I'm saying is What we need to do is see how a free space negatived lens forms in slow motion. I have been doing this. But what we need to do is map out with a particles detector. What a free space negative lens is doing. When it forms . In slow motion. What I'm doing. You can't use a particle detector to map it out. But I have found two places in nature where a negative lens forms in slow motion in nature. Where you can use a particle detector to map out it's geometrical shape and detect what kind of particle is in what part or place of the negative lens. At any one given time. I was thinking. Would you mind if we asked you to go out and solve Einstein's Grand Unity Theory for us? Aren't you the one that said. "I thought GreenGlow was about finding out ways to manipulate gravity." It is. The balls in your court. Tag your it. Larry George I gave a look at your link. I think that you are on the right track. I like your two atom approach. And you are right when you say the things have to go to zero. The strength of the forces as to equal zero. But there are some things that you are missing. What you are saying has to a line it self with nature. The theory has to be right first time. Every time. We both know that there is no gravity particle. But if you don't have a particle. That is responsible fore the force. The force's of mass The force of gravity. Saying curved space want get it. This is the same problem that Einstein ran into. Curved space will tell us how it goes. But it doesn't tell us what makes it go. What particle is responsible for the force. Because we are both working on two atom model of gravity. You probably have the right math. I have the right particles. We could learn from each other. Can you take your two atom model of gravity and use it to solve the mystery of gravity. What I mean is. Have you tried it out with Newton's gravity and Einstein's gravity. Have you tried it out with the way things work in nature? Can it make objects that have deferent mass, fall at the same rate? Can it make two deferent objects stay in the same orbit that have deferent masses? Can it make the force of each object very? Can it make the strength of centrifugal force very. Can it make the mass of objects very? Can it make the force of two objects counsel each other's forces out. Once they meat. Can it explain way whey the gravity between the moon and the earth is a two way street? Can it explain why object can produce a force in two deferent directions at the same time. Can it explain how an object can produce a force in all direction at the same time. There are a lot lot of test. That a new theory of gravity would have to pass. It has to be able to do it all. Right first time every time. If it fails just one test. You just got shot out of the water. I can help you fix that thing. I have made a lot of mistakes. It's imposable. Just imposable to do. Till you see how it done. In nature. You are starting out at point (A) and are working your way towards point (B). I'm starting out at point (B) and working my way towards point (A). We should meat some where in the middle. Larry.









   Sure. Feynman "Six Easy Pieces on Physics" Of course you didn't watch it. It was recorded on tape. A tape recorder. In his Oct. 16 1962 Lecture on gravity. I read the book. listened to the tape. towards the very end He says some thing about The two electrons of the hydrogen atom.???? Hydrogen atoms have only one electron???? Was this a typo? Or was he thinking . The electrons of two deferent hydrogen atom. This is the same thing as Einstein's Two atom model of the universe. One that has gravity. Or his two atom model of gravity. The building blocks of gravity. The rest of you. If you haven't listen to Feynman lectures on gravity. You need to do so. It's good. Best yet. Larry









    With out gain or loss of energy. Gravity. Gravity like that found in nature. Pick a rock up off the ground and hold it in your hand. You can feel the force. To get gravity to work. You don't need an out side force or energy. What you are holding in your hand. Is all you need. If you want to solve the mystery of gravity. You have to take what you are holding in your hand. Adding nothing to what is there. Taking a way nothing from what is there. Can you do it. Can man do this? Sure. Every thing that is needed to make gravity work. Work like it does in nature. There is only one way that gravity works in nature. Gravity doesn't need fixing. It's working great. If it's not broke. It don't need fixing. Man does not need to go out and make his own gravity. Al he need to do is use the gravity that is al ready there. In nature. But if he wants to manipulate gravity. He will have to find a way to make a wormhole form. Can man do this. I guess so. He all ready is. The same people that are working on the technology of forming wormholes in order to manipulate gravity. Or the same people that are working on the same technology of forming wormholes to be used as a weapon system. So you want to know where they get the energy or mess to form a wormhole from. You are sitting in it. David Bohm. "The holographic Universe." Every cubic inch of space that rest before you has the same mass of 50 thousand hydrogen bombs. Which I don't think is right. It's more like What Einstein said. The positive energy of a star is equal to the negative energy of it's gravitational field. The positive energy of all of the stars in a galaxies is equal to the black hole in the center of the galaxies. But here is where they get it right. The positive energy of the universe is equal to the negative energy of it's gravitational field. The gravitational field. That's the space that's rest between object that has mass. The tube part of the atom is it's gravitational field. It's not two different fields of energy. It is the same membrane in two deferent places at the same time. The tube has the same mass as the atom it is attached to. The same electron that makes up the atom. Is the same electron that makes up the tube. Like Einstein said "It is as one." It's all the same field energy. There is not two different field energy's . There is only one field energy. If you could see it. If you were looking at a atom. This atom is connected to every other atom in the universe by way of the tube part of the atom. It's gravitational field. But if you go out side to night. And you look due east. You can see stars close to the horizon. But if you look in the 180 other direction you will see states In the due west. If you drew straight a line from the star in the east to the star in the west. It would cross through your point of view. A focal point. Where you are standing. The tube part of the atom will form a straight line through your point of view. But in any direction that you look in the universe. Then turn and look in the 180 degrees other direction you will see stare. These stars are made of atoms. Whether you are there are not. Whether there is a atom there or not. The gravitational field. The tube part of the atom. Crosses through every point of space that rest before you eyes. It is there. But you can't see it. Strange dark matter. Missing mass? There all talking about the same thing. The same amount of mass needed in order to have a gravitational. In this universe. Is also the same amount of mass need to form a wormhole in this universe. The wormhole is composed of the tube part of the gravitational field of all of the atoms in the universe. Why? One half of the universe is connected to the other half of the universe by way of it's gravitational field. The tube part of the atom. This mass that is in the space that rest between objects is the same. From one end of the universe to the other. It all has the same amount. Every where. At every focal point in the universe. These means that you don't have to run out and get some energy to build your wormhole with. You have every thing you need right here at home. I've got it in my back yard. And you have it in your back yard also. If the space between objects isn't broken. It don't need fixing. If we want to manipulate gravity. We will have to find some thing that will effect gravity. No need to weary. We all ready know some thing that will effect gravity. Objects that are composed of atoms. Objects that have mass. Will have an effect on gravity. Gravity is all ready turn on. It's working great. You can't turn on some thing that is all ready turn on. What we need is some thing that will turn gravity off. No need to weary. We all ready know what we need to turn off gravity. A wormhole. What are wormholes made of? Space. The space that rest between objects. that has mass. The gravitational field part of atoms. The "key" , Are you listening? The key is. Find some thing that will effect space. Do we have things that will effect space. Yes superconducting elements will effect space. They are said to be space shielding. It's not the mirror effect. It's not the spacer shielding effect. Objects that are space shielding are not gravity shielding. It is the light that it does not stop. The space that it does not stop. As the information goes past the space shielding object. It inter acts with the object. The space curves in at a 90 degree angle to the edge of the object. Diffracted light. diffracted space. Curved space. Wheeler said that "It is not the gravitational field that makes the light curve in as it goes past a star. It is the mass of the star the makes the light curve. " You can take that statement to the bank. Nature proves Wheeler right. All right. We have our mass needed to form a wormhole. We now have some thing that will effect space. Then the question becomes. Who do we get the tubes of the gravitational to form a wormhole. If you had a sheet of tin foil. And that tin foil had a pin hole in it. All of the information of the tubes that connect one half of the universe to the other half of the universe goes through that one pin hole. Now that is a lot of tubes to go through a one tiny pin hole. But it's true. You can take a pin hole and take a picture of one half of the universe through a pin hole. If you take a mirror and reflects the light from the stars off of it. You can take the same picture. If you placed a mirror in front of the stats. The light coming from the stars will inter act with the reflection of there self's. In the mirror. But if you place a concave mirror on the back side of the pin hole. The light coming from the stars will inter act with the reflection of it's self as if there is a hole universe on the other side of the pin hole. The tube part of the atom will inter act with it's reflection ( a virtual one half of a universe.) As if it is interacting with the other half of the universe. Any way you go at it. You end up with the mass of a hole universe. Even though there is only half of a real universe there. If you record the information. As a space shielding hologram. On the film of the concave mirror' The light will interact with the hologram as if there is a real universe on the other side of the mirror. When ever light goes through a hole. It will form a negative lens. Light in the form of a tube. The membranes of the tube part of the negative lens is composed of the mass of a hole universe. This is the type of wormhole you need to manipulate gravity. Wormholes do not suck. They blow. Any thing you try to push down the mouth of a wormhole. It will push it right back out again. Go read my web page some more. It's a lot bigger than you think. If you set up your equipment one way. You could use it as a weapon system. Like Moses did. The pillar of blackness. But if you set up your equipment the other way. Like the Mayan, Inca, Egyptians and Ed of Coral Castle. You can use it to manipulate gravity. They have pictures of the black contrails on the net. Pictures of the Egyptians using them and the Mayans using them. You can see the tubes of light at night , You can see the tubes of light, in the day time. The particles that rest between space have a wave function to them. You could say that they are coherent light. There is not a leaser there. There is no bean. No ray of light. It is light. Energy. Field energy. In the form of a tube. But all lasers are resonators. The concave mirror behind the pin hole acts like a resonator. This is what you have to have in order to form a hologram. You have to have a resonator in order to form a hologram. The hologram is as recorded standing wave. This is what holds the wormhole open. It is not producing any energy. It is interaction with the energy that is all ready there. It is a stand a lone device. It doesn't need a out side power source. In the bible. Moses's ark was a weapon system. It produce a pillar of blackness. A wormhole. Joshua used the ark in the battle for Jericho. The same thing that made the walls of Jericho turn to dust and fall down. Is the same thing that made the walls of the Twin Towers turn to dust and fall down. A wormhole. Where did Moses get his power source? He didn't. It doesn't use an out side power source. It doesn't need an out side power source. It is a stand a lone device. If you look in Dr. Kock,s Book "Lasers and Holography" There is two pictures of the negative lens recorded as a hologram. One he used the lens action of the hologram to take a picture with. You can see what is on the other side of the hole. But in the other picture. He moves in closer to the hole used as the lens. And takes a another picture. And all that can be seen in the second picture is the black empty space. The type of space needed to stop gravity dead in it's tracks. The only thing known to man that can turn off gravity. The same people that are working on the technology of wormhole in order to manipulate gravity. Is the same people that are working on the technology of wormhole to be used as a weapon system. If we have such a weapon system. This also means that we can form wormholes. This means that we can also manipulate gravity. And we can also get cold fusion to work. A wormhole can curve space to the point that atoms there self become ripped apart. They glow in the dark. GreenGlow. Get it? All lasers are resonator. This devics is a resanor. But it is not a laser. Lasers produce corherent light. If form a hologram of The geometry of a negative lens. ( wormhole.) like Dr.Kock did. You have to use coherent light. The same particles the are produced by the sun. That have mass. Is also the same particles that rest between objects that form the gravitational field. Because it is all the same field energy. If it is the same field energy. You can use sun light and form a hologram of the geometrical shape of a wormhole. he spores of mold is space shielding to sun light. It is also space shielding the particles that make up the gravitational field. These particles have a wave function to them. The wave function to these particles is coherent light. They are suitable for making holograms. You can't see them. You can't detect them. But they are effect by the space shielding effect of the mold. So this device doesn't need an out side energy source from man. It gets it's energy from nature. From space. The energy. The mass. Is all ready there. Or here. We live in this ocean of unseen energy. It's this way. If this energy is there. You can get a wormhole to form. If it is not there. There will be no wormholes. It does not produce energy. It effects energy. It manipulates space. If you can manipulate space. You can get a wormhole to form. And if you can get a wormhole to form. You use the wormhole to manipulate gravity. Or if you do it just right. You can get it to form a very long wormhole. A black tube of light like the ones we see pictures of on the net that they are testing out west.(That's where I live.) And, or use it as a weapon system. And cut sky skyscraper in half with them. Why. Oh Why. Would any body want to use a wormhole as a weapon system? It's like opening the gates of hell. But if you use it to produce electricity with like ED did. Or as a propulsion system to make your car run down the road. The heavens part and right a way. You can start to hear the angles singing. Larry L. Burks









   Dear Linda; I have found some new proof of crop circles. And what they are and who's doing it. We both know that in a real crop circle. There is found in the soil samples. Evidence of radon particles. Micro wave or some thing else. There can also be found little BB of metal. Curved space is what is causing the BB's to form. When the trace elements found in the soil turn from a solid state to a liquid state. They will bead up just like water does on a waxed car. The stem of the wheat become less than solid and bends over. The elbow joints. And some of nodules of the stem are pop open. Like pop corn. This is all of the calling singes of a wormhole. Are wormholes real? Can they be used to manipulate gravity. Sure. In the soil of real Crop circle There can be found small BB of metal. They are using wormhole to form crop circles. Curved space is what makes the wheat to bend over. It is moving from a solid state to a liquid state. Less solid. Are we all ready doing this Sure. Some thing new has come up. When My first wormhole formed. It was in my truck. It caused the truck to catch on fire and burn to the ground. Things that were made out of hight carbon steel. Cast iron. Or high carbon. tires. While metals that were not made out of high carbon steel. Moved towards a liquid state. I just looked at the burnt cars of 9/11. http://www.rense.com/general75/melt.htm The same thing that happened to the cars. Also happen to my truck. I was doing an experiment on wormholes. The wormhole formed. NASA wants to know what I know about forming wormholes and manipulating gravity. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com is my website. The same people who are working on wormholes to manipulate gravity are thew same people who are working on wormholes is be used as a weapon system to shoot down missiles. They call it a beam weapon system. It's a wormhole. Light or energy in the form of a tube. http://www.ufolab.info/DNA-Lights-Main.htm A object that goes in to the mouth of a wormhole. Space becomes curved and you can use it to manipulate gravity. But IF some thing goes a little further down the mouth of a wormhole. Space becomes curved to the point that it can over ride the electro magnetic force. And atoms become ripped from atoms. When atoms get ripped from atoms. Steel changes from solid state to a liquid state. It will run, bend and warp. 9/11. Objects that are made out of silicon. Will turn to dust. Like cement and glass windows. 9/11 Get into your lungs and cause black lung. The dust may be as small as one atom. Mercury will change from a liquid state and change into a gas. 9/11 Get in your brain. Objects that are made of high carbon elements. That would usually not burn. When shot with a wormhole. become flammable. Why? The wormhole will effect the atoms at the molecular level. It will cause the atoms to rearrange their self. When this happens . It becomes flammable. 9/11 What do we find at 9/11 that is flammable. Things that are made of high carbon. Like the beams of the Twin Towers. Engine blocks. Door handles. Hubs. Tires. Oh. The wire in tires is spring steel. It will not burn. And Oh. Body's. Where are the body's? Metal that are not made out of high carbon steel will not burn. A person that is being shot with a beam weapon system. Their skin would fill as if it was on fire. They would try to run a way from what ever was causing it. People whose clothing catches on fire. They will try and run. Why did they jump out of the buildings. They are also using this beam weapon system for crowd control. When steel catches on fire. and burns. It will burn white hot. It will also boil. it splatters out small ball of metal. They call them BB. Welders get BB on the ground when they wield. There were BB found in the dust. That's why it was so heavy. And this is why we have large pools of molten metal on the ground. Can all of this be proven. Yes. The carbon is what burning in the steel. The burnt steel would have lesser amount of carbon in it than the carbon steel that didn't burn. A simple test will tell you If it is true. Test the metal. The same weapon system they are using to shot down missiles with. Is the same system we used to shoot down six North Korean missiles down with. Which is also the same weapon system they used to shot down the plain over Pa. Twin Towers. Pentagon. And there is a lot, lot, lot more from where this came from. One more thing. I stoped And talked to the people that are taking the pictures of the "Deming Lights". They are taking pictures of that Big Black Triangle shaped UFO that the U.S. Navy is testing down there in Deming N.M. They show it to me and I looked at it. If you get off Interstate I-10 at mile marker 102. Exit 102. And go east on the feeder road to mile marked 111. And look due south of the Interstate about eight miles at those hills. It will come up off the ground a little bit after dark. About 8:10 pm. Just like clock work. On time. It's after dark. You can't see it. But it has light on it just like any other air plain at night. Moves kind of slow. But this one is deferent. Looking at it with the naked eye. Every things all right. But if you look at with a set of binoculars. Or take a picture of it with a camera with a long lens on it. You are view it with some thing with a lens. The lens will make the deferent lights, on the craft become smeared out over space and time. The lights of the craft will look like as if they are 500 yards apart. When with the eye. We know that they are not. The mountains, fence post, stars etc. The other things that can be seen. The back ground Objects don't be come smeared out. They are as clear as dots. The stars in the pictures are still seen as dots. (See Deming lights pictures). But the lights of the craft. When you view them with a lens. Are smeared out, but nothing else is. ???? I get the same effect when I use a lens to view costic sheets of light Field Energy. Space is what gravity is made of. Light is a part of space. When ever you effect space. When ever you effect gravity. It will effect light as well. The way that we find wormhole in space is by this effect. We can not see the wormhole It's self but we can see the effect that gravity has on light. The lens effect on light. A wormhole. A Free Space Gravitational Lens. If you go to NASA's Hubble telescope home page. They have pictures of them. Why is the UFO craft producing this effect? It's effecting the Field Energy of space. It is effecting gravity. It is manipulating gravity. I've told you where to go and what to do after you get there. You can go see it for your self. Take a friend if you go. They say it's not safe by your self. A lot of drug runners down there. Some body need to investigate this and tell the truth about what is happening. It's a once in a life time story. It would be neat if you had pictures. And you could tell every one why the pictures are coming out the way that they do. Larry L Burks









    Some thing new has come up. When My first wormhole formed. It was in my truck. It caused the truck to catch on fire and burn to the ground. Things that were made out of hight carbon steel. Cast iron. Or high carbon. tires. While metals that were not made out of high carbon steel. Moved towards a liquid state. I just looked at the burnt cars of 9/11. http://www.rense.com/general75/melt.htm The same thing that happened to the cars. Also happen to my truck. I was doing an experiment on wormholes. The wormhole formed. NASA wants to know what I know about forming wormholes and manipulating gravity. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com is my website. The same people who are working on wormholes to manipulate gravity are thew same people who are working on wormholes is be used as a weapon system to shoot down missiles. They call it a beam weapon system. It's a wormhole. Light or energy in the form of a tube. http://www.ufolab.info/DNA-Lights-Main.htm A object that goes in to the mouth of a wormhole. Space becomes curved and you can use it to manipulate gravity. But IF some thing goes a little further down the mouth of a wormhole. Space becomes curved to the point that it can over ride the electro magnetic force. And atoms become ripped from atoms. When atoms get ripped from atoms. Steel changes from solid state to a liquid state. It will run, bend and warp. 9/11. Objects that are made out of silicon. Will turn to dust. Like cement and glass windows. 9/11 Get into your lungs and cause black lung. The dust may be as small as one atom. Mercury will change from a liquid state and change into a gas. 9/11 Get in your brain. Objects that are made of high carbon elements. That would usually not burn. When shot with a wormhole. become flammable. Why? The wormhole will effect the atoms at the molecular level. It will cause the atoms to rearrange their self. When this happens . It becomes flammable. 9/11 What do we find at (/11 that is flammable. Things that are made of high carbon. Like the beams of the Twin Towers. Engine blocks. Door handles. Hubs. Tires. Oh. The wire in tires is spring steel. It will not burn. And Oh. Body's. Where are the body's? Metal that are not made out of high carbon steel will not burn. A person that is being shot with a beam weapon system. Their skin would fill as if it was on fire. They would try to run a way from what ever was causing it. People whose clothing catches on fire. They will try and run. Why did they jump out of the buildings. They are also using this beam weapon system for crowd control. When steel catches on fire. and burns. It will burn white hot. It will also boil. it splatters out small ball of metal. They call them BB. Welders get BB on the ground when they wield. There were BB found in the dust. That's why it was so heavy. And this is why we have large pools of molten metal on the ground. Can all of this be proven. Yes. The carbon is what burning in the steel. The burnt steel would have lesser amount of carbon in it than the carbon steel that didn't burn. A simple test will tell you If it is true. Test the metal. The same weapon system they are using to shot down missiles with. Is the same system we used to shoot down six North Korean missiles down with. Which is also the same weapon system they used to shot down the plain over Pa. Twin Towers. Pentagon. And there is a lot, lot, lot more from where this came from. Larry









   Hi all, I'm back. Looks like I missed all the action again to night. You all must work must be here in the day and I get here at night. That or we live on the other side of the planet. There's a pattern to be found here. Caught up on my the email. Read ever one's mail. Looked at the links. Don't get me to talking about what is going on around here. The things that I know about . You don't want to hear it. You want sleep for a week. Go read the Safety First page on my web page. I've been a lot of places and seen a lot of things. Your right George. GreenGlow is about finding a way To manipulate gravity. There are two paths that we can take to solving the problem of how to solve the problem on how to manipulate gravity. I call them the top down,( which would be point (A)) or the bottom up. (Which would be Point (B)). Point A. Is at a point where man all ready know how to manipulate gravity. But he doesn't know what gravity is.( OH. By the way. This is where we are at today.) We don't know what a wormhole is or just how the wormhole is effecting gravity. Start out at the end or top and reverse engineer it back to being a science. The top down path. Point B. Where most people believe we are at today. Which is. We don't know what gravity is. But if we can find out what gravity is. We might some day be able to understand gravity to the point we can find a way to manipulate it. Start out at point B and work our way to point A. The bottom up path. If gravity if some kind of black box that no body knows what is in side. And it has a front door. And a back door. If point a is the front door. And point B is the back door. Some people are trying to get in by way of the front door. And some are trying to get in by way of the back door. Not me man. I crawled in through the bath room window. I don't play fair. If you have taken a beating from gravity like I have. It will either break you or make you. At some point in time. You will have taken all beating that you can take. At this point you will give up. Or the kid gloves come of. And it's down and dirty. Your not smart enough. I wasn't smart enough. No one is smart enough. I through my hand up into the air and said. "I give up. Tell me the answer." Mother Nature was standing right behind me when I said it. She said "your the stupidest one yet. What do I have to do. Show you a picture." I turned and replied. "Show me the picture". And she did. It's history. Man is not smart enough to solve the mystery of gravity. As long as man keeps telling nature that he is the smarter of the two. He will not win at this game. Only when man lets nature tell us how it is. Will we start to win at this game. So why is it. That when I talk about gravity. No body here know any thing about what I'm talking about? Strings are the only things that we find in the universe that have mass. Strings are nouns. Every thing else that we find in the universe is a verb. Waves. Particles. Curvatures of time and space. You have to see nature or the universe from my point of view. From nature's point of view. Go look at the pictures. What you are seeing in the picture can't be explained a way as a wave. Particle. Or curvatures of time and space. What you are seeing is the missing part of nature that man knows nothing about. What you are seeing is what gives us waves, particles and gravity. This is how nature works. You have to take that is there. Nothing more. Nothing less. And build from scratch. A hole universe. Like the one that we live in. If you can't find what it is that you are talking about. In these pictures. You want find it in this world. It doesn't exist. It's not real. It is something that man invented in his brain. It's not required that you prove that thing that are not there. Are real. It is only required of you to prove the things that are there. Are real. What is happening in nature when we chose not to look? What is happening in places where we can't look? Larry if you put in line. That means like a train. horizontal and vertical polarizing screens back to back. Where the information has to go through both polarizing screens. Trees go up and down and they have branch that go left and right. If this be the case. Ping. There goes your radio wave. I have been studying polarized like trying to find a way to prove that light is a string instead of a wave. If the tube shape of trees and there limes can cause like to become polarized. And cause bands to form. Cold it also be that strings can make light to become polarized and form bands. The fringe pattern we see in the membranes of light? May be. larry What a great ideal Tim. If you take white light ( The universal wave function.) Let pass through a resonator so that you can see it. Then let pass through a prison and watch it split in to different colors. Why don't you do this and come back and tell us what it did. See if you can get some pictures for posting. Use your PC cam. Larry I'm asking what is it about nature that gives us curvatures if space and time. There are not tooth fairy's. We are not after what we know we are looking for what we don't know. In Einstein's two atom model of the universe. Einstein's two atom model of gravity. His G.U.T. There is no math. But there is room for curvatures of time and space. Room for G.R., S.F.T. and Q.M. Have you had a chance to go read my web page yet? I need your help. I need your feed back. I need every body's feed back and help. Larry Why do you think I ware a foot ball helmet made out of aluminum foil around all day for. They say that they really work. A first down reflecting surface is space shielding. I told some one on the net,that a laser would not go through a mirror. The next day I saw a picture of a man in Iraq, walking around with a mirror over his head. I makes you wander just who all is reading our email now days. Probably every body. Is any thing safe any more? Larry









   Hi all, I'm back. I had to work yesterday. Didn't get a chance to check my email. Thought I'd take a second to see if I had any thing. Been kind of dead around here lately. Holy Cow. What happened yesterday? I missed it all. Read ever body's mail. George. I'm new here. I think this is the first time that I've seen your posts. I'm the Mickey Mouse guy here that Neil keeps talking about. Neil keeps talking about the either. We live in a ocean of energy. You could call it either. But I think it's more like field energy. It's not field energy. It's the geometry of field energy. I have been studying costic sheets of light. These sheets of light can make all kinds of weird shapes. The ones that I have taken an interest in are the geometrical shapes of positive and negative lens. Why I chose to study lenses is because there is a lot of data and some have used the positive lens to do experiments on. Like Wheeler. What I have read about Wheeler's "Delay Reaction Experiment". Based on Wheeler's findings. He does a thought experiment. To drive his point home. He says. There is a star two light years a way from us. There is a galaxies that rest between us and the star. The galaxy is one light year from us. The star admits one particle. The particle travail through space to us. The Particle (particles) to get to us. The particle has to the right or to the left of the galaxy. Because there are tow paths that the particle can go by. Just like in the double slit experiment. That's why they call it Wheeler's double slit experiment. As the information of the particle goes past the galaxy. The mass of the galaxy causes the information of the particle to change it's path. It causes space to become curved. The information of the particles curve back in to form a point. The function of a positive lens. ( Now when I do this with simple optics. The bending of light is called diffracted light. But when Wheeler does it. It's called curved space. It's all the same field energy. It all plays by the same rules of nature.) The information does not stop at the focal point. But carries on through the focal point. The particles cross paths. And as the get to where we are. The information is smeared out over millions of miles. We place a particle detector at point (A). And at point (B) There are millions of miles between point (A) and point (B). If the particle goes to the right of the galaxy. It will go through the focal point . And wind up at the detector on our left. At point (A). But if the particle comes around the left side. It will be curved by the mass of the galaxy. Go through the focal point and end up at point (B). On our right side. We can turn each particle detector off and on at will. If both detector are in the are on. If we turn of (A) the particle will be detected at point (B). If we turn of (B). It will be Detected at point (A)And vis versa. What Wheeler does. He lets the star admit one particle from the star. He waits one year. And lets the particle go past the star. The he wait almost one more year. To the last hour. the last minute the very last second. The last milli second. Then flips the switch to either (A) or (B). (A) and (B) are millions of light years a part. Which ever particle detector is left on will be the detector that will be the detector that will detect the particle. There is not enough time for a particle to travail between point (A) and (B) at the speed of light. In that one millionth of a second. It would take months to do so. But this is what most people miss about this experiment. At the very end Wheeler tacks on this. " Not only can the particle be detected at points (A) and (B). But all points between points (A) and (B)". At points (C) There are many points (C)s Which brings us to this. At point (C) that is half way between points (A) and (B) There is a galaxy that rest between the star and point (C). There is no information of the particle that travailed between The star and point (C). In the lab Wheeler used a solid round disk. No particle travailed through the disk. How did it get to point (C)? If you are observing the side view of a positive lens in nature. Like those produce by nature. You can see that there is a membranes that forms between points (A) and (B). And positive lenses are 3d. Point (C) is not only let and right but up and down. All a round. That does this say for particles that travail in a straight line. It don't look to good. I think that there is some thing curved here. In fact. When I look at this light. One day it accrued to me. I can find no straight lines. Every thing in the light is composed of curved lines. Check it out fore your self. One more thing that i noticed. The light is expressing no signs of prospective. Every thing is flat. It's like looking at the shadow of a 3d object that is transparent. But here's this. You could was a negative lens and repeat Wheeler's double slit experiment In the lab. The negative lens has a focal point. This means that there is two paths by which it can go by. It could have a point (A) and a point (B) The good thing about using a negative lens for a double slit type experiment. Is. It also has a point (C). The same problem arises with point (C) In the negative lens double slit experiment as it does with the positive lens double slit experiment. Only this time it's different. We now know that negative lens don't have a focal point. Nothing moves from the light source Through the empty black space that is found on the inside of negative lens. There is no mass to be found there. No wave. No particle. No information of any particle. No membranes. No strings. No nothing. No either. So what are we left with. Field Energy. NO. No. No. That's not right. The " geometry of Field Energy" The same shape that membranes of the negative lenses make's in nature. Is the path that the information of the particles takes. The path by which it goes by. From the light source to point (C). Which brings us to this. This ocean of field energy that we live in. Is composed of 90% of the mass of the universe. Your sitting in it right. Yes. You. Right there. You! If wormhole are free space negative lenses. They to would have black empty space on the inside of them. Just like all negative lenses do. If man can not detect this mass. We could detect the absent of it. George You may have missed it when I posted my web address. You talk about atoms being able to curve space. You talk about G.R. You have talked about your work. You may be able to pick up on what I'm talking about. Go read my webe page. And come back and tell us what you think. Larry









   Hi All I got "The Bottle Experiment" up and running on my web page. Here's the link. http://www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/The%20Bottle%20Experiment.html This is some thing that every one here can do. It a very powerful experiment. Because it has the power to poison your brain. And you will never be able to think quite right some how. Because you are the one who is doing the experiment. There will be no one around to blame it on who the light is not doing what you think it should be doing. A standing wave? A membranes function as a standing wave. There is no wave or no particles to be seen. Now. Through your own eye. What words would you use ti enplane what is happening in the experiment. Oh. About the gold. They were using a wormhole. On gold ore. Gold ore looks a lot like lead. It is black. And real heavy. If they thought that they had lead ore. But when they really had gold ore. It's not so hard to believe that they got gold from gold ore. Using a wormhole to remove gold from gold ore. Is a 100% effective process. Why. A wormhole can curve space to the point that atoms get ripped from atoms. The silicon part of the ore turns to dust. A dust composed of one atom at a time, dust. Real fine dust. But gold is a metal. It will turn from a solid state to a liquid state. The gold atoms will move in the direction of other gold atoms. Due to it's charge. It will beads up. Just like drops of water. It will form little BB. Or nuggets. Like they found at the Lost Dutchman's gold mine. They found the gold, in a bow, on the inside of a old Dutch oven. That the Indian had made. Why do you think they call it the Lost Dutchman's gold mine. The Indians did this. What did they use the Dutch oven for. Make pottery. What did they do with the bow? They used it to form a wormhole. What did they use the wormhole for. To get gold out of gold ore. All of those nuggets were rounded on the edges. They looked every where for the gold mine. There was no gold mine. There was no water. There is gold ore there. There was no way to get the gold out of the ore that was there. Or was there? But there is so little gold in that ore around where they found the Indian's gold. It would cost more to get the gold out of the ore than what the gold would be worth. It's called substandard gold ore. It is to poor to be mines. It's ever where out here. But with a 100% effective method for getting gold form gold ore. You will find that there is a lot of gold in that ore. The BB"s of metal. Like we find in the soil of crop circles. (wormhole.) The BB's. Like we found in the dust around the Twin Towers. (wormhole) The burning of the beans. The fine dust. The black lung. The mercury poisoning of the brain. They have tracked the mercury back to the thermostats in the offices of the Twin towers. But in order for the mercury to get in to the brain. It would have to change from a liquid state to the state of a gas. What on earth could have change mercury form a liquid state to a gas. Heat? I don't thing so. The dead dogs? They killed the dogs? Don't tell me they killed those poor dogs. Got to go eat. Larry









   Adrian Hi Read your email About this problem of matter mass and info. Missing mass. We know that the strange dark matter or missing mass is there. Can we detect it with a particle detector. No. Well may be. Sure. Depending on how we go about tiring to detect it. If we can not detect it be direct means. The no part. Then may be by indirect means. Which is called verify. You would have to have a lot, lot, lot, of indirect evidence in order to verify that it is there. Then there is this yes part. We have stat in our solar system. We call it the sun. We know that it can produce sun shine. Sun light. This so called sun light has the information of particles. Electrons, photons, and radon particles. We know that the electron and the radon particle has mass. But there is this question mark hanging over the head os the photon particle. About whether it has mass or not. Now the information of these particles that are produce by the sun. Wheeler was able to prove that the information of these particles are smeared out over space and time. Not only up and down but also back and forth in space and time. Is the mass of there particles smeared out over space and time. Sure. There is this arrow thing. The arrow of time. We can detect. In coming particles. We can't detect particles that pass us on all sides. We can not detect particles that have already passed us by. Kind of like the ghost of Christmas past. The ghost of particles past. Wheeler believes that the mass of these particles are still here to day. They never went a way. Depending on just how long this has been going on will determine on just how much of the missing mass is in the space that we are resting in today. How old is the universe? How many stars are in the universe? And then there's this other thing. There is no way of telling just how old the universe is. You can't tell how old the universe is by knowing how much mass it has. How much mass does the space that rest between objects have? The same space that we are resting in. The universe is expanding. It is expanding at a accelerated rate. At a steady rate of accelerated expansion. Can some thing like this be happening by chance? No. It would be like balancing a BB on a razor edge. But could the universe be expanding at a steady rate of accelerated rate of expansion. Yes. If there some laws of nature. that are acting as a governor. Depending on how much mass space has in it will determine what the tempter is of space. It very cold. Not as cold as it could get. But close. Some where around -370 Degrees If stars are adding energy and mass to space. It will heat up and expand. If it expands The mass in space will go down and the tempter will go down. If the numbers of stars relative to the size of the space Between the stars in the universe stay about the same. Even number of stars pitted against the space the rest between the stars Pitted again against the mass and tempter in space Pitted again with the heat up and cold effect It doesn't heat up and it doesn't cool down the mass stays the same even though there is mass being added to it. The number of stare relative to the mass being add. All of these thing are interlinked. A one on one inter action and relationship. To give us the governing effect. What makes all of this possible. Gravity and stars. The some thing from nothing. There are stars that have burnt up the nuclear fuel. But are still shining light. Still adding mass and energy and tempter to space. A never ending cycle. The universe may be much older than we have been lead to believe. But if the universe is much older than we think it is. Shouldn't be a lot more mass and heat in space than like what we find. Sure. It should. But it's not. If this is what is causing the universe to expand in the way that it does. There would be much less mass there. We are adding mass but the mass stays the same. Why? It's expanding. At a very unusual rate. A compound complex rate. There for the mass stays the same. But if there is a way or means for the mass of space to stay the same. For how long could some thing like this go on? A long long time. Like we find things in the universe today. Some thing in the physical aspect in nature would have to be changing in order for other thing to remain the same. Adrian. About your brain If you weighed your self. Then cut out your brain. Then weighed your self a gain. Would you weight less? And then again. If you weight your self. And you just realize that you forgot where you left the keys to the car. And you weight your self again. Would you weight less? Now I'm getting old. Can't remember any thing any more. I think I'm going bran dead. But when I get on the scales. I find that I'm gaining weight. I can't remember to stop eating so much. Why is that? Of course you don't want to here the stuff from a old brain dead truck driver. Go read Hawking stuff. One more thing. The same amount of mass the rest in the space. In order for us to have gravity. Is also the same amount of mass that wound have to be there in order to form a wormhole. I know the we can't detect gravity. But if you can make a wormhole form. That kind of statement would that make about gravity? Can't have one with out the other. If any one of these things are real. Then there is a good chance that the other is also real. Larry









    I am calling this experiment "The Bottle Experiment". Why I am calling it the bottle experiment is because I have found out that you can find a ready made resonator in the molding marks at the bottom of refreshment bottles made of glass. What we are going to do is make the resonator perform in just such a way that you can see light form a positive lens. But other things of interest that can happen are. some times it will form a negative lens. Which some times will form a long tube of light. You get to watch how two positive lenses shape shift to form a negative lens. That negative lens are formed by two half's. That positive lenses can some times form open ended positive lens. This means that the positive lens will form a hole where the focal point should be. A tube with in a tube. Tea, fruit juice and a lot of others bottles have these mold marking at the bottom. This is what makes the experiment so cheap to do. If you drink refreshments found in glass bottles. Don't through the bottles in the trash when your finished drinking the liquid from them. Save them for use in an experiment later. You can collect a lot of bottles real fast from the trash cans. That other people have thrown away. If you do it this way. The experiment can be done for free. The bad part is you don't get to drink the liquid refreshments. There is a name for this type of technique. It's called Dumpster Diving. When you are able to drag that large bag a bottles back to the house. I mean lab. Keep the lid if you can. You can use it later. Take the labels off the bottles and clean them up. Wash them. Inside and out. Dirty finger prints are any thing else that might be on the glass. This is an optical experiment. You have to keep the glass of the bottle clean for best results. Look at the bottom of the bottles on the out side and on the side at the bottom. There are these little round raised dote. The glass is transparent. The surface of the glass is an excellent reflecting surface. It acts like a mirror. The surface of the glass acts like a slitter. Because the light that you are going to be view is on the inside of the glass. The glass acts like a one membrane slitter. This means the there will be less interference with the light. A slitter used in optical experiments. It lets some of the light go through the glass. And at the same time. Some of the light is reflected back by the mirror effect of the surface of the glass. The in side of the bottle is smooth and flat like. Almost flat. It is curved. Bottles are rounded. The use of this curved mirror probably plays a roll in why the light will perform the was that it does. The dote on the out side of the bottle. It Looks like a half sphere. It acts like concave mirror. But when you put a concave mirror up close to a flat or almost flat mirror. The dynamic in the system of the equipment. The system acts as if there are two concave mirror there face to face. There is one real concave mirror and one virtual mirror. A virtual mirror will work the same as if it is a real mirror. This type of set up is called a resonator. They are able to produce some very weird effects with light. Because what we are going to use to get the light to diffract around the edges at a 90 degree angel to the edge of the object. Is a small speck of dust. Or sand. Black sand works best. I used some carbon dust. Coal dust would work. It is opaque to the light. This means that the light will not pass through the object. We are going to place the specks of black dust on the inside of the bottle. In line with the concave mirror, and in line with the center of the real concave mirror. The almost flat glass on the inside of the bottle is found to be resting in the middle. Half way between the two concave mirrors. Found half way between the real concave mirror and the virtual mirror. Make your room as dark as possible for best results. Use a small bright led light bulb. Stand about 30 feet from it. With one of the clean bottles. Hold the bottle up close to your eye. With in the optical range. Just like you would as if you were looking in to a microscope. Look into the center of one of the dote. The concave mirrors. The light will pass through both sided of the bottle and in to your eye. You should be able to see A costic sheet of light Most of them are rounded A rounded membrane. The membrane should have a fringe pattern in it. Looks a lot like ruffle with ridges. Rows of light. Like rows that are found in a plow field of soil. Some where I read that this is where we got the word of field energy from. These fringes are some times called Newton rings. They say that these bands of light are caused by the constructive and destructive interference pattern of the wave part of light. That may or may not be a true statement. You are looking at a clean bottle. Sprinkle some black dust into the bottle. And look at it again. Nothing will happen. There a few things that have to be don't in order to make the bottle perform right. So that you can see the light of the positive lens in the resonator. I haven't been able to solve all of the mysteries found in the bottle and why it works the way that it does. It is to complex. It is compound complex. There are a lot of different thing going on in the dynamic of the system in the field energy of the resonator of the bottle. Here is one aspect of why you are allow to see the shape of th positive lens in the bottle. There is more than one resonator up and running in the experiment. You have to make a resonator. All round the speck of dust. To get a feel for what this second resonator is like do this. When you look at a bright light at night. If you squint your eyes. The light will form a glare of light. Makes the light bulb look like it is growing lines of light out of the top of the light bulb. The glare is not coming out of the top of the light. Where the lines of light is forming at is on the inside of your eye. While looking at the light . If your open your eyes wide. The glare goes a way. If you squint you eyes again the glare comes back. The moisture on the top of your eye lid . Is acting as a resonator. The same light that passes through the moisture on top of your eye lid. Is the same light that goes past the edge of the hole in your eye. When the light goes past the edge of the hole in your pupil. The light id diffracted in towards the edge of the hole at a 90 degree angle in relation ship to the edge. It is this light that is on the inside of your eye. That you are looking at. For the same reasons that you can see the light on the inside of your eye. Is the same reason you will be able to see the positive lens in the bottle. Your eye can also act like a resonator. This is why a cat's eyes can be seen in the dark. If you shine a light on them. Just kike a black speck of dust. You can tale round disk And build a resonator around the edges of it and get an effect. To do this you need A disk (a penny ) Some two part epoxy glue form Wal-Mart. Cost about five dollars. And small sheet of plexiglass. A sheet of plastic. If you go down to lumber yard. They usually have some small pieces of scrap laying around that they will give you for free if you ask they. You could use the plastic cover on food boxes like cakes or carry out disks. You mix up your glue. Take a tooth pick and put a even bead of glue on top of the penny. Along the edge. Turn the penny over and drop it from s short distance on the top of the flat sheet of plastic. We want to make the glue that is on the under side of the penny. Between the penny and the plastic. To come out from under neath the penny and form a ring all the way round the edges of the penny. Don't push down on the penny to make the glue come out. Place your finger on top of the penny. In the center of the penny. The penny is about 1/4 inch round. But if you move the penny around in a very small circle. About a 1/16 inch circle. The glue will work it's self out from under the penny. And form a bead on all sides of the edge of the penny. If you want you can use honey instead of glue to get some practice in on doing this. And when you fill that your read. You have got the hang of thing. Do the same thing . But this time use the glue. When you have the glue even on all side. Stop moving the penny in a circle. And let the glue dry for a little bit. When the glue gets hard. About ten minutes. But not real hard. This is the time that you want to take the penny off the plastic. To get the penny off the plastic. All you have to do is bow the plastic a little. And the penny will pop off. Let it dry for about two more hours. Then you can take it out in to the sun light. Hold it about one inch about a back drop. And you will be able to see the light form a focal point of th positive lens that the light makes when it diffract past the edge of the penny. The same path that the light takes by the edge of the penny Is also the same path that the light takes trough the resonator. Along the edges of the penny. You can see the focal point in the darkest part of the shadow of the penny. Does the light do the same thing when you don't use the resonator. Yes they have proven that the light can be detected with a particle detector. The only thing is when the resonator is not there you cant see the focal point of light. You are going to do the very same thing with the black speck of dust in the bottle experiment. The only difference is in the resonator of the bottle Some thing really weird happens. You can not only see the focal point . You also get to see the walls of the membranes of the positive lens. And you get to see what the light does after it goes through the focal point. On the other side of the focal point. See the lens as a three dimensional geometrical shape that the field energy forms of a positive lens. Like those found in nature. Buy nature. Which is really neat. Plus you get to see it do a lot of other real neat stuff. Now all we have to do is find a simple way to form a resonator all the way round the edges of the black speck of dust. That we are going to use in the experiment. To get the positive lens to form. No problem. I have all ready found the way. I painted air craft in Dallas for about a year. I know that if you have so much as one grain on the surface of the panel that you are painting. It will show up. If you have liquid with a lot of sugar in it. When it dries. The surface will dry to a smooth surface. Just like glass. Lolly pos are made out of rock candy. They are shine like glass. If you take some fruit juice. Which has a lot of sugar in it. If you mix some black specks of dust in the juice. Put it on the inside of the bottle. Not much. About a 14 tea spoon. Just enough to coat the in sides of the bottle. It will stick to the sides. The juice will cling the sides of the specks of black dust. And after you coat the insides of the bottle. Set it on it's side In the sun and let it dry out for about two days. Put the lid back on the end of the bottle. After it gets dry on the inside of the bottle you put the cap back on the bottle to make sure that the inside of the bottle stays dry. If moisture gets in the bottle. The juice will melt just like a sugar cube. And then all is lost. Then check out every one of the dote. May have as many as ten dote. This is like going fishing. You have to rely on chance to find the positive lens. Luck. You may have to go through five bottles before you find some thing interesting to look at. What you look for is a black dot in the membrane Or some kind of interference pattern. Watch the black dot and move the bottle to one side, and then to the other side and up and down. about a 45 degree angle of movement on all sides. If you don't find some thing in the first concave resonator. Don't whether about it. Go to the next one. And if there is nothing in that bottle . Go to the next bottle. When you find some thing in the dot that you are looking at. Put a small piece of black electrical tape Over the dote to the left and right. It will make it easier to see. And easier to find when every you come back to it later. You can take a felt pen and write on the side of the bottle so that you will know what is there with out looking. I had looked at about 500 bottles. I had a collection of about fifty bottles that I liked. My kids cleaned out the storage shed one day and through them all a way. One man junk is a another man gold. Oh well there's a lot more where they came from. I will get back around to taking picture some day. If you are using film. You have to use time elapse photography. About six seconds elapse time. Any less. Nothing show up in the picture. And more that. It will over expose the film. And again nothing show up in the pictures. You have to make a frame for the bottle to sit in. And a frame for the camera to sit in. Both frames have to be built together. What you want is no movement. This means hand off. I want to try digital cameras. Streaming video would be best. This way you get to see the shape shifting. Which is important. In finding out what is going on with the field energy. Use more that one camera at one time. And a split screen monitor. And a slitter. And get to watch the parallel universe effect. There is a warning that I have to tell you about. Looking at a bright for long period of time at night. Is not good for your eye. To much of a good thing is not good for you. Like sitting to close to the T.V. Or being on the net for to many hours. You will have red eye the next day. Red eye for looking at the light and red eye because you stayed up till four in the morning. The red eye double whammy. Larry









   Warm I'm with you. The big bang has cracks. They say that we can see 13.5 billion years back into the past. What I mean is. Do the math. It took 13.5 billion years for the light of those galaxies to reach us. This means that those galaxies have been moving now for the past 13.5 billion years. This is where they were 13.5 billion years ago. Where are they at today? If the universe started out as a point. And it took the galaxies 13.5 billion years to get where they were at 13.5 billion years ago. plus the 13.5 billion years for the light to get to us. That's 27 billions years. Those galaxies weren't moving faster than the speed of light 13.5 billion years ago. I got picture. This means that if the universe started out as a point. It would have taken them much longer for them to get to where they were 13.5 billion years ago. How long? I don't know. At least a half dozen k-Zillions years. Plus the other 27 billion years that we have already talked about. If the universe is much older than we have been lead to believe. Then where were we at, way on, way on back when? That would put us as being around here some time about 90000 billion years before the big bang ever happened. Do the math. It doesn't add up. Does it really matter. Who's counting. The universe is old. Real old. And we don't know how it all began. What does matter is. What's it like to day. Now. The laws of nature have been around for a long time. And I can see no light at the end of the tunnel. Larry Warm, Many have started to look at electrons and photons as glue balls Two different aspect of the same thing. Particles may turn out to be vibrating strings. It may be all the same string expressing it's self in two different ways. If the string is smeared out over space. In some places it can vibrate and act like a particle and having mass and be related in time. But in other points in space. It can be smeared out over space and not vibrate. Maybe reciprocating. And not show any singes of mass. And not be related in time. Have the ability to tunnel. The pictures that I'm taking of simple optics. There are two kind of membranes. Some membranes have a fringe pattern in them. And some do not. But it's all the same membrane. This is why I'm here trying to find someone that will do some test on these costic sheets of light. You can see them. But looking at them want tell you what information of what particle they hold. You have to test it. I'm going to work on my web page this week end and show every one here how to make this light visible to thee eye. Larry









   Warm I'm with you. The big bang has cracks. They say that we can see 13.5 billion years back into the past. What I mean is. Do the math. It took 13.5 billion years for the light of those galaxies to reach us. This means that those galaxies have been moving now for the past 13.5 billion years. This is where they were 13.5 billion years ago. Where are they at today? If the universe started out as a point. And it took the galaxies 13.5 billion years to get where they were at 13.5 billion years ago. plus the 13.5 billion years for the light to get to us. That's 27 billions years. Those galaxies weren't moving faster than the speed of light 13.5 billion years ago. I got picture. This means that if the universe started out as a point. It would have taken them much longer for them to get to where they were 13.5 billion years ago. How long? I don't know. At least a half dozen k-Zillions years. Plus the other 27 billion years that we have already talked about. If the universe is much older than we have been lead to believe. Then where were we at, way on, way on back when? That would put us as being around here some time about 90000 billion years before the big bang ever happened. Do the math. It doesn't add up. Does it really matter. Who's counting. The universe is old. Real old. And we don't know how it all began. What does matter is. What's it like to day. Now. The laws of nature have been around for a long time. And I can see no light at the end of the tunnel. Larry , Many have started to look at electrons and photons as glue balls Two different aspect of the same thing. Particles may turn out to be vibrating strings. It may be all the same string expressing it's self in two different ways. If the string is smeared out over space. In some places it can vibrate and act like a particle and having mass and be related in time. But in other points in space. It can be smeared out over space and not vibrate. Maybe reciprocating. And not show any singes of mass. And not be related in time. Have the ability to tunnel. The pictures that I'm taking of simple optics. There are two kind of membranes. Some membranes have a fringe pattern in them. And some do not. But it's all the same membrane. This is why I'm here trying to find someone that will do some test on these costic sheets of light. You can see them. But looking at them want tell you what information of what particle they hold. You have to test it. I'm going to work on my web page this week end and show every one here how to make this light visible to thew eye. Larry I know thing aren't right in Mudsvill. I've see those pictures of the different stats of hydrogen atoms before. On my other webpage www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/9958/ I talk about this a little. But with the costic sheets of light. You get to see The shape "shape shift." Depending on from what angel you are looking at the object from and how close or how far a way you are. Will determine what shape you will see. But to that if you add the fact that If you have more than one observer. The same field energy will be making more that one shape at the same time. This is what they call parallel universes. There real. The field energy has two past histories. If there are many observers. There will be many past histories. We live in a Multiverses universe. Einstein say that it is relative. How you are relating to the field energy. Wheeler said. That the observer determines the out come of the observation. The field energy is interacting with the observers. When you use particles to try and find out what is happening. One acts like many. Many acts like one. The Bell curve. They use to say that 50% of the information of the particles travailed in this past history's shape (a) observers (a) and 50% of the information of the particles travailed in this past history's shape (b) observers (b) But when you use one particle in you experiment. In order for the data to come out the way that it does. The information of the single particle. Would have to travail down the road of both past histories, of both observers. So what do they do. They play the Olympic game for intellects. The word game. The point like object objects game is not working. So the change their story. And say that the information is like a wave. But the wave thing didn't work out so go. So now they call it a pilot wave. But if this is true. There would have to be as many pilot waves as there are observers and histories. But then again. Science will have to explain a way what is happening in nature when they use the same technique that I'm using. Feynman worked the "double Slit Experiment". Instead of using two different observers. They use two different slits. But Wheeler used a positive lens to do a double slit experiment with. Wheelers "Delayed Action Experiment". Which proved that the information of the particle is not only smeared out over space and time ( Up and down left and right). But is also smeared out over time and space. In it's history. It's so called past and future. What we do now, effects the past history of the information of the particle. And then again what has happened in the past will effect what happens some where in the future. The observer's now. What this experiments is saying is. When time goes to zero, space becomes infant and all nows are the same. Every thing in the universe is connected to every other thing in the universe. What is he talking about? A standing wave. A standing wave does not move. They are in two different places at the same time. And they can express their self's in, or as parallel universes. It's part of my ever famous Absolute Rest and Absolute Motion are one and the same Theory. Nothing is fasted than some thing that is already there. And it's not expressing any signs of movement. That's nothing more than the word game for saying. "Standing Wave". If you where sitting before a desk. And you close your eyes and take your finger with your left hand and touch the top of the desk. You can think to your self. " Yes. The desk is at this point in space an time because i can touch it here ". Then you put your left hand down to your side. and then take a finger on your left hand and touch the top of the desk at some other point. And you think to your self. "yes> The desk is at this point in space and time. Because I can touch it here." Then you take your right hand back to your side. Then you take both of your fingers and touch both points in space and time on the desktop at the same time. And your are thinking to your self. Boy this desk is really fast. It's so fast that it can be in two different points in space and time at the same time. Then you open your eyes to see what is happening. And you act surprised to find that the desk top is really not moving at all. There is no movement to be found here. The desk top is smeared out over time and space. The desk top is in two different places at the same time. It is in many places at the same time. The information of the particle and the wave acts like this. You can do the same experiment with a harp. The many strings form a flat sheet of strings. Costic sheets of light are like flat sheets of light that are composed of yet smaller strings. They can rest in three dimensions of space. They can form three dimensional shapes like tubes. or positive lenses or negative lenses. Bubbles. Round spheres. Isn't that the same shape that the standing waves ( I mean membranes ) Make when we look at atoms from a distance. Sure it is. We got pictures. When you get up close to the hydrogen atom. It can make all of these weird shapes but when you back off from the atom. It shape shifts. And forms a bubble. Then I have this other theory. I call it my every famous "Look.... There goes one now." Theory. "I can see it". Which simple states. There is nothing in the rule book that states that science can't be cheap, easy, or fun to do. This is fun to me. I'm a truck drive. I do this as a hobby. The unwritten code of the truck driver. Which states " If it is true, I get to say it. " I'm going to move my " bottle experiment from the back burner to the front burner on my web page today. Which you can use to see a positive lens in the resonator of the bottle. You can see what a positive lens looks like in nature. We have done many test and experiments on positive lens. It's some thing in nature that we know a little about. You are looking at the side view of Wheeler's " Delay Action Experiment". Wheeler's double slit experiment. And what I want you to do while your looking at the side view of the positive lens. Keep every thing that I have said here today in the back of your head. Because this is precisely what would have to be happening in nature in order for the data and information that Wheeler gather in the lab. To come out the way that it did. Task your self this questions. Where is the information of the point like object. The particle. Where is the information of the wave. There not any where to be found. There is some thing like a standing wave. But it's not a wave. It is a standing membrane. And because you can see it. If the information, of field energy, of simple light is a pilot wave or a particle. They are both are related in time. You would not be able to see the negative lens. Because where the negative lens rest in space. Relative to you. The observer. Would be resting some where in the past or in the future. But you are seeing it as being now. The key word here is "NOW" If the field energy of simple light is a particle,or a wave Things that are related in time. It would be physically imposable to see the positive lens forming in the space where it is. "Things are the way they are because this is the way that it is. I think Hawking said that. So have a lot of others. multiverse tubes. The so called strings. Strings can express their self's as standing wave membranes. They can express their self's as waves that are related in time. And they can express their self's as point like objects that are related in time. And they can express their self as parallel universes. Strings can do every thing that waves and particles can. But to that you have to add that they can do things that waves and particles can not do. Nature simply fail's to play fair. She has been playing man for a fool for years now. And man has been nun the wiser. This can be proven in the lab. Sure. Can you trick a scientist in to working on this in the lab. No I have yet to find a way to get a scientist to shoot himself in the foot. They just want do it. This is what's needed to be said. I think this is why they want truck drivers. To say it first. This way every body can come on over and beat the stuffing out of me. ( light me up Neil) ( that was just a friendly joke ) It is good that we have other opinions. But when man turns to beat nature up for what she is doing. They usually have to go home with a not on their head, limping on one leg and dragging the other leg behind. The question then becomes . Will nature come to the rescue of Wheeler and save his work from a faith worse than death. Or will 99.9 of the scientist on the face of the planet stand up and tell Mother Nature she's crazy again. If we here at GreenGlow can prove nature right. Then it would be up to all on comers to prove nature wrong. This is where the fun part comes in. It doesn't take very long to prove nature right. It take 's for every and a day to prove nature wrong. It will never happen. It will be interesting to see just what all they will try. The word game. What will they say. Regardless of what man will say. Will not make nature change her ways. And now days. I'm just going with the flow. If it's not broke. It don't need fixing. Neil, your the particle guy here. Come on over and help me. You can prove me wrong or you can prove me right. Either which way the truth go's. We will have learned some thing new. This is the stuff that dreams are made of. This is the stuff that Nobel Prizes are made of. Wheeler, Ed Witten, Kaku, Hawking, and everyone here at GreenGlow is waiting for you to make your move. Your the only one here that could test the positive lens. You probably the only one here that could get a paper published. Make us proud. Larry assumption What I have read about the testing of these stones. They found out that the atomic structure on the inside of the stone. Are arranged like those found in nature. But on the skin of the stones At atoms have been tampered with. And there are no signs of tool marks. Heat or any thing else. But what I have read about what it would be like to travail in to the mouth of a wormhole( Hawking.) Space can become curved to the point that atoms become ripped from atoms. This means that a wormhole could be used to cut and shape stones. Would it leave any signs of tool marks. No. Would there be evidence that the atoms have been effected. Yes. There are pictures. Drawings of men using the equipment on the walls there. In Egypt And in Mexico. They both are using a concave mirror. The drawing both show a tube of light. But a wormhole can curve space to the point that atoms them self's can be ripped a part. Produces a electron, photon, and a radon particle. Radon particles can do damage to your DNA. Damaged DNA is what causes your genes to mutate. And mutated genes is what caused species to evolve. Mutations in nature are rare. One out of every so many millions. A very slow process. But there is a time in the history of man the he evolve at a unnatural rate. It's happened so quickly that there is no fossilize record of this transformation. It's called the "Missing Link" Not only man but many things around man evolve at the same unnatural rate. Man's dog. Live stock. Crops. Many of the diseases that man can get. Can be tracked be tracked back to man's DNA. And tracked back to this time point in the history of man. Like cancer. Male-pattern baldness. ( Honest Neil. I didn't mean to say that. I didn't know that you were bald. Sorry. )Region. Slavery. Un told sums of gold. And no gold mine. Pottery. The lifting a large stones. Manipulating gravity. The cutting and shaping of the stones. Cut a diamond? Turn metal from a solid state to a liquid state. Effect that atoms of people protein. A carbon based element and high carbon steel Change from a non flammable state to a flammable state. Like what happen in the Bible. People caught on fire and burnt to the ground. Like the Twin Towers. The high carbon steel beams caught on fire and burnt a way. The white hot steel that came out of the building when it fell. And the large pools of molten metal found at the bottom. All of these things are all over the page. That is the one thing. The only thing that could make all of these thing possible. Think before you answer. Man forming wormholes could make all of these things possible. This was happening all over the planed about 20,000 to 3,000 years ago. What one man can do. Another man can do. The only difference between us now and man back then. He knew how to do this. We don't. Well may be a little. You right. I have been sitting here just talking out the top of my head. I know that sometime if you just ramble. About the subject matter. There will be things that will come out of what your saying. Things that even you didn't know that are there. the mere suggestion by one. Will some times start a avalanche of ideals in the minds of others. I will try to break it down in to paragraphs. For easier reading. Larry









    Your right. What are friends for. That was not indented to be a slur on your good character. You have your reputation to protect. If your friends want send you a friendly note and point out your mistake. Then who? We need to protect your credibility. This is probably your job. You do this as a living. It was indented as a joke. I thought you would take it as one. It was intended to help you out a little. I do this as a hobby. It's ok if I make mistakes and people laugh at me. I still have my job. You can't be making mistakes. The quicker you find your mistakes. The better off your are. You have my sincere apologies. Larry L. Burks.









   Warm; I know that some find it hard to believe. But the laws of nature are universal. That means that the laws of nature work the same way all the way across the universe. And that nature's laws have withstood a test of time. This means that we can look in to deep space and see back 13.5 billion years back in time. The same laws that were in effect back then are the same laws of nature that we have today. Nothing has changed. The laws of nature have been working great for 13.5 billion years now. This means that way on, way on back when. When monkey man was around. The same laws of nature that are in effect today. Are the same laws of nature that were in effect when monkey man was alive and well. A technology is an exacting science. It has a mathematical proof, and a physical proof. Know how. Is a technique. It's a caveman way of doing things. When monkey man was alive. We hadn't invented science yet. But think of this. Monkey man would have had to have had what is called a "lucky accident" This means that some where in his daily routine. What he did during the course of the day. He would have had to do something that would make a wormhole form. We know that he would have to have a concave mirror. What did he use for his concave mirror. A bowl. Pottery? Shortly after he invented fire and before he invented the wheel he inverted how to make pottery. Heat treated clay. Made it harder. He also found out that if you glued sand ( glass) to the bowl with sap from trees. Resins. And if you get the fires hot enough. The sand melts and turns to glass. Ceramics. We know that food will spoil. Mold will grow on food. One more thing. We hadn't discovered how to wash dishes yet. We hadn't invented dish washing liquids yet. The Mayan's where using a lid on there pots. It helped to keep the flies out. They had a hole in the center of the lid. Why did they put a hole in the center of the lid? You could stick your finger in the hole and get the lid off. We have found graves that had just such pots in them. They are called ceremonial coffee cups. (I got pictures.) Why would any body make a coffee cup with a rounded bottom. Every time you set it down it would fall over? The same way that the Mayan were doing it 3000 years ago. Is the same way that monkey man was doing it 50,000 years ago. The Mayan hadn't changed the way that they did this in 50,000 years. I have a picture of a Mayan woman tending one of these pots. It's resting in a bowl with three legs on it. The pot is setting on the inside of the three legged bowl. ( a ball joint, also know as a universal joint.) She is pointing the pot towards the sun. she is tracking the sun. The very same optical set up that the Mayan were using. Is the same optical set up that I have on my web page. If it's been working great for man for 50.000 years. works. Why change it. They picked up a 900,000 pound rock. And floated it through the air. Over the tops of trees and hills. This is not science. But it is history. There about ten different thing that are closely related to the history of man that you can use to track the history of when man first found a way to form wormholes. And who were using them. Huh. I can do any thing that monkey man can do. He's got nothing on me. I can read him like a book. larry









   They are electro engineer. Dr. Kock. Study under Einstein. Dr.Kock worked for NASA. And A lot of other people. Dr.Kock was a electro engineer. He's got 80 us patents. They are experts on the electron. Glue balls. Photons. The photo- electro effect. The book. Fundamental's of Photonic. (A must read) Electrical engineer not only have to know every thing about the electron. Which means that they also have to know about the photon. Optics. And now Gravity. If you can explain what roll the humble, electron plays in gravity. You just united the four forces of nature. GUT, TOE. larry









   Duane I read that book. Back in 1994. Kaku came out with is his Hyperspace book the same year. Hawking is now back tracking on what he said ten years ago about wormholes and gravity. There are a lot of people doing some back tracking. Back slider? This is good. This means that we are finding our mistakes and fixing them. I would like to here what he is saying now days. Any body know? We are in a golden age of science. We are watching history come and go before our very eyes. It's like a long playing soap opera. A never ending story. About gravity waves. It's got cracks that are growing bigger every day. Their is a wave function associated with gravity. The electron has a wave function associated to it. We have already detected it. There real. But there 's this other thing. There is no such thing found in nature as a wave. It's as if there are waves. For years now the big dog's have know that waves are doing what we know good and well what waves can not do. The wave start out at a point and expands exponentially. In 3D space. 2D waves can not expand 3dimitionaly. A flat 2D wave is not mathematically sound. But a wave function in the form of a tube is. There is some thing like a tube found in nature. They are called vibrating strings. But there are no waves. As long as man keeps dictating to nature what the laws of nature are. Man will never be able to tell nature how to run it business. Man will start making forward progress again when he starts letting nature dictate to man what the laws of nature are. Man does not set in judgment over nature. Nature sets in judgment over man. Nature will tell man if man is right or not. Nature speaks well enough for her self. She has never lost a shouting match with man. And she is fully capable of fighting her on battles. Un defeated in battle. Nature is the world's leading authority on the laws of nature. No one alive to day or any one that will ever live. Will know more about the laws of nature than nature it's self. Why is it that science doesn't want to use the physical evidence that they have collected from nature? When ever scientist star using physical evidence. Their science blows up in their face. What we are learning today in science is the fact that the science that we formed back in 1865. The wave function. Can not possibly be right. Man was wrong in 1865. There are a lot of things that we got wrong back in 1865. It has taken man 150 years to figure this one out. Just how smart does this make man? You would have to go long and deep to find a scientist that would willing to admit that man is really that stupid. I think that it's great that we are able to learn by our mistakes. And this is how it works. This is how we learn. By finding our mistakes. And those scientist that are not able to learn by their mistakes become frozen in time. And will never be allow to progress past the point that they are at. They will be one's that will have to go quietly in to the night. And be no more. This is the way that thing work. It's the way that things have all ways work. Nature is unforgiving. This, is what it has taken us 150 years to find out. Some are jumping for joy, while others are trotting off the bath room with tears in their eyes to slit their wrist. Finding our mistakes is a good thing. What is every one afraid of? We learn when we get it wrong. We learn when we get it right. It's a win, win situation. Gravity waves? Think of this. When every a super nova explodes. This is when atoms form. The very instant that a atom comes in to existence. It is obeying the laws of gravity. " Every thing in the universe is attracted to every other thing in the universe with a force that is directly in proportion to the mass of each" This means that the atom that just formed in now interacting with other atoms on the other side of the universe. 13.5 billion light years a way. The so called gravitational wave is related in time. It would take 13.5 billion years for the atom that just formed to start to interact with the mass of all other atoms on the other side of the universe. It would take 13.5 billions years for the atoms that rest on the other side of the universe to start interacting with the atom that just form. Nothing is faster than some thing that is all ready there. You put the electron in the atom. The atom has gravity. Take the electron out of the atom. Gravity vanishes. For years now man has been trying to solve this mystery. Of why it is that when we take the electron out of the atom. Gravity goes away. But the electron back in the atom. No sooner done. And gravity is back again. You take it out. You put it back in. You take it out. You put it back in. And for 150 years now man has been trying to find that gravity wave. That gravity particle. And the only thing that is coming in and out of the atom. Is that dam stinking old electron particle. If you are setting there thinking to your self that may be the electron particle has some thing to do with gravity. Your probably right But if this is true? Duane. What was it you were saying about gravity waves? And Hawking? Back in 1994? Back in 1865? Things are changing for the better. larry









   Jerry' Thank you . I'm trying to help. Isn't this why we come here for. When I say that gravity can be tracked back to the mass in the electron. What I'm talking about, is what I read in a book by Feynman. "Six Easy Pieces on Physics. ". What Feynman said in his lecture on gravity is " Every thing in the universe is attracted to every other thing in the universe with a force that is directly in proportion to the mass of each" "Each" is one of the key words in this statement. After 1947 Wheeler and Feynman dropped what ever they were doing. And started working on gravity. They were doing work for the government. A lot of people talk about the work that Wheeler on gravity. Wheeler wrote the book on gravity. "Gravity." A nine pounder. But not many know about the work that Feynman did on gravity. Feynman did a lot of work on gravity. Feynman talks a little about what he was able to find out about gravity. In the work on gravity that he did. You need to read this book. Feynman is tough. Feynman stoped using the word gravity. He used the words "the strength of the force." Feynman was able to note that the strength of the force was able to very exponentially to the mass of each object. The strength of the force grew in steps. He track the strength of the force back to the atomic mass of the number of atoms or number of electrons that the objects were made of. How many electron a atom has will determine it's atomic mass. The elements. Feynman strengthen case when he stated. Two different aspect of the same thing. One force due to it's charge. And one force due to it's mass. "The electron." Feynman knew that gravity could not be a force due to it's charge. Because he knew that in order to have a force due to it's charge. Gravity would have to violate the conservative laws of nature. Which states. "All energy has to be accounted for." Gravity is in nature. "With out lost or gain of energy." Gravity does not violate the conservative laws of nature. Gravity can not be a force due to it's charge. If not the charge of the electron. Then what? There is only one chose that is left. It's mass. Feynman knew that gravity could not be a force due to it's charge. It had to be a force due to it's mass. Feynman call it a pseudo force. A false force. Not a true force due to it's charge but a force due to it's mass. Not some thing that matter is. A force due to it's charge. But something that matter does. A force due to it's mass. It's called mass. centrifugal force. Where is the force due to it's charge found at in centrifugal force. There's not any. You want be able to get any scientist to admit it. But centrifugal force violates the conservative laws of nature. But we don't want to talk about that now do we. When this fact of nature comes to light. It's going to embarrassment every scientist on the face of the plaint. Your not going to tell anybody are you. Good We will keep this little secret between us two. No body else has to know. May be it's best this way. There is not two cent of different between gravity and centrifugal force. They are both a force due to the mass of the electron found in atoms. Both forces have this ability to cause the strength of the force to very. It can get stronger or weaker. Ask any body to take their finger and point to the SOURCE of the force of centrifugal force. And every one will point to the atom. Ask any body to take their finger and point to the SOURCE of the force of gravity. And every one all ways points to the space that rest between atoms. Scientist are simple failing to play fair. They have implemented a double standard. The mass of the electron does not very. All electrons have the same mass. Feynman got some of the pieces of the mystery of gravity right. We are not after what he got right. That's in the bag already. What we need is what he missed. What he couldn't get is how the force is produced. And how the strength of the force is able to very inversely to the square of the distance. Feynman talked about mono pole. Most people, when you say "mono pole." They think mono pole magnet. Why, oh why would Feynman say that gravity is a force due to it's mass. And counter contradict his self. And start talking about a force due to it's charge. When Feynman talked about mono poles. He was talking about mono poles due to it's mass. Which are called by their right name as open loop systems. About you question about the positive and negative charge of particles. A repelling force due to it's charge. Feynman in his work. He pitted the electro electromagnetic force due to it's charge against the force of gravity due to ti's mass. He found out that the strength of the two forces are able to very. But they very at different rates The electro electromagnetic force is stronger than the strength of gravity. At close range. But At a long range The force due to it's charge got weaker quicker than gravity. Gravity at long ranges is stronger than the force due to it's charge. Gravity can not be a force due to it's charge. It's that simple. It true that you can get some thing to levitate using a force due to it's charge. You can't get it to work at long ranges like gravity. There is a simple test that any body can do. ( cheap ) That will tell you if the object that you are levitating is a force due to it's charge , or a force due to it's mass. Gravity. If you take a scale. And weigh. All the pieces of the equipment in your experiment. One at a time. The equipment and the object that you are going to making levitate. Add it all up and get your net weight. Set the test up so that every thing involve in the test is resting on the scale. Levitate the object. Then check out the weight. If the equipment weighs the same weight as when the object is levitating as it does when it is not levitating. It is a force due to it's charge. If it is a force due to it's mass. The weight of the object that is levitating is missing from the weight on the scale. It is a force due to it's mass. Gravity. Larry









   Dear Uncle_Shacky, I know that the interest in finding a way to manipulate gravity is dropping. What they need is hope. A sign from above that this can be done. So many have tried . And all have failed. That is not a true statement. A lot of people have tried. But not all failed. You have to learn to look to the ones that did not failed. They are around. They work for NASA. The other NASA. You don't want to go looking for these people. They don't want to be found. Their job depends on not being found. They can't talk to you about what they do for NASA. The same people that work on the technology of wormhole as a weapon system. Are the same people that work on the technology of wormholes. And manipulate gravity. There are different themes and variations of wormholes. And there are several different ways that you can use the wormhole to effect gravity. One day while walking down the street, I happen to meat one of these people. He works on wormholes for NASA. I didn't know who he was. I didn't even ask him for this name. I don't know who he is. I don't want to know who he is. It's best this way. I was telling him about my project. When I told him about how the black empty space found on the inside of the wormhole is gravity shielding. He was shaking his head yes. And he said " high speed switch" He was correcting me on the words that I was using. I was saying all the right thing. But using the wrong words. He had knowledge beyond his years. But because I had got it right. I was talking turkey. I had stated it correctly. He took the time of day to talk to me. With people like him. If you are just blowing smoke. The conversation stops right there. They want talk to you. He knew that I knew. And By the way that he talked I know the he also know. But after he started talking. Wow! I'll not repeat what he said after that. This guy worked for NASA. Type in to google; Gate, high speed switch, wormhole. It will take you right back to the man the first used the word wormhole. David Bohm. The man that talked to Einstein all the time. The same man that the US Government tried to destroy. Because Bohm was talking about wormholes. Bohm was talking about the technology to manipulate gravity. The same black empty space that forms in the all optical high speed switches in simple optics. The internet. Fiber optics. Is also the same black empty space when you are using light that has mass. Space. Space optics. NASA's Space Optics Laboratory. The only experiment that I know about the average person can do in his own back yard That will effect gravity is the spinning disk composed of space shielding spores. The other is the hologram experiment. The disk forms a half a wormhole. Simple and safe to do. The hologram wormhole is a little bit harder to do. It forms a hole wormhole. It is not safe. Not unless you do it the right way. It can be made to be safe. They both are able to form this black empty space. Some one else can't prove to you that man can manipulated gravity. The only way that you will every believes that this can be done. Is if you prove it to your self. Do the disk experiment. If you see it with your on eyes. No one will every be able to convince you that gravity can be manipulated. What we need here at GreenGlow. Is some thing like the Mile High Club. You can only join this club if you are all ready manipulating gravity. If you put all of your equipment on a scale and weigh it While in the off state. Then turn it on. If it losses weight. Your in. Larry L.Burks









   Many know that a fast spinning superconducting disk can have an effect on gravity. Superconductivity is space shielding. The spores produced by mold are also space shielding. No one has ever thought to do an experiment using some thing else that is also space shielding. It see if it is the "space shielding" part of superconducting that is effecting gravity. This text can be done for less than five dollars. Make a disk and attach it to an electric motor. Glue cloth to the top of the disk. Put food on the cloth and grow mold on it. Spray paint the mold so the spores don't fly off. Glue a small rock on the end of a string. Glue the string to the end of a fine wire. Hang the rock over the spinning space shielding disk. And see if it has an effect. You may like what you see. Manipulate gravity for less than ten dollars. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com Larry









   Dear E; Thank you for your email. You have just hit the nail on the head. Thank you for bringing this matter to every one's attention. It is something that we will all have to face at some time or other. Better sooner than later. I'm lost for words on what to tell you. This same problem can be found in NASA's BPP. And it can be found here at GeenGlow. It is up to each indiveguall to fix this promlem for their self. To each his on. In his on time . In his own way. I know how it is. I was just as shocked as every one else when I found out that some of my collage professor lie to me. He seamed like such a sweet little innocent old man. Totally incapable of perpetuating a lie of this magnitude. It broke my hart. I was like a three year old child that had just been told that there is no such thing as Santa Clause. I cried my self to sleep that night. I felt so ashamed. Betrayed by the ones that I trusted the most. Played for a fool. I felt so Violated. The hurt that I felt was unbearable. The good part about be told the truth is, at last, at long last. You can see things for what they really are. You can see the state of denial that you are in. You are able to see your mistakes. You can see your childless, foolish way for what they are. And if you are able to see all these things for what they are. You age a little bit. You are able to mature a little bit. And when you are able to mature and be able to see your younger foolish day for what they are. You are able to let go of your mistake. And let the healing process began. I have been working on gravity for all my life. I was fifty nine years old before I found all of this out. I am now sixty years old. I have been through the meat grinder more time than I care to mention. But I was able to find my mistakes. But that's only half of the problem. 99.999% of all the scientist on the face of the planet refuse to except the physical evidence at it's face value. The brightest of the brightest and the best of the best. I have all way felt that I would be the one that would be smart enough to solve the mystery of gravity. No man is smart enough to solve the mystery of gravity. Hind sight is 20/20. I to was not smart enough. No one is smart enough. I had to be told the answer. The brightest of the brightest and the best of the best. I got the answer from the grand master her self. Mother Nature. No one knows more about the true laws of nature than nature it's self. As long as man keeps trying to detect to nature what the laws of nature are. Instead of letting nature detect to man what the true laws of nature are. There will be no forward progress. In order to for a theory to have a proof. You have to have the physical proof. Mother Nature is like a gate keeper. She is standing in the door way. No one will be allow to go through that door before they please mother Nature first. I have been lead to believe that she was a truck driver in a previous life. Because she keeps mumbling some thing to the effect of " It's my way or the high way." But in the same breath Mother Nature is a shameless hussy. She will bare all to any man that dare's to look. That's it. This is one of the problems. That man will have to find a way to fix. What is happening in nature when we chose not to look? When ever you detect a particle. You record the physical evidence of that particle. The end result. You have looked. Is this all that is there to be had in nature. No. I would think not. The end result is not all that is happening in nature. If you are trying to build a science based on the true laws of nature. If you speak in terms of only the end results. You are speaking in terms of part of what is there in nature. You are speaking in half truth's. Does this mean that we are speaking in hole lies. No. Not really. We can still be speaking in half truth's and not be stating a falsehood. What we need is the other half of the missing truth. The hole truth. The big picture. This is what's missing. What is happening in nature. When we chose not to look. A particle detector is able to tell us the end results. But it is incapable of telling us any thing about what the information of the particle did in it's past history. Detect the imposable. Detect what can not be detected by way of the particle detector. It's past history. It's life line. The shape that it's life line makes. The history of the chain of the interaction that take place through out the hole history of the life line, The life cycle of the periodical closed loop cycle of the electron found in the atom and the space that rest between atoms. What gravity is in nature. Imposable you say. True. But then again. Not really. The question then becomes. If not detected out right by way of the particle detector. Then what. Verified by indirect means. Verified by way of the particle detector, with indirect means. When you are asked to do the imposable. If your best just any good enough. You have to try harder. Can this be done. Sure. I can say this because I have already found some ways. There are many ways that this can be done. The same shape that a atom makes in nature is also the same shape that a positive lens makes in nature. The same shape that the gravitational field makes in nature is also the same shape that a negative lens makes in nature. And from time to time we have to remind our self's that the laws of nature are universal and they have with stood a test of time. It is as one. The same shape of one half of the shape of a positive lens ( one half of a atom). Is also the same shape that makes up the shape of one half of the negative lens ( the gravitational field). Your probably asking your self. Well is it the shape of a positive lens or is it the shape of a negative lens? It's both. And then again it's neither. It the shape of the building blocks of nature. The shape of Ed Witten's building blocks of nature. The Y- strings. It's not two different shapes. It's all the same shape. One shape. It functions as one shape. It's not two different membranes in two diffeent places at the same time. It's shape is composed of a membrane in two different places at the same time. Einstein said. It is as one. The positive energy of a star is equal to the negative energy of it gravitational field. Whish is true. What he should have said is. The positive shape of the atom is equal to or the same as the negative shape of it's gravitational field. Ed Witten's building blocks of nature. So who's right here? They are both right. They both got it right. And the best part about all of this is the fact that Mother Nature agrees with Einstein and Witten. I got pictures. So there. And what is even better about all of this is ( one up man ship ) is the fact that pictures don't count. Pictures are nothing more than a good signs. ( Did I ever tell you that I'm part Indian. You have to learn to read the signs ) There are ways to use a particle detector and verified by indirect ways that all that you are seeing in the pictures are true and are also a matter of fact. Here are the rules that all men play by. " What is fair is fair. All things being equal. If it is true in nature. I get to say so." From time to time we have to remind our self's, Less we for get. Science is not about the rules of nature that man created. Science is about the rules of nature that nature created. The day that a scientist refuses to except the physical evidence at it's face value. Is the day that this scientist gives up there right to call their self's a scientist. Because science is about nature. It is not about man. Nature is right first time every time. The world's leading authority on the laws of nature. I do not find it very hard to believe that man could some how be wrong. This is the direction that science is headed today. You can't use the physical evidence to stop science from going in this direction. Because the same evidence needed to prove their point. Is also the same evidence that others will have to use to stop them. And if the evidence proves them right. You will be bared from using the same evidence to prove them wrong. There will be no other evidence found in nature that will prove them wrong. The only evidence that can be found to prove nature wrong. Is the evidence that man is fabricating. Based on assumption. See. This is what you get when you practice a science that is based on assumptions. And not physical evidence. Mr. E. If you had gotten it right the first time. You wouldn't be needing me to walk along behind you and point out your mistakes. Mr. E. If you had gotten it right the first time. We would be manipulating gravity by now. Ok. So we are manipulating gravity. But that was a free bee. That's not the promlem. You can't tell me what gravity is. You can't tell me what is happening in nature. You have had your fifty years to come up with the answer. You failed. You have had your turn. And now it is time to let every one else have their rightful turn. It's nature's turn. And Mother Nature does not need your consent to do so. Nor does any body else. Everybody here at GreenGlow is taking their turn whither you like it or not. To each his own. Or. To each his own kind. I'm here to help you. I want you to help me. I know that man can't have a Quantum Theory of gravity with out the chain of interaction of the particles that are related back to the force of gravity. The building blocks of nature. I'm smart enough to know that this can't be done with out the people like you. The particle people. What I can't understand is why your not smart enough to figure out that gravity is one of those thing in nature that man can't solve by his self. Man could use a little help about right now. A little expert advice from Mother Nature could help. The experiment that I'm talking about. Could give use that Data that we are needing. Do you get to use you particle defector in the experiment. Sure. By all means. Please do. The experiment was designed specifically for use of particle detectors. This means you. There are no tooth fairy. Larry L. Burks









   Dear Gary, Thank you for your email, I read it all. There is a lot of things that your working on. I'm trying to do some of the things that you are. Like find a cheap way to manipulate gravity. But my work goes beyond just manipulating gravity. I am asking my self the question. Why are we able to manipulate gravity. You may want to pass my web page on to others. www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/ There is an experiment that I'm working on this week. You can read about it here on my page. Look for where it says {up date 2/24/07 ) www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/gravity4.html I have my new theory of gravity there also. It's a big web page. A lot of info there. You may be able to find some thing there that you would find useful. Larry L. Burks









    This experiment can be done for around ten dollar. It can produce this gravitational effect. A real gravitational manipulating device. It really effects gravity. But you probable already know about other experiments like this one that work just as well. Even the Big Dogs agree. That they have an effect on gravity. But this experiment is different. It not only effect's gravity. But it can also tell you what is happening in nature that allow it to effect gravity. What is happening to the gravitational field energy that allow nature to turn off gravity. If you do this experiment at home. And you can see what the field energy of the gravitational field is doing. There is a way that you can see gravity with your very own two eyes. Well not all of it. Just a little bit of it. But that's all you need to see. You should be able to see the black empty space of the high speed switch. That form on the inside of a wormhole. It only reduces gravity by .02 per cent here on earth. But it is a real reduction in gravity. But if you can be made to see. Why this experiment works. Then it becomes much easier for every body else to see why the other experiment that I have on my home page can produce a 100 per cent + reduction of gravity. How many of you know that the strength of gravity here on earth is, way less than .000000001 of one per cent of what Gravity is capable of producing. The trick is not getting it to produce a force that is strong enough for man to use. The trick is being able to make gravity weak enough is that man can use it. I've been thinking about this problem. So what is this new experiment? It not a new experiment. It's really an old experiment. One the man is already doing. One that works. Thank God. It's just that it is done in a little bit different way. A much cheaper way of doing the same old experiment. Only cheaper and simpler. Because of this. Everybody wants to find out how to manipulate gravity can do it at home for their self's. And for their own amusement. Just some thing to play around with. The new toy for big boys. Nothing big , fast or fancy. Just manipulate gravity a little bit. Isn't that what we all want to do in the first place. Isn't this what we are here for. We know scientist are using fast spinning superconducting disk that are able to get a 1.5 to a 2.0 reduction in the strength of the force of gravity here on earth. That's not very much. But it is enough to get an effect that and be detected easily. This means that you could detect the same effect at home using crude instruments. Home made. Cheap. But this superconducting experiment is to expensive for the average person. There is a cheaper way to do the same experiment. We already know that superconducting elements are space shielding. We also know that spores produce by mold are also space shielding. Spores that are produce by mold are dirt cheap. And they can be had for free. The purpose of this experiment is to do a cross experiment using spores instead of superconducting elements. If in deed. It is the space shielding effect of superconducting elements that making the experiment work. With the use of spore in the same experiment will net the same results. All you need is an electric motor with a disk attached to the shaft. Glue some cloth to the top of the disk. Grow a thick growth of mold on it. Spray paint the mold so that the spores don't fly off. If you get a thin piano wire from the hobby shop. And tie a little rock ( rocks are dirt cheap )on the end of a thread. Attach it to the end of the wire. Hang the rock over the disk. Check where the rock weight's in at before you turn on the electric motor. Then turn on the motor and check for a rise in the rock. If the rock rises up and down with the turning on and off of the motor. It's working. We already know that fast spinning space shielding superconducting disk will effect gravity. The spore disk works just as well. What we don't know is "Why is it effecting gravity?" It's all way's, Not how, But why. There are some things that you can do with a spore disk that you can't do with a superconducting disk. If you modify the equipment in the experiment a little. Nature will tell us why gravity is being effect. I already know what is happening. Because, I know what is happening in nature. Even before I do the experiment. If I know what to look for and how to make it visible to the human eye. Make it so that you can detect it with a particle detector. Because I've been playing around with resonators for some time now and doing all kinds of experiments with then. Using a resonator, so that I can see what the light is doing. I have a few trick up my sleave. Tricks of the trade. What I believe is happening in the experiment is the spinning disk is effecting the field energy of gravity that rest between the rock and the earth. That last statement is a no brainer. Then the question becomes how is it effecting the rock. What on earth could the field energy possibly be doing, that would be turning off the effects of gravity. And make the rock weigh less? That last statement is also a no brainer. For this fact. The only thing know to man that can turn off gravity. Is a gravitational high speed switch. Made out of space. Space is the light that rest between objects that has mass. A wormhole. But what is happening in this experiment is not a complete wormhole. It's only a half of a wormhole. It's what wormholes are made of, Two half's. Wormholes are composed of two half's. The question then becomes can a half of a wormhole. A open ended positive lens effect gravity. Sure. Are open ended positive lens's real in nature? Sure. ( Of course, I'm just making this all up as I go a long. Why do you ask? This is the way it works. This is the way it's all ways been done. You want find any thing about any stinking open ended positive lens's in any text book. Here are the rules. If they are real in nature. I get to say it. I got pictures. So there.) We are using a spinning disk that is space shielding. When the disk is not spinning. The field energy that is made of mass. Space. Will form the shape of a positive lens. Will a positive lens produce an effect? No. But when the disk is spinning. You get an effect on gravity. So, what's the difference? A wormhole starts out as two positive lens's. When the two positive lens's meet. The point of the lens touch. the point turns to a flat disk. Out of the center of the disk grows a small tube, that turns into a larger tube. A tube with in a tube. On the inside of the second tube forms a black empty space. This black empty space acts like a high speed switch. And is able to turn off the gravitational field. The wormhole looks like a one piece wormhole. But it works as two half's. Then the question becomes. Can a single positive lens do the same thing that it does when it form's a hole wormhole composed of two positive lens half's? As it does when there is only one positive lens present? A open ended positive lens. ( There's no such thing found in nature. All positive lens's form a point. They don't form a hole where the focal point is supposed to be. Well,there is now. )The answer is YES it can. Is this what is happening in nature when the disk is spinning? Sure. Can this be proven? Sure. Only if you can see the membrane of the lens. Sure. Only if you can detect or map out the shape of the open ended positive lens with a particle detector. You can map out the shape of a positive lens with a focal point. Sure. The same thing can be done with a open ended positive lens. No problem. But knowing this takes care of this other problem that we have. You can not detect the hole that forms in the middle of a free space negative lens. A real wormhole. I have pictures of what is happening in nature. So,I know this is what's happening in nature. I also know that man can't verify it with a particle detector. Nature will not allow man to do this. So how is this going to help. If you know that a free space negative lens in nature are composed of two half's and both half's are identically the same as to one, as the other. All that is required of man is to verify one open ended positive lens in order to get both half's. Why? The first half is the same as the second half. What I mean is. Go do the math, man. Two half's equal a hole. Can you see the focal point of the positive lens shape shift. And change from a point into a tube. A positive lens with a tube on the inside of it. An open ended positive lens. Sure. Can you see the empty black space? Sure. The only thing is when you are looking at the black empty space is. Your not seeing any thing. Your seeing the absents of some thing. You are seeing nothing. That's why it's black. It has no mass. There is nothing there. No mass. No particle. No tube. No gravitational field. No gravity. It that simple. Gravity gets turn off for any atom that goes there. So, how are you proposing that we go by the way side and see the marvelous sight for our self? I have been using a resonator placed around the edges of a disk to study the membranes of light that is able to form a positive lens's. With most positive lens's the light goes on through the focal point and forms a round membrane on the other side. If there are two positive lens's present. Point to point. It will form a negative. But once in a blue moon. I will find a positive lens. In which there is only one positive lens present. That will do the same thing it does when there are two positive lenses present. Form a open ended positive lens. If this turns out to be the case here. With the spinning space shielding disks. We have our cause of the effect. Cause an effect. Get it? If you build a resonator around the edge of the space shielding disk. And take sun light and two mirror. And make the sun light come from the direction of the earth. From the bottom up wards. Let the sun light ( sunlight has particles in it that have mass. Electrons and radon. and also photons that don't have mass. ) past by the edges of the disk. Through the resonators on the edges of the disk. So that it will form the focal point of a positive lens. If you use smoke or dust or a fogged screen you can see the shape of the positive lens. It can also be detected with a particle detector. Then turn on the motor and spin the disk. You will be able to see the positive lens shape shift. If you use a small led light and place it to the side of the lens and let the light shine through the lens and hit a near by wall. You will be able to see the shape of the lens as a shadow. The same way you can see the shadow of heat waves coming off some thing that is hot. You can see the black empty space found there. But because we are playing around with space. If you take a neon light and place it next to the open ended end of the positive lens. A black dot will form on the neon light. Evidence of the presents of the empty black space of the high speed switch. You can place it up to a t.v. screen ( the old tube type.) ( Make sure that it's an old one. One that you were going to through a way any ways. ) and again the black dot will appear. If the space that the spinning disk is effecting is still forming a positive lens that has a focal point. There will be no stinking black dot, nor any effect on gravity. But,If it does have any effect on gravity. This is nothing more than a big fat finger pointing to the direction in which man needs to go. Follow the dots. Follow your nose. Follow the yellow brick road. But what else could be had out of this experiment, is the fact it can form a stand a lone open ended positive lens. What you would have to know about in order to develop the physical proof of Ed Wittens "building blocks of nature." Because the open ended positive lens id real. It could be mapped with a particle detector and clocks. Real science. To prove the two atom theory of gravity is real. You first have to prove the Building blocks are real. That in nature. They can stand alone and function independently. Atoms are nothing but a positive lens. All positive lens's form a bubble in the center of them. Positive lens's are composed of two half's. and negative lens's are composed of two half's. These two different lens actions can all fit together like a train End to end. This is what a atom is. And this what gravity is. What you have to prove is that the two half's of the atom ( the positive lens ) can function independently from each other. Atoms have to have this ability to produce a force in two directions at the same time. They are like two way streets. and at the same time the space that rest between the atoms. Also has to be a two way street. Space has to be curved in two different directions at the same time. In order for the two different atom to produce a force that would cause them to move towards each other. In order for the negative lens ( the gravitational field energy. ) to be able to this. It too must function as two independent half's. One building black is really functioning as a 1/2 positive lens on one end and a negative lens one the other end. But it is all the same membrane. How can this be? Go look at the picture I took from nature. If you try to paint a picture with words of what is happening in nature. It's imposable. But if you look at the picture. You can see the positive lens action and the negative lens action. All together as one unit. You have to ask your self. Is it a positive lens or a negative lens. It's both. It's a building block of nature. You can use these building blocks of nature to build a simple two atom model of gravity. You can use the two atom model of gravity as the building blocks of gravity. And solve the mystery of gravity. This experiment and the whirlpool experiment is the only two experiments that I can think of that can form an open ended positive lens. That can be verified with a particle detector. Larry L. Burks









   Hi, All at GreenGlow I've been thinking. I got this ideal today. What we need is a group project. There is this simple and cheep experiment that I know about. That ever person can do here at GreenGlow. And report back to the group on what they found out. A group project. This experiment can be done for around ten dollar. It can produce this gravitational effect. A real gravitational manipulating device. It really effects gravity. But you probable already know about other experiments like this one that work just as well. Even the Big Dogs agree. That they have an effect on gravity. But this experiment is different. It not only effect's gravity. But it can also tell you what is happening in nature that allow it to effect gravity. What is happening to the gravitational field energy that allow nature to turn off gravity. If you do this experiment at home. And you can see what the field energy of the gravitational field is doing. There is a way that you can see gravity with your very own two eyes. Well not all of it. Just a little bit of it. But that's all you need to see. You should be able to see the black empty space of the high speed switch. That form on the inside of a wormhole. It only reduces gravity by .02 per cent here on earth. But it is a real reduction in gravity. But if you can be made to see. Why this experiment works. Then it becomes much easier for every body else to see why the other experiment that I have on my home page can produce a 100 per cent + reduction of gravity. How many of you know that the strength of gravity here on earth is, way less than .000000001 of one per cent of what Gravity is capable of producing. The trick is not getting it to produce a force that is strong enough for man to use. The trick is being able to make gravity weak enough is that man can use it. I've been thinking about this problem. So what is this new experiment? It not a new experiment. It's really an old experiment. One the man is already doing. One that works. Thank God. It's just that it is done in a little bit different way. A much cheaper way of doing the same old experiment. Only cheaper and simpler. Because of this. Everybody that comes to GreenGlow to find out how to manipulate gravity can do it at home for their self's. And for their own amusement. Just some thing to play around with. The new toy for big boys. Nothing big , fast or fancy. Just manipulate gravity a little bit. Isn't that what we all want to do in the first place. Isn't this what we are here for. We know scientist are using fast spinning superconducting disk that are able to get a 1.5 to a 2.0 reduction in the strength of the force of gravity here on earth. That's not very much. But it is enough to get an effect that and be detected easily. This means that you could detect the same effect at home using crude instruments. Home made. Cheap. But this superconducting experiment is to expensive for the average person. There is a cheaper way to do the same experiment. We already know that superconducting elements are space shielding. We also know that spores produce by mold are also space shielding. Spores that are produce by mold are dirt cheap. And they can be had for free. The purpose of this experiment is to do a cross experiment using spores instead of superconducting elements. If in deed. It is the space shielding effect of superconducting elements that making the experiment work. With the use of spore in the same experiment will net the same results. All you need is an electric motor with a disk attached to the shaft. Glue some cloth to the top of the disk. Grow a thick growth of mold on it. Spray paint the mold so that the spores don't fly off. If you get a thin piano wire from the hobby shop. And tie a little rock (m rocks are dirt cheap )on the end of a thread. attach it to the end of the wire. Hang the rock over the disk. Check where the rock weight's in at before you turn on the electric motor. Then turn on the motor and check for a rise in the rock. If the rock rises up and down with the turning on and off of the motor. It's working. But here is the experiment that's going to put GreenGlow on the map. We already know that fast spinning disk will effect gravity. What we don't know is why is it effecting gravity. It's all way's, not how. But why. There are things that you can do with this set up that you can't do with the superconducting experiment. If you modify the equipment in the experiment a little. Nature will tell us why gravity is being effect. I already know what is happening. Because I know what is happening in nature. Even before I do the experiment. If I know what to look for and how to make it visible to the human eye. Because I've been playing around with resonators for some time now and doing all kinds of experiments with then. Using a resonator, so that I can see what the light is doing. I have a few trick up my sleave. Tricks of the tread. What I believe is happening in the experiment is the spinning disk is effecting the field energy of gravity that rest between the rock and the earth. That last statement is a no brainer. Then the question becomes how is it effecting the rock. What on earth could the field energy possibly be doing, that would be turning off the effects of gravity. And make the rock weigh less? That last statement is also a no brainer. For this fact. The only thing know to man that can turn off gravity. Is a high speed switch. Made out of space. Space is the light that rest between objects that has mass. We are using a spinning disk that is space shielding. When the disk is not spinning. The field energy that is made of mass. Space. Will form the shape of a positive lens. Will a positive lens produce an effect? No. But when the disk is spinning. You get an effect. What's the difference? A wormhole starts out as two positive lens's. When the two positive lens's meet. The point of the lens touch. the point turns to a flat disk. Out of the center of the disk grows a small tube, that turns into a larger tube. A tube with in a tube. On the inside of the second tube forms a black empty space. This black empty space acts like a high speed switch. And is able to turn off the gravitational field. The wormhole looks like a one piece wormhole. But it works as two half's. Then the question becomes. Can a single positive lens do the same thing that it does when it form's a hole wormhole composed of two positive lens half's? As it does when there is only one positive lens present? A open ended positive lens. ( There's no such thing found in nature. All positive lens's form a point. They don't form a hole where the focal point is supposed to be. There is now. )The answer is YES it can. Is this what is happening when the disk is spinning? Sure. Can this be proven? Sure. Only if you can see the membrane of the lens. Sure. Can you see the focal point of the positive lens shape shift. And change from a point into a tube. A positive lens with a tube on the inside of it . An open ended positive lens. Sure. Can you see the empty black space? Sure. The only thing is when you are looking at the black empty space is. Your not seeing any thing. Your seeing the absents of some thing. You are seeing nothing. That's why it's black. It has no mass. There is nothing there. No mass. No particle. No tube. No gravitational field. No gravity. It that simple. Gravity gets turn off for any atom that goes there. So, how are you proposing that we go by the way side and see the marvelous sight for our self? I have been using a resonator placed around the edges of a disk to study the membranes of light that is able to form a positive lens's. With most positive lens's the light goes on through the focal point and forms a round membrane on the other side. If there are two positive lens's present. It will form a negative. But ounce in a blue moon. I will find a positive lens. In which there is only one positive lens present. That will do the same thing it does when there are two positive lenses present. A open ended positive lens. If this be the case here. With the spinning space shielding disk. We have our cause of the effect. If you build a resonator around the space shielding disk. And take sun light and two mirror. And make the sun light come from the direction of the earth. From the bottom up wards. Past the edges of the disk through the resonators on the edges of the disk. If you use smoke or dust or a fogged screen you can see the shape of the positive lens. Then turn on the motor and spin the disk. You will be able to see the positive lens shape shift. If you use a small led light and place it to the side and let the light shine through the lens and hit a near by wall. You will be able to see it's shadow. But because we are playing around with space. If you take a neon light and place it next to the open ended end of the positive lens. A black dot will form. Evidence of the presents of the empty black space of the high speed switch. You can place it up to a t.v. screen ( Make sure that it's an old one. One that you were going to through a way any ways. ) and again the black dot will appear. If the space that the spinning disk is effecting is still forming a positive lens that has a focal point. There will be no stinking black dot, nor any effect on gravity. If it does have any effect on gravity . This is nothing more than a finger pointing to the direction in which GreenGlow needs to go. Which at last. At long last. Brings us to this. If this cheap, simple, and safe to do experiment perform's up to expectations. It's a good sign that the other experiment is going to work as well. I will never do this experiment. I'm going to by passing this experiment and go for the full blown wormhole experiment. But this experiment would get everybody else up to speed on the right way to manipulate gravity. This and this alone will be enough to put GreenGlow on the map. We will have two different experiments to work with. The go old Texas two step. Works every time. This is what I have up on my drawing board. Now all I need to do is draw some picture to go a long with it and get it up on my web page. For all to see. I know that this is not science. It's nature. But it could be. But what else could be had out of this experiment, is the fact it can form a stand a lone open ended positive lens. What you would have to know about in order to develop the physical proof of Ed Wittens "building blocks of nature." Because the open ended positive lens id real. It could be mapped with a particle detector and clocks. Real science. To prove the two atom theory of gravity is real. You first have to prove the Building blocks are real. That in nature. They can stand alone and function independently. Atoms are nothing but a positive lens. All positive lens's form a bubble in the center of them. Positive lens's are composed of two half's. and negative lens's are composed of two half's. These two different lens actions can all fit together like a train End to end. This is what a atom is. And this what gravity is. What you have to prove is that the two half's of the atom ( the positive lens ) can function independently from each other. Atoms have to have this ability to produce a force in two directions at the same time. They are like two way streets. and at the same time the space that rest between the atoms. Also has to be a two way street. Space has to be curved in two different directions at the same time. In order for the two different atom to produce a force that would cause them to move towards each other. In order for the negative lens ( the gravitational field energy. ) to be able to this. It too must function as two independent half's. One building black is really functioning as a 1/2 positive lens on one end and a negative lens one the other end. But it is all the same membrane. How can this be? Go look at the picture I took from nature. If you try to paint a picture with words of what is happening in nature. It's imposable. But if you look at the picture. You can see the positive lens action and the negative lens action. All together as one unit. You have to ask your self. Is it a positive lens or a negative lens. It's both. It's a building block of nature. You can use these building blocks of nature to build a simple two atom model of gravity. You can use the two atom model of gravity as the building blocks of gravity. And solve the mystery of gravity. This experiment and the whirlpool experiment is the only two experiments that I can think of that can form an open ended positive lens. That can be verified with a particle detector. Larry L. Burks









    Hi Debbie. It's my home page. NASA all ready know how to get wormhole to form. And manipulate gravity with them. They don't know what a worm holes is are what gravity is. Marc Millis back in 1999, asked me to put what I know about the subject. Before the eyes of the public. And that I have done. I have my own project that I'm working on. I have made my webpage simple enough. That if you want to do this you can, Even though you don't understand the science behind how it works. Do all the right thing at all the right time. And the wormhole forms. Using a wormhole to manipulate gravity is real simple. And at the same time. If you want to know what gravity is How it works. What a wormhole is and how they work. It's there too. The hard part is developing the physical proof. Which can be done. At lest by direct means. But can be done by indirect means. Do what cant be done. Do the imposable. Detect what can't be detected. There are ways. The page is meged out right now. Go back there tomorrow and you can see it. I found out how to do this from NASA. Dr. Winston E. Kock's Who worked for NASA. Is doing work in NASA's Space Optic laboratory. That he is forming holograms of wormholes As a standing wave. A standing wave does not move. This is what makes the wormhole stay open. There are two pictures of this negative lens Wormhole. In Dr.Kock's book. "Lasers and Holography " In one picture he uses the hole in the equipment as a negative lens to take a picture of the words' "NASA"s Space Optics Laboratory". He then moves in closer. With in the optical lens. To where the empty black space of the high speed switch can be seen. The empty black space that can stop gravity dead in it's tracks. The only thing know to man that can turn off gravity. There are picture hidden in the picture, of UFOs. Why is Dr. Kock playing mine games in his book? He's trying to tell you something. Which is? Nothing to do with UFO's Every thing to do with forming wormholes and manipulating gravity. NASA knows how to do this. They don't know what makes them work. Why is it that you don't know about this? Why is it that you can't find out any thing about "NASA"s Space Optics Laboratory" About NASA's UFO's Is there such a place or things? Sure. Is there a black out on the subject matter. Yes. Is it safe to go there? Are there snakes in the grass? Sure. Larry









   You know what's sad about all of this up date this year. Non of the letters I sent to Jack is here. And you get to see what I said. But you don't get to see what all they said. Oh my God!!!!!!!








    Would you believe that when I saw the picture where you are looking down the mouth of the wormhole. And it donged on me that this was right kind of open loop system that is being formed by nature. That I was looking for.


   All the text, pictures, and though processes of gravity on this web page when through my brain in 1.5 seconds. That's how long it took me to get it. It is true that a picture is worth a thousand words. The picture book story of gravity is a powerful technique. Larry L. Burks





Back to Home Page