web space | website hosting | Business Web Hosting | Free Website Submission | shopping cart | php hosting
























WHAT DO YOU MEAN?

YOU JUST SAW A UFO?
















JUST THAT
























WHAT DO YOU MEAN?

MONKEY MAN MADE THE FIRST WORMHOLE?
















GOD HELP THE MAN THAT READS THIS PAGE.

     Most of the text on this page is old and wrong. I need to edit It and up date It. But not to day.

    GRAVITY

    In Richard P. Feynman?s book which comes with a auto tape. ?SIX EASY PIECES?. On Tape 5, Lecture 5: ?The Theory of Gravity?, given on October 17,1961. Feynman lays down the ground work for a truly workable, a more complete Theory of Gravity. A theory that takes us from what Feynman calls ?a natural root hidden deep with in nature? to ? Newton?s laws modified to Einstein?s law, modifies once more to be consistence with the uncertainty principle. This last modification has not yet been completed..?to Carrying the quantum-mechanical aspects of nature over to the gravitational force.. Uniting Quantum-Mechanic with General Relativity. Develop a mental picture of what gravity is, that can be verified experimentally One that is able to explain how the uncertainty principal of electron can produce a force that goes beyond the energy equivalent of the electrons that produces the force. One in which the strength of the force is able to very smoothly ( a smooth transition of the strength). It would have to go one better, in which the force could be manipulated naturally in nature. and be manipulated by man. A theory of gravity in which man would be able to make products from this ? a much deeper understanding of the way gravity is found in nature. What I mean by a workable theory of gravity is a theory of gravity that is nature?s laws that can be understood to the point that one could grasp the concepts of gravity and be able walk as a mental picture all the way from the root to useful products. to make produce products. Beautiful and simple laws. Beautiful and simple laws to the point you could explain them to a child, and they would be able to grasp the concepts of gravity. See it and experience the force first hand See It. Hold it in their hands. Play with it. Fill the force by their on hands Make the strength of the force. stronger or weaker. Only when any body and every body can do these things will we truly be able to understand gravity.

    Why the need for a deeper and simpler theory of gravity? If you can not put your theory in simply enough term that children can not under stand them. And demonstrate what you are saying to a child. There is a very good chance that the theory is not right. Simplification is one of the goals of this theory.

    I find in Feynman?s works is a bass for forming such a theory of gravity. Feynman speaks of a need to look at gravity as some kind of a machine .If gravity is looked at as a machine then there would be a way to applied math to the theory. This is why I?m calling the theory Feynman?s Machine. It way Feynman that suggested this approach back in 1961.

    FEYNMAN'S MACHINE

    I'm using Feynman?s lecture to open up the subject for debate. Because Feynman talks about all the right things that are at the root of the problem. The different aspects of nature that needs to be look at more closely and understood better in order to have a theory of gravity. That is right by man?s law of gravity as it is right by nature?s law of gravity. Feynman speaks of the natural root. A machine like mechanism found in nature, that man can envision in his mind that would be capable of producing a force that has an infinite amount of force. Where does source of the force come from? It is not a energy force like electricity and nuclear, that has a particle that is responsible for the energy force. Particles are nouns. But a force as way of propelling the atom as some form of movement, and resistance to being moved, being repelled away from each other, or being attracted towards each other. And a form of pressure or compression. These words are all verbs that show action . Action verbs. Man walks. Man is a noun. He is made of particles. Walk is a action verb. There are no particles that make up verbs. Atoms move. The movement of atoms towards the earth is referred to as gravity. There are no particles that is responsible for gravity because it is a verb. There is a particle that is responsible for the movement of atoms. The electron. It is the only particle found in the make up of atoms. It has to be the right one. It?s?s the only one. Do the math. 1-1= 0 Take the electron out of a atom and the atom disappears. The electron is the atoms. Electrons that are smeared out over time and space in the form of a membrane that takes on the shape of a sphere is what we call a atom. Atoms are electrons. Electrons are atoms. The electron when it is smeared out over time and space is a shape shifter. Just like in science fiction moves where the monster changes it?s shape from one thing to the shape of some thing else. Same person. Different shape. Same electron. Different shape..

    The force is inexhaustible. The electron that is responsible for the source of the fores never runs down. When man has to compete with this force by way of using electrical or nuclear fuel to produce his source of propulsion. His fuel source soon run out in comparison if the gradational source.. The source of the force that gravity springs from never stops. ( oh. And by the way, I would like to state at this time that the electron never gives up it?s inertia when it is found in atoms. It?s one of those never never land thing just like gravity is one of those never never land thing.) And because of this gravity is said to have a infinite amount of Force Not energy, but force. Some people are trying to mix apples with oranges. There is a difference. Energy is like electricity and nuclear energy. Gravity is not like that . It is not like energy it is like force. mass weight. It?s some thing that matter produces a after effect. Ont some thing that matter is There is no particle that is linked back to gravity like thee is a particle that is linked back to electricity or nuclear energy there is a particle that is responsible for gravity. The mass of the electron.. Gravity can produce a force. that will out last electricity and nuclear by a lot lot lot. is made by man but a machine like event that is found in nature The shape of the atom. That incorporate the is based on the mass of the electron. The three forces that are mass related, coupled with the Newton?s laws of motion

    Quote; But is this such a simple law? What about the Machinery of it? All we have done is to describe how the earth moves around the sun, but we have not said what makes it go. Newton made no hypotheses about this; he was satisfied to find what it did without getting into the machinery of it. No one has since given any machinery. It is characteristic of physical laws that they have this abstract character. The laws of conservation of energy is a theorem concerning quantities that have to be calculated and added together, with no mention of the machinery, and likewise the great laws of mechanics are quantitative mathematical laws for which no machinery is available.

    Since has all ready given us the needful things to build such a machine. All we meed to do is but it together What Feynman is saying is we know how they go. But we don?t know why they go. It?s one of those ?why? will give you ?how? thing. The ?how? and ?why? of things.

     We need to take a atom and make it like a machine that has the ability to move across empty space. The things that an atom would need to build such a machine is some thing that never runs down about the atom. We?ll use an electron. It never runs down The electron never gives up it?s inertia in the atom. We need some thing with mass. I know! We?ll use the electron . It has mass. WE need a way to make it move . Away to turn the force off and make it come back on and a way to make the strength very with the square of the distance.

    The Word that Feynman uses is, ?analogies?. If you look up the word in the dictionary and thesaurus. to get a filling of what this word means. We are looking at two different thing, but are a like as the same thing.

    Feynman expresses it in these words.

    Gravity

    Quote ?Every object in the universe attracts every other object with a force which for any two bodies is proportional to the mass of each and varies inversely as the square of the distance between them. And An object responds to a force by accelerating in the direction of the force by an amount that is

inversely proportional to the mass of the object.?

    Quote ? Finally, let us compare gravitation with other theories. In recent years we have discovered that all mass is made of tiny particles and that there are several kinds of interactions, such as the nuclear forces, (. It is not an aspect of electricity or something like that.)etc. None of these nuclear or electrical forces has yet been found to explain gravitation. The quantum-mechanical aspects of nature have not been carried over to gravitation.

    Quote ? Newton?s laws modified to Einstein?s law, modifies once more to be consistence with the uncertainty principle. This last modification has not yet been completed. This is the way it stands today.?

     Quote ? Finally, let us compare gravitation with other theories. In recent years we have discovered that all mass is made of tiny particles and that there are several kinds of interactions, such as the nuclear forces, (. It is not an aspect of electricity or something like that.)etc. None of these nuclear or electrical forces has yet been found to explain gravitation. The quantum-mechanical aspects of nature have not been carried over to gravitation.

    Quote ?If we take some natural units, the repulsion of two electrons ( natures universal charge ) due to electricity, and the attraction of two electrons due to their masses, we can measure the ratio of electrical repulsion to the gravitational attraction. The ratio is independent of the distance and is a fundamental constant of nature.

    The key words in this passage is ?due to their mass.?

     Quote ?We have considered two aspects of the same thing , an electron.?

     Then he goes deeper in to the subject and states.

    Quote ?Next we discuss the possible relation of gravitation to other forces. There is no explanation of gravitation at the present time in terms of other forces. It is not an aspect of electricity or something like that. So we have no explanation. But there is the interesting thing that other forces and gravitation are very `similar. It is very interesting to note analogies. For example, the force of two electron obey varies understood.......Looks just like that ( you can hear Feynman writing on the black bard and talking at the same time, the tone of his voice has changed, he is excited. Because of this I know that this is one of his pet peas ) The force of electricity is a constant x (times )the product the charges inversely to the square of the distance and a minus sign.?.

     Quote; ? It is a fact that the force of gravitation is proportional to the mass, the quantity which is fundamentally a measure of inertia.

    Quote; ?If we take, in some natural units, the repulsion of two electrons (nature?s universal charge) due to electricity, and the attraction of two electrons due to their masses, we can measure the ratio of electricity repulsion to the gravitational attraction. The ratio is independent of the distance and is a fundamental constant of nature.?.

     Quote; ?Many attempts have been made to unify them; the so-called unified field theory is only a very elegant attempt to combine electricity and gravitation; but, in comparing gravitation and electricity, the most interesting thing is the relative strengths of the forces. Any theory that contains them both must also deduce how strong the gravity is.?.

    Quote; ?Perhaps gravitation and electricity are much more closely related than we think.?.

    Quote; ?For example the force of electricity between two charges objects look just like the law of gravitation: the force of electricity is a constant, with a minus sing, times the product of the charges, and varies inversely of the square of the distance. It is in the opposite direction?likes repel. It is very remarkable that the two laws involve the same function of distance.?

    What he should have said is? While in the shape of a atoms like found in nature, the inertia of the mass of the electron, that is never given up, is what lies at the root the source of the force that propels the atom that gives us the force we refer to as the gravitational force?.

    Quote; ?We have considered two aspects of the same thing , an electron.?

    Quote; ?There is no explanation of gravitation at the present time in terms of other forces. It is not an aspect of electricity or something like that ( Gravity is not like electricity or nuclear energy in that it does not absorb a particle or admits a particle. There is no particle for gravity. But there is a particle that is responsible for the force. The electron. Not the energy aspects of the electron. Based on the mass of the electron Any thing that has mass will obey Newton?s laws of motion The forces that are related back to the mass of the electron are Mass it?s self The resistance or force that is produced when the object is accelerated. Centrifugal force. Which is the very same thing as the laws that govern mess. When centrifugal force is being produced the object is being accelerated. In both cases the shape of the electron changes it?s shape when accelerated The shape of the electron also is changed when the gravitational force is present All three forces are linked together due to the fact that the in each case the shape of the atom changes when the force is present. Keep this thought in the back of your mine because it plays a very big roll in understanding what gravity is.)

    Quote; ?Next we discuss the possible relation of gravitation to other forces. There is no explanation of gravitation at the present time in terms of other forces. It is not an aspect of electricity or something like that. So we have no explanation. But there is the interesting thing that other forces and gravitation are very `similar. It is very interesting to note analogies. For example, the force of two electron obey varies understood.......Looks just like that ( you can hear Feynman writing on the black bard and talking at the same time, the tone of his voice has changed, he is excited. Because of this I know that this is one of his pet peas ) The force of electricity is a constant x (times )the product the charges inversely to the square of the distance and a minus sign.?.

    If you apply this rule to the inertia of the mass of the electron in which the electron never gives up it?s inertia like that , that is found in the dynamics of the set up of membranes of atom Coupled with what the electron is capable at the quantum level while in a state of uncertainty Where mass and inertia comes and goes. Add worm holes to the wall and tunneling and holes to the set up. And there we have it atoms that are able of propelling their self?s.

    because I fell that Feynman lays down the ground work for a truly workable Theory of Gravity. What I mean by a workable theory of gravity is a theory that works to the point that man understand gravity in a very simple and beautiful way that all most any one can understand it to the point that they can manipulate the gravitational force and make free energy devices like , like, say, a UFO. UFOs is not the subject matter here. Also a GUT is not the subject. Gravity? No. Getting to the root of the problem that is gravity is the bottom line. Not man?s gravity, but gravity. like that is found in nature. If we can understand what is happening in nature. Then and only then can one see in our minds what is happening and start to work on thing like math, proofs, a way to manipulate the force, and produce products from this knowledge. To do this we need what is already know and what is not know about nature. With out violating any laws of nature take some little thinks that I know could be done if man could do something that is impossible. Impossible to man, but not impossible to nature. If nature is doing what is being done. Then no laws of nature are being violated.

     There are some hidden messages that can be found on the tape , but are not found in the text of the book. Lessen to the tape . Read the book. And you will see what I mean. On the tape, when Feynman is writing on the black board he mumbling to him self, while he is writing , he becomes distracted, and his subconscious comes out . His true insight , his creativity comes alive. He states in what ways the gravitational force with the electro magnetic force are one and the same. With out even knowing that he has done so. In this lecture Feynman is spilling is guts out for this young students He has taken the kid gloves off and is bearing all. Even at the risk of looking foolish in the eyes of this students ( and his pears, It turned out that there were was more DR. in the hall that keep dropping in to lessen to Feynman speak than students. The lectures were that good. Lessen to the tape.) Feynman knows that in his hart of harts that one of these students will be the one. The one that will do what he can not. The one that will solve the misty of gravity. All it takes is for one to win at this game and every one wins. It is a very important lectures. Any one who is interested in gravity, what it is and what makes it go. Needs to study this lecture. and the things there in that Feynman is talking about. Feynman holds closely his dreams of gravity in the lecture. More so than any thing else. Because Feynman knows like every one else knows that with out having a gravity that is wright by man. There will be no infinite amount of clean, free energy for man .If our theories of gravity are wrong about gravity, then there is a chance that the rest of our theory?s on the laws of nature can also be wrong. Or at least what we have picture in our minds. The picture man has created. Man some times can be wrong. Wrong in the sense that what he has pictured in his mind can be the wrong picture we should be using. May be all that is need is to see gravity to be working in a little- bit differently than we did in the past. Some times this is all that it takes .And then as if by magic. Poof. Every thing starts to make sense. All the pieces of the puzzle fit in place.

    What I?m going to do is quote Feynman word for word off the tape. After each quote I?m going to go in to the subject a little deeper and try to explain why this statement in impotent to under stand in this way. I?m going to form a time line that forms a clearer logic. Simplified gravity to the point that what had seem to have been an impossible goal for gravity to have achieve in nature. Becomes laughable because it is so simple we just can?t imagine why it was that we didn?t think of it in this way sooner.. To what he is saying. The one part that is missing for his insight he puts in a statement . What he is really doing is asking the question. If you ask the right question in the right way sometimes you can find the right answer.

    But here we are forty years almost to the date later and that question has not ben answered. I?m going to filling that last 1% of insight, and give a way to answer Feynman?s question. In order to do so I will have to put in text what is on the tape, and was left out of the book?s text, and add what is know by me about the interaction of particles with their self. ?THE ?diagrams. The every famous y- diagrams. of Wheeler and Feynman. The y-diagrams of 1961 are known to have a higher dimensional shape . The 2001 shape of twin inverse vortex. Two tubes that change it?s shape to form one tube. What roll they play in forming the machine that Feynman asks about. If there is any one who has ever had the insight to form a Quantum Theory of gravity that would be compatible with the other two forces. It would be Dr. Feynman . Dr. Q.E.D. him self. What does he have to say about the subject?

    On page 109 and 110 Feynman is comparing the relative strengths of electricity to the relative strength of gravity.

    Quote ?We have considered two natural aspects of the same thing, an electron.?

    What Feynman should have said is. Based in the mass of the electron when it is in a state of uncertainty and expressing it?s shape as a compound complex shape that is a machine that has the ability to make the atom move Attract due to gravity at the long range or repel at the short range due to its electrical charge.

     Their many thing happen in nature that makes gravity work. You can track down the different aspects of the problem but to see How it works you have to see every thing working at the same time. The big picture.

    The string people know that the atom has to have a more complex shape to form a atom. . Nine of space and one of time. This is enough dimensions to make ma atom based on the mass of the electron, that can move of produce a force bass ed on it?s mass but is it 10 or 11 dimension We can have atoms that move with 10D but there has to be one more dimension that allows atoms relate or be connected to each other. Feynman states that one Photon will do the trick.

nbsp;   The shape of the photon when it is connecting to atoms together. Is a vortex. Vortex?s are like bubbles. Bubbles are the same as a vortex turned inside out different in their shapes but the same in their function. Vortex are shape shifters. They are not only shape shifters but how many dimensions that they have changes .Atoms that are expressing gravity have to be connected to each other. The two forces produced by the same electron is the same . They differ in that the gravitational fores is stronger by a factor of one photon. at the long range The photon that connects the two electrons can have as many dimensions as the atom. The history of how many dimension changes. It can be expressed as one and go all the way up to ten then go all the way bask down to one.

     So atoms that can move have 10 dimension and atoms that have this unseen guiding hand

    (Gravity) as 11 dimension in the system, the big picture.

    For this to be true in the beginning nature would have to have different two system working in together as one system Like having to parallel universes Each having nine dimension of space and one of time One universe reduces down to one dimension and the other reduced down to the dimension of space and they both have the same dimension of time.

     So how does this work? In the beginning there is one universe that has nine dimensions of space and one dimension of time. The universe has the ability to duplicate it self in the form of a twin only the offshoot has a different shape, that of a atom. Which starts of as a point changes to nine dimensions then reduces down to three but the first universe when the first when the second reduces down to three the first reduce down to three the shape of a vortex. It is truly a three dimensional shape but we express it as one dimensional.

     This is the way we find thing to be in nature today. We have atoms that are expressed as three dimensional of space and one of time.. But all of the energy did not collapse down to form particle we are still connected together by the energy that has yet to be recorded. To loose the way that we are connected all of the energy would have to form matter, all at once. If this were to happen every electron would fly or be repelled a way from each other at the speed of light. Explode. Pop. Er, Band or big bang is what I should say. But when electron move at the sped of light in its state of uncertainty. This is when they form the membrane that connects the energy together the membrane is what forms the membrane that make up atoms.

     But is it the big bang that we come from or is it stars that produce atoms? When stars get so hot like in supper nova. It is so hot that the string that connect break down and when that happens the electrons fly away from each other atom The difference or the ratio between the two is, the relative strength of the gravitational attraction relative to the relative strength of the electrical repulsion between two elections is 1 divided by 4.17 x 10 to the 42ed. It is a very large number , but a very small difference. How much mass does a Photon have? Photon are said to be massless. But the photon is the carrier of the electron. Electron have mass. Einstein?s Relativity theory states anything that has energy has mass?mass in the sense that it is attracted gravitationally. But if the shape that the photon makes due to some field energy. Is also the same shape that electrons make when they are interacting due to the mass forces. It would be very hard to tell what is the root cause of the shape the two theory would be indistinguishable able from one another . But when the shape that is made by the particle in question here . Makes a shape that would violate the laws of mass. Then we would know that field energy is at the root of what is effecting the presents and direction of the particle.

    What is not found in the text of the book, but on the tape he states

     Hay, Well with in a factor of 2000, you can put a photon here, but it is only a factor.?.

    What Feynman Is saying is the ability for the electron to move is a fundamental constant of nature. Regardless of which direction it is moving, it is still the same. The only deference between repulsion and attraction at the very strong short rang is charge is one photon. The only deference between the attraction at the very strong long gravity rang is negative charge of one photon. Where does the photon come from? Due to the uncertainty principle That states that a photon can be smeared out over time and space. That while in this state of uncertainty, it can be extended in to the past. What this means that even though the photon passed this way many years ago, it is still has not been recorded. And can not be recorded due to the fact that information will not move backwards in time. The presents of its history is still with us. And can make it presents know as the negative energy that is able to connect two atoms together at a distance. All the photons that have a field energy is all part of the same system as light. There is light that we can not detect. This can be experienced using the holographic technique that I?m using. The form of negative energy can come up from out of no where.. The membrane of the vortex , that connects the two atoms together is negative in charge. Being negative makes the two atoms come together just like two negative ends of a magnet will make two positive end of a magnet come together. Take out the negative ends and the two positive ends repel

     Note; What all this is leading up to is if one could prove the mass of the electron is related to the ability of two electron to move a way from each other as being electrical and that the mass of an electron is related to the ability of two electron to move towards each other as being gravity. That the same law that allows both forces to comply with the same variant inversely as the square of the distance. It?s not two laws, it is the same law. It?s not two deferent particles . It is the same particle. The electron. And it?s all related to the same mass of the same electron. There is not two deferent electron to be found in nature . We only find one electron. One Electron responsible for two forces. No That?s not right. One electron responsible for the same force, expressing it?s self in two deferent ways. This is right because the electron only has one mass. One mass One law. Same electron. One force expressing its self in several deferent ways. All arrows or indicator are l pointing to the same thing. Feynman goes so fore as to tell you what has to be done. He even gives you some examples , but they are ones that don?t work He knows what has to be done and he tells you .I?ll list them.

     Has to be some kind of machine that is able to produce a force..

     Has some thing to do with mass

     Has to be compatible with the varies inversely of the squar of the distance law.

    Has to be a universal constant found in nature that is related to all forces.never runs down., or stops, like a .

    Is not like electricity, not force that is made of matter , some thing that matter does , not some thing is.

     Has to be consistent with the Quantum effect.( Tunneling)

    Has to be consistent with the uncertainty principle.

Has to violate known laws of physics. Feynman states that the laws must be wrong.

    It must be an interaction of particles.

    If it is not made of matter it does not exist, or you could say there is a particle responsible for every force.

    Feynman believes it is the electron. He States that the ratio between gravity and electricity is so small or so close that all it would take is the energy of one photon to make them as being the same aspects of the same electron..varies inversely as the square of the distance between what is being observed and the observer point of rest.

    Einstein believes that they are as one.

    Which is the same thing as Feynman. Two deferent aspects of the same thing, the electron.

    Wheeler?s big picture states they are as one.

    Hawkins believes that lowly photon ,the carrier of the electron that is responsible for gravitational force.

    The laws of conservation can not be violate on a large scale     But is being violated at the very small scale.

    Hawkins believes in the free lunch, which is the same thing.

    The question you must ask your self is not what is gravity, but what is mass, and how do you get it to change inversely to the square to the distance law ?

     Hears what you have to know that they don?t teach you in school. They don?t teach you what it would take to make a perpetual motion machine. They don?t teach you about the interaction of particles as bridges.

    That a worm hole in a bubble gets bigger or smaller with the changing of the distance , which gives you a machine that is able to produce a force that vary inversely to the square to the distance. That It?s relative strength is relative to the mass of the two atoms, or how much energy the atoms is equal to, or how many electrons that the two objects in question have.

     (A) The field energy that rest between two atom?s shape varies inversely as the square of the distance between them changes. Which in turn cases the

     (B)Shape of the atom to vary inversely as the square of the distance between the two atoms. Which in turn causes the

;    (C) a worm hole to form that is able to very inversely as the square of the distance between two atoms changes. Which in turn causes the

     (D) relative strength of the force (gravity) to very inversely to the square of the distance between two atoms.

     (E) holes act like holes . Where the hole is there no mass forces to be found there do atoms have holes in them? Sure they do. On pages123, 124, and 125 of Nick Herbert?s book )?QUANTUM REALITY? we find evidence of worm holes in atoms. (Keep in mind that worm holes can take on the shape of disk like worm holes like that found between the shapes of double stacked dough-nuts. Page 125"But the probability for the electron to be found anywhere on the plain separating the two doughnuts is exactly zero. Keep in mind that holes have zero electrons to be found there also. Note the evidence found on page 123, of shape shifting atoms. But all the shapes on page 123 would not move. All the forces are being council out. The force is the same on all sided = no movement. But if you took shape H and in bread it with shape H*3 a hybrid. It would form the shape of a egg with no hole at one end and a hole at the other end.+ movement, or force or gravity

Ed of the coral castle.

  &Why go over to Ed's place to find out about how to build the equipment needed to build a device that can pop a worm hole in space and hold it open so that you can use to curve time and space and do All the things that can be done with corved space? Well there is a lot of reasons. One of the reasons why I went there to study his work, is safty. Ed did it in a way that is more safe than others. Mistakes ? Yes, he made a few. He's dead isn't he. 99.999% of the people that find out how to do this are dead. And this is the main reason why you don't know how to do this. "Dead men tell no tells." Now how are you going to get some one to tell you how to do this if there all dead.

  & Ed tells you. ED marked is trail. There is even writing on the walls {well it's realy the front gate. but it's there.} If all his specialised equipment that he need to do this is still there, even to this today. It's like having the blue prints to one of these devices. They tell you that It's all there. but it's not. But if you go look at what every one else was doing and then go look at how Ed do it. You find a pattern What every one else has Ed is missing. And the one thing that Ed has eevery one else is missing. Make a list of what each person has and lay it over the top of each other's list and what you get in the end is a list of all the equipment needed..

     Here are some of the facts you would have to know about in order to look for the clues. They are makeing a spical kind of equipment used for making s a spical kind of hologram. A Hologram of the shape of the field energy of a worm hole. Why A Hologram? Holograms are made of a standing wave. Field energy is a shape shifter. Every time time you move towards it . It moves a way from you. But by forming a hologram of the field energh of a worm hole. By forming a standing wave that is frozen in the space in which it rest. When you move towards the worm hole, it does not shape shift and move a way from you. You can access the inter space that rest on the in side of the worm hole. A space that has no mass. If you move down the mouth of a worm hole. Time and space becomes more curved for you. The forces of gravity will prevent you from going in to the mouth.You can try if you may. but it will only spit you right back out again. Objects are moved out of wormholes. They are not sucked in to them. This is what the space is black. I is black because it is empty. It has no mass Because the space is empty. If nothing can rest in this black space, Not even light. Even light is rejected form this space. If light cant go there . What makes you thing that a worm hole would let you go there. The laws of nature forbids you from going all the way down the mouth of a worm hole. You can go a little ways but you will never be allow to go all the way. You can be sucked in to a black hole. Which takes you to the center of a the worm hole. Which in turn just spits you right back out again.

  &Look at jet gallixe M87. M87 has a black hole at the center of it . It produces radon particals. It also has a worm hole in it. Look at the jet.

  &There is one word that can hold the patterns of these different thing togeather. Shape. In this subject shape is every thing. what kind of shape? Egg shape. Why did I use the word egg shaped? Everyone knows what the shape of a egg is. It's an oval. Some of the other words used describe an oval are, Stone or Stone shaped, Pottery, Bowls, Wine Jars Olive jars, Wine Glass, Cresent Moon, Throne of Mercy or Set of Mercy, Eye, Eye of Ri, Disc Shape, UFOs. concaved mirror used as negative lens, parobolic, Free space negative lenes, negative lens forme by a aperture or hole, Box cameria, hole, apenture, curatures of space and time. Gravity, Very's inversley to the square of the distanse, Worm Holes, E=mc x 2. There is but one type of reflecting firat down surface (mirror) that can be used to form a resonator ( hologram)Of the shape That light makes when it formes a negative lens when it pases through a hole. A mirror that is concave or parobolic. Inorder to form a resonator the mirrow has to reflect the light that came through the hole back up through the hole, In order for the light to do this the light has to hit the mirror at a 90 degere angle. The shape or envelop of a negative lens produced by a aperture (hole ) curves. just like the shape of a vortex is curved. In order for the light to hit the mirror at a 90 degeres angle all around on all sides of the mirror( vortexs are round shaped} the mirrror has to be round shaped as well. The mirror has to have a curviture to it. The shape of the mirroe has to be compatible with the shape of the negaqtive.

  The light has to hit the mirror at a 90degree angle on all sides. The pieces of the puzzal have to fit togeather in order for it to work. The making of a hologram is a photographic technique. The recording of the info in the hologram is done with film. There has to be a way to shoot the film and there has to be a way to develop the film. The elements that the film is made of has to be space shilding. What did they use? At that time the only thing that they had on hane that they could use that is space shilding. is spores formed by yeast or mold. If this is all they had. Then this is what they would have had to use. Is this what they used Yes. How do I kanw this? Simple . They tell you. Moses! Bread Yeast bread. Or what yeast breas is befor it becomes yeast bread. Dough. Bread dough. soure dough. When Moses left Egypt they carried their bread dough in troughs. Befor you say no, check it out. Wine. Or what wine is befor it is wine grape juice. Holly Grail A wine glass that had grapejuice in it. It had yeast in it also.

  Ed's film .When I went to Ed's place to see if he was realy doing this. I already knew how to do this. I knew what to look for.I knew to look of Ed's optical equipment. His box cameria. And sure enough. I found it. It was there. I was cought off guard and by supprise when I saw that his box cameria and his home made film was resting on the same self. side by side each other. Still there after, fifty years , his death. in the same place he left it. untoughed. How did I know that what was in side of the jar was his film? It tells you on the side of the jar. It was black and smiled like what itis supost to smell like. The mold in it had turned it black.( more writing on the wall.) It says on the side of the jar,"malted milk." Maltedmilk has malted barily in it. What is malted barily used for? It's used in the makeing of products that use yeast Like beer. bread, moon shine. sour dough. You put malt in bread or corn mash, used it for making moon shine. malt has an emzine in it that can change starch into suger. Suger is the food of yeast. If you know about these thing befor you go th Ed's place and you find that Its all there . the rest is history. They tell you. Bread with out yeast.What bread is before it is bread Dough. Wine. or what wine is befor it was wine . Grape juice.

    CAVE MEN HAVE WORM HOLES

    We know that the Epyption had devices that could form worm holes. But if you ask your self gut how long as this been going on? One way of finding out just at what point in time did man first descover how to do this, is if you follow the phisical trail of the radiation poision. Radion particals can do damage to your DNA and DNA that has been damaged will cause your gens to motate. motations is what caused you to evolove. Mutation happen naturaly in nature. But a mutations only happen about one in one million. It takes along time for speces to evlove. But you are zaped with high dosages of radion particals. The rate that mutation happen goes way up. If you took a large number of a speace and you gave them a strong dose of raditation. 98% of them will die. Out of the 2% that are left. !/3 will be uneffected. 1/3 will have a mutation that is detrimental and will die out over time for one reason or a nother. But the 1/3 that will have a mutation. that is benifishul will live on to domanated the 1/3 that is uniffected.

    When you from from a mutation rate that is slow like is found naturealy in nature. 1/1000000. to a rate in which the motation rate is one out of two that are left to live on. This is a very extreem rate of evovleing. An exclearated that is unnature.

    Dorwen thory of elovolotion is right up to a point. If a theory is not right in every instance then it is wrong. There are a few exceptions to the rule. Man is one of them man's destimice gream, and mans dog is a few of the exceptions.

Man eloved ata natural rate like that found in nature A slow rate. But as long as man had the knowage to make a device that caused a worm hole to form Ten thousan to three thousin years ago. man evoloved ata excelaroated rate. And when he lost the ability to make the devices that formed worm holes. Man whent back evoloving at a natureal slow rate. In the past three thouson years man has not evolved one bit.

    Man evolved at such an excelarated rate that thereis no fossol record of this transformation. This is what mutation will do for you one day you are a cavwman and the next generation you are modern man. THE MISSING LINK.

    Some time between when man descovered fire, and befor he invented the wheel. He invented pottery. What he would have to have to make a worm hole.

    There was a dig in Prue. they found a village that lived on a river bank. They where making fishing nets. They corbin dated the fishing nets and found out that they were 20 thousan years old. But in the same did they found pieces of pottery. So it true.

    What this means is that who we are(modern man ) can be tracked back to the missing link. This means the every one is a direct decent of the missing link. We are the ears. to their legicy their trade sicrest their family scrites. This technology belonges to no one man or group of man . It belongs to every body. Every body has a right to use this techinologe as he see fit. IF this is true and we have this technilogy why am I paying two a gollon for fuel when I dont have to?????????

Winston E. Kock ?LASERS AND HOLOGRAPHY? An introduction to coherent optics Second, Enlarged Edition copyright 1968 first published 1969; second enlarged edition published 1981

    For years I looked in vain trying to see if some one else had discover the same thing that I had discovered. How to make diffrected light visible to the eye. Ten years of looking and I found nothing. It looked as if I was the first. I knew that the device was an important discovery. I just couldn?t bring my self to believe that after all the people that had studied light that no one had ever discovered the same effect. That one could make diffrected light visible to the eye as costic sheets of light, by implying a parabolic resonator in junction with a razors? edge and view the light through an other resonator, that uses an objective beam. A holograph technique.

    Now I fine that I don?t have to make my case. DR. Kock has already made it for me in his book.

    The like wise device I discovered accelerated my learning process of what light particles do when we can?t see or detect them by way of a particle detector. In there state of uncertainty. The uncertainty principle . In no time I was making drawing of atoms. found a way to make them move. uniting GR. with QM. And made drawing of UFOs that I think will work. I was delighted when I found the same drawing hidden in Kock?s book. plate #32, on the wall behind the men. It is fragmented. You have to know about the technology and the symmetry of the light in order to piece it to together to form a 3-d drawing of the UFO.

    It is a line drawing. At first I thought that it was electoral wires held up there with duct tape. Orthe fore runner of duct tape.(fix any thing) Black electoral tape. But the wires don?t go any where. Where are the electoral appliances that the wires go to? there aren?t any. Just dead ends. It?s because their not wires but lines. It?s a drawing A hidden drawing. Ask your self this question? If Kock has hidden messages in his text. What other stuff has Kock hidden in this book? The black rectangle seen on the wall is where the hologram goes. (See Roswell stuff) The line that it crosses is the line that represents the vortex. coursed by razors edge of the hole in the top of the parabolic resonator. The parabolic resonator is not shown. you have to add it in. The straight line is the center axis. the axes tells you where to spin the drawing to get the 3-d picture. of the UFO. The curved line at the bottom left and right of the axis is the center lobe that forms the bubble in the center. The bubble has a holes in it. Some thing that I didn?t know. But I do now. The bubble is hard to see. You have to look at with the light coming in at a angle. Where a disk might be located but is not there in this case. There is a bubble there. The higher dimensional equivalent of a disk. Knowing where the two keys are at let?s you know how to unlock the drawing.( light relates back to it?s self at a 90 degree angle; the third kind of singularity. A disk in the middle of a central axis. Light would not be able to do what it does with out this third singularity and it?s higher dimensional forms of it. Man has not corn figured this one out yet. But nature has. By the way; if you have points singularity and ring singularities add a another point singularity to that and puff , you have your third kind of singularity. There are several deferent theme and variations of it forming in several deferent ways It?s what makes all things possible. This is one of the things I?m working on I?m building me a P.C. This is one of the reasons why this paper is taking me so long. It took me a year to find out how to get the dam thing to work right. I?ve got every thing but a new monitor. Then I will be able to take home movies of all this stuff record it on CD-ROM and send to other to look at.) This gives you way to take the fragmented 1/4 the of the drawing. And turn it into the 4/4th of the pie. Take this 1/4th piece of the pie and make a hole pie with it. Add the other 3/4 pieces of the pie . them spin the drawing . And out pops a 3-d drawing with the placement of the hologram ( space-gram like found on the wall in Roswell N.M.) in it?s right place. The drawing gives you a look at what is going on the inside of a UFO. Take the hyper dementia shape of a double stacked dough-nut. A bubble with in a bubble And you have the hole picture.

    Carl Sagen investigated the UFO phenomena. He published a book on the subject. Carl found the same blue prints that I found. Carl did the blue prints in his book Contact. in the same way that Kock did in his. Carl talked to Kip S. Thorne about worm holes.(see Thorne?s book 94 ) Find the Keys. the axis and the central disk. And it let?s you find the hidden drawing in it?s higher dimensional form, 3-D form. Makes you wonder where Carl got the ideal to do the same thing in Contact at?????

    In no place does Kock say any thing about no stinking UFO in his book. Kock?s book is aboutthe history of lasers and Holography. Lasers are resonators. UFOs are resonators. UFOs have a special hind of hologram on the inside of them that is made of a superconductive material like copper. What is a UFO? A parabolic resonator. A parabolic resonator is what Kock is standing by in plate # 32. And right next to his head is the fragmented 3-d drawing of a UFO. I know that if I was very going to build a UFO I would have to find a way to use a opaque resonator instead of the one in which I was using. Which is transparent. Due to the fact that when some thing becomes superconductive. It is opaque to space . It is space shielding. It is also mirror like. It can reflect space just like a mirror. My resonator can never make a UFO fly, but mine can do something else that Rosen?s can?t. Rosen?s will rotate by 45 degrees. A 3/4 profile at best. Mine will form the disk out in open air and rotate the view by 90 degrees. I can get mine to form bubbles and doubles with bridges out in open air. No prop made of matter there to make hem form. Maybe dark matter like found in nature. And it can change it?s shape in just the right way that is needed to make atoms move and make the strength very. Gravity is expressed in quanta, Electrons. But it must also have a way to very. You must have a way to make things fall at the same rate. But weight deferent weights or have deferent masses. When some thing falls . the atoms work as many single atoms working as if they are one. in unison. Like many people. regardless of how many people there are in this grope. Taking one step forward at the same time. When an object is weighted you have to toil the number of people in the grope. Gropes of people that have deferent number of people in them would weight deferent weights. Ant Nature the lucky one she has it all.

    A Q-Theory of gravity will not stand alone. You can have a Q-theory of atoms that have the ability to move or produce a force. But with out GR.. to dictate in what direction it will move and how strong the strength of he force is by changing the shape of the atom in just the right way to make it move just so-so. GR. and Atoms that move QM has to work to together as a team. Matched they dance in unison, as if they are one. Where GR. and QM are as one in nature. Where the distortion of the shape of a atom due to Einstein?s laws of contraction and the distortion of the shape of the atom need to make the strength of the force the same as seen in nature. WHEN BOTH DISTORTED SHAPES ARE THE SAME AS SEEN IN NATURE, BY BOTH THEORIES. THEY ARE UNITED AS ONE BY WAY OF THEIR SHAPES ( SHAPE ) One shape obtained due to contraction of space and time. The other shape (same shape ) obtained due to deducting how much the shape would have to change to get the right strength of the force. according to the theory that atoms can be made to move. Feynman?s Machine.

    You say that atoms are usually round. You can?t say that for sure because no one has every seen the side view of a atom. They may be egg shaped if seen from the side view. The only picture of a atom I have very seen was a picture of the front view. There all front views. The characteristic of the energy we see in the pictures is relative. We all ways are looking at it from the front view. Using a resonator like the one that I have. One might be able to produce a image of a atom from the side view. If the atom turns out to be egg shaped and if the side view of the back of a atom has a vortex in it. No one can say for sure that it does not because no one has every seen the back side of a atom. than there is a very good chance that my theory of gravity is right. Gravity as it is in nature.

    The paper trail keep leading me back to this one book.? Lasers And Holography? By Winston E. Kock. Because Kock talked about all the thing that one need to know about to build a UFO. I also know that they to would have to have a device like mine that would also accelerate their learning process to develop the deck knowledge to Build UFOs. There is this one picture in the book. It is in the very center of the book. The picture has Kock Gabor(the inventor of the hologram, And Lowell Rosen. They are looking at a hologram. There is a device on the table that is not usually found in a hologram setup Could this be the device that I have been looking for. The one made the right way needed to make a UFO work? At first it seem as if ?no? But after a year of looking at this picture I was able to fine the right answer.

    This device is censored from being published. KocK had to muddy the water some what in order to get it published. Get it passed censorship. How do I know that it?s the right device? A parabolic resonator use with diffrected light to make it visible to the eye. Why was it so hard for me to get a straight answer. Censorship.

     Kock does not say that it is a resonator straight forward The fact that it is a true resonator can be found in the :index of the book. under ?resonator?

    If you look in the index under resonator it states ?Resonators, 36-39 figs. 37 38 ? If you turn to page 36-39, we find out that lasers use reflectors at each end of a ruby ( resonators ) to make lasers work They have a hole in one of the plain reflectors Which is true. Every thing is find and dandy here.

    But when we go to the page where the fig is we find some text about two mirror. But when we read the text about the fig it says nothing about resonators. Weird but not unusual. But when we true to page 80 where fig #38 is . All hell breaks loss.. There is no resonator used in the fig experiment. But what I find wrong with the text of the experiment is that it says nothing about a resonator in the text. The experiment talks about image inversion. Which to do this you need a negative lens. In the picture is a positive lens?????? What the hell is going on here?????? I know that a man Like DR. Kock could not be that stupid. And he is not . His action are deliberate. Because if we read on. ON page 82 Kock States that ?At about the time that Lowell Rosen was first experimenting with focused- image effects, Dennis Gabor visited the NASA center in Cambridge; a photo taken there of Rosen, Gabor, and the author is shown in plate 32. And When we go look at plate # 32 we find Gabor ... A parabolic resonator, A opaque resonator The device has a hole in it . Holes act like negative lens, so we find the negative lens need to make the images invert. (note page 61. Kock talks about zone plates as negative lens; page 67 Kock talks about zone plates as lenses and refers to plate 23; page 58 Kock talks about Lord Rayleigh Who is Lord Rayleigh? Beam optics. He worked on the negative lens effect of diffraction light. the depth of Gaussian beam Vortexes?. On page 80 of B.E.A. Saleh and M.C. Tech?s book ?Fundamentals of Photonics? you will find a picture of Gauss and Rayleigh face to face. Einstein-Rosen bridges act like negative lenses.). But also we find a prop with the word Space Optics Laboratory written on it. If this device is doing what I know it can do then what the three men are looking at is the dick found in the hole of a bridge.

    Pages 56-62 Kock Talks about these disk or zone plates. But what is most important is the fact that he talks about the zones of silences. that is found when you are looking in to the mouth of a worm hole.

    The picture of Gabor at Space optic Laboratory was made in 1966 (see page 80n) On page 81 it state that There was a paper published on the subject by Stroke, Rosen and Kock.

    But that paper was published before 1966 , In 1965. note on page 88 it states ?When in 1965 ,the author published a note on this phenomenon, a wide response again resulted. A former colleague sent a letter saying, ?beware! Other people?s holograms don?t work that way?; an M.I.T. professor explained the phenomenon very elegantly with Fourier Transforms; and a third corespondent wrote;? the . . . properties . . . are exactly what one should expect.? DR. Kock uses the response of others to tell you what can be seen when you use one of there devices. But his statement also tells me that their are others that are knowable about these devices Kock has company

    (1)?Beware! Other people?s holograms don?t work that way?; Costic sheets of light can be made to form be reflected light and refracted light , but can not be made by diffrected light. Rosen device is doing some thing that can not be done.

    (2) an M.I.T. professor explained the phenomenon very elegantly with Fourier Transforms; Founier transforms is the math that is used when describing light that is made to curve by matter diffrected light the mouth of the vortex of the worm hole is diffrected light.

    (3) ;? the . . . properties . . . are exactly what one should expect.? The blank properties blank are. Info /////zone of silence info....zone of silence. This is what you see when you look down the mouth of a worm hole. see page 56-62.

    So it is true. On the page where you find Gabor?s picture is where you find the truth. Not what lies before them but what lies behind the on the wall. There is a drawing . There is a black object and some lines. If you take the piece of metals founds at Roswell and place it where you see it in the drawing of a 1/2 of a worm hole the UFO will work right.

    IF you make a time line from the info in Kock?s Book and what is know about Roswell It would go like this If you take plate # 3 and plate # 32 pulse what is sad on page 58 and what know about negative lens action of disk. zone plates light that diffracts when it passes through a hole Gaussian beams, then take what is said on page 88. Then! Now!!! go look at plate #32 every thing starts to make sense.

    If you know that Gaussian beams are vortex and that the vortex have a disk like zone plate ( hologram) and that there is a lobe. divergence Jet of light coming out of the disk. Einstein-Rosen bridges do the same thing. They act like negative lenses,

    In optic you would call them Gaussain beams or negative lenses, But if the same Vortex were found between the inside and out side membranes of a atom (note same particles performing the same function) it would be wrong to call them Gaussain beams. They would be called Einstein-Rosen bridges. Or worm holes.

     But to all of this you add the fact that the in side lobe is a shape shifter. It can change from a lobe in to a tube. This gives us a tube with in the tube of the vortex What is needed in atoms to give them the ability to move or produce a force..

    The first time that modern man found a device that was able to effect gravity, it was leaked to the public due to the fact that they had a run a way that landed out side of Roswell NM. In 1947. The weather balloon that it was attached to was sent to FT Worth Texas. The dick, the resonator went in to the trunk of some one ?s car and went back to Alamogordo NM. where it came from. They tried to find out how it was effecting gravity but got no where. It wasn?t till 1965 when Dr.Kock was the director of NASA ?s Electronic Research Center that in a Little Know Lab , Space optic Laboratory that there was a device that was discovered by Lowell Rosen that allow NASA to make giants leaps in this technology. there was a paper written on the subject in 1965 In 1966 Gabor was brought in to look at the device.

    IN 1968 the book was copyrighted In 1971 Kock retired. In 1980 the book was published. In 1994 I found out how to do the same thing .

    In 1996 a piece of metal was given o he museum in Roswell.

    In 1999 I went to Roswell NM. and looked at the piece metal. The metal lead me to Kock?s book It took me a year to find the deliberate miss takes where Kcok leaked to the public the device that they had discovered while he was it?s director. This device allow the to make great advances in UFOs

    In February of 2001 I saw my first one in Moriarty NM. It was able to do every thing it?s was designed to do.

    In Kock?s book, he had to say some thing that he could not say out loud. He uses the comments of other people to say what he can not say.. As if to say ? I?m glad that they said that and I did not.

    This is why the book is a little messed up. But how do I know that it has anything to do with UFOs??????

    Behind Gabor , in he picture, on the wall. is a drawing. A little black rectangle of a mark. and several lines. The lines are the 2-d drawing of a worm hole., vortex. The black mark is the right place to put the space -gram .

    It's the same place I'm putting mine. In My UFO.

    The only way to find the blue prints of the UFOs hat the Government like he one hat the government are building is if you are already building them.

    The true intent of the Kock, is the some day some one will look at the picture and find the drawing. Leaving no doubt in any body?s mine who was the real inventors of the UFO.

    Giving created where credit is due. There place in history. is reserved for them

    In Kock?s book there is more than one thing going on here Kock speaks in whispers of the hidden code of third rail. He hides his work in the broom closet Page 88 tells me that Kock. is not acting alone. That I?m not acting alone . There are others????? Where did Kock get his blue prints of a UFO from? The others?

    Why is it that man can not keep a secret? Why is it that man can keep UFOs secret when they can?t keep thing like nuclear bombs secret. They don?t know. They know how to build them for all the right reasons. But they don?t know what makes them go. they know how, but they don?t know why they go. They can?t tell you any more about why UFOs move , than they can tell me why a rock is able to move from my hand to the ground when I drop the rock from my hand. You can get a copyright on the blue prints. But you can?t get a patent on a UFO till you can state in scientific terms what makes it go. We don?t have a theory of gravity that tells us why, or what makes atoms move. What makes rocks moves as if by magic. No theory! = No patent!

    If I know what they have . I also know what they don?t have. A theory of gravity that tells them why atoms move or produce the force that they do.

    What kind of time line can I get from Kock?s book. I know that in 1964 Kock Stroke, and Rosen author a paper. page 81 and page 114 1964 to 1966= NASA. In 1965 they found out that they were not the first to do some thing like this. There where others Page 88. When some one writes you a letter and is able to tell you what you already know . Your not the first. So the technique ?s history goes back before 1964. How for does it go back? In 1966 When Dennis Gabor shows up at NASA Space Optic Laboratory. Page 82 and plate #32. and in the Preface page ?i? 1947. But it goes back before 1947. And we know what happened in 1947.

    So if Kock or Rosen did not discover the UFO. They came to late in the day. Then who? Gabor ? maybe? The others that Kock speaks of ? May be? But someone knew. Kock was able to get his hands on some one else?s blue prints. Where did Kock get his blue prints from? In order to convince Kock and Rosen not to talk about the device they had invented. Someone had to tell Kock what had happened at Roswell. Someone had to show Kock the blue prints of the UFO and how they were made, in order for Kock to believe them and they had to give reason enough why he should not publish what was happening in there experiments. And he did. Well almost. The most damming evidence that is found in the book is in plate # 23.... The 3/4 profile of the experimental

    equipment found in plate # 32 is found on pages 61& 62. Zone plates as NEGATIVE LENSES. ( light that passes through a hole forms a zone plate on the inside of the hole. it also acts like a negative lens, But in order to be able to see the zone plate they would have to be using a parabolic resonator in there equipment , just like I do ) How do I know that plate # 23 is a picture of a zone plate that is forming in the hole of the parabolic resonator seen in plate # 32???? IT?S NOT . There is no stinking zone plate in plate # 23. in Kock?s book. KocK had to cut the picture down and cut out the zone plate in order to be able to get his book published. He also had to state incorrectly where the zone plate is in the text OPPOSITE PAGE. Kock states ? THE ZONE PLATE IS THE DARK AREA WITH A CIRCULAR OUT LINE........? What Kock need to state but could not is ?the zone plate is found in the middle of the dark area. ? The dark area is also refereed to as the ZONE OF SILENCE or DEAD ZONE OR ?RING OF SILENCE? page 58 and page 88 ?THE.....PROPERTIES....ARE ? The two defects seen in plate # 23 ( lower left), have moved to a 3-d shape. they are forming on the mouth of the vortex , and not the zone plate disk that is found in the middle of this type of set-up. ( see my picture that I?m sending.) In my picture can been seen the mouth of the vortex the dark zone or ring of silence the zone plate disk in the center , the center lobe and the membrane at the end of the lobe.. The same as M87 Jet galaxies. It?s field energy. The shapes that particles form when they are smeared out over time and space. The disk zone plate would been seen in the fair upper right hand corner. Which is not there. It was cut from the book.. And is laying on the floor.

    This is Kock?s hidden massage. Kock repeats this massage over and over again in his book What Kock did is in black and white. copyrighted. Published. Kock does not state out right what he is trying to say. He expresses it in many deferent ways. Some times as picture. Some times as text. The text does not make sense unless you know what is happening in the laboratory equipment and the set up of the experiment. If you are an out sider and have know ideal about what he is talking about . He did not. But if you know about what Kock is talking about then he did. Only if you know how a UFO works are you able to find the blue prints of the UFO in plate # 32. This is the way that Kock wanted it and this is the way it is. Only after every body and his dog. know what makes UFO ?s go will they be able to find the blue prints and then every one will know what roll Kock and outers like him played in the history.

      Worm Holes . Einstein - Rosen bridge. Wheeler?s tea pot handle worm holes. Free space negative lens. Y-strings. Black holes, the Building blocks of nature Atoms. simple optics.

      In a way when you talk about these thing. You talking about the same thing . The geometric shape the elementary particles can make as envelops or costic sheets of light. Or you could say two dimensional flat space that rest in three dimensions of space and one of time. But when it fractures in the middle and forms two different half. We have to say that it?s expressing it?s self as higher dimensional space or hyperspace. But it is a closed loop system. This means that what every splits in half will unite with it?s self again and express it?s elf as lower dimensional space again. A interaction with it?s self. They are shape shifters. They are not composed of one tube but at one point in there life cycle there is two vortex . A vortex with in a vortex. It starts out as a two positive lens. The two positive lens meat in the middle. It forms a disc. The disc forms a string in the center of it just like jet galaxies do. The string opens up to form a tube . The tube forms a vortex. And then the two vortex grow together to form one tube or vortex again. The vortex forms a disc which forms in to the shape of a point. Positive lens. And the shape of the two positive lens shrink and goes away. There is a progression . It?s as if they are some thing that is alive. Their not alive but they do have a life cycle Their shape shifters..

       This is what a atom is . This is what a atom does. It?s nothing more than a really weird looking worm hole. Some time you can se the worm hole and some times you can?t . When you look at a atom . The worm hole always forms on the back side . You can?t see it . It?s on the back side. There is a way in which you can cause the atom to rotate and look at it from the side. If I can take pictures of the side view of a free space negative lens .Then man can take the picture of the side view of atoms. The side view of a atom will be egg shaped and on the back side there will be a very small vortex.

       The little worm holes found in atoms is one place that man will find worn holes With out these worm holes there can not be some thing like gravity. Man will never touch one of these worm holes. He can see them, but he can?t touch it There is nothing that man can do directly that will effect the little worm hole found in atoms. And the same thing goes for the worm holes that form in the center of galaxy There is a indirect way that man can effect the worm holes found on the back side of atom. And for this we need the big dog. The real thing. Now when you hear a person talk about a worm hole . Most people don?t think about the little worm hole found on the back side of atoms. They usually think about the ones that are seen in the movies. Which are not real. They don?t work that way.

     Worm holes are like truth. There are only hole truth . There are no such thing as half truth. There is no such thing as half worm holes. There are only real worm holes. They are scale invariant . There are big ones and there are smaller ones. The small ones can do every thing that the big ones can do. You don?t want a big one. A little one will work just as good.. Little one are jut as real as the big ones.

      Empty space has enough mass in it that it that if you could produce the absents of this mass or the difference between The full mass of empty space and the 100% massless space formed by a worm hole in empty space. IT would not only curve space to the point that objects would produce a force and move . It would curve space and time to the point that atoms will become rip apart from other atoms.. You could use one to cut a diamond But if it is the real thing. A real worm hole. It can curve space to the point that atoms their self will be rip apart. This means that matter . Atoms will be changed in to light . Photons and electrons. It will glow in the dark It will produce an radon particle Ripping atoms apart is a nuclear reaction. If you build one of these devices. And if you are able to get it to work. And form a real worm hole. You will not need to go trotting off to town to ask some one if it is a real worm hole or not. When you see it for the first time. You will know If the mass of light passed is not there You can not form a worm hole in the way that I?m telling. But if the worm hole forms. The mass in empty space is there. This means that there is a reason why mass is able to curve space. And that it is all the same field energy and because of that when the field energy that makes up the space that rest in between objects becomes curved then the other objects that are rest in this field energy. This ocean of mass. It to will become curved or will change it?s shape. And if changing the shape of the atom can be tracked back to the mass of the atom and the force produced by the mass of the atom. Then man can say that he knows what gravity is. And that he knows every thing about it. Finding out what empty space is all about . What worm holes are all about. What gravity is all about and how you manipulate gravity comes . As a package deal. One lump sum. If you find out about one . At the same time you will find out about all of the other thing. If you develop the technology of worm hole. There want be any need to develop the technology of all those other thing . You will have all ready have done it.

      The good thing about all this is that if you look at it as a ?art form?. Instead of a technology. You don?t have to prove any thing to any body. You don?t have to prove no theory . Don?t have to prove that worm hole are real. Don?t have to prove that it?s a real gravitational force. You don?t have to ask any one if it?s all right to do it. Don?t have to have a lot of money. All you have to do is just go out and do it. Just do it.Any thing that is machinicaly sound is also gemetrialy corect which in turn is mathamathicaly soune, the first step to solaveing Eunsteins Grand unity theory is to produce a mental picture of what is happening in natureinorder for there to be some thing like geavity. the bust place to look for this picture is nature. Nature has the right shape.

    There are a few thing you would have to know about inorder to have some thing likegravit

    The moon produces a force in the direction of the earth and at the same time the earth produces a force in the direction of the earth. This means that gravity produces a force in two drection at the same time. this means that space can be curved in two direction at the same time.

    What you can't have space that is able to be curved in two direction at the same time?that's imposable. it has to becurved in one direction or the other but never in two direction at the same time.

    But it is.How does it do this?parall univeres. Its relative,

    If auniverse formed in which there are only two atoms formed there would be gravity. It would act like two universe one for eaach atom two posative lens action. but if your point of abseveration was in between the the two atoms and back off ,away from. the two posative lenes becom united as a negative lens action.

    What this means is that there is a mathical prof for the two atom universe.

    But there is this other thing. the atoms of the moon ( and the earth ) haave to produce centrifical force if the are in mostion. this means that the atome have to be able to produce a force in two directions at the same time. This means that the atome have to produce a force in the direction of the other atom and a force in the opiset direction for centrifical force, For the atom to do this the atom would have to produce an egg shape with a worm hole in the back for gravirt and a egg shape in the direction of centrifical force with a worm hole in the back.

    But if you try to get the two shapes to fit together. They don't fit together. So what is happen in nature> Parall universes.

    The same phenomenon ,parallal universes, two or more egg shaped atoms with a worm hole on the back side, resting in the same place and the same space, at the same time in where the the egg shape points in different direction., To produce a force in different directions. What happens naturaly in nature that allows the systum to work, gravity is the same phenomenon, that will forever bars man from ever uniting the higher dementional shape of the eggs ,mathamaticaly But the atom even though it has different eggshaped atoms for different obsvers. It is still united together and acts like a point like objecr. #dememtions of space and ont of time.

    Now how does it do that. It starts out as a point grows to be a bobble but retains it point like caristices. The eggs shear a commom imaginary central point . But wate a minit atoms doint have a imanigary central point they have a real center point . It's called the nucili where the protron and the nutron is found. The parallal universes of all the egg shaped atoms are united by way of the nucli.

    So. the Einstins two. atom universe is unitedmathamitical . this means that gravity can work in two direction atb= the same time The moon produces a force in the direction of the earth. One parallal universe. and vice versa. the earth produces a force in the direction of the moon. the other universe. gravity is like a two way street. Space can be curved in two direction at the same time. One curves space and parallal universe for the moon and one curves space and parallal universe for the earth. This means that space can be curve inntwo directions at the sme time, due to the fact that there are two different universed up and running at the same time. it's relitive to the obsver. If you place your self in between the two you will find that the the two posative curved space become united as one negative lens . the same as in optice , twoposatrive lens action become united as a freespace negetive lens. Theyare conective to geather.as one system

    And then there is this other two way street effect for the atom. in which the moon (and the earth ), the atome of the moon have to be able to produce a force in two direction at the same time. One egg shaped atom for gravity and one egg shaped atom for centrifugal force. In nature gravity and centrifugal force is pitted against each other. ( you also have to have this third verable , which is how fast or the rate at which the object is traviling.) But the higher deminital shape of the eggs of the atom are not compatible nor would be the math of the two shapes. but they are united mathamaticl by way and the fact that they have a commem hidden vector or opint. . the nucles of the attom. The same phenomon that allow it to work parallal universes( two egg shaped atom pointing in different directions, one up and one down Two eggshaped atoms resting in the same space at the same time. That allows it to work Is the same thing that happens in nature that keeps from makeing the math work. But both atoms are stell able to main tain it's point like caritestic It nucles.

    So. what this means is that every thing in the univers Regardles of how many universe there are. Every thing in the univers is conected to every thing else in the universe. And it all can be conected togeather mathamaticaly.Just in the right way for us to have some thing like gravity in nature.This means that every persons point of view are every atom point of view. Lives in a different universe than every body else In In your univers the only thing that is real to you is where the membreans are at and what they are doing.the membreans of light, dark matter, and what the membreans of atoms are doing. In your universe all atoms point to you.. But every body elses universe is the same as your. in there universe all atome point toward them and every atom produces a forece in there direction. But for gravity to work in nature like it does. Each universe is just as real as the next because each atom has to hace the ability to produce a force in every direction a once. In the right direction in the right strength of the force for the right length of time.

    So How do you solve Einstina grand unity theory? What the Newton theory of gravity and Einstine theory of gravity and the force produceing atoms theory have in common is they all pit gravity against centrifugal force and there is the thrid verable . the rate in which the object is traviling. The atom is united with G R.. by way of its shape Curatures of space is what makes the round or sheprical shape of the atom move from a sphere to an egg shape The changeing the shape of the atom effect where and how big the worm hole will be . Which will deturm in what direction and by how much the force will be and for how long the force will last.. Because there is this one on one relatichip between the curvitues of space and the what and how the source of the force will act or preform. It is not absosulty neseray to solove Einstins Grand Unity Theory When you are working with gravity. Enistine got it right the first time. The right way to compuite gravity, is the way we are are allready doing it. The only thing different betweeen Einstines old theory of gravity and his new theory of gravity. Is that his old theory was a clasical theory( toothfairy ) and his new theory of gravity is not a thoery it is a valid working scince. A technoilegy. What part og gravity is it that man does not under stand/ The part that is real. If atoms are real then gravity is real. Gravity is just as real as atoms are solid like . Nock on wood. That real. Bacouse the same thing that gives atoms' it solid effect is the same thing that produces the force. Centrifugal force.

    The key to soliveing Einsteines G.U.T. is not unite G.R. with Q.M. But unite G.R. with string field theory. Why? You can have membreans expressing them self as point like objects like atoms. One of the things that most men belive is real. And you can have membreams expressing point like objets like particals. But if you take out the membreams . There are nopoint like objects atoms , and if you take away the membreans there are no pont like objects like particales. With out a membream being present , the probility of detecting a partical is zero. 99.99% of the time , the true carticer of nature is being expressed as a membrean and the exception to the rule is the some times the membrean expresse it's self as a particle. If in fact the atom is being expressas a membrean and not a point like object like a partical.. There is one way and one way only. The way that is done in nature. If you try to expressing it as a partical when in nature it is a membreanor string., . at some point along the way you will fail. Particles are not like strings and stringe are not like particals. If in nature particales don't even enter in to the picture. There is no need to try to solve what atoms are and what atoms have to do with gravity. Like in nature As particles. Because it's not that way in nature. And Isn't this what we are after. After all. The truth. Science is about finding out about truth, in nature. When man states That it has to be expressed as a partical or it not a scince. This is a law that man as created It is not a law like that found in nature. Man keeps try ing to tell nature what the laws of nature should be. And when his laws of nature don't work out. He try to tell nature that some how it is wrong. Nature may violate mans laws of nature. But one thing that I'm sure of is that it never violates the same laws that it functions by. The same phisical evidance you would need to develop a proof of string field theory is the same phisical proof you need to prove Einsteins G.U.T.. Because in nature they are the same.

    There is nothing that man can do to effect gravity directly. but it can be manoplated in directly by curving space. Because this is how it works in nature. What do you need to corve space ? Aworm hole. How do you do this .? Simple You do it like every one else doses it. The way it has all ways been done.Do it the way the cavemen did it.

    So you want to solve Einsteins G.U.T.? Here is what I know. Every thing that is mechinical coreect is also geometricalcorect. which in turn means that it is also mathamaticly correct. There math problims that are exprested as numbrese, And then there problims that are expressed as words. Word problimans. But you have to be very carriful how you use your words because just what words you use will determ what you will do with your math.

    But in order to get the words right you have to a mential picture.of what is happening in nature. There is only one way to get the picture right. Direct obsveration of nature. But because of what is happening in nature. Mostly parallal universes. Theonly part of the univers that is real to you is what the membreans are doing from your point of obsveration. Even if you can see it in real live action. Its hard to figgur out just what is happening. Because of the shape shifitinf. that goesn. Itis imposable to picture in your mind how it is that two differnt shapes that don't fit togeather can change it shape and fit pericaly.

    And things are the way they are because that is the way it is..

    Physical Proof.

    If strings are real how do you prove it? Costic sheeets are eazy to prove . Most people belive that whenwe look at costic sheets of light there is nothing that is real that rest be for you. But if you make a hologram of the costic sheets of light that is befor you. you can do some thing called a transes hologram. Which is nothing more than useing one hologram to make an other hologram. But if there is nothing that rest befor you when you make the first hologram then when you place the secon hologram in the space where you see the costic sheet of light. It will record the shape of the costic sheet of light in the right place where you saw it the first time . if there is nothing real there. Nothing will tuch the hologram and no info willbe recorded there . Costic sheets of light or membrains are real.

    But costic sheets of light are made of yet smaller objects . Strings . If you take a costic sheet of light and use a lens to make the membrain expaind . Holes will form in the membrain . The holes will get biger to where all that is left oof the membrain is a string that has fringes in it. If you use a poliderised schreen to turn of the black bands and turn on the hole string. .And you use a strob light to make the light of the string stop viberating to where there is a wiggily line befor you You can use a transet hologram to prove the string is real. Membraines are nothing more than millions of stringe. expressing them self s as membrains. But the membrains can make different shapes such as worm holes and y strings. They to can be verified by use of transet holohrams.

    So how do we know what partical the membrain can make or are making? I know that you can use a transit hologran to prove that the shape of what rest befor you is right And if you use the first hologram and shine light through it and use a partical detecter you can vreifie what membrain is produceing what partical. But befor you make the first hologeam you can use a particle detecter and fins out what partical the membrain is makeing if it is a real image. There are two hinds of images the real images that can be verifies useing a partical detecter and the virticul image. If you look at your self in the mirrow you can see your self. If you shined a light in the mirrow you can place a partical detecter this side of the mirrow and detct real particals. But if you look behind the mirrow to see if any body is standing behind the mirrow you will find that ther is no one back behind the mirroe It is a mirrow and not a clear glass. The same happen when you put the partical detecter behind the mirroe where you see the light. And the particle detects not particals where the virtule image of where the light is seen. But if you are viewing costic light there are real images and vetule images .Real images can be detected and vertula images can not .

    But some thing real weird happen when you use a transes hologram to verafie if there is some thing real that rest befor you. The virtule images are just as real as the real images are . Why? Its relative. The only part of your universe that is real is the one that is real to you This means that if you can see the light in the mirroe the vertual images iTo you it is just as real as any thing else becaous to you this is what the history of the membrains are doing and there is a one on one relationship in what thw history of the membrain is and the out comw of the experiment. This is imporant to know befor you do this naxt experiment.

    One of the problims of developing a profe we would have to know the history of the membrain in a negative len like those in nature. WE know what is happening at point A and we know what is happening a point B . but we don't know what is happening half way betweeen A and B . the history of the membrain or the history of the partical. When we move detecter to where C is . Half way is still half way . How can we very fie what is happening at the half way point in a negative lens.?

    This is what you have to know . negative lenes are made of two posative lenes. The point of each posative lens is also the half way point of a negative lens. Some times posative lenes will do the same thing that a it does when it forms a negative lens . It forms a tube on the in side of the out side membrain.

    There is a collage on chatman road in orange county Ca. where there is a water founton.. If you look at the costic sheets of light on the bottom of the pool where the water shoots up in the air . There is a trof that feeds the other water fall in the founton. AS the water comes out of the round founton and goes in to the trof or conal. the edg of the conal causes the water to form tublarence . which in turn causes wheral pools to form when a wherol pool forms a posative lens forms but goes through the shape shifing of formimg a tube with in a tube.. It actes like a negative lens. But if you placed a mirrow at the bottom of the pool It would form a vertual image of a hole negative len and would act like one to. IF you put a particles detecter on the botton of the pool .it would give you the same information as if the detecter was at the half way point in a a real negative lene. Which we know we can't do.. This is how you do the imposable.

    If we have the hole truth and nothing but the trouth about negative lenes. Then generat relativity and string theory start to make sence. Because the interaction of y- string become united with generlative by wat of the shape of real worm holes found in nature relativity. The building blocks of nature.

    What makes the two atom universe work is the worm hole or the negative lens that conects the two atoms to gether and the negative len is what lets space becomed curved in two directins by the two negative lens. that are relative to each atom . Parallal universes and this means that gravity can flow in two direction s at the same time.

    And that the worm holes are found on the back side of each atom which means that tha atoms can produce a force in the right direction for all the right reason.

    And that the three atom universe will also work due to the fact that that atom can live in matable parallal universe and produce a force in all the righr direction for all the right reaasons.

    And if you can make the three atom universe work ...... it can also work with how ever many atoms there are in our universe. Problim solved.

    RECIPROCATING STRINGS

    You hear a lot of talk about viberiating strings , but you don't hear much talk about recipocating strings., Why the need for recipoacating strings? I find them there in nature. With out them you can't get light like that found in nature to work.

    Why does there have to be recipocating strings? what function do they surve in nature. Recipocating strings don't express any singes of mass. For each action there is a equial and opiset reaction. Strings that recipocate councle out any mass that they produce. they can convay info as a twodementional wave function. A string can convay info between two points symitanousl. Einstin ounce used rack and pinion gears as a t5hought experiment to explain symitanouse reaction. .A recipocating string can do the same thing. There no gears found in nature. But there are cranks. A crank like found in the engin of my truck. They call them viberating string. A viberitaition string is like a engin creank. It has a cam cation. You can conect two cams together with repicatocating conectings rods.if p-brains are like points and points are not points but little points whaere recipocating strings connect to viberating strings , just like the pist Ththe recipocating piston is connected by way of the connecting rod to the crank. The the can be two different types of strings and then again there can be two types of membrains . One that has fringes in where the stringviberta in three dimentions of space in order to produce mass. and the a membrean that has no fringes that only recipocates and can transmits ingo but can not express mass.

    If II wanted to make a device that can produce a force due to the mass of the object you can't do it with point like objects like lead balls. or gyrodisk. But you can produce a device that can produce a force by useing a viberiating string that curves. A string that viberiatea in three dimentions of space is like a gyro that is spining and smeared out over space and time.Picture a cork screw that is spinning. If you took a disk and spinnit to make a gyro. and if you put a dot of light oon it and moved it throught the air at night a nd made a time elopes picture of it it would look like a cork screw. If you try to make a gyro move in the by ladersl axes of the grryo It will produce mors mass that it will if you move it in the direction of the central axea or in the direction of the same plain as the rotating disk. If you try to swing the gyro aroung in a circuls .it does the same thing.' But what is weaird ifr if you take a corkscrew shape gyro that is in a sreight line and spine it . it produces no force.for every action there is an eqialand opsit reaction all force councle out each other. B

    But if you take a sring and viberated it in3-d the same thing that a gyro has to do anf you bend the string in a curved shape a half loop some thing very straingh happends it starts to produce as force due to it 's mass. Nature is doing the same thing that a gyro would if you moved it in a circula But the the half loop of wirs is not moveing but is mimick the same action as a a gyro that is move. It is able to produce a force due to it 's mass. But when an object produces a force when it s is not moveing It moves for the same reaon an objects produces a force ,, mass, when moveed .

    Einstein said that mass and gravvaty where inseperable. Or indistingable from eacherother. He was right.s

    Now just saying there ar recipocating strings and proveing they are real is two different things.If you pull down a membrain by inlargeing it. to where it forma strine with fringes and enlarge it just a little bit more to all is left is one string with no fring pattern in it the last thing you see befor it goes off the radir screen. You can say that it it is recipocating . but when you look at you cant see any movement . how do you know. the ere no refance point by t6o detect movement. Th4e only place where you can detect movement is wher it conects to the vibereating streng. If the recipocating string is conected the the viberating string. you can see the movement of the vibereating string if there is movement in the vibersating string and the recipocating string is conected to it they are both moveing. And if you look at both end os the recipocating string at the same time you will find that they are moveing in unicion. Viberating to recipocating and back again into viverating . This is how nature can conect two points in space at the same time when time goes to zero space becomes infinet and all nows are the same. Aspce that is not related in time but regulated in time.

    Wheeler absober theory states that a particles is not emitted from its source, untill nature is reado to absorbe a partile at athe same time. The instance that a recole is detcted at the source and the time the atom recoles from the mass of the partical all happens at the same time.

    Strings tha viberate are like electrons they have mass and strings that recipocate are like photons they don't have mass.

  ARK

   Before man invented the car he first had to invent some things like the wheel. He first had to invent the device to make the wheel. But first there had to be some thing that can be found naturally in natural that was round ,or circles.

    The same is true about UFOs We'll do the reverse engineering thing, In order to re invent the UFO. After I found out how the Egyptian made their levitating devices. I built the same equipment, with the same materials that they had available to them. The way that they would have had to make in order to make an organic hologram( a hologram that had the info of a worm hole recorded in it.) out of mold. (The wheel.) To get object to levitate ( any object that is made out of atoms )

    It is a box camera with hole inthe top What is a Ark? It's box or chest It's a simple optical device. A piece of equipment. Any optical equipment usually has a frame work of some kind to support the different pieces of the device. You all way use a frame work in order to the different pieces to work together better and easier. The frame work gives you this control. You have to have a resonator in order to from a hologram. The so called interference pattern. What makes me think they were using mold? The same mold that the Egyptian were using in the pyramid back when is still found there today. When the Egyptian brought the mold into the pyramid they contaminated the building. Once you infest a building with mold . There is no getting it back out again. When the Egyptian contaminated the pyramid . They runt a perfectly good pyramid. It will never be right some how again.

    Magic carpet any one? A thick piece of cloth that has deep fibers Is used to grow mold in and form space shielding spores.. If you look at a clod in the shy. If the water droplets are a thin layer you can all most see through the cloud But if the cloud is thick and deep . It will block out the sun. The same is true about spores in a carpet. Thick and deep. Round washer of the spore laced carpet are used for the washer in the optical device.

    So on the inside of the box that has a hole in the top to let the sunlight come in. A bowl shaped mirror is placed in the bottom of the box to form the resonator. The trick is to get a thin layer of mole to grow on the surface of the mirror.

    Mold will not form spore when it is growing. It only produces spores when it drys out slowly If the center cloth has juice in it and the juice has growing mold in it. And it is dark on the inside of the bow and the holes at each end of the box and the disk are all alined there should not be any light on the center cloth. The show of the disc should be on the cloth. It is with in the darkest part of the shows of the disk where the zone plate will form. The pattern. The zone plate. The hologram.

    What will it look like ? An eye ball. "The Eye Of Ri" If you don't know what the Eye of Ra looks like . Look on the back of a U.S. one dollar bill.". The best place to set this device would be at some high point to where you can see the sun when it first comes up when it's red. Then changes to yellow and then when the shy turns blue. After the sun gets 19.5 degree above the horizon The changing of the colors of the sun stops Red, yellow and blue. All the colors that are need to make a white light or rainbow hologram. Just like Dr.Kock states in his book.

    The way that NASA does it. Is fine and dandy and works great. But there is one thing wrong with the way that NASA does it. I can't do it that way. I can't do it the same way that NASA does it for this reason. There is no know element to man that can be used as the film to make space shielding holograms. This is why NASA uses a two step process to form their space shielding holograms. The first step is a photographic technique. The recorded info of the vortex is then transferred over in to an element that when cooled becomes . Copper. This is superconductivity what is hanging on the wall in Roswell NM. They use a electroplating process to grow the hologram. It's to hard for me to do cost to much and would require some equipment to do some thing like this.

    But if you know of some of the things that can be done with this technology. And the side effect that are displayed. Cut and shape stone with out any tool marks. Able to lift and transport very have stones. There was a truck driver that told me that he went to a place where NASA was using a device to cut hole in the side of a stone mountain. When he looked at the hole. He said that the sided of the hole had no tool marks . It was smooth as glass. He couldn't see the end of the hole.

    When you look at a new car. You think to your self. "Nice shine." There are several was to get some thing as smooth as glace. One way is buff the object. Which leaves very small scratches. Or tool marks so as to speak. Then there are way where the bonding with in the atoms are loosen and the substance flows like liquid. Or water. And then hardens. Most paint does this. An other was is to heat the element which loosen the bonding action of the atoms. And when it cools the shine is there.

    But there is still an other way to loosen the bond of atoms. Worm holes. When a star is sucked into a black hole found in the center of galaxies. The atoms of the stars become rip atom from atom. The bonding effect is over ridden and what was once solid , flows like water. With out any heat being added. Atoms are rip from atom. And then the atoms them self are rip apart. The particle that make up the atom become the particles that make up the space that rest between atoms the same as light. In fact it is light. The same electrons that make up atoms is the same electron that make up light which is also the same electrons that make up the field energy that makes up the shape of black holes found at the center of galaxies. It's all the same ,same.

    Man can not put the same energy and mass that is found in the space like that is found in galaxies. We can not rip or loosen the bonding action of atoms in this way. But there is this other way.

    The electron that make up the field energy that forms the shape is a shape shifter. To an observer on one of the stars that is being sucked in to the black hole. The black hole would look like a sphere. Some galaxies are jet galaxies like M87. It has a jet that comes out of the black hole. The jet is a shape shifter. It can grow to form a vortex. The area of the space on the inside of the vortex is empty of energy and mass. You could say that it is a vacuum It does suck. It doesn't do any thing. A space that has zero energy Any thing that has energy or mass that rest hidden behind this empty space you are cut off from . Its as if it does not exist. The vortex is like a tube. If you where to move down the mouth of the vortex. Into the tube. On one side of you would be empty space and on the other end of the tube would be the rest of all the energy and mass of the universe.

    Atoms are point like. They can be at one place at a time and they can only move in one direction at a time.. Gravity makes atoms move in the direction of space that has the most mass or energy. You could say the very same thing by saying "objects move a way from space that has less mass or energy. When all factors that are relevant are considered. This will determine which way the atom will move. Empty space has just as much of an effect on atom as space that has mass. oppose but equal in strength.

    Jet galaxies have black holes at their centers that are so strong so massive, that not even light can escape them. That's why they are black. If this is true . Why do they have jets. The particles and atoms that rest on the inside of the jets would have to be equal in strength or stronger in strength in order to move a way from the black hole. But if to the observer on one of the atoms coming out of the black hole the field energy is now massless. Then it would be very easy to move away from the black hole. Empty space is also black. If to the atoms on the inside of the vortex the space of the black hole is massless . It would not effect the atoms. But the atoms would be effected by the rest of the mass found in the universe. Which would cause the atom to shape shift and move toward The space that has the greater mass in it.

    Man can make space that is empty of mass. And it is just as empty as the space found in the jets found in jets galaxies and just as strong. If you try to move through a vortex the closer the atom gets to the center the stronger the force gets. At one point the force becomes so strong that it can rip atom from atom. With out gain or loss of heat.

    Man can not access these low energy worm holes that are all around us because they are shape shifters. But when you record one in a hologram , they can not shape shift . Then you can access the empty space that is found on the inside of them.

    I'm not interested about who got there when . I'm wearied about when do I get mine now.

    The Egyptian where doing the same things back when. that NASA is doing now. There is nothing that the Egyptian had back then that I don't have now. I know that I can not do it the same way that NASA is doing it, But I could do it the same way that the Egyptian did it Knowing what NASA had to do to make their work goes along way into finding out how the Egyptian did it.

    The Key to finding out how the Egyptians did is knowing that there are two thing that become space shielding or opaque to space. One is inorganic . Elements like copper. The is organic spores like this produced by mold. Tb shows up as a black spot on x-rays because the spores are space shielding.

    ultra violet light kills mole. Ultra violet light is to mole as kryptonite is to superman. Mold only forms spores when it is dying off,slowly. IF it dies out fast from sun light which has ultra violet light in it. It does nothing time to form spores. Because we have two different rates of killing of the mole. WE can record the info that light has in it in a hologram.

    We find free space negative lens forming Through the hole in the washer. The washer has to be space shielding.. If you use a washer as a template and cutout pattern out of a carpet or rug. And grow a thick growth of mole in the fibers of the rug . The washer become space shielding. Because the washer is effecting 100% space or all of the info or mass found in space. Then the space on the inside of the vortex produced,will be 100% empty. Having no mass. We are using white light. Sun light. To form a white light hologram. It not only has all of the colors of the rainbow it also has the wave function of the universe in it. The waves that can be detected and the waves of energy that can not be detected.

    You would have to track the sun. You would have to have "time elapse photography" of six hours to get the pattern to form.

    In order to make a hologram form you have to have a resonator or a reflective hologram . Light coming from two directions. The light that comes in the hole at the top of the box camera , is also the light that comes out of the hole at the top of the box camera

    If you use the sun as your light source you could use a cord board box as your camera . A shoe box camera with a hole in the top. To get the light to go through

    Your going to have to track the movement of the sun in the same way that you get your telescope to track stars at night.

    You can buy such devices. But I made a home made one like ED. Mime's different from Ed's

    Because we are growing mold. After you shoot the film you have to take it out of the box camera and put it in some kind ofd home made incubator. For growing mold it has to be worm most and out of any light. It's juct like a dark room for working with film. This means that the tempiture and humidity has to be controled. When you shoot the film the mosture content has to be just right . most enough to grow mold but dry enough to keep it from running. When you shoot the film you are forming the fring pattern in the film. the pattern is spelled out as bands of dead mold and bands of live mold. I has to be dred enough to keep the live mold from growing back in to the area of dead mold. Right after you shoot the film there is no mold in the film mixture. It takes about three weeks for the mold spores to grow thick enough to activate the hologram.

    Mold has to have water and a food source to grow. You could using orang or grape juice. Or the sour dough mixture.

    The membrane will only grow in the darkest part of the shadow of the washer makes. In a negative lens . this is where the fring patern forms. This is where you have to placethe film that has been infected with mole spores. In the mirror. Live mold that is not dying that is in a process of growing. After you shoot, you want the mold to dies of slowly.

    After you shoot the film while in a dark place where there is no light . You have to take the mirror out of the box camera and put it in a large jar and seal it. PLace a bloon with out any air on the inside of the jar. You have to leave it in a dark place till it activates. When it activates . The worm hole will eat all of the air out of the jar and form a vacum.Then the vacum forms. the bloon will blow up. May burst. This is how you check it to see if it's working or not. The Egyptions placed there in a lead lined sealed box. Why lead? Every hear of a lead safe? And where they are used at and why they use lead safes ? Radon particals.

    WHAT MAKES THEM WORK

    If a UFO has no visible means of propulsion. And it is levitating a few feet above the ground, in the air. Then it would be reasonable to say that the UFO is obeying the same law that are governing the movement of the stars , planets and moons obey. The same Newton?s law of motion and forces that are mass related. The UFO is in orbit. There is only one way that some thing like this can happen. If the strength of gravity for the UFO is weaker than the strength of gravity is for us the observer. The strength of gravity did not change for us . It is still the same as it all ways is. If our gravity did not change and the strength for the UFO has . This means only one thing . Gravity is local. And some one has found a way to manipulate the local force of gravity. Made it weaker for the atoms that the UFO is made of . And decreased the strength of gravity in order for it to be in orbit

    In order to understand how some thing like this could be happening. You have to ask your self this question. Is the strength being manipulate naturally in nature. And where when and how.

    It is true that the strength of gravity is being manipulated in nature. And we also know what is manipulating it. We also know what it would take for us ,man, to manipulate the forces of mass.. It?s simpler than you thing. Let me give you some simple thought experiments to put you in a positive mood .

    If I took an object and put it in my hand and held it up above the groung and let it go . What happens? It falls to the ground.

    But if I did the same experiment but before I let the object go from my hand I made the earth disappear. What will happen? That?s right the object would not fall to the earth. It would not move To us. It would appear that the object is levitating..

    Well that not right . What would happen would be us and the object would start to go in a straight line.. The earth that we are standing on is spinning around. We are really moving at a very fast speed. If the earth disappeared we would stop going in a circle and start to go in a straight line, at the same speed.

    But we don?t want to flung into outer space by centrifugal force . We want to levitate. When the earth disappears the force of gravity goes to zero. If we want to levitate we only want to weaken the force of gravity in just the right amount. Just enough to make us move to a higher orbit. And make it look as if we are levitating. Well to us the out side observers We could say that the UFO is levitating. And it would be a true statement. But then again If we want to under stand what is really happening we have to say that the UFO is in orbit. Some thing like a low earth geostationary orbiting satellite. But it?s not a satellite It is a device. A Space Optic Device. Use to weaken the self generated force of gravity. This is what allows it to be in orbit at the lower than normal range that it does

    Even we are in orbit. Even though our feet are planted on the ground. We are spinning around. Centrifugal force is still in full effect. It is stronger at our head than at our feet. Gravity is stronger at our feet than at our heads. We are being stretched from our heads to our feet.

    If the UFO is in orbit. Then the only thing that could be happening if they have found a way to manipulate the gravitational force.

    In order to find out how they were able to do this we will have to ask our self the right questions. Can the gravitational force be manipulate? Does the strength of gravity vary? The answer to that is yes . Gravity gets weaker and stronger. We weigh more on earth than on the moon. If we liver on an asteroid, we would weigh even less.

    So gravity gets manipulate in nature. What is happening when it gets weaker? We are relating to fewer atoms in one place than the other . If we could make the earth get smaller. We could go in to orbit just like on an asteroid

    We could make part of the earth disappear. Or better yet make the atoms in our UFO think that part of the earth has vanished. As if it had when really it has not.

    This is the way things get done. By placing a black disc between us and the earth. It becomes disconnected from the atoms that are hidden behind the disk. What ever is hidden behind the disc, is as if it has vanished because we are no longer connected to that part of the universe.

    If we place a soiled object the info just goes around the object. But if we record where the light goes black, an optical effect. Then we are cut off.

    If you use a supper conductive disk to form the optical disk and use white light to record it. Transfer the info over to a supper conducting hologram. Place it between us and the earth and gravity for us will decrease. And when that happen we move to a higher orbit..

    UFO's are compatible with the geometrical shapes that are found in nature. These shapes that are formed by nature are even and Constant through out the universe. The shape of an electron or atom starts out as a point that is able to change it's shape to grow in to a compound complex shape of the hyper parabolic shape of a double decker doughnut ,that changes it's shape to a double bubble. A glueball. The Shape of the UFO is that of two parabolic round disk One on top of the other. Two resonating reflectors, The doughnuts are made of negative energy. The top disk fits inside of the top doughnut and the bottom disk fits inside of the bottom doughnut. There is a hole in the top disk and a hole in the center of the bottom disk. When the disk are placed on top of the other there is a space left between them, that forms a slit. When the doughnuts form the doughnuts will also have a distance in between them. The hole in the top forms a vortex and the bottom holes forms a vortex. The slit formed by the two disk , one above the other also forms a vortex . All three shapes of all three vortex form one vortex on the in side . In the inside of the mouths of the vortexes is a bubble. The mouths of the vortexes on the out side of the disk also form a bubble. Make the out side bubble disappear. And what is left is the two negative doughnuts that have the two disk inside of them. The negative energy of space will only connect Positive energy to positive energy it will not connect any thing that is positive to something that is negative. The atoms that the disk are made of are cut off from the out side world. To the disk it is as if the rest of the universe has vanished . As if nothing is there at all.

    What is used to make the out side bubble vanish is polarized screens. A horizontal at the slit and a vertical at the holes. But it doesn't take you very long to figure out that if you move around the disk by 90% you find that you have two horizontal screens. This is why you have to use holograms that have the polarized screens recorded in to them. The hologram has to be cut up every 5% Only the center 5% of the hologram will work All the 5% digress wedges are fixed to gather to form a circle that fits on the in side of the disk. Every thing that is made of matter in the UFO is made out of supper conductive material. And this is what we see at Roswell NM. Light recorded in metal. Which means that you could do the same thing with some thing that was supper conductive. Now you know. I need a simple way to put into words that can be tested experimentally just what gravity is and how it works. To see why I'm taking this approach to prove my theory. You have to know about some thing that you can't find out about in books. You have to find these things out by your self. It's not the things that are right in nature. It's the thing that can't be right but are true . You have to ask your self. " What would it take to make thing right, by way of the laws of nature?"

    I have changed my line of thinking about gravity and UFOs because of this simple fact. Last winter I was fueling my truck in Moriarty, NM. I stopped and looked up at the skies. I started looking at the airplanes and birds flying around in the air above me. I saw a silver looking sphere in the sky. It was not moving. It just set there. I was thinking to my self, what in the world is that thing. Then it bonged on me. It's that new space station that their putting up. They say that it's a geostationary satellite. It's only 200 hundred miles up and you can see it with the necked eye. I was thinking Wow! Now that's neat. I started showing and telling the other truckers what I had found and their reaction was the same as mine. Cool, Neat, Something else. I went in side and payed-up when I came back out side I looked up to take one last look at it before I went on down the road. When I looked at it. It ran off. It looked like a shouting star. No more had it stared to move till it was gone. I was thinking to my self. This is not right, not right at all. Satellites don't do this. This is not a satellite. It's one of those UFO things. The first one that I have every seen. I kept looking all around for it. Couldn't find it any where. After about two minutes I found it. It was right back where I had seen it at the first time. It was about ten o'clock high and due east of where I was standing. I was going east. So I jumped in my truck and drove east and stopped at the rest area about forty miles down the road heading east. I got out and looked for it. I found it. It was about the ten o'clock high and due west from where I was standing. What this told me was that this thing was not 200 hundred miles up in the sky. It was only about twenty miles up. Way to low for a geostationary satellite

    Is it a true story? Yap! True story all right. But it doesn't matter if it's true or not. That not the point that I'm trying to drive home, here. If man can make a satellite stay in orbit at twenty miles, he could make a satellite stay in orbit at twenty feet above the ground.

    About right now, your eyes are probably rolling back in your head. And your thinking thoughts like, " All right! Only when pigs learn how to fly!" The reason for this is you know like I also know that you can't get a satellite to stay in orbit at twenty feet due to the fact that you would be violating the laws of nature. Not true. I know some thing that you don't. I didn't get from books or school.

    Under standing what makes a UFO work is just a round about way of finding out about nature and what make's gravity work the way that it does. If gravity worked in any other way than it does in nature. There would be no such thing as UFOs. Due to the fact that what is happening is not natural. Man has done some handy work here, but what is happening is, the laws of nature are not being violated. But just the opposite. The laws of nature are complying with. All I'm asking you to do is check the facts and do the math to see if I'm telling the truth or not.

    To do this you have to play the "what if game." You have to look at what would it take to make something orbit at twenty feet. What laws of nature would have to change. There is only one way that something like this can be done. Only one way in which gravity is produced. You would have to be able to change the laws of nature. In order to do this the laws of nature would first have to have the ability to change. And they do.

    Let me dive a point home here. The strength of gravity changes naturally in nature. Because it changes in nature and in the way that it changes allows man to have the ability to make it change, when he needs to. If nature is doing it in the right way then there is also a way that man can do it. If gravity is a force that is produced locally by the mass of the electron s that make up atoms, man can change it. But if it is the other way, man would be powerless to do any thing about the force of gravity. Man cannot change the laws of nature that cross the universe as a hole. He cannot make the hole universe change just because he wants it to. He can change a little piece of it though. The atoms that make up the UFO. By forming a small universe around the UFO. He can change what is happening in side of his on little universe.

    The strength of gravity gets weaker the further out you go from earth. The strength of the atoms gets weaker due to the mass of the electron.

    The mass, of the electron is constant. But it is like money. Either you got it or you don't. Gravity doesn't turn on and turn off like mass. It varies in its strength. From 100% down to all most zero. What every is happening in the dynamic of the atom due to the mass of the electron would have to have this ability. There is a way for this to happen.

    If you take an object and drop it from your hand, it will move to the ground. The object obeys the laws of gravity. But the strength of gravity produced by the atoms at say one million miles distance from the earth. Is much weaker. If the object that you drop from your hand has the same strength that it does at one million miles distance from the earth. When you drop it. It would not drop. It would levitate. ( Which is some thing that a geostationary satellite does. ) It would be complying with the laws of nature.

    But if you dropped an object from your hand and the atoms in this object was producing the strength of gravity that an object would at two million miles distance from earth. When you let it go, it would rise to a higher orbit. It is complying with the laws of gravity. But to someone that didn't know better would say that the object was over riding the gravitation force and violating the laws of nature. Nothing could be further from the truth. Even thought the object would be failing up. It also would be complying with the law of nature.

    When we see a UFO fall to the ground, every thing looks all right when we see a UFO levitate. It may look wrong, but every thing is all right. And when it goes up through the clouds without any visible means of propulsion every thing is still all right by the laws of nature. Not naturel, but right. The unnatural part about has some thing to do with man.

    To but what I'm doing in its simplest terms, I'm lowering the odd, of the endless things that could be happening in nature in order for us to have some thing like gravity. Lowered to 50/50. I'm pitting gravity as curvatures of time and space against atoms that have the ability to move their self. If you can prove that different aspect of mass induced forces that the atom can produce are all related somehow. And that they are linked to the mass of the electron. A mass that is constant at full strength. pitted against it's ability to very from 100% to zero in deferent way.

    Why I have chosen the path of atoms that move there self is If atoms have the ability to produce the forces of mass then all the pieces of the puzzle of nature ( the four forces of nature become united as one.)all fit together. And at the same time we are able to see why UFO can levitate. It is an illusion that UFO are levitating. What they are doing should be called "In a geostationary low earth orbit ". This little thought brings the "how" part of UFO back to the real world.. A theory that can be tested scientifically. We know that the moon is not levitating Our geostationary satellite (space station )that are up there at say 200 miles . UFOs are not levitating. To us, it just looks like they are levitating. Their really in orbit. Just like the space station. But it is a low earth orbit. How low. "30 feet." But what is need ed to know is like Feynman says; we know "how" they go we don't know "why" they go.

    You say that this can't be done, because in order for a object to made of matter, to orbit at 30 feet it would have to be violating the laws of nature. Not true. It is complying to the laws of nature. Here's why. Dr. Feynman states " That the force is directly related to the mass of the electron that make up the atom. The strength of the force varies inversely as the square of the distance. The key words in this statement are "Strength" and " Varies". If the electrons found in atoms produce the strength of the force then it must also have the ability to make the make the strength vary. If what is happening in the atom can make the strength of the coefficient of G change in the laws of gravity. Then man can change it in the atoms. He does not make the laws of nature as a hole change just the the laws of the atoms in the UFO. Then the atoms that the craft is made of would act accordingly. If it complies with the laws that governs the orbits of satellites then it could achieve a lower earth orbit that what would normally take place in nature. . Do the math If you where in a universe in which the laws of nature acted different moons would orbit around the earth at a different distance.. Its not " change it's mass" It's change its ability to produce mass " it would rise to a higher orbit. Which in turn to point of observation would look like it is violating the laws of nature. defying gravity . Doing the impossible. Falling up , instead of falling down.

    Because UFOs are real. NASA has UFOs They just don't know how the work. For the same reason that we don't have a theory of gravity that works. How to build a UFO is not the problem. What needs to be worked on is a better theory of gravity. A theory of gravity basses on the mass of the electron. Speaking in term's of mass that comes and goes. In the dynamics of the atom..

    We landed a probe on asteroid year. The asteroid was 20 miles long and 12 miles wide. It was big enough to land on. And they did. But because the asteroid was so small that it's gravity was so weak. That they could get the prob to orbit at a very close range. Lets just say 30 feet.

    But if the asteroid was round and it was spinning and we were on the asteroid They prob would look like to us like it was levitating. There is no difference between what UFOs are doing here on earth and the probe on the asteroid.

    On earth the strength of gravity is so strong. On the moon it has a different strength. On Jupiter it is still a different strength.

    On think of this .If the atoms are the producers of the force of gravity. Then atoms are what changes the strength of gravity . What I'm getting at is the force of gravity can change.

    When a satellite go around the earth there are three forces acting on it. Inertia or forward momentum . Centrifugal force and gravity. When we change the speed of the satellite it effects centrifugal force and makes rise to a higher orbit. But if we can change one of the three factors of the forces that regulates orbits . If we could change the strength of gravity ,it to would make the satellite rise. But if we could change the strength of gravity in just the right amount . Well, we could get a satellite to stay in a geostationary orbit at 30 feet. To us it would look like it was levitating. But it is really in a low earth orbit just like the probe on the asteroid. So if this is what has to be done to get a UFO to levitate or. rise up through the roof. . then this is what they are doing They have found a way to manipulate the strength of gravity

    Now how did they do that? They fiddle with the hidden root that governs the energy of the universe

    UFO's are compatible with the geometrical shapes that are found in nature. These shapes that are formed by nature are even and Constant through out the universe. The shape of an electron or atom starts out as a point that is able to change it's shape to grow in to a compound complex shape of the hyper parabolic shape of a double decker doughnut ,that changes it's shape to a double bubble. A glueball. The Shape of the UFO is that of two parabolic round disk One on top of the other. Two resonating reflectors, The doughnuts are made of negative energy. The top disk fits inside of the top doughnut and the bottom disk fits inside of the bottom doughnut. There is a hole in the top disk and a hole in the center of the bottom disk. When the disk are placed on top of the other there is a space left between them, that forms a slit. When the doughnuts form the doughnuts will also have a distance in between them. The hole in the top forms a vortex and the bottom holes forms a vortex. The slit formed by the two disk , one above the other also forms a vortex . All three shapes of all three vortex form one vortex on the in side . In the inside of the mouths of the vortexes is a bubble. The mouths of the vortexes on the out side of the disk also form a bubble. Make the out side bubble disappear. And what is left is the two negative doughnuts that have the two disk inside of them. The negative energy of space will only connect Positive energy to positive energy it will not connect any thing that is positive to something that is negative. The atoms that the disk are made of are cut off from the out side world. To the disk it is as if the rest of the universe has vanished . As if nothing is there at all.

    What is used to make the out side bubble vanish is polarized screens. A horizontal at the slit and a vertical at the holes. But it doesn't take you very long to figure out that if you move around the disk by 90% you find that you have two horizontal screens. This is why you have to use holograms that have the polarized screens recorded in to them. The hologram has to be cut up every 5% Only the center 5% of the hologram will work All the 5% digress wedges are fixed to gather to form a circle that fits on the in side of the disk. Every thing that is made of matter in the UFO is made out of supper conductive material. And this is what we see at Roswell NM. Light recorded in metal. Which means that you could do the same thing with some thing that was supper conductive. Now you know. I need a simple way to put into words that can be tested experimentally just what gravity is and how it works. To see why I'm taking this approach to prove my theory. You have to know about some thing that you can't find out about in books. You have to find these things out by your self. It's not the things that are right in nature. It's the thing that can't be right but are true . You have to ask your self. " What would it take to make thing right, by way of the laws of nature?"

    I have changed my line of thinking about gravity and UFOs because of this simple fact. Last winter I was fueling my truck in Moriarty, NM. I stopped and looked up at the skies. I started looking at the airplanes and birds flying around in the air above me. I saw a silver looking sphere in the sky. It was not moving. It just set there. I was thinking to my self, what in the world is that thing. Then it bonged on me. It's that new space station that their putting up. They say that it's a geostationary satellite. It's only 200 hundred miles up and you can see it with the necked eye. I was thinking Wow! Now that's neat. I started showing and telling the other truckers what I had found and their reaction was the same as mine. Cool, Neat, Something else. I went in side and payed-up when I came back out side I looked up to take one last look at it before I went on down the road. When I looked at it. It ran off. It looked like a shouting star. No more had it stared to move till it was gone. I was thinking to my self. This is not right, not right at all. Satellites don't do this. This is not a satellite. It's one of those UFO things. The first one that I have every seen. I kept looking all around for it. Couldn't find it any where. After about two minutes I found it. It was right back where I had seen it at the first time. It was about ten o'clock high and due east of where I was standing. I was going east. So I jumped in my truck and drove east and stopped at the rest area about forty miles down the road heading east. I got out and looked for it. I found it. It was about the ten o'clock high and due west from where I was standing. What this told me was that this thing was not 200 hundred miles up in the sky. It was only about twenty miles up. Way to low for a geostationary satellite

    Is it a true story? Yap! True story all right. But it doesn't matter if it's true or not. That not the point that I'm trying to drive home, here. If man can make a satellite stay in orbit at twenty miles, he could make a satellite stay in orbit at twenty feet above the ground.

    About right now, your eyes are probably rolling back in your head. And your thinking thoughts like, " All right! Only when pigs learn how to fly!" The reason for this is you know like I also know that you can't get a satellite to stay in orbit at twenty feet due to the fact that you would be violating the laws of nature. Not true. I know some thing that you don't. I didn't get from books or school.

    Under standing what makes a UFO work is just a round about way of finding out about nature and what make's gravity work the way that it does. If gravity worked in any other way than it does in nature. There would be no such thing as UFOs. Due to the fact that what is happening is not natural. Man has done some handy work here, but what is happening is, the laws of nature are not being violated. But just the opposite. The laws of nature are complying with. All I'm asking you to do is check the facts and do the math to see if I'm telling the truth or not.

    To do this you have to play the "what if game." You have to look at what would it take to make something orbit at twenty feet. What laws of nature would have to change. There is only one way that something like this can be done. Only one way in which gravity is produced. You would have to be able to change the laws of nature. In order to do this the laws of nature would first have to have the ability to change. And they do.

    Let me dive a point home here. The strength of gravity changes naturally in nature. Because it changes in nature and in the way that it changes allows man to have the ability to make it change, when he needs to. If nature is doing it in the right way then there is also a way that man can do it. If gravity is a force that is produced locally by the mass of the electron s that make up atoms, man can change it. But if it is the other way, man would be powerless to do any thing about the force of gravity. Man cannot change the laws of nature that cross the universe as a hole. He cannot make the hole universe change just because he wants it to. He can change a little piece of it though. The atoms that make up the UFO. By forming a small universe around the UFO. He can change what is happening in side of his on little universe.

    The strength of gravity gets weaker the further out you go from earth. The strength of the atoms gets weaker due to the mass of the electron.

    The mass, of the electron is constant. But it is like money. Either you got it or you don't. Gravity doesn't turn on and turn off like mass. It varies in its strength. From 100% down to all most zero. What every is happening in the dynamic of the atom due to the mass of the electron would have to have this ability. There is a way for this to happen.

    If you take an object and drop it from your hand, it will move to the ground. The object obeys the laws of gravity. But the strength of gravity produced by the atoms at say one million miles distance from the earth. Is much weaker. If the object that you drop from your hand has the same strength that it does at one million miles distance from the earth. When you drop it. It would not drop. It would levitate. ( Which is some thing that a geostationary satellite does. ) It would be complying with the laws of nature.

    But if you dropped an object from your hand and the atoms in this object was producing the strength of gravity that an object would at two million miles distance from earth. When you let it go, it would rise to a higher orbit. It is complying with the laws of gravity. But to someone that didn't know better would say that the object was over riding the gravitation force and violating the laws of nature. Nothing could be further from the truth. Even thought the object would be failing up. It also would be complying with the law of nature.

    When we see a UFO fall to the ground, every thing looks all right when we see a UFO levitate. It may look wrong, but every thing is all right. And when it goes up through the clouds without any visible means of propulsion every thing is still all right by the laws of nature. Not naturel, but right. The unnatural part about has some thing to do with man.

    To but what I'm doing in its simplest terms, I'm lowering the odd, of the endless things that could be happening in nature in order for us to have some thing like gravity. Lowered to 50/50. I'm pitting gravity as curvatures of time and space against atoms that have the ability to move their self. If you can prove that different aspect of mass induced forces that the atom can produce are all related somehow. And that they are linked to the mass of the electron. A mass that is constant at full strength. pitted against it's ability to very from 100% to zero in deferent way.

    Why I have chosen the path of atoms that move there self is If atoms have the ability to produce the forces of mass then all the pieces of the puzzle of nature ( the four forces of nature become united as one.)all fit together. And at the same time we are able to see why UFO can levitate. It is an illusion that UFO are levitating. What they are doing should be called "In a geostationary low earth orbit ". This little thought brings the "how" part of UFO back to the real world.. A theory that can be tested scientifically. We know that the moon is not levitating Our geostationary satellite (space station )that are up there at say 200 miles . UFOs are not levitating. To us, it just looks like they are levitating. Their really in orbit. Just like the space station. But it is a low earth orbit. How low. "30 feet." But what is need ed to know is like Feynman says; we know "how" they go we don't know "why" they go.

    You say that this can't be done, because in order for a object to made of matter, to orbit at 30 feet it would have to be violating the laws of nature. Not true. It is complying to the laws of nature. Here's why. Dr. Feynman states " That the force is directly related to the mass of the electron that make up the atom. The strength of the force varies inversely as the square of the distance. The key words in this statement are "Strength" and " Varies". If the electrons found in atoms produce the strength of the force then it must also have the ability to make the make the strength vary. If what is happening in the atom can make the strength of the coefficient of G change in the laws of gravity. Then man can change it in the atoms. He does not make the laws of nature as a hole change just the the laws of the atoms in the UFO. Then the atoms that the craft is made of would act accordingly. If it complies with the laws that governs the orbits of satellites then it could achieve a lower earth orbit that what would normally take place in nature. . Do the math If you where in a universe in which the laws of nature acted different moons would orbit around the earth at a different distance.. Its not " change it's mass" It's change its ability to produce mass " it would rise to a higher orbit. Which in turn to point of observation would look like it is violating the laws of nature. defying gravity . Doing the impossible. Falling up , instead of falling down.

    Because UFOs are real. NASA has UFOs They just don't know how the work. For the same reason that we don't have a theory of gravity that works. How to build a UFO is not the problem. What needs to be worked on is a better theory of gravity. A theory of gravity basses on the mass of the electron. Speaking in term's of mass that comes and goes. In the dynamics of the atom..

    We landed a probe on asteroid year. The asteroid was 20 miles long and 12 miles wide. It was big enough to land on. And they did. But because the asteroid was so small that it's gravity was so weak. That they could get the prob to orbit at a very close range. Lets just say 30 feet.

    But if the asteroid was round and it was spinning and we were on the asteroid They prob would look like to us like it was levitating. There is no difference between what UFOs are doing here on earth and the probe on the asteroid.

    On earth the strength of gravity is so strong. On the moon it has a different strength. On Jupiter it is still a different strength.

    On think of this .If the atoms are the producers of the force of gravity. Then atoms are what changes the strength of gravity . What I'm getting at is the force of gravity can change.

    When a satellite go around the earth there are three forces acting on it. Inertia or forward momentum . Centrifugal force and gravity. When we change the speed of the satellite it effects centrifugal force and makes rise to a higher orbit. But if we can change one of the three factors of the forces that regulates orbits . If we could change the strength of gravity ,it to would make the satellite rise. But if we could change the strength of gravity in just the right amount . Well, we could get a satellite to stay in a geostationary orbit at 30 feet. To us it would look like it was levitating. But it is really in a low earth orbit just like the probe on the asteroid. So if this is what has to be done to get a UFO to levitate or. rise up through the roof. . then this is what they are doing They have found a way to manipulate the strength of gravity

    Now how did they do that? They fiddle with the hidden root that governs the energy of the universe

    Roswell NM.

    The piece of metal at Roswell has fringes in it. There fore I know that they knew about the hidden root in nature. They didn?t know what it was. But they did know that if they did this , then there radar experiment would do this . This is called progress but studying cause and effect . Or trial and error . It was luck that found it and trail and error. An a lot of work. They were using a technique. Hologram. It went from photo graphic technique to a photo copying technique. Space shielding four color root alternating hologram. The info of some kind of optical device like a lens, screen. Blind spot It can be one or more of a hundred different thing. I have every thing but just what they did. And this is where I stand today 6/18/01

    8-04-1 up date I went to Roswell for the week end after the forth of July. I wanted to look at the piece of copper and silver metal. I found what I was looking for. The metal. piece was grown like crystals are grown. It is composed of substandard metal. When at the copper and silver mines when they take the ore from the mine . They grind it up into a fine power. Then they add nitric acid. The acid dissolves the metal. in the power. Then they take the acid and use a electro-plating technique to make the metal collect on a plate that grows thicker.

    The metal. grows like a crystals, like frost grows on things that are in the refrigerator. Close up it looks just like frost., But as it grows it from pits, little air pockets, or cavities, pitted. If you look at sub-standard or un-processed metal it has pits. That why they take the ingots some place else where they melt it down in order to get the pits out and to remove trace elements that are copper or silver. Like any dirt or chemical . Like silver nitrate. A by product that forms when nitre acid and silver are mixed together.

    When you cold roll metal. you use process metal. The copper and silver piece of metal at Roswell is not processed metal. It is unprocessed metal. This means that it is not costume jewelry But some form of Hologram. A space -gram Probably came from one of NASA Black project. Space Optics Laboratory.

    There is no such thing as NASA Space Optics Laboratory???????? It?s like Area 51. It does not exist. But it?s real and there just the same. I got pictures. And you can see them to See Kock

    In step one we see what is happening when you are shooting the film. Which is on the svrface of the mirror. But as step two shows the mirror is acting as a resonstor. The sun light that pasas down through the washer acting as a negative lens also is reflected back up through the washer and forms the other end of the vortrex or worm hole. After the film is shoot. while in the dark< you have to take the mirror and film out of the box and place it in your jar. which is sealed. so that it will form a vacum when it activates. Being in a vacum is what turns off the nucler reaction. If you want to make use off the gravitational effects that can be produced by the worm hole with out haveing it produce an radon particals. You have to leave it in the jar. You have to make your jar so that you can make the mirror move towards the other end of the jar When the mirror and worm hole moved to where the atoms of the jar end start to move down the mouth of the wormhole. It is the atom that the jar is made of that is going to produce your force go slow when doing this. Remenber that the worm hole is only about six inches long This means that half of the worm hole is three inches long. In that short distance the curviture of the space can go from zero to being able produce a nucler reaction You want to move the mirror the distance of a hair at a time. If it is a real worm hole it can produce up to 30,000 pounds of thrust per squear inch. This is the point where objects start to run like water And it does it with out forming any heat.

    Sfty first Technology second. 99.99% of the people in history that found out how to do this are dead. The Egyptions , Moses The Maya. Ed. Knowing this should make red flags start to poping out of the wood work on all sides .

    When things sound to good to be true.... there probely not. I keep thinking to my self. " where am I making my first big mistake?" There is a good side to all of this and then theres this bad side. Well how bad can it be ? bad bad bad bad. It can be done safly. It's not nature that's the problim here . It's man. Why I can't have it. Is why we can't have it. Have our cake and eat it to. In the worng hands this technology could be deadly. It's to cheep. It's simple. It's to deadly. Any thing that is this deadly. It would be better if every one know about but didn't uses till every one has a chance to talk about it first.

   Talk is safe. Building is dangerus.

   This is no sport for sissey

    We don't want any other spores around, other than what is in the box camera. The best plase to shot the hologram would be in deep space. There no spores to be found in deep space. We can't go to deep space.

   But, we can shot the film in a way to where it's as if the has earth vanishedand along with any mold spores found there. If you can get on top of a large mound so that your up in air. And the only time of day that you shot the film is when the sun is 45 degres above the horizon. 9 am and 45 degres befor the sun goes bellow the horizon 3pm. This way the film doesn't pickup on any spores that are on the ground. And there isn't that maney spores in the air above the camera. the few that are there are moveing and the film does n't have time to record their presents. So you get the same effects as if you were in deep space but your not.

  Hawkins put out a tape a few years ago in which he talks about what it would be like to fly in the mouth of a worm hole. As you first start in to the mouth time and space becomes curved atoms becomes stretched from top to bottom. Because atoms are round when the becomes stretched the shape shift to a egg shape. Gravity. A gravitational effect. Things will move. But when you go deeper in to the worm hole. Atoms becoming ripped atom from atom. The same thing happens when you heat some thing up. Iron becomes soft when heated. But if you go deeper into the worm hole Time and space becomes curved to the point that atoms them self are rip apart. This releases the energy of the atom the same thing as a nuclear reaction. The atom turns to light. Photon and electrons. But this reaction also produces another particle . The radon particle. It will glow in the dark. But something else happen when you produce a nuclear reaction in this way. It also produces a electoral pulse. Car engin stop It causes a surge in the power lines that trip circuit bakers and you get electrical black outs. You do not need nuclear fuel to produce a nuclear reaction from curvature of space. No nuclear fuel = no nuclear fail out. We are able to find galaxies that have black holes in them by looking for the tattle tail singes of gamma rays. Or x-rays or radon particle. A black hole is not like a worm hole things get sucked into black holes Worm holes spit things out. The U.S. has a bomb called a neutron bomb. It kills every one by producing large amounts of radon particle. But produces no radioactive fail out There is only one way in which man has for making such a bomb. That is if he has found a way to curve space to the point that it can rip atoms apart. The only way that he can do this is if he can cause a worm hole to form. Because they say that have this kind of bomb. This should tell you something.

  They can also curve space and make things move. = UFO like devices and they can make electrical generators spin and produce electricity with it. = free energy devices. Every nation that says that they have one of these neutron bombs, also know how to do this. And there are a few. But the way they are doing it is with space shielding superconductive elements. Marc Millis of NASA wanted me to tell him how the Egyptians did this. So I did. The Egyptians were doing this at room temperature. This is what Marc needed to know in order to get to the stars. NASA can't use a elements that becomes superconductive. Because you have to have liquid nitrogen. Liquid nitrogen evaporates. When the nitrogen is all gone.You get the same effect as if you just ran out of gas. If you are using spores. As long as the spores are in tack. The device will work. Spores have a shelf life of about 2,000 years. Just enough time to make it to the next star and back again.

   There is no film that becomes superconductive after you shoot it. NASA uses a photographic- photocopying technique.. I can?t do it the same way that NASA does it. I can?t afford the equipment. And it?s to expensive. I know that if the Egyptians were doing this they had to have a photographic technique. They had to have a film. A home made film the same as ED?s home made film. Which a dried up jar of it can be found setting right next to his home made box camera. At Coral Castle, In Homestead Florida. Millions of people have been through ED?s place and looked at this jar and no one knew what it was. Looks a lot like dried up sour dough. It?s black. Many other people have done this in the past History. Put they all die out because they did n?t know about the dangers of the radon particle has on DNA.,. But to day we know about all these things and we no how to make them safe. Then why am I paying $1.50 for fuel for my truck.

  It worked for others of old. It worked for ED It?s working for NASA. I worked for me It?s simple and cheep It is well with in the reach of any one that is interested in learning out how to do this I was able to do the same thing with spores that Ning Li is doing with superconductive elements. I made a disc with a cloth that had a thick growth of mold and spores on it. But it on the end of a shaft of a electrical motor so I could spin the disc. I got an empty large pop bottle and placed a small twig on the end of a string on the inside of the bottle and put the lid back on the bottle. When I placed the spinning space shielding spore disc next to the bottle. The twig on the end of the string inside of the bottle would move.

  &It didn't cost me any thing to do this and it worked. What is it about a spinning disc that triggers a gravitational effect. It doesn?t do it when the disc is not spinning. A disc{ whether it is a solid round disc or a disc with a hole in . } the solid round disc forms a positive curvature. Foot ball like membrane in optics they call this membrane an envelop. It?s just a costic sheet of light. When the disc is setting still the membrane forms a point . But when the disc is spun the point opens up and forms a string down the center of the foot ball. The string then opens up and forms a tube. The space on the inside of the inside tube is a space that has no mass. This can be tested and proven in the lab. I have a picture of one of these strings on my web site. The same it true with disc that have a hole in the center of them(negative lens effect) the string opens up and forms a tube (vortex )that has a space that has no mass. But when you do the very same thing with a spore generated space, shielding negative lens hologram . You produce a space that has no mass and you don?t have to spin any thing.

  &NASA all ready knew how to do this but for The past fifty years now they have been looking for a way to do this at room temperature, so they can go to the stars. So, I told them. Now I find out that they gave this technology the deep six. It's a black project now. NASA's BPP is no more. They got what they were after. They cut the funding to NASA's BBP. There not going to use it to go to the stars like they said, and like I wanted. This Technology will never see the light of day.

Back to Home Page